Recommended Posts

You can dual boot them anyway you like, you just cant launch a 64bit install from within a 32 bit environment. I dual boot 32 bit and 64bit just fine.

With your situation you will have wanted to install xp and then windows 7, because windows xp's multi boot manager will not pick up windows 7 or vista, but windows 7 boot manager will pick up xp. You can get around this but it's a pain in the butt.

Yes that makes sense. Thanks

On a side note: I'll be doing some Win7 32 vs Win7 64 gaming benchmarks and will be sure to post results... In a seperate topic of course. :whistle:

For the same reason you had for posting it. Which is none but to agitate people and make you feel self superior.

Really?

Oh, no, don't mind me, I'm just making an observation about those unable to follow rules when they KNOW the rules. You know, the ones everyone here read when they signed up, and the ones they've repeatedly seen mods post in here.

If that's not you, then, really, ignore my posts.

Good day sir ;)

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

Really?

Oh, no, don't mind me, I'm just making an observation about those unable to follow rules when they KNOW the rules. You know, the ones everyone here read when they signed up, and the ones they've repeatedly seen mods post in here.

If that's not you, then, really, ignore my posts.

Good day sir ;)

Aw thats so sweet of you, wishing me a good day. You too bud :)

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

I can't seem to find the source of the rumored 7015 build..

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right?

Yes.

the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

No, it's also 7000.

You should google 'copyright law'.

Anyway, I'm not the one that has to worry. But if I had an FTP with those files, I would be worried.

You should google "Company's cant sue when no financial loss can be proven" okay thats kinda long but yea, lighten up already theres like 20 people on this thread striving to be mods the ass kissing is beyond disgusting now.

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

the x64 release around is Build 7000 not internal build 7015.

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

all version 7015,7018,7019 etc are Ghost version (something made by Chinese and personalize with language and other stuff...) those are not official MS

The beta is 7000, full stop. No it's not 7001 or 7002 or 7015 or anything else. It's 7000!

all version 7015,7018,7019 etc are Ghost version (something made by Chinese and personalize with language and other stuff...) those are not official MS

7018 and 7019 haven't even been compiled yet :p (winmain)

Well, just installed the 64bit version and having a few problems.

I have two HDDs, C: Main Drive and D: Downloads - I made a 100GB Partition out of the C: drive, F:.

Though Windows can't see my D: drive, checking Disk Management it's there but without a drive letter, the name of the drive when checking the name is \\?\Volume{347C4CE5-DD20-11DD-B03F-806E6F6E6963}\ - Any way to make it show up without a format or messing with it and causing it to mess up in Vista as well.

Also, isn't it possible to install Live Messenger 09?

Well, just installed the 64bit version and having a few problems.

I have two HDDs, C: Main Drive and D: Downloads - I made a 100GB Partition out of the C: drive, F:.

Though Windows can't see my D: drive, checking Disk Management it's there but without a drive letter, the name of the drive when checking the name is \\?\Volume{347C4CE5-DD20-11DD-B03F-806E6F6E6963}\ - Any way to make it show up without a format or messing with it and causing it to mess up in Vista as well.

Also, isn't it possible to install Live Messenger 09?

Just needs to be assigned a letter?

Right click -> Change drive letter and paths? (under disk management)

I'm sure you know how to do that, so I assume something else is up. Sorry I can't think of anything else.

Congratulations to both of you! You now have been reported for flaming, and ale0 for posting warez! :) Well done!

Thanks,

David.

ROFL, wow I am devastated. Couldn't be that impersonating a mod and throwing authority around that you don't have couldn't also be against the rules.

Just needs to be assigned a letter?

Right click -> Change drive letter and paths? (under disk management)

I'm sure you know how to do that, so I assume something else is up. Sorry I can't think of anything else.

I believe it was blanked out but it's my first time using Windows' own Disk Mangagement, so will take another look. I am currently on my Vista boot until I find a solution for the Messenger problem as well.

I believe it was blanked out but it's my first time using Windows' own Disk Mangagement, so will take another look. I am currently on my Vista boot until I find a solution for the Messenger problem as well.

Ah right :/

You could always grab a 3rd party partition tool.

It just sounds like Windows 7 might have assigned another drive, maybe your CD-Rom or a USB stick the letter this drive normally has, hence under Windows it has no letter assigned to it.

Not sure though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!