Mac's - are they overpriced?


Recommended Posts

So basically from this 24 page thread (or God knows, maybe it'll reach 100 pgs :p) if you have the money and want a mac, go buy one; if not just pass by peacefully. :)

That about sums it up.

If this were an experiment or study of some kind, we would have actually gotten government funding in order to arrive at that conclusion.

Definitely overpriced when compared to other laptops. Since they are using Intel now I assume the hardware is mostly the same as PC and yet the price difference is pretty substantial. My favorite thing I saw about a macbook pro was the power cord. I wish other laptop makers would just license it from apple. I love the idea that if your cord was snagged on something it just drops out and doesn't pull the laptop across the room.

Apple would never sell-out one of their inventions. That's like giving the recipe for a new cookie to a rival cookie bakery.

As for being the same parts, I'm quite sure Apple have deals with (at least) Intel and nVIDIA that allows them to receieve components of top quality with a guarantee of it. Compare that to a PC, read overclocking forums and such, people are actually grateful if their unit is decently manifactured.

@LTD,

I wouldn't extend my selfishness as to agreee on myself being reasonable, although I try! But I can with much confidence tell you that there are about as many people here with equal intellect to various countries all over. That is, people you'd rather see not visit your favourite board :lol:

I wouldn't want to go near a mac, only cos of steve jobs tho.

and it has to be said, Compiz on Linux blows anything clean outta the water in terms of shinyness in a window-manager.

I nearly spit out my coffee. Thanks for that!

...oh...wait...you were serious?

Apple has gotten a lot better in terms of pricing their products over the years. Hell, I was an early adopter of the iPods (3G), for 20GB it cost ~$600CAD... ridiculous!

As time goes buy, the technology needed to make some of these laptops get cheaper.

I believe the MacBook isn't overpriced... try to find a similar spec'd 13" with such a sleek design for a lower price... you can't.

Also, considering the iMacs come with high-quality displays in them, I'd say they are pretty decently priced, although there is a bit more of a premium.

The MacBook Pro, and the Mac Pro, seem to be the most overpriced for the specs... but when you look at their whole product line, their pricing does seem to make some sort of sense.

I nearly spit out my coffee. Thanks for that!

...oh...wait...you were serious?

Indeed. Compiz is very pretty, and does lots of cool stuff - but it's still far too rough round the edges and is about a 1,000 miles away from having the polish that the OSX compositing / effects engine has. The OSX system is seamless and completely reliable - Compiz does weird stuff, you get tearing, and other such delights.

I think Compiz is a huuuge step forward on the Linux desktop and provides lots of lovely sparkle that was missing for too long but it's just nowhere near ready for primetime yet. I've no doubt its day will come though!

As for being the same parts, I'm quite sure Apple have deals with (at least) Intel and nVIDIA that allows them to receieve components of top quality with a guarantee of it. Compare that to a PC, read overclocking forums and such, people are actually grateful if their unit is decently manifactured.

I always laugh when people post stuff like this, please for the love of god show me where or how you know this. Have you seen the super secret Apple invoice listing the parts as "APPLE ONLY - TOP QUALITY + GUARANTEE"

Do you honestly believe Intel and nVidia are going to tell people, "Sorry all the good **** is going to Apple, here are some components of lesser quality"

Most likely not, DavidM, but as they order large quantities of the same item there are more possibilities of a fine manufacturing. I haven't said that I am right, I might be wrong, but I strongly believe this to be the case since I can re-call reading it a few times as well.

If you are a PC user, and an experienced one, you must know that there are differences from cpu to cpu et cetera.

"For the love of God" made me chuckle - thank you. :)

That about sums it up.

If this were an experiment or study of some kind, we would have actually gotten government funding in order to arrive at that conclusion.

And no doubt a committee would have been formed (1.3 brains, 6 or more legs) :D

Couldn't agree more. Can't afford one, don't want one? Don't buy one! Also don't trash talk what you can afford.

I've always found them to be very overpriced for the hardware that you are recieving.

Thanks for copying my avatar :angry:

I read something a few days ago (will try and find link again) with someone explaining the level of detail they went into designing the new aluminum Macbooks. Take for instance the thumbscoop. As they didn't want to have a clip to open the lid, they tried out hundereds of variants of the thumbscoop to get the exact right size to get the correct pressure, even looking at it under an electron microscope.

I was guinely quite suprised they'd go to those lengths, and the macbook is full of loads of little details like that. I used to think Mac products were totally overpriced, but now I see they at least go the extra mile for it.

Yeah too bad their hardware always have terrible quality control with the melting plastics, faulty GPUs (part deux) and whatnot. You'd think with all the recent nVidia troubles they'd thoroughly test the GPUs in the new Macbooks.

