Sony calls out Xbox and Wii as flea market peddlers


Recommended Posts

No, their situation is nothing like MS's
And you don't think that if MS includes better hardware and all bells and whistles in their Xbox 720 or whatever that it will cost more to produce than the 360 did at launch?

I find your lack of proper rebuttal quite weak, sir :p

And you don't think that if MS includes better hardware and all bells and whistles in their Xbox 720 or whatever that it will cost more to produce than the 360 did at launch?

I find your lack of proper rebuttal quite weak, sir :p

The difference is that while Sony relied on the PS2 to fund the PS3's expensive hardware, they still sold it for a very steep price. I think DM's idea was that MS can include a few extras next round while maintaining a reasonable price at launch.

The difference is that while Sony relied on the PS2 to fund the PS3's expensive hardware, they still sold it for a very steep price. I think DM's idea was that MS can include a few extras next round while maintaining a reasonable price at launch.

...and use technology that has been proven, not a format to push their own agenda and a chip that was the Achilles' heel for programmers.

The difference is that while Sony relied on the PS2 to fund the PS3's expensive hardware, they still sold it for a very steep price. I think DM's idea was that MS can include a few extras next round while maintaining a reasonable price at launch.
So what, if they're just re-launching the 360 with all peripherals attached, would people buy? No, of course not. A new console would mean better hardware. Better hardware would mean increased cost. And if they sold it at a too reasonable price, they would bleed all the 360's (still minute) profits in a heartbeat (provided people would actually buy the 720 so soon after the 360).
...and use technology that has been proven, not a format to push their own agenda and a chip that was the Achilles' heel for programmers.
See newer hardware point above.

If they didn't include a Blu-Ray player in their next release, they would be shooting themselves in the foot. Or perhaps they would be so stubborn that we'd eventually see 10 disc games? That'd be just lol.

So what, if they're just re-launching the 360 with all peripherals attached, would people buy? No, of course not. A new console would mean better hardware. Better hardware would mean increased cost. And if they sold it at a too reasonable price, they would bleed all the 360's (still minute) profits in a heartbeat (provided people would actually buy the 720 so soon after the 360).

Now that's just you making stuff up.

Better hardware doesn't mean increased cost, because "better" is relative to the old hardware, launched years ago. The point you missed is that the 360 could have launched with wifi and a few other extras built-in, but for around $500. With profits made from the 360, they can put those extras in at no cost to the end user, resulting in an attractively priced console. And just so I don't get misunderstood, I'm just saying they can, I'm in no way saying they'll do this, or are even considering it.

If they didn't include a Blu-Ray player in their next release, they would be shooting themselves in the foot. Or perhaps they would be so stubborn that we'd eventually see 10 disc games? That'd be just lol.

I'm more inclined to believe the next XBox will include an HD-DVD drive, it's a proved format and would provide for less piracy. Blu-ray could come as an external accessory or not at all, since they're pushing digital distribution.

I'm more inclined to believe the next XBox will include an HD-DVD drive, it's a proved format and would provide for less piracy. Blu-ray could come as an external accessory or not at all, since they're pushing digital distribution.

That would be absolute fail.

HD-DVD isn't made any more, and it would mean you couldn't watch any of your physical HD movies on the next 360. It's not a proved format, it's a dead format.

There would be no pluses what so ever to MS including an HD-DVD drive in the next xbox. If anything costs would be higher as HD-DVD discs (and readers) would need to be made just for the xbox 360, nothing else uses them. By then Blu Ray drives/discs will be incredibly cheap compared to when they launched.

It's ether going to be proprietary, or Blu Ray.

That would be absolute fail.

HD-DVD isn't made any more, and it would mean you couldn't watch any of your physical HD movies on the next 360. It's not a proved format, it's a dead format.

There would be no pluses what so ever to MS including an HD-DVD drive in the next xbox. If anything costs would be higher as HD-DVD discs (and readers) would need to be made just for the xbox 360, nothing else uses them. By then Blu Ray drives/discs will be incredibly cheap compared to when they launched.

It's ether going to be proprietary, or Blu Ray.

Unless MS start producing the drives themselves and puts the games on HD-DVD discs.

Why would they do that?

Again, it would ramp up manufacturing costs.

Some of you guys are going bananas about manufacturing costs through adding wireless, yet somehow reviving a dead format, then having to manufacture the readers and discs yourself is a good option?

Why would they do that?

