Recommended Posts

You can dual boot them anyway you like, you just cant launch a 64bit install from within a 32 bit environment. I dual boot 32 bit and 64bit just fine.

With your situation you will have wanted to install xp and then windows 7, because windows xp's multi boot manager will not pick up windows 7 or vista, but windows 7 boot manager will pick up xp. You can get around this but it's a pain in the butt.

Yes that makes sense. Thanks

On a side note: I'll be doing some Win7 32 vs Win7 64 gaming benchmarks and will be sure to post results... In a seperate topic of course. :whistle:

For the same reason you had for posting it. Which is none but to agitate people and make you feel self superior.

Really?

Oh, no, don't mind me, I'm just making an observation about those unable to follow rules when they KNOW the rules. You know, the ones everyone here read when they signed up, and the ones they've repeatedly seen mods post in here.

If that's not you, then, really, ignore my posts.

Good day sir ;)

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

Really?

Oh, no, don't mind me, I'm just making an observation about those unable to follow rules when they KNOW the rules. You know, the ones everyone here read when they signed up, and the ones they've repeatedly seen mods post in here.

If that's not you, then, really, ignore my posts.

Good day sir ;)

Aw thats so sweet of you, wishing me a good day. You too bud :)

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

I can't seem to find the source of the rumored 7015 build..

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right?

Yes.

the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

No, it's also 7000.

You should google 'copyright law'.

Anyway, I'm not the one that has to worry. But if I had an FTP with those files, I would be worried.

You should google "Company's cant sue when no financial loss can be proven" okay thats kinda long but yea, lighten up already theres like 20 people on this thread striving to be mods the ass kissing is beyond disgusting now.

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

the x64 release around is Build 7000 not internal build 7015.

so, it would be safe to assume they are going to release the x32 bit version along side the x64 right? the previously leaked 32x was build 7000 where as this new x64 is 7015 so they would release a x32 7015 build correct?

all version 7015,7018,7019 etc are Ghost version (something made by Chinese and personalize with language and other stuff...) those are not official MS

The beta is 7000, full stop. No it's not 7001 or 7002 or 7015 or anything else. It's 7000!

all version 7015,7018,7019 etc are Ghost version (something made by Chinese and personalize with language and other stuff...) those are not official MS

7018 and 7019 haven't even been compiled yet :p (winmain)

Well, just installed the 64bit version and having a few problems.

I have two HDDs, C: Main Drive and D: Downloads - I made a 100GB Partition out of the C: drive, F:.

Though Windows can't see my D: drive, checking Disk Management it's there but without a drive letter, the name of the drive when checking the name is \\?\Volume{347C4CE5-DD20-11DD-B03F-806E6F6E6963}\ - Any way to make it show up without a format or messing with it and causing it to mess up in Vista as well.

Also, isn't it possible to install Live Messenger 09?

Well, just installed the 64bit version and having a few problems.

I have two HDDs, C: Main Drive and D: Downloads - I made a 100GB Partition out of the C: drive, F:.

Though Windows can't see my D: drive, checking Disk Management it's there but without a drive letter, the name of the drive when checking the name is \\?\Volume{347C4CE5-DD20-11DD-B03F-806E6F6E6963}\ - Any way to make it show up without a format or messing with it and causing it to mess up in Vista as well.

Also, isn't it possible to install Live Messenger 09?

Just needs to be assigned a letter?

Right click -> Change drive letter and paths? (under disk management)

I'm sure you know how to do that, so I assume something else is up. Sorry I can't think of anything else.

Congratulations to both of you! You now have been reported for flaming, and ale0 for posting warez! :) Well done!

Thanks,

David.

ROFL, wow I am devastated. Couldn't be that impersonating a mod and throwing authority around that you don't have couldn't also be against the rules.

Just needs to be assigned a letter?

Right click -> Change drive letter and paths? (under disk management)

I'm sure you know how to do that, so I assume something else is up. Sorry I can't think of anything else.

I believe it was blanked out but it's my first time using Windows' own Disk Mangagement, so will take another look. I am currently on my Vista boot until I find a solution for the Messenger problem as well.

I believe it was blanked out but it's my first time using Windows' own Disk Mangagement, so will take another look. I am currently on my Vista boot until I find a solution for the Messenger problem as well.

Ah right :/

You could always grab a 3rd party partition tool.

It just sounds like Windows 7 might have assigned another drive, maybe your CD-Rom or a USB stick the letter this drive normally has, hence under Windows it has no letter assigned to it.

Not sure though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!