Yeah too bad their hardware always have terrible quality control with the melting plastics, faulty GPUs (part deux) and whatnot. You'd think with all the recent nVidia troubles they'd thoroughly test the GPUs in the new Macbooks.

as ive been saying, apple products "look nice" but are overpriced for what you get.

i just bought a lenovo w500 with the following for the same price as a macbook (1300)

Intel Core 2 duo 2.53 ghz 1066 mhz 6mbL2 chache

Vista bis w/ xp cd

3 gb ram ddr2

fireGL V5700 512 mb vram ddr3

2 GB intel turbo hard drive cache

160 GB hd 7200 rpm

Dvd R/rw

The mac doesnt even come close to these specs. I was going to get one until i saw what i could get for 1300.

oh btw i got this with 15% off the sale list, which ends in just over an hour. (they have counter on website)

i just bought a lenovo w500 with the following for the same price as a macbook (1300)

Intel Core 2 duo 2.53 ghz 1066 mhz 6mbL2 chache

Vista bis w/ xp cd

3 gb ram ddr2

fireGL V5700 512 mb vram ddr3

2 GB intel turbo hard drive cache

160 GB hd 7200 rpm

Dvd R/rw

The mac doesnt even come close to these specs. I was going to get one until i saw what i could get for 1300.

not a bad laptop but still too much for my tastes, if i were you id install 4gb of ram and up the hdd to at least a 320. but yeah try to get a macbook with specs like that for that price, oh wait you can't !!!! :laugh:

Since they are using Intel now I assume the hardware is mostly the same as PC

No, the Intel CPUs in Apple computers are different as their off-the-shelf/Newegg equivalents.

Instead of using electricity, Apple Intel CPUs are powered by a combination of the user's smugness and hot air.

So basically, my interpretation of it is that if you are a stylish person and have a lot of cash ready to be spent on a good laptop then get a macbook or an imac. I'm yet to see a laptop that looks as good as a Macbook to be quite honest. I'd love one as I like good looking things, I just can't afford it, meaning I won't get one.

Apple really are targetting the stylish/rich area of potential customers with their products, it's clear to see. In the end people like that won't bat an eyelid at how much it costs or what they're getting for their money. Hell, if I had the spare cash I'd buy one (Y)

On the other hand many people don't care about how ''sexy'' their hardware is, which means that the Macs don't appeal to them. That's okay, what's not okay is how people like that start flaming the Mac hardware.

So basically, my interpretation of it is that if you are a stylish person and have a lot of cash ready to be spent on a good laptop then get a macbook or an imac. I'm yet to see a laptop that looks as good as a Macbook to be quite honest. I'd love one as I like good looking things, I just can't afford it, meaning I won't get one.

Apple really are targetting the stylish/rich area of potential customers with their products, it's clear to see. In the end people like that won't bat an eyelid at how much it costs or what they're getting for their money. Hell, if I had the spare cash I'd buy one (Y)

On the other hand many people don't care about how ''sexy'' their hardware is, which means that the Macs don't appeal to them. That's okay, what's not okay is how people like that start flaming the Mac hardware.

This whole thread has descended into a semi-flamewar that is based on generalities and vague assumptions.

I bought a Mac because I simply couldn't stand working in a Windows environment anymore. And OS X at the time seemed to be a great fit for me. It's in line with my philosophy about how computing should take place, and what it should mean to a person. It's in keeping with what I find most important in hardware and an OS. It has nothing to do with money, or even style. It's about tastes and beliefs. For me, if function isn't wrapped in effective form/design, then I won't be interested in using those functions. It's about the WHOLE package. I want a family of hardware/devices that work seamlessly together, and that require very little work on my part to maintain.

Has nothing to do with me being "stylish" or "rich." I just took longer to save up for an Apple product. If you want something and it costs more, you'll need to be a little more patient and put aside a little more money. It may not take long, or it may take quite a while. It's all relative.

This whole thread has descended into a semi-flamewar that is based on generalities and vague assumptions.

Has nothing to do with me being "stylish" or "rich." I just took longer to save up for an Apple product. If you want something and it costs more, you'll need to be a little more patient and put aside a little more money. It may not take long, or it may take quite a while. It's all relative.

That's the other reason I missed out, however most people I know in real life with Macs are in fact rich and/or stylish. Many people will be looking to use OSX which is why they switch to using a Mac.

Keep in mind I'm on about the general public who use it for themselves, not media business such as magazine editors.

That's the other reason I missed out, however most people I know in real life with Macs are in fact rich and/or stylish. Many people will be looking to use OSX which is why they switch to using a Mac.

Keep in mind I'm on about the general public who use it for themselves, not media business such as magazine editors.

Well, it does tend to attract that particular demographic, I'll give you that.

I find that whenever I walk into my local Apple Store (it's usually pretty busy), I see a lot of women - younger professional types, and good looking, too. That's interesting.

Well, it does tend to attract that particular demographic, I'll give you that.

I find that whenever I walk into my local Apple Store (it's usually pretty busy), I see a lot of women - younger professional types, and good looking, too. That's interesting.

Not really interesting, women buy things as a fashion statement just like how they buy designer clothes, its trendy to have a Mac so like the sheep they are they go and buy a Mac because only cool people use them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!