Recommended Posts

You must be joking right? Or you're just a big fan of Windows? Come on, Windows 7 is not a revolution, even if it's the OS that could safe face for Microsoft (with the relative flop of Vista), yes it's better, yes it's slimmer, but it's still Windows. And other than the fact that Mac hardware is fantastic, most Mac users are in it because of OS X. And we will get Snow Leopard, what will "probably" run circle around Win7. In many ways, Apple is always one step ahead of Microsoft.

Mac hardware? You mean the off the shelf parts that can bought anywhere? You do realize that a Mac is, was and has always been a personal computer, right?

OSX isn't revolutionary either. It might have been revolutionary if Apple were the ones that made it. It amazes me that a company can take an OS that they didn't write, add some shiny bits on top of it and people will eat it up just because of the Apple logo that's on it.

Please. Snow Leopard is to Leopard what Windows 7 is to Vista. Mac hardware is the same as PC hardware but i agree the whole point of a Mac is OS X. As for Snow Leopard running rings around 7 spoken like a typical Mac troll, played any good OS X games lately?

Exactly.

Mac hardware? You mean the off the shelf parts that can bought anywhere? You do realize that a Mac is, was and has always been a personal computer, right?

OSX isn't revolutionary either. It might have been revolutionary if Apple were the ones that made it. It amazes me that a company can take an OS that they didn't write, add some shiny bits on top of it and people will eat it up just because of the Apple logo that's on it.

Exactly.

Apple uses Intel parts, but the resulting package is about as similar to a generic PC as night and day. Compare any Macbook to Dell trash.

http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/First-Look/Mac...-Unibody/Page-2

And Apple didn't buy OS X. Not that it makes any kind of difference if they did. OS X is still Apple's baby and it sets the bar.

Here's the history. Enjoy, and draw your own conclusions.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mac_OS_X

http://www.kernelthread.com/mac/osx/history.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer

I watched a bit of the stream here and there. Some of the updates are impressive. It's great to see iTunes finally go DRM-free, and I'm not surprised about the 17-inch Macbook Pro update. I think it should of came out when the other new Macbooks came out though.

Trying to change the subject after 39 Thieves post? :laugh:

I've said all that needed to be said.

There's only so much that can be said around here without the whole topic degrading into a complete flamewar.

He's been in the RDF for too lon:rofl:l:

Radish?

And I like it here. It's nice and warm. And I think, that to some limited degree, it also grants wishes.

It giggles when I touch it.

Weak example. I see a typical laptop internal layout, with an aluminum shell. What's so impressive? Are you easily amazed (which is a rhetorical question, considering your obsession with trivial tech products) or have you never disassembled a laptop before?

As far as OS X goes, more specifically, it's Steve Jobs baby, which he developed after he abandoned Apple and started NeXT. Apple purchased NeXT, and ergo purchased OPENSTEP, and from that, developed Rhapsody, which was renamed to OS X. So, in essence, Apple did in fact buy OS X. And they've spent nearly the last decade refining it...and selling it, point release by point release.

Don't know why I bothered with that, since any sort of rational discourse will be quickly glazed over by the typical fanboy crap you spew. Ah well....

It may go over the typical fanboy's eyes, but not mine. And you're right. Apple computers are more or less exactly the same as any other PC manufacturer's computers. All that's different is the chassis and default operating system.

I've found that high-end Dells and most Sony notebooks are as well-built and as reliable as anything that Apple offers, including the newer unibody models.

They aren't going DRM free. They will continue to have DRM tracks, they are expanding the current offerings of DRM free tracks.

They've been selling select tracks DRM free since May 2007.

They seemed to say in the keynote that by April 2009, all 10+ million songs on iTunes will be DRM-free.

Where is my Mac Mini, iMac and Snow Leopard showcase?

Seriously, it's my first Keynote I watch and care about, and it was soooo disappointing...

I hope Apple is gonna make a personal show just like they did for the Macbook and iPods really soon.

I was really hoping a lot for today :(

Specially after knowing how great the keynote about Macbook where.

Where is my Mac Mini, iMac and Snow Leopard showcase?

Seriously, it's my first Keynote I watch and care about, and it was soooo disappointing...

I hope Apple is gonna make a personal show just like they did for the Macbook and iPods really soon.

I was really hoping a lot for today :(

Specially after knowing how great the keynote about Macbook where.

Don't fret, I'm pretty sure Apple won't let the Mini and imacs go unrefreshed . . . all of a sudden.

There will be some very, very big news, this year, and likely very soon. Apple won't just suddenly run out of ideas. The whole culture at Apple is about ideas. Take the iPhone. It's only been out a short time and look at what that's accomplished, and the ipod Touch hitched a ride as well. Apple is just getting started with these devices. Their potential is insane.