Again, it would ramp up manufacturing costs.

Some of you guys are going bananas about manufacturing costs through adding wireless, yet somehow reviving a dead format, then having to manufacture the readers and discs yourself is a good option?

I wasn't suggesting they would, I just stated that it's an option if they decided to.

I wasn't suggesting they would, I just stated that it's an option if they decided to.

Fair enough, my bad, but they still ain't going to do it :p

It would be one of the biggest mistakes ever.

Unless there is a landfill of say 60-80 million HD-DVD players dumped somewhere ;)

Could work as a gaming format, just like Blu-ray. You say proprietary? Why not use an already existing format then. Just because it's a failed MOVIE format, doesn't mean it's a failed gaming format.

At least they won't try to shove a format down our throat to aid their own agenda ...

I do agree it probably won't happen but there are other sides to the coin than "zOMG HD MOVIEZZZ", some of us use our consoles as a gaming console, not a media center.

I'm more inclined to believe the next XBox will include an HD-DVD drive, it's a proved format and would provide for less piracy. Blu-ray could come as an external accessory or not at all, since they're pushing digital distribution.

The next Xbox won't use HD-DVD, it just won't happen. It would totally take away from the media centre aspect of the console if can't even play the current standard for HD movies. By that point plenty of people will probably own a Blu-Ray player and a couple of movies too. Sure a console is for gaming, but plenty of people watch movies on them too, otherwise they wouldn't be wasting their time with Netflix right?

The other choice I see is they could build a hybrid drive to read both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs, but why incur those manufacturing costs when there is already a defined standard? I expect the next Xbox will use Blu-Ray, and Microsoft will probably be singing it's praises too tbh.

Could work as a gaming format, just like Blu-ray. You say proprietary? Why not use an already existing format then. Just because it's a failed MOVIE format, doesn't mean it's a failed gaming format.

At least they won't try to shove a format down our throat to aid their own agenda ...

I do agree it probably won't happen but there are other sides to the coin than "zOMG HD MOVIEZZZ", some of us use our consoles as a gaming console, not a media center.

Using the existing format over a new proprietary format would be a marketing and image nightmare - You'd have the media everywhere saying "MS adopts failed format". You can't even comprehend how much bad PR MS would get for reviving HD-DVD just for the next xbox.

There's nothing you can really say about a new format with no history (if they went proprietary).

And some people like using consoles to play movies, it's been that way for ages. The Wii even gets stick for not playing back DVDs, yet people probably have 100 DVD players in their houses. Consoles are primarily under the TV, the place where you're going to watch DVDs/Blu Rays, ect.

When the next consoles come, the HD market will be much larger, it makes perfectly fine sense for MS to use Blu Ray for gaming and movies. Consumers get the ability to play their movie collections, and play games.

The only people who'll be spazzing up against that are those that somehow get butthurt because Blu Ray is heavily imaged with Sony. And quite frankly that's sad, Blu Ray is the format of HD movies, just accept that and not go crazy if MS adopt it. It's perfectly sensible for them to do so.

It would just be two companies sharing tech, like DVD was in the PS2/Xbox - Fanboy logic does not stand in this equation, it would merely be business decisions and deciding what's best for your consumer base which includes people playing games/people using media features/ect.

Edited by Audioboxer
Now that's just you making stuff up.

Better hardware doesn't mean increased cost, because "better" is relative to the old hardware, launched years ago. The point you missed is that the 360 could have launched with wifi and a few other extras built-in, but for around $500. With profits made from the 360, they can put those extras in at no cost to the end user, resulting in an attractively priced console. And just so I don't get misunderstood, I'm just saying they can, I'm in no way saying they'll do this, or are even considering it.

If they were making a console in 2010, they wouldn't use 2007 hardware just because it's probably cheap to make, would they? They would use 2010 hardware to really punch a hole in the PS3's graphics.

We can speculate about what they could do all day long that would still produce marginally better graphics for a reduced manufac cost, but I'm trying to be realistic in what a company would do if they're launching a console.

Also: Well yes, they could make an "Ultimate" version of the console later during this generation that will cost as much as a PS3 costs now.

Could work as a gaming format, just like Blu-ray. You say proprietary? Why not use an already existing format then. Just because it's a failed MOVIE format, doesn't mean it's a failed gaming format.

Do you seriously believe that a proprietary format like that would work for a console that partially markets itself as a media center?

