Would You Like To See Windows Se7en Have a Boot Scree  

470 members have voted

  1. 1. Select Your Choice

    • Yes Make it Welcoming
      147
    • Yes, Anything But The Black Screen
      63
    • Yes, It Would be Nice To See While I Wait For It To Load
      53
    • No, It's Pointless As It Loads Quick
      97
    • Who Cares
      110


Recommended Posts

I dont think anyone would like to see all the stuff Safe Mode has when booting into Windows, I just think that having a better Boot Screen in Windows Seven completes the experience and not make it feel incomplete as with Windows Vista

Although nothing special i think thats what a majority of people want.

A few people think no-one customizes Windows, i.e skin the theme or boot screen so i am running another poll to find out it's located here

Do You Customize / Skin Your Windows Computer

I dont think anyone would like to see all the stuff Safe Mode has when booting into Windows, I just think that having a better Boot Screen in Windows Seven completes the experience and not make it feel incomplete as with Windows Vista

Although nothing special i think thats what a majority of people want.

A few people think no-one customizes Windows, i.e skin the theme or boot screen so i am running another poll to find out it's located here

Do You Customize / Skin Your Windows Computer

The only change I would make is to just have the progress bar in the middle center of the screen.

My question is, who cares?! I mean, it's on your screen for all of what 30 seconds maximum (unless you're running it on a PC with not nearly enough power). And for what it's worth, it certainly has no effect on the actual OS features/performance. It could be a picture of a turd for all I care, as long as Windows 7 delivers, I'll be happy (as long as they don't use it as an opportunity to try and market more stuff to me... always marketing...).

Edit: grammatical mistake.

Thats all fine and well but we'll never truely find out what people want will we?

Valid point, but it was an option! Okay, what I want, here it is: Ditch the boot screen altogether. Start using a bit of hard drive space to store the OS current state on shutdown. Have intelligent service monitoring that can restart, repair, and modify services as required. The only time you should see the boot screen is the very first time you turn on the OS, and that could be a welcome, please wait while we configure your PC screen. I guess if I have to look at a boot screen, I'd like it to look better than the 8-bit graphics we're used to, since most people who will be running it will have a good enough graphics card to support it. And I'd like the option to see current startup threads (drivers being loaded, services starting, applications starting, etc.) I realize this is multi-threaded and asychronous, so there could be a few lines of info.

I think that's it...

You've touched on a feature that Microsoft was suppose to be including in Windows Vista.

Have intelligent service monitoring that can restart, repair, and modify services as required -

Microsoft was working on a feature where when using Windows Update the sytem is suppose to update itself pro-actively without too many reboots and if it does then it takes a snap shot of the current state, reboot the computer and returns it to the previous state, which it does not, if you are working on something or using an application these are suppose to reload after reboot, it never happens, therefor the feature was never included.

It's supposed to stay there until Explorer is up and ready to go. It does NOT wait for other apps in the start-up path like Messenger, sidebar, etc. However, the system should be responsive while those are loading since they're loaded with background priority.

The idea is that as soon as you see the taskbar you should be able to click on the start button and open an app. Your gadgets, buddy list, tray icons might trickle in over a short period though.

Just today, I sat through Vista's entire boot sequence for the first time in last 18 or so months. I noticed something weird. I could click the start button and the start menu loaded but performance was sluggish than usual. The HDD activity made me think that it was probably superfetch loading its "stuff" into RAM. I have noticed that after booting (about 30 sec for me), I have to wait for superfetch to load into RAM and system is noticeably slow during that period.

How about a photo we Pick? That would be cool oor a photo slid show from out picturs folder.. or just an apple logo with a gere.. LOL.. (Mac Fan) But I still like to keep up on windows for old emulator and nes snes games.. (emulation) Well I like both worlds tho lol

lol, so before it starts loading windows it's supposed to load at least 1 jpg file from your pictures folder and decode and render it. and even then it will look all low res and low colour. yeah that doesn't sound like a waste of time and a possible source of boot issues.

people really need to think before they type :rolleyes:

I think the user should customize what they want on the OS, the more personalization the better

unfortunately microsoft is never going to let you have the kind of customization that he was suggesting. the main reason being that it would be a virtually pointless waste of time.

Why would you think that, there are plenty of 3rd party software available for this to be done, so why shouldn't Microsoft jump on this bandwagon?

Anti-trust lawsuits come to mind really. Microsoft has to be careful how much 3rd party functionality they impliment into their products without being taken to court over it now of days. That and some parts of the OS to personally for Windows would require a bit of a re-write to accomplish as the bootscreens for Windows for one are stored in the ntoskrnl.exe file and they would have to change how Windows boots up to acommodate a higher resolution screen (which may come whenever we can ditch the BIOS in favor of EFI possibly). The amount of work just to put in the ability for the user to change the boot screen would simply be a lot more work than one would think, especially if they want something other than just 16 colors. Other parts of the OS might be easier to impliment customization, but again, Microsoft needs to watch what they do so they do not get taken to court for including too much that 3rd party developers think their product is no longer needed.

It seems such a shame that Microsoft can implement what users want without the fear of being taken to court by 3rd party developers, there are so many things Microsoft can do but again the fear can be so great and the lawsuits would be endless.

I think Microsoft may have the EFI feature in incubation thus are waiting until the technology has matured before implementing it into the Windows OS, saying that i don't know of any other OS which has that feature.

I dont think it would be that hard my frend still uses windows 98 and he has his own jpg when he boots up... and it is very quick to get in the gui and runs fine and looks fine and everything... with the power of todays computer why would making a jpg pop up? But even better is to have somthing like how the mac's boot up just like how about a windows logo and a spining globe ? I dont know

lol, so before it starts loading windows it's supposed to load at least 1 jpg file from your pictures folder and decode and render it. and even then it will look all low res and low colour. yeah that doesn't sound like a waste of time and a possible source of boot issues.

people really need to think before they type :rolleyes:

Bump!

Ok This is somthing i woorked on.. I got photo shop cs3 i was using like 4.0 for like ever So i have to re learn it LOL but here is my ideia.. but the glob would move like in ie4\5 and you g=could change the windows logo and that would load windows like how mac's load osx.. and no messing with biso... OK Dont laugh my photo shoping sucks at the moment

Bump!

Ok This is somthing i woorked on.. I got photo shop cs3 i was using like 4.0 for like ever So i have to re learn it LOL but here is my ideia.. but the glob would move like in ie4\5 and you g=could change the windows logo and that would load windows like how mac's load osx.. and no messing with biso... OK Dont laugh my photo shoping sucks at the moment

So where is this photoshoped picture that you created?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!