Why do people like to buy HUGE HDTVs?


Recommended Posts

I hope this question doesn't anger anyone, but I was just curious: Why do people like to buy such large HDTVs (i.e. over 32"). Most people like to buy 40-50" HDTVs. I don't get it. The greatest advantage LCDs have over CRTs is that it's light. And if you get a 50" HDTV, it's now heavy. It's not light anymore. So, why would people break their backs buying a heavy 50" HDTV when they can get a nice light 20-30" one?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/688144-why-do-people-like-to-buy-huge-hdtvs/
Share on other sites

um.....are you serious? I take it you've never been to the movies, where screens are like 200 ft wide?

I have a 52" LCD HDTV and it is absolutely gorgeous to watch...so immersive, If i could afford an 80" I would.

Becaise for 99.999999% of the tv's lifetime, I'll be watchign it, not carrying it around.

And big hi res tv image is just awesome. Seriusly have you even seen a 42 inch or bigger tv picture, or atually watched a full movie or played games on these sizes. mmmyeah.

The larger screen provides a more immersive, theatrical experience. Also, with the increasing amounts of text in device menus and games, they're easier to read as well.. The only time the thing gets moved is when it's installed, broken, or everything in the house gets moved along with it. So long as the floorboards support it and a couple of coordinated people can move it, weight is not an issue.

The guys got a point.

I sometimes struggle in the morning to get my 40" HDTV on the train with me.

Sarcasm FTW

But the OP is wrong, the biggest advantage of LCD plasma is that it allows for bigger screens to be built. Also, they look really cool.

And yeah, the bigger the better

Here in the UK though, houses are fairly a lot smaller than in the US.

This means (in some houses) you have to physically move your head to watch a certain part of the screen (anyone ever sat near the fornt in the cinema?).

However, if I had the money, I would probably wait a year, then buy a huge TV. Why wait a year? Blue Ray needs to be a bit more used and accepted rather than standard DVDs for me to warrant spending hundreds on a huge HDTV. It is the way forward though, whether you like it or not.

Weight isn't really issue (only time the TV ever gets moved is when the Christmas tree goes up, and then, I think the glass stand it's on weighs more than the TV itself (we have a 46" Panny as our main box)).

We chose a 46" because it's just about right - it's better than a 42", yet a 50" is just a bit *too* big (and often run at a lower resolution and use cheaper panels :().

Here in the UK though, houses are fairly a lot smaller than in the US.

This means (in some houses) you have to physically move your head to watch a certain part of the screen (anyone ever sat near the fornt in the cinema?).

:yes: If you are having to move your head, it is too big. There is nothing wrong with a big screen IMO, providing it suits the room size and viewing distance. However I do get the impression some people will buy big TVs for the sake of "my pe... TV is bigger than yours".

Besides the obvious "Bigger is Better" comment.... there is a rule of thumb with HDTVs on viewing distance to screen size... I am about 8 to 10 feet away from my tv and its 52... I still feel like I could have gotten a 60 if I could afford it

screen-size.jpg

Just curious as I remember when you first starting looking at HDTVs (sometime in July)... are you ever going to actually get one?

I just got a 52" 120Hz sony set, and I think it is still too small for my room (18' wide). I am sitting 16ft away from the set, and it looks like it is 32" set at 10 ft.. Sometimes I just go sit in the middle of the room while playing games, it looks incredible.

Oh, I found a trick, just extend your arms and make a fame with your thumbs and index fingers, make a rectangular shape.

If the picture you see is smaller than your "frame" your tv is too small.

If the picture is larger than your frame, your tv is just fine, you can always go bigger...

I would have bought a 60" if I had the money....

Besides the obvious "Bigger is Better" comment.... there is a rule of thumb with HDTVs on viewing distance to screen size...

screen-size.jpg

Just curious as I remember when you first starting looking at HDTVs (sometime in July)... are you ever going to actually get one?

Bingo! Another graph to illustrate when bigger is more appropriate: http://s3.carltonbale.com/resolution_chart.html

i have a 50" Plasma and i wouldn't want it any other way. I had a 55" Sony Rear Projection CRT and that was heavy!!! But since i moved it maybe once in 2yrs i guess it doesn't matter :). The 50" Plasma that's here now weighs probably 100lbs but definitely moveable easily if i needed to.

Since we got videophiles here... can anyone recommend picture calibration DVD or BD for HD?

I used one before but that was not for HD. Acoustic something..

I dunno the "best" but i've always heard good things about AVIA. I have it but keep forgetting to use it. I manually did it (the setup) and tuned it the way i like it best.

I dunno the "best" but i've always heard good things about AVIA. I have it but keep forgetting to use it. I manually did it (the setup) and tuned it the way i like it best.

Avia didn't have good reviews, neither did Video Essentials. Although they both worked great and produced very pleasing results on my old CRT set, but that was back then when we did it with DVD.

Since we now have BD and much higher res TVs, there should be a better versions of these calibration discs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!