Mac's - are they overpriced?


Recommended Posts

Here are two simple & great looking laptops not from Apple:

Sony Vaio FW

2804464966_e68bca79cc_m.jpg

Dell XPS m1530

2922465300_81ba25670f_m.jpg

It's good to see other companies besides Apple giving some attention to the looks.

I laughed when people were going "OMG Sony copied Apple's keyboard!" when it was the other way around!

Apple's design is nice as well :)

Well... It's good that windows manufacturers are trying to put some effort in, but I think it's more than just a curved screen. It's about the quality (and no, I can't quantify this, because it's a qualitative measurement...) of MacBook when you've got it in your hands. It's also about the little things that they've thought of, etc.

Flame on...

dismantle an apple then dismantle a PC... compare...? same parts? yep so why is the apple 2000 and the equal pc 500?

I'd like to see a $500 dollar PC that equate to a $2,000 Mac.

:shiftyninja:

Challenge!

Edited by Cormier6083

This was what I was referring to above...

Just spec'd it up. If it has the blu-ray and the 1920 screen then it works out at ~$2000. This also comes with DDR2-800 memory (the MBP has DDR3-1066) and a 256Mb ATI 3450 (the MBP has a 9600M with 512Mb). The MBP also has an 85WHr battery. So the specs aren't the same and the price difference isn't as much as you said it was. Hmmm...

The Dell

Starting Price $2,397

Instant Savings $459

Subtotal $1,938

As low as $59/month*

Apply | Learn More

Discount Details

Print Summary

My Components

Intel? Core™ 2 Duo T9400 (2.530GHz/1066Mhz FSB/6MB cache)

Genuine Windows Vista? Ultimate Edition SP1

Jet Black

2Yr In-Home Service, Parts + Labor, 24x7 Phone Support

Microsoft Works

Hi Resolution, glossy widescreen 15.4 inch display (1920x1200)

4GB Shared Dual Channel DDR2 at 800MHz

Speed: 250GB SATA Hard Drive (7200RPM) with Free Fall Sensor

256MB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450

6X Slot Load Bluray (BD) Combo Drive (BD Read Only)

Intel WiFi Link 5100 802.11agn Half Mini-Card

Dell Wireless 370 Bluetooth Internal (2.1)

Integrated 2.0M Pixel Webcam

85 Whr Lithium Ion Battery (9 cell)

Integrated Sound Blaster? Audigy™ Advanced HD Software Edition

Standard Keyboard (included in the price)

Integrated Finger Print ReadeThe Mac/u>

Summary

Total

$2,449.00

Ships: 3-5 business days Free Shipping

Get it as low as $58.00 per month with a Juniper Visa Card.

Specifications

2.53GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

4GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB

250GB Serial ATA @ 7200

SuperDrive 8x (DVD?R DL/DVD?RW/CD-RW)

Backlit Keyboard (English) / User's Guide

The Dell also has a special offer on atm, so the regular price is the first one (without the "instant savings")

innovation my a$$, over priced.

Even with the "high grade manufacturing process and parts" apple still makes a hefty profit on each unit. That's the only way they can get away with selling these things for 2k imo.

1411f9f.png

The Apple even has some more features than that.

Who's is really cheaper? $1000 more arse, lets say almost $300 more for less ram, no DDR3, etc.

1411f9f.png

The Apple even has some more features than that.

Who's is really cheaper? $1000 more arse, lets say almost $300 more for less ram, no DDR3, etc.

But the Dell also has Office 2007, Adobe Acrobat (somewhat reduced as you can print many things in OSX to a PDF, but if you want to edit a PDF...) a much higher res screen (1920x1200 vs 1440x900), a faster 7200 RPM HD, a 512 MB Quadro workstation gfx card, and an extended 3yr warranty.

Neither laptop will do games all that well, so that's largely a wash.

When you add iWork 08 and APP, it's brings that MPB upto $2,927. But iWork 08 still doesn't match Office in most features, but the version of Office for the Mac sucks to begin with, but Pages isn't too bad.

Funny that when I bought my iMac, I did no dollar for dollar parts comparisons with PCs. At all.

Most Mac users don't, or if they do, it seems to be far more cursory compared to the average tech consumer.

I think we regard "computing" from a somewhat different perspective.

