UEFA Champions League


UEFA CL 2008/2009  

105 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win UEFA CL 2008/2009?

    • Arsenal
      12
    • Liverpool
      10
    • Barcelona
      31
    • Inter
      2
    • Manchester United
      30
    • Chelsea
      6
    • Real Madrid
      4
    • Other
      10
  2. 2. Top Scorer?

    • Kaka
      1
    • Henry
      5
    • Eto'o
      13
    • Ronaldinho
      2
    • Fernando Torres
      16
    • Ronaldo
      21
    • Other
      47


Recommended Posts

I have to say Liverpool last night were poor and made a big mistake using the zonal marking, But i honestly believe we were robbed to an extent.

The Officials were more of less on Chelsea's side and i lost count of how many times they were time wasting time even at 1-1 which was disappointing.

It can't take away the bad performace but Chelsea were not that good whatever BBC/SkySports lead you to believe. Two of the goals were from free headers and the other was a normal goal, I honestly feel 1-3 flatters Chelsea alot as it should of been 1-1 at the very least, They just got the rub of the green.

It looks impossible really to turn the tie around at the Bridge need to score 3 goals without reply but anything is possible.

You can't say Liverpool fans give up even in the 94th minute they coutinue to sing "You Never Walk Alone" which i thought was great.

It's that attitude that seperates out from the Chelsea, Man U and Arsenal.

Martyn is probably wasted right now :laugh:

...and still feeling the effects of it right now.

Chelsea played very well last night, so you have to give them credit for that. Liverpool gave one of the worst defensive performances I have seen for a long time, which is uncharacteristic from us. I think I read somewhere that 6-2 would have been an accurate reflection of the game, and I think they are right, Chelsea missed guilt edge opportunities my Nan could score.

Those critiquing zonal marking and jumping on the bandwagon make me laugh. Liverpool rarely concede goals from corners, and if you look at the stats we have one of the best set piece defensive records over the last five years, using zonal marking. Liverpool have only conceded 4 goals in the league from corners this season, two of them being own goals. Zonal marking will work 99 times out of 100 if you setup right (we never for Chelsea's second last night) and attack the ball correctly).

We will definitely be giving it our all next Tuesday, it is what this club is about. I wouldn't say it is over, and one word: Istanbul.

...and still feeling the effects of it right now.

Chelsea played very well last night, so you have to give them credit for that. Liverpool gave one of the worst defensive performances I have seen for a long time, which is uncharacteristic from us. I think I read somewhere that 6-2 would have been an accurate reflection of the game, and I think they are right, Chelsea missed guilt edge opportunities my Nan could score.

Those critiquing zonal marking and jumping on the bandwagon make me laugh. Liverpool rarely concede goals from corners, and if you look at the stats we have one of the best set piece defensive records over the last five years, using zonal marking. Liverpool have only conceded 4 goals in the league from corners this season, two of them being own goals. Zonal marking will work 99 times out of 100 if you setup right (we never for Chelsea's second last night) and attack the ball correctly).

We will definitely be giving it our all next Tuesday, it is what this club is about. I wouldn't say it is over, and one word: Istanbul.

You don't have any comments on Torres Martyn?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvlMpLopbEw

Sad if you ask me ;[... He even offered his hand twice :o

Sad if you ask me ;[... He even offered his hand twice :o

Your point is what? He is a young, passionate player that was upset about getting defeated, besides it is entirely possible the chelsea player may have ticked him off one way.

There is plenty of unsporting things going on football pitches these days (you as a chelsea fan should be fully familiar with Drogba's diving), so why people are whining over something as stupid as a handshake is beyond me.

Drogba has dived, but he is not alone. There is a HUGE difference in on the field play and off the field actions.

The least he could do was acknowledge the fact the kid was trying to say good match, but unfortunately (for the game of football) his true colors showed.

On to the 2nd leg!

Your point is what? He is a young, passionate player that was upset about getting defeated, besides it is entirely possible the chelsea player may have ticked him off one way.

There is plenty of unsporting things going on football pitches these days (you as a chelsea fan should be fully familiar with Drogba's diving), so why people are whining over something as stupid as a handshake is beyond me.

General consensus is what happens on the pitch ends with the final whistle and you shake hands after the game no matter what went on. You see it with managers when they survive relegation or win a cup / league, they'll celebrate for a second then go find the other manager to shake their hand as that is what you do.

Drogba has dived, but he is not alone. There is a HUGE difference in on the field play and off the field actions.

The least he could do was acknowledge the fact the kid was trying to say good match, but unfortunately (for the game of football) his true colors showed.

On to the 2nd leg!

Typical of the kind of rubbish a Chelsea fan would spout. Fernando is actually a very nice and humble guy off of the pitch, and I am sure he had his reasons, so evidently like most Chelsea and United fans you display the ignorance typical of your childish hatred of everything Liverpool. If you want to see a real jerk in action, just look at the way Christiano Ronaldo behaves.

General consensus is what happens on the pitch ends with the final whistle and you shake hands after the game no matter what went on. You see it with managers when they survive relegation or win a cup / league, they'll celebrate for a second then go find the other manager to shake their hand as that is what you do.