Apple is in an incredibly enviable position right now - loads of cash on hand (rivaling MS' cash reserves - at one point this year they were equal), a whole line of solid products, important software updates, a lock on the smartphone/MP3 player market, virtual ownership of the music entertainment market, OS X, etc. It's never been better. Things aren't going to suddenly change for no reason. Apple right now is one of the very few players that is doing well in this economy, due in large part to the segment of the market it targets - the premium end.

Apple has ignored the low end market for a very good reason. Nobody in that market is making any money. Look at Dell's margins, then look at Apple's. Apple's share is growing, while Dell is struggling. Apple's gross margins average 33%, while Dell struggles to achieve 18%. Garbage in, garbage out. Simply put, Apple's share of the high end market is 70%. This is where computer profits are being made. It is not in volume. That's a loser's game. That's a generic box-maker's game.

The list of firms that have tried to win using price as their main differentiator - and failed, is long. Very long.

No reason to worry at this point. If you watched Schiller's keynote carefully (aside from the very telling and foreshadowing Tony Bennett bit), he all but admitted that Macworld is useless and that Apple would rather not be there (Every Apple Store is its own Macworld, etc.) He basically gave the whole event the finger. Apple was not going to waste everything by revealing everything in a non-Jobs keynote at an event it's already dumped very unceremoniously. So all we got were teasers; Apple got the software news out of the way plus threw everyone a bone with the 17-inch MBP.

No reason to worry at this point. If you watched Schiller's keynote carefully (aside from the very telling and foreshadowing Tony Bennett bit), he all but admitted that Macworld is useless and that Apple would rather not be there (Every Apple Store is its own Macworld, etc.) He basically gave the whole event the finger. Apple was not going to waste everything by revealing everything in a non-Jobs keynote at an event it's already dumped very unceremoniously. So all we got were teasers; Apple got the software news out of the way plus threw everyone a bone with the 17-inch MBP.

Well, this part is true. But I think Apple has made it clear for quite some time now that trade shows aren't all that important anymore. In 2008, all we really saw at Macworld was the MacBook Air. Everything else, whether it be the iPhone, iPod or notebooks, was unveiled at smaller, Apple-controlled events. This trend will continue in 2009, 2010 and so on and so forth. I don't think Apple was intentionally giving Macworld "the finger," it was just being honest in a way. Sure, a new Mac mini is probably coming, but it wasn't ready yet.

What do you think Apple would rather do? Introduce the all-new Mac mini at Macworld, noting that it's "Shipping this June!" Or, would they rather hold an event in June, introduce the all-new Mac mini and proudly proclaim that it's "Shipping today!" In the past, Apple has announced or shown many products at Macworld that clearly weren't ready, most notably the iPhone; it was a full six months before it was actually made available. Remember Macworld 2003, when three new notebooks were released, and yet it took two months before any were available? The real reason Apple isn't interested in Macworld anymore is because they'd much rather be able to tie events into the actual release date of the product. Notice how every iPod event since 2005 has included at least one iPod model that was available that very day, usually the iPod nano.

Well, this part is true. But I think Apple has made it clear for quite some time now that trade shows aren't all that important anymore. In 2008, all we really saw at Macworld was the MacBook Air. Everything else, whether it be the iPhone, iPod or notebooks, was unveiled at smaller, Apple-controlled events. This trend will continue in 2009, 2010 and so on and so forth. I don't think Apple was intentionally giving Macworld "the finger," it was just being honest in a way. Sure, a new Mac mini is probably coming, but it wasn't ready yet.

What do you think Apple would rather do? Introduce the all-new Mac mini at Macworld, noting that it's "Shipping this June!" Or, would they rather hold an event in June, introduce the all-new Mac mini and proudly proclaim that it's "Shipping today!" In the past, Apple has announced or shown many products at Macworld that clearly weren't ready, most notably the iPhone; it was a full six months before it was actually made available. Remember Macworld 2003, when three new notebooks were released, and yet it took two months before any were available? The real reason Apple isn't interested in Macworld anymore is because they'd much rather be able to tie events into the actual release date of the product. Notice how every iPod event since 2005 has included at least one iPod model that was available that very day, usually the iPod nano.

Well said, and I agree with the point that you have made in regards to Apple not needing to be fully involved in trade shows to launch their products. It looks much better to hold their own event, unveil a product when it's ready and be able to say "it's shipping today", instead of having to rush around.

Well, I never saw him before until today, so I'm going with no, he was pleasantly plump!

I'm sure he'd prefer the term festively plump ;)

As good as iPhoto '09 looks, I cannot justify the price tag for that one piece of software. I rarely use anything else in the iLife suite.

They aren't going DRM free. They will continue to have DRM tracks, they are expanding the current offerings of DRM free tracks.

They've been selling select tracks DRM free since May 2007.

post-8780-1231327848_thumb.png

http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/01/06itunes.html

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!