But the Dell also has Office 2007, Adobe Acrobat (somewhat reduced as you can print many things in OSX to a PDF, but if you want to edit a PDF...) a much higher res screen (1920x1200 vs 1440x900), a faster 7200 RPM HD, a 512 MB Quadro workstation gfx card, and an extended 3yr warranty.

Neither laptop will do games all that well, so that's largely a wash.

When you add iWork 08 and APP, it's brings that MPB upto $2,927. But iWork 08 still doesn't match Office in most features, but the version of Office for the Mac sucks to begin with, but Pages isn't too bad.

It comes with iLife. The Mac comes with 4GB DDR3 memory, the Dell comes with 2GB DDR2, etc.

I personally think Mac is worth every penny I paid for it. I traded my custom built desktop (which was a gaming powerhouse) for this little Macbook, I am so totally pleased with my decision. (For comparison sake, they both were about the same price).

Yes, they are overpriced.

I look at it like this. 90% of the people in the market for computers are going to use their computer for only a few things. Internet, Word Processing, and maybe a few other things, possibly business related or gaming or whatnot. You can do all of these things on a PC at least as efficiently, if not more efficiently, for much much less money.

But people don't think of it that way. They think Mac's are the cool thing and so they pay a lot more when it's not really worth it.

And I'd just like to mention that I say all this not as a mac-hater. If Mac's were cheaper, I'd probably have one. That's just not the case though.

-Spenser

dont you mean, perfect UNIX desktop :)

Mac OS X is absolutely not a perfect UNIX OS. No OS will ever be perfect, and even Unix has its flaws by design.

I will say this, though... I was considering for the past few months switching back to the PC platform. But then, I found myself running on the Mac platform full-time again, and now I'm back, so to say. In other words, there was too much that I missed on the Mac platform for me to leave it. That's not to say the PC alternatives are bad, they are not bad at all. It's just that again, it's a personal preference. After using Windows for years, I switched to Mac OS X and liked what I saw, at least for a year. Then I tried switching between both equally for the past six months or so but now I'm back full time to using the Mac.

hehe, well nothings perfect off course :p

But this is pretty perfect, is it not? Feels like it was hand-coded by God. :p

They do have a-lot under control. Everything seems very modular and well implemented in the OS. Like Growl notifications for example, one app for all notifications. The system-wide spell-checker, and many other useful things etc. which is part of Cocoa API, the file system having on-the-fly defragmentation.

it just seems, comparing to Windows for example - every app would need its own module to check spelling etc. I have no problems with Windows, Vista seems great for the short time I've used it, but in no way does it seem as clean, well implemented and perfect as OSX.

It comes with iLife. The Mac comes with 4GB DDR3 memory, the Dell comes with 2GB DDR2, etc.

So? iLife isn't the end all be all - it's an $80 suite, and I barely use it on my Mac, good for lightweight uses, but it's not a dealbreaker - it's just a stepping stone to better apps like Aperture. As for as DDR3 vs. DDR2, there are PC laptops that have DDR3, and I'm not sure how much of a difference it would make in real world applications, maybe a few percentage points ATM, and with that fast of a CPU, I don't know if most people would notice between opening apps, it would all seem really fast at 2.5 GHz.

The reason I wanted a Mac was to run OSX, the aluminum shells are just eye candy, they're OK, but not the most important thing for me, it's the OS and UI, the goofy built up to how Apple does this and that to create the unibody shell is useless to me, when Apple then also decides that people just don't need FW or ExpressCard slots on a $1300 laptop anymore, but then don't offer any viable replacements in the meantime.

Same goes with my iPod Touch, love the OS, but having to jailbreak it because Apple wants a closed system, and for what, as there are plenty of crummy apps at the App Store, the apps are still buggy (moreso than the Symbian and WinMob apps I have), they don't allow certain applications because they compete with their own. But even though it crashes randomly, mobile Safari is slick. It's just annoying at times that OSX can be so awesome, but Apple can be no better than Microsoft most of the time IMO, when it comes to the features they allow in their computer configurations (they believe that consumers don't want a decent desktop, that's not an AIO or a workstation) and how they want to control everything through iTunes (no BR for anyone, even if you wanted it for backing up your HD - I have TM, but don't trust HDs that much).

1411f9f.png

The Apple even has some more features than that.

Who's is really cheaper? $1000 more arse, lets say almost $300 more for less ram, no DDR3, etc.