General consensus is that there is no rule in football requiring you to shake anyone's hand after a game. Fernando is a passionate guy, he was obviously upset, and he just wanted to get off the pitch without chelsea players walking past him and rubbing their success in his face. Like it or lump it, that is a stone cold fact, and preconcieved notions of how human beings should react are just sad and pathetic. Evidently you can't have felt that kind of serious, crushing disappointment in your life, or you would understand how it can be hard to cope with.

Can Liverpool can repeat the Real Madrid game? ;)

I'm not doubting anything :-P

As for FRANK FONTAINE. Don't be so quick to judge me. I give credit when its due and only argue with Martyn.

I'm glad you disagree, that is a typical liverpool fan. Like I said, we must agree to disagree because everything we say to each other is not taken lightly. There is no reason on earth such a "humble guy" shouldn't shake a guys hand after a match. Give me a break.

Edited by gregb0b
General consensus is that there is no rule in football requiring you to shake anyone's hand after a game. Fernando is a passionate guy, he was obviously upset, and he just wanted to get off the pitch without chelsea players walking past him and rubbing their success in his face. Like it or lump it, that is a stone cold fact, and preconcieved notions of how human beings should react are just sad and pathetic. Evidently you can't have felt that kind of serious, crushing disappointment in your life, or you would understand how it can be hard to cope with.

No there is no rule, there is no rule that you help a person who collapses in front of you, you still do it though. Shaking a players hand after the game is not rubbing success in their face. Take when we beat Bayern in 99, the players still shook hands even though they just lost the CL in the last 2 minutes. Fact.

I'm not doubting anything :-P

As for FRANK FONTAINE. Don't be so quick to judge me. I give credit when its due and only argue with Martyn.

I'm glad you disagree, that is a typical liverpool fan. Like I said, we must agree to disagree because everything we say to each other is not taken lightly. There is no reason on earth such a "humble guy" shouldn't shake a guys hand after a match. Give me a break.

Well go talk to Fernando and find out, I am sure there was a reason for it. If the most unsporting thing a guy does is refuses to shake someone's hand that I would rather have him in my team over diving scumbag pussies like Drogba and Ronaldo any day. Funny really how chelsea funs run around throwing fits about things like that, but strangely none of them sit there trying to assassinate Drogba's character every time he flops.

No there is no rule, there is no rule that you help a person who collapses in front of you, you still do it though. Shaking a players hand after the game is not rubbing success in their face. Take when we beat Bayern in 99, the players still shook hands even though they just lost the CL in the last 2 minutes. Fact.

Without knowing what was said and what happened during the game you can't just make that judgement. Alex Ferguson is just as much of a sore loser as any Liverpool player, look how often he slags of referees. Have to admit though it was amusing to see their assistant manager eating humble pie and admitting the ref did nothing wrong after your 4-1 pasting.

Well go talk to Fernando and find out, I am sure there was a reason for it. If the most unsporting thing a guy does is refuses to shake someone's hand that I would rather have him in my team over diving scumbag pussies like Drogba and Ronaldo any day. Funny really how chelsea funs run around throwing fits about things like that, but strangely none of them sit there trying to assassinate Drogba's character every time he flops.

Without knowing what was said and what happened during the game you can't just make that judgement. Alex Ferguson is just as much of a sore loser as any Liverpool player, look how often he slags of referees. Have to admit though it was amusing to see their assistant manager eating humble pie and admitting the ref did nothing wrong after your 4-1 pasting.

Lol sigh. It is pretty common in ANY sport for a coach/manager to give their two cents into the ref's. It mainly a ploy in keeping their jobs if you ask me. You would be surprised at how a fan base can dictate whether a coach is going to have his job the following year. Just look at the NHL for example, non-aggressive coaches are usually terminated and replaced so fast u cant even keep up with it.

And again, there is a difference between on the field play and off the field conduct. It surely doesn't help the game of football with players like torres acting the way he did. But anyways, on to the second leg.

Chelsea played very very well the other night. As soon as I saw Ivanovic was being given a start, I new something would happen. The guy gets played far too infrequently, he is far too good not to be sat on the bench. Absolutely worked for every ball, as you could see from the first goal.

Liverpool have a mountain to climb, but stranger things have happened. It depends on Chelsea playing as well as they did again, if they do the Scousers have no chance. I've got a ticket to the home leg at the bridge, can't wait for it now after that start :D

As for Torres, what a little girl. Refusing to shake hands because he was absolutely overshadowed by Ivanovic, the guy should stop throwing his toys out of his pram and man up.

Edited by Si_
Lol sigh. It is pretty common in ANY sport for a coach/manager to give their two cents into the ref's. It mainly a ploy in keeping their jobs if you ask me. You would be surprised at how a fan base can dictate whether a coach is going to have his job the following year. Just look at the NHL for example, non-aggressive coaches are usually terminated and replaced so fast u cant even keep up with it.

And again, there is a difference between on the field play and off the field conduct. It surely doesn't help the game of football with players like torres acting the way he did. But anyways, on to the second leg.

