Why do people like to buy HUGE HDTVs?


Recommended Posts

Yeah, I carry around my 42" plasma all day long!

Work, bathroom, gym and on holidays - You never know when it might come in handy.

No but seriously, who cares? You mount it / place it and then it remains stationary for a few years in most cases. It's all about the HD experience and the immersion, who cares about weight.

. . .you say how do you get them in your house... are you talking about the older DLP sets?... I can see those being a lil difficult to manage getting into a small house or condo... but the 52" LCD could prob fit through a big window if i needed it to...

Yeah, but then this is where I don't understand? With flatscreen TVs, why is it such a struggle to get it through the door? Unless your TV is taller than the door frame?! If so, then surely it would be as long as a cinematic screen?! Ha ha!

I meant carrying them. A 52" LCD has got to be heavy.

Why would you want to carry it? You need to move your 52" around all day?

Man, you put your TV where you want it and that's it... It stays there! And LCD are much lighter than any CRT TV.... I can move my 46" LCD all by myself. It even fit inside my Pontiac Vibe!!!

There are many reasons -

First, I didn't actually have a TV after college - I had a small 13" one in my room at home from my parents. When looking for a TV, I wanted the best possible experience to emulate the theater experience. At the time, a 61" 1080p DLP set was the best bang for my buck.

Second, I got married shortly after college and was ready to buy a house with my wife - rather than cram the room to the point where we're directly in front of the TV, a big screen allows us the opportunity to have the couch on one side of the room, while the TV is on the other side, giving more than enough space to keep the aesthetics of the room in tact. I'm able to maintain a nice "family" style appearance, while still having the big screen for TV/Movies/Gaming/HTPC. In fact, my main PC is set up via my HDTV and I just sit on my couch while doing anything.

Finally, the weight issue, as many have pointed out, is non-existent. My wife has a CRT from before we got married which is up in our bedroom. A 32" CRT weighs enough to be carried by one person, but realistically should be carried by two unless you're pretty strong. Trust me, after lifting that monstrosity during our move into the house, I'll be glad to never do so again. The HDTV on the other hand, is light as a feather compared to the CRT, weighing in at just under 80 lbs. Sure 80 lbs isn't something we carry around on a daily basis, but it isn't being moved on a daily basis, and when it needs to be, the weight is divided evenly enough to make it a non-issue.

The beauty of society is that (at least in America) we're all free to purchase items that make us happy and serve a purpose. If HDTVs weren't useful or desired by folks, there wouldn't be a market. Every piece of equipment has an intended application and target audience. It's no different than me balking at a car such as the Chevy Aveo which serves me no purpose - just because it doesn't appear to be beneficial to me in any way doesn't me others won't differ and buy one. I'm not sure if the original intent was to be a knock on large HDTVs or on society's desire to have one in a materialistic world, but you've sure attracted quite a few detractors to the original post :)

I meant carrying them. A 52" LCD has got to be heavy.

Lets just cut the crap. You just have a lazy and doubtful mindset.

Setting up a large HDTV doesn't require a piano lift, it just takes two average-sized men. The size of the TV measures diagonally so getting it through a door will never be an excuse because most HDTV's are no wider than 3/4 of a foot. Unless you live in a midget house or something.

I could understand if you were asking about a refrigerator or washing machine, but come on. Just use some common sense.

Lets just cut the crap. You just have a lazy and doubtful mindset.

Setting up a large HDTV doesn't require a piano lift, it just takes two average-sized men. The size of the TV measures diagonally so getting it through a door will never be an excuse because most HDTV's are no wider than 3/4 of a foot. Unless you live in a midget house or something.

I could understand if you were asking about a refrigerator or washing machine, but come on. Just use some common sense.

Ok, enough with the flaming. I don't know what part of my question was "flamebait," but my question was answered already, so there ya go. Now, I'm praying that a mod would lock this topic. Starting this was a huge mistake. People on this site are so immature. I post on the AVS forum and I don't get nearly as much flaming responses as this site. No offense, but I think the moderators need to be more strict here. People here going overboard.

try taking the tv with you while taking a dump ... man ... back breaker .. but picture wise... crystal clear ... actually i don't even need to wipe my ass, the tv does it for me ... is amazing these days what a huge HDTV can do for you ...

Ok, enough with the flaming. I don't know what part of my question was "flamebait," but my question was answered already, so there ya go. Now, I'm praying that a mod would lock this topic. Starting this was a huge mistake. People on this site are so immature. I post on the AVS forum and I don't get nearly as much flaming responses as this site. No offense, but I think the moderators need to be more strict here. People here going overboard.

Yeah, it's definitely the people here who are immature - Not you sounding a bit lazy?

Whoa!! I step out and when I return home, I find a whole mess of replies, 90% of which are flaming responses. Notice, I said, "I hope this question doesn't anger anyone." (sigh) I guess we can't act maturely here. I request a moderator to close this topic because it's obviously leading to trouble which was not my intent. I refuse to engage in a conversation that's going to end up in a flaming war. Yes, I did start this topic, but I didn't think it was so hard to ask for mature responses here.

People probably remember your other 'attempts', like https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=637942&hl= and how you just didn't seem interested in the actual answers as much as you seemed interested in deriding people for having the eyes to see the quality difference.

People probably remember your other 'attempts', like https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=637942&hl= and how you just didn't seem interested in the actual answers as much as you seemed interested in deriding people for having the eyes to see the quality difference.