I will tell you one thing Mac users fail at. It's for shopping around for the best price. Anyone who knows Dell, knows that they are notorious for their coupons. Mac fanboys have gotten used to getting ripped off on Apple products when in reality, there are better products for any equivalent Apple product. It's a price they're willing to pay to stay "trendy." <snipped>

Are Mac's overpriced? Diehard mac fanboi's will tell you no, but in reality, they are.

Oh, and guess what? Gateway from Bestbuy is much cheaper, and look at the specs on the Gateway... It would rape that MBP because it has a nice processor, same memory, faster hard drive, better graphics card. Most importantly, it's much cheaper, more than a $1k difference, and it's from a retail outlet, Best Buy, which if you shop around, you can probably get the same laptop for less.

I hate when Mac fanboi's compare a Dell laptop but don't use a coupon or shop around for better laptops online.

Edited by Triliaeris

The only argument I made regarding the price was that OSX makes it worth it, which it does. Thats the only reason people use Mac's. Thats all there is to it.

So I don't think its overpriced. Off course in a direct comparison of hardware only, the Mac looks expensive, but.. for something I am going to use everyday for three years, I can easily justify spending AU$2000~. I don't care that my graphics card cant play games, and that I could have gotten a 2.6GHz C2D Dell system for cheaper because I wouldn't be able to do anything with it.

If I were able to build myself a computer and run OSX on it as well as it runs on Apple hardware, id be ordering parts in a heartbeat.

Edited by se7en.hu

lets end it this way, Mac is Overpriced cause the majority are not able to pay for it with proper justification :D

now lets peace.

@Se7en , You already can do that, didnt you hear about PyStar offering Custom desktops with OSX? you can google for OSx86 , i am using OSx86 legal copy on my HP laptop :D

I hate when Mac fanboi's compare a Dell laptop but don't use a coupon or shop around for better laptops online.

And I hate when self important tech smart-asses think that joe sixpack is going to be out Googling and searching online for discount vouchers when he comes to buy himself a new computer. It's only geeks like us that know about vouchers, discount codes, etc. People like my parents would just turn up at a store and buy something of face value as that's just how their generation works. So we're in the minority and don't represent the majority.

Mac fanboys have gotten used to getting ripped off on Apple products

I've never felt ripped off by a Mac product. In fact I don't think I've ever felt as much satisfaction or as much value for money as I ever have from what i've spent on my iMac, or my iPhone. The products always deliver exactly what I expect of them. If they didn't, I'd get rid of them and search for an alternative.

It's a price they're willing to pay to stay "trendy." If only they would stop sucking Job's dick...

Steve Jobs must get around the world like SANTA if everyone is taking a chug on his dick then cause otherwise I just don't see how he'd fit it all in. Look - I'm all for a bit of intelligent debate on this, but if you're going to resort to low-brow crap like you might as well find yourself another thread.

You know "trendyness" must be everything whether you're a Windows fanboy (which I guess you must be if I'm an Apple fanboy) or a Mac fanboy. People who clamor after the very latest MacBook, or the latest iMac are no different to those who continually upgrade their Windows PC's to even faster CPU's or stick shed loads of RAM in, or who change graphics cards frequently. In reality the gains are minimal and ultimately most people do it for bragging rights, or to have the latest and greatest. In the case of the Mac, because it is generally a sealed unit, you have no choice but ship out the whole thing to get the latest and greatest. But who cares? If they can afford to do it, then it's their money and to hell with it.

Ugh - OSX vs Windows (and PS3 vs Xbox) are just worse than politics. Who'd have through people could have such strongly differing opinions on even the smallest things.

i am using OSx86 legal copy on my HP laptop

Legal in the sense that you bought Leopard, but still not legal as the EULA demands that the product is run on Apple hardware. I'm not having a pop because I'm quite keen to try OSX86 too (and have done in the past) but be under no illusion, it aint legal. Though if you've actually bought a copy of Leopard, I doubt Apple will be busting your door down just yet :)

Legal in the sense that you bought Leopard, but still not legal as the EULA demands that the product is run on Apple hardware. I'm not having a pop because I'm quite keen to try OSX86 too (and have done in the past) but be under no illusion, it aint legal. Though if you've actually bought a copy of Leopard, I doubt Apple will be busting your door down just yet :)

Oh sweet Jesus... For the last time, EULA =! Legality of a product. It is perfectly LEGAL to run OSX on non-apple certified hardware, Apple will just choose to not offer you support as you are breaking the agreement set forth by said EULA.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!