Strange, I have never seen Rafa slag off the referee. Mind you Liverpool's management is a step down from United and Chelsea's in terms of arrogance.

And I disagree, it does no harm to football, the only people I see complaining about it are chelsea and united fans (surprise surprise) because they are jealous that we have the best striker in the world on our team, and just another excuse for Liverpool hate.

Evidently you may follow different morals to me, but if someone was an idiot, or went out of their way to wind me up whilst I was participating in a sporting event I wouldn't shake their hand afterwoulds either, win or lose. Fernando is a human being not a robot, and he has emotions. So why don't you stop trying to assassinate his character and whine about something worthwhile?

Strange, I have never seen Rafa slag off the referee. Mind you Liverpool's management is a step down from United and Chelsea's in terms of arrogance.

And I disagree, it does no harm to football, the only people I see complaining about it are chelsea and united fans (surprise surprise) because they are jealous that we have the best striker in the world on our team, and just another excuse for Liverpool hate.

Evidently you may follow different morals to me, but if someone was an idiot, or went out of their way to wind me up whilst I was participating in a sporting event I wouldn't shake their hand afterwoulds either, win or lose. Fernando is a human being not a robot, and he has emotions. So why don't you stop trying to assassinate his character and whine about something worthwhile?

I disagree with your striker comment, I'm going to give that to David Villa.

It's alright, there's no sense in arguing the concept of respect with you... it seems to be lacking any relevance and truly shows what type of person/fan you are for your team and the game of football.

I disagree with your striker comment, I'm going to give that to David Villa.

It's alright, there's no sense in arguing the concept of respect with you... it seems to be lacking any relevance and truly shows what type of person/fan you are for your team and the game of football.

I appreciate the concept of respect fully I am and have always been respectful to people that have been respectful to me, but I live my life by the principal that you reap what you sow, and I just don't agree with your stupid argument that you should respect someone who is a jerk to you. Fernando wasn't a jerk to him, he just didn't want to shake his hand.

I disagree with your striker comment, I'm going to give that to David Villa.

Whilst David Villa is one of the best strikers in the world, it is hard to define "the best" seeing as there are multiple league's in multiple countries.

The best strikers in the world, in my opinion of course, are Samuel Eto'o, David Villa and Fernando Torres.

Whilst it is obvious Torres plays better for Liverpool than he did for Atletico Madrid (and even the Spanish national team to an extent), the reason for this is because of the different type of football played over in Spain.

In England it is a lot more direct, with an emphasis on quick counter attacking football. This suits Fernando's physical and passionate way of playing the game, and as defenses in England do not sit as deep as those in Italy and Spain, he finds himself with a lot more space in behind them as well as more time on the ball, something he takes advantage of ruthlessly. He is not just a one dimensional player either, there is so much to his overall game. He scores goals with his head, his left foot, his right foot, and the way he can terrorise some of the best defenders in the world (Vidic, Ferdinand, Cannavaro etc...) makes me so glad that he is playing for Liverpool.

I personally think David Villa would be a great signing for the likes of Chelsea (and even us!), but I don't think he would be as successful as Fernando Torres is. He is an excellent player, and the way he strikes a ball is absolutely superb, but I just do not think he has the physical presence to take the Premier League by storm. By all means, I think he would be a success over here, but he would not be on Fernando's level.

Samuel Eto'o now is a brilliant striker as well, and has scored goals for fun for years now. He is a very similar player to Torres, so much so I don't really need to talk about his attributes as I would just be copying and pasting what I wrote above about Torres. I actually think Eto'o is a better player than Villa, but then I suppose opinion differs.

The way I look at it, I wouldn't swap Fernando Torres for any other striker in the world. He is the best striker in the Premier League, without doubt, and as the Premier League is classed by many as being the strongest in the world, I think there is a more than reasonable argument to class him as the best striker in the world.

Of course, none of the trio are a patch on the 'real' Ronaldo...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 10 games join Xbox Free Play Days this weekend by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Another Free Play Days offer has just landed, and this one is a unique one. On top of offering 10 games to jump into for Xbox players, all the titles are from a single publisher: No More Robots. The promotion has games like Little Rocket Lab, Spirittea, Descenders Next, Let's Build a Zoo, and much more. Almost every game in the selection does need an Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, or Essential subscription, so keep this in mind when browsing. Many of the titles are Xbox Play Anywhere titles though, so both Xbox console and PC players can jump in. Here's how the announcement blog post described some of the available titles: There is one game that's available to all Xbox players without the need for any subscriptions, which is Descenders. Here are the announced games and the platforms they are available to play on: Little Rocket Lab (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Spirittea (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Soccer Story (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Descenders Next (Game Preview) (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Let's Build a Zoo (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Hypnospace Outlaw (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Slayers X: Terminal Aftermath: Vengance of the Slayer (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Nowhere Prophet (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Family Man (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) Descenders (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) To easily find the titles on Xbox consoles, first head to the Store, then in the sidebar, find the Home section. In there, open the Subscriptions tab. The Free Play Days collection will show up in this area. This week's Free Play Days promotions will end on Sunday, June 7, at 11:59 pm PT.
    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!