That was a topic I started months ago and I admit, it was a mistake. I even sent the moderator that locked the thread an apology PM, which he ignored. Me and my family believed HDTV was useless but if you noticed, I changed because people here convinced me and now I've mentioned several times that I've planned on getting an HDTV when the price is right. I've had my heart set on getting a Samsung LN32A450. But anyways, since then, I tried very hard to try to engage in a nice, mature conversations and all I kept getting was flaming responses. I guess people are never going to forget that thread and will take it against me for the rest of my life. Here are some non-flamebait threads I started and all I got were flaming responses:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=651879&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=648032&hl=

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...=649006&hl=

Oh and by the way, if people hate me because of that first thread I started, you will not like my father then. He thinks HDTV is disgusting (but I don't, just so we're all clear). I guess now I know why all his co-workers hate him ;)

Did you seriously just ask what the point is in buying an HDTV because they aren't light?

Are you ****ing kidding me??

No, I asked why people buy 50" inch HDTVs when you can get a nice light 20-30" one.

Edited by xraffle
No, I asked why people buy 50" inch HDTVs when you can get a nice light 20-30" one.

but why would you buy a smaller tv just because it's lighter ?

most places will deliver it to your door, and even then you can usually order full instalation service, and if not, yeah the bog of a 42+ screen you'll usually need to be two to carry, but how hard is it to get a friend to help set up a TV. out of thebox if you have to move it, you CAN mov a 42 inch by yoruself at least, it's heavy, but it's also flat so it's easy to get around as logn as you can hold it.

I mean you aren't going to be moving the tv aroud. and if you need to access to rear connections a lot, make sure to get a tv with a twiastable stand, or a wall mount that can easily be extended out for accessibility.

but why would you buy a smaller tv just because it's lighter ?

most places will deliver it to your door, and even then you can usually order full instalation service, and if not, yeah the bog of a 42+ screen you'll usually need to be two to carry, but how hard is it to get a friend to help set up a TV. out of thebox if you have to move it, you CAN mov a 42 inch by yoruself at least, it's heavy, but it's also flat so it's easy to get around as logn as you can hold it.

I mean you aren't going to be moving the tv aroud. and if you need to access to rear connections a lot, make sure to get a tv with a twiastable stand, or a wall mount that can easily be extended out for accessibility.

The way the post office handles things today, I wouldn't trust them. On that first thread I started, I mentioned that my co-worker had an HDTV that arrived cracked. I highly doubt that was done at the factory. Looks like a post office problems to me. I'd rather buy my HDTV at the store and bring it home myself. That's kind of hard to do if you're buying a 50" HDTV, especially if you're by yourself.

And TVs, especially LCDs, are estimated to last around 20-30 years. I highly doubt I will be living in the same place in 30 years. When I move, I want to be able to move my TV easily.

The way the post office handles things today, I wouldn't trust them. On that first thread I started, I mentioned that my co-worker had an HDTV that arrived cracked. I highly doubt that was done at the factory. Looks like a post office problems to me. I'd rather buy my HDTV at the store and bring it home myself. That's kind of hard to do if you're buying a 50" HDTV, especially if you're by yourself.

And TVs, especially LCDs, are estimated to last around 20-30 years. I highly doubt I will be living in the same place in 30 years. When I move, I want to be able to move my TV easily.

Post office doesnt do it. It is the installation company.

You won't keep your TV for 30 years. Something will go wrong with it and eventually you will get a new one.

We get it. You don't like big TV's. Great. So stop trying to convince the rest of us who have them that we are idiots or whatever as you obviously have nothing positive to contribute to this community as a whole

Edited by Brandon
So the reason you buy a TV is because its light? :huh:

Do you hold it on your lap whilst watching it or something? Usually you put the TV in one place and then leave it there for years.

I do. Its a lap warmer for the winter time. Hope it just doesn't catch on fire!

Its a shame there's nothing much in way of CRTs. They were cheaper and the colors popped out A LOT more than with LCDs and I always find the LCDs much too pixelated.

And TVs, especially LCDs, are estimated to last around 20-30 years. I highly doubt I will be living in the same place in 30 years. When I move, I want to be able to move my TV easily.

going by this logic, you must have a light waster, dryer, fridge, bed, dresser...ect ect. When you're moving the tv is the least of your worries.

The way the post office handles things today, I wouldn't trust them. On that first thread I started, I mentioned that my co-worker had an HDTV that arrived cracked. I highly doubt that was done at the factory. Looks like a post office problems to me. I'd rather buy my HDTV at the store and bring it home myself. That's kind of hard to do if you're buying a 50" HDTV, especially if you're by yourself.

And TVs, especially LCDs, are estimated to last around 20-30 years. I highly doubt I will be living in the same place in 30 years. When I move, I want to be able to move my TV easily.

Well the post actually has warranty on anything they transport so if they break it they replace it.

and again, you have no family or friends to help you with the one time deal of carrying in the TV ?

as for moving, when you move no matter how big your tv is, I doubt it'll be your biggest issue, I'm pretty sure your couch for example will still be heavuer, way harder to move and definately require 2 people. Then there's things like Fridges and stuff if you own these in the apartment/house you're in, dishwashers, landry machines.... those nice big soft and lovely spring mattresses, they're a royal pain to move.

Moving is something you occasionally do yeah, but you rarely move by yourself, and you most people hire moers to do it, effectively, quickly, and with insurance.

bigger is better (as long as the room you're putting it in works for the tv)

myself (all plasmas for black levels),... my current smallest i have or recommend is 42'' (by master bedroom tv) .. 50'' is average/nice (in my den) , and the 60'' kuro is in my main living room (great size)

I hope pioneer makes a larger tv in the future (70-80'') , that would be excellent.

also you gives a crap about power consumption or weight/mobility ??? (once its on the wall who cares) ... Personally really only care about picture quality / viewing experience, that is most important.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!