At least they won't try to shove a format down our throat to aid their own agenda ...

Which won them the war. Seems like a smart move in my book. And besides, you speak as if having two formats gained you anything as a consumer.

I do agree it probably won't happen but there are other sides to the coin than "zOMG HD MOVIEZZZ", some of us use our consoles as a gaming console, not a media center.

And some of us use our consoles as both.

I find it amusing that the console that markets itself as a gaming console is the best media center, and the console that markets itself as both is also mediocre at both.

Using the existing format over a new proprietary format would be a marketing and image nightmare - You'd have the media everywhere saying "MS adopts failed format".

There's nothing you can really say about a new format with no history.

And some people like using consoles to play movies, it's been that way for ages. The Wii even gets stick for not playing back DVDs, yet people probably have 100 DVD players in their houses.

When the next consoles come, the HD market will be much larger, it makes perfectly fine sense for MS to use Blu Ray for gaming and movies.

The only people who'll be spazzing up against that are those that somehow get butthurt because Blu Ray is heavily imaged against Sony.

I doubt Microsoft will ever use Blu-ray anyway so they might as well do a step up from DVD, a format which offers the same capacity and features of Blu-ray and STILL plays DVDs. They are probably going to do HD-DVD gaming format and just rename it so it looks like a proprietary format. Would be quite an effective solution really.

And yes, argue that all that but I really doubt Microsoft will go Blu-ray on the "next round".

And some of us use our consoles as both.

I find it amusing that the console that markets itself as a gaming console is the best media center, and the console that markets itself as both is also mediocre at both.

Hope you are talking about the PS3?

I doubt Microsoft will ever use Blu-ray anyway so they might as well do a step up from DVD, a format which offers the same capacity and features of Blu-ray and STILL plays DVDs. They are probably going to do HD-DVD gaming format and just rename it so it looks like a proprietary format. Would be quite an effective solution really.

And yes, argue that all that but I really doubt Microsoft will go Blu-ray on the "next round".

Fair enough if that's your view.

However I can see MS wanting to grab as many consumers attention as possible, and adhere to industry standards of movie playback and games. Consoles aren't just the game playing devices they were in the 90s, they've evolved into all in one entertainment solutions which has broadened their appeal. MS aren't fanboys, they are a business - They'll adopt and make decisions around industry standards, not what segregates them most from competition just to say "we're different".

They ain't going DVD next round, so good luck if they go proprietary, something which nearly every company gets stick for.

Ah yes, the "NO U" argument.

Somebody living in a dream world :rofl:

Fair enough if that's your view.

However I can see MS wanting to grab as many consumers attention as possible, and adhere to industry standards of movie playback and games. MS aren't fanboys, they are a business - They'll adopt and make decisions around industry standards, not what segregates them most from competition just to say "we're different".

They ain't going DVD next round, so good luck if they go proprietary, something which nearly every company gets stick for.

They are a business, exactly. Like using a dead format could have PR repercussions, so could jumping on the "competitors" format so quickly. I just want them to pick a format which adhere to gaming standards, I don't want mandatory, slow installs and long load times because they are trying to push their own agenda. WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

They are a business, exactly. Like using a dead format could have PR repercussions, so could jumping on the "competitors" format so quickly. I just want them to pick a format which adhere to gaming standards, I don't want mandatory, slow installs and long load times because they are trying to push their own agenda. WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

It's not a competitors format any more.

Blu Ray is an industry standard for HD movies, like DVD is for SD movies. PCs, Apple MACs, movie players, ect all are using it, it's not just the PS3 any more. The Playstation pretty much shot forward disc based gaming over cartridge, do you think that meant competitors wouldn't adopt it? Well Nintendo tried not to (stuck with cartridges) and failed for that.

It was only really a competitors format when it itself was essentially a proprietary format - Whilst the war was going on. Once the war ended it became a standard.

And you won't have mandatory installs and slow loading times - That is down to the read speed of the PS3 reader, do you really think 2x readers are going to be put in the next generation of consoles? The speeds of disc based readers always ramp up over time.

Even the PS3 has pretty much abolished mandatory installs nowadays anyway.

Edited by Audioboxer
They are a business, exactly. Like using a dead format could have PR repercussions, so could jumping on the "competitors" format so quickly. I just want them to pick a format which adhere to gaming standards, I don't want mandatory, slow installs and long load times because they are trying to push their own agenda. WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

Not all installs are mandatory. I only have 3 games thus far, but Dynasty Warriors 6 did not feature a mandatory install. It was quite optional.

WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

So basically when the disc drives get faster read speeds (and cheaper prices to match), which will have happen over time just like it always does with new optical disc formats.

It's not a competitors format any more.

Blu Ray is an industry standard for HD movies, like DVD is for SD movies. PCs, Apple MACs, movie players, ect all are using it, it's not just the PS3 any more.

It was only really a competitors format when it itself was essentially a proprietary format - Whilst the war was going on. Once the war ended it became a standard.

And you won't have mandatory installs and slow loading times - That is down to the read speed of the PS3 reader, do you really think 2x readers are going to be put in the next generation of consoles? The speeds of disc based readers always ramp up over time.

Even the PS3 has pretty much abolished mandatory installs nowadays anyway.

Still just left the womb of Sony and a product of the current generation console 'war', so it would still have some PR repercussions whether you like it or not.

I have no idea what next generation hardware has to offer, read speeds are still horrible plus the Blu-ray discs are bolstered to hell and back with dummy files - Doubt everything is just magically fixed in a year or two.

And the PS3 didn't do jack about mandatory installs, it's developers who had to adapt and cope with that huge boulder around their angles. I truly do hope the format will be so much more mature next generation.

Still just left the womb of Sony and a product of the current generation console 'war', so it would still have some PR repercussions whether you like it or not.

I have no idea what next generation hardware has to offer, read speeds are still horrible plus the Blu-ray discs are bolstered to hell and back with dummy files - Doubt everything is just magically fixed in a year or two.

And the PS3 didn't do jack about mandatory installs, it's developers who had to adapt and cope with that huge boulder around their angles. I truly do hope the format will be so much more mature next generation.

When the next consoles hit it will be about 4-5 years after the release of the PS3.

No one will care, only those as I said butthurt over formats - That goes for any media that in say 2011/2012 would even care to report the 360 using Blu Ray. By then Blu Ray will be as I said in many many places covering PCs, to Macs, to players under your TV.

No one seems to care about people using a Blu Ray drive with Microsofts Windows operating system... because even the thought of caring about that doesn't cross most peoples minds.

It is an industry standard. People are either ignoring that fact, or they are really that offended by seeing their next Xbox include Blu Ray. Which as I said, is completely sad. It's just a piece of technology/hardware there for anyone to use, it's not a Sony proprietary format any more.

The developers work on the PS3 with the development kits they're given, if the end results are no install, it's no install.

And as we've said, readers get faster, we're talking players that will be generations older than what we have now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Good think I still have SDRAM and FP RAM sitting around.
    • Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker with Google apps is now at its lowest price with 47% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker at its all-time low price with a 47% discount. The device features an AMOLED touchscreen display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 that should offer improved scratch resistance and durability. The Charge 6 is equipped with a range of sensors including an optical heart rate sensor, a 3-axis accelerometer, built-in GPS with GLONASS support, red and infrared sensors for SpO2 monitoring, a skin temperature sensor, an ambient light sensor, a vibration motor, NFC, and multipurpose electrical sensors compatible with the ECG and EDA Scan apps. Heart rate is recorded every second during exercise tracking and every five seconds during normal daily use. The device requires the Google Health app for setup and synchronisation. Furthermore, Bluetooth provides wireless connectivity for syncing and communication with devices running Apple iOS 16.4 or later and Android 11.0 or later. The tracker stores up to 7 days of minute-by-minute activity data and retains daily activity totals for the previous 30 days. In terms of water resistance, the Fitbit Charge 6 has a 5 ATM rating that should make it suitable for swimming and water activities. The tracker operates in temperatures ranging from 14°F to 113°F and at altitudes of up to 28,000 feet. Moreover, the included Infinity band is made from a flexible silicone material and features a loop-and-peg fastening. The small band fits wrists measuring 5.1 to 6.7 inches, while the large band fits wrists measuring 6.7 to 8.3 inches. Both small and large bands are included in the box. When it comes to battery performance, the Fitbit Charge 6 should deliver up to 7 days of battery life under typical usage conditions. Features such as the Always-On Display, built-in GPS, and SpO2 monitoring increase power consumption and may require more frequent charging. The rechargeable lithium-polymer battery should take approximately two hours to charge from empty to full. Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker with Google Apps: $85.45 (Amazon US) - 47% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!