Sony calls out Xbox and Wii as flea market peddlers


Recommended Posts

Greenberg also said they aren't "even thinking about next-gen" here

If you believe that, then wow :rofl: You're in the wrong hobbie. Me thinks people need to do some light reading on product design and cycle :yes: Same goes for PS3/Wii. Without a doubt, they are all at work on the next console and will have been for some time (Y)

I really don't care about a next-gen console at the moment. I'd be more happy with a refined version of the 360 (much like what Sony did with the slim PS2s). I'd like to see improvements to the existing model instead of an all new one.

I checked again and people who pay $4 are semi-semi-fools. Try stealing one.

And thats what I did :p

Although it is ironic really seeing as it was my brother's HDMI cable that came with his Elite 360 :p

I really don't care about a next-gen console at the moment. I'd be more happy with a refined version of the 360 (much like what Sony did with the slim PS2s). I'd like to see improvements to the existing model instead of an all new one.

A slim 360 with the powerbrick packed inside (death to power bricks!) would be awesome, and sure to boost 360 sales as opposed to moving to a new generation next year which will probably somewhat choke sales.

I'd definitely buy a new slim 360.

If they included a slot loading drive also, it would be amazing.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/24/xbox-36...-vision-mind-c/ - FTW!

Oh god, not slot loading - bunch of BS that is, there's a reason why most devices use regular old drivers.

It's okay, you can just stick with your normal 360.

I want my slim to have slot loading ;)

Then it will be sexy (Y)

I was gonna update my Halo 360 to a new Jasper, but with all this talk about slims, I think I'll wait till E3 to see if anything stirs!

Then you are ( Thankfully ) gonna have to wait until hell freezes over ;)

You never know! :sorcerer:

The Wii slot loading works fine for DVD.

But you probably are right. I just want a slim though with included powerbrick, slot loading would be nice, but it's unlikely due to the contractors MS have on board for their DVD drives.

Why are these dumb price comparison charts still being throw about? We all know the PS3 is the cheaper option should you want to buy a 360 with every available add-on.

But that's the point, they are add-ons and are therefore optional - no one really needs Wi-Fi connectivity, but it sure is a nice luxury to have.

By offering add-ons, Microsoft has the cheapest console on the market. In this current economic climate cheap sells, and their holiday sales prove this.

no one really needs Wi-Fi connectivity, but it sure is a nice luxury to have.

Actually no one really needs the hard drive - You can play 99% of 360 games without it.

People do need WiFi, it's the only addon in this chart people may need to play games/update their system, so it's hardly a luxury for those people.

I needed WiFi till I drilled holes in my room walls and ran cables through my loft/down through a new wall that was being erected downstairs.

If that new wall wasn't being put up, there was no way I could've gone wired due to the location of my room in the house (my whole room/PC was on wireless for years before this event). As it stands the cable has actually been embedded inside the wall itself - If it ever fails, im doomed :p

That's probably the reason Nintendo went WiFi only, as with WiFi everyone can connect, with ethernet only you've got those in rooms far away from their router.

Not causing an argument here, just pointing out if anything is needed for people, it's WiFi before any of the other addons.

There's a reason you've got topics like this :p - https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=721396

Edited by Audioboxer

The lack of WiFi connectivity on the 360 is actually what was putting me off getting it because i didn't want to play ?60 for the adapter. My router/cable modem is on another floor of my house in my bedroom while the 360 is in the living room and it's not feasible to use a 10-20m ethernet cable.

I don't understand why it's so expensive.

Why are these dumb price comparison charts still being throw about? We all know the PS3 is the cheaper option should you want to buy a 360 with every available add-on.

But that's the point, they are add-ons and are therefore optional - no one really needs Wi-Fi connectivity, but it sure is a nice luxury to have.

By offering add-ons, Microsoft has the cheapest console on the market. In this current economic climate cheap sells, and their holiday sales prove this.

Actually, in Europe (even with the add-ons) the 360 is cheaper. Hell, an Elite costs 299? and an 80GB PS3 goes for 399? around here, even with the WiFi adapter it's cheaper (and has a bigger hard drive).

Anyway, each console has it's own advantages, comparing prices isn't the best way to define value, it's really up to who's buying it to define it.

I'm just shocked some people don't have phone lines in their bed rooms, do mummy and daddy not trust you with phone bills? :p

I have a wireless handset in my room, no need for a phone line :p

My room is located in a loft conversion though, so realistically I'm lucky to even have power points in here, besides phone lines :laugh:

People with consoles in living rooms may also want to use wireless, as you're still talking about running and tidying a long ethernet cable from your TV setup to the room where your router is. When I briefly had my consoles downstairs in the living room (before I got my HDTV), I still had them on wireless.

I'm just shocked some people don't have phone lines in their bed rooms, do mummy and daddy not trust you with phone bills? :p

I'm the opposite, i don't have the cable modem/router or even a PC in my living room on the whole ground floor. I don't trust anyone else to even look at them :p

Wireless is not a "requirement" at all. We have been over this. The only requirement for online gaming some form of connection, and the most flexible of those connections is actually a wired one since a wire doesn't have a maximum effective range like a router does. By the time you buy a wireless router ($50-$80) and then an extender ($30-$50) you could have bought at least five 100ft ethernet cables and a switch/non-wireless router.

Wireless is not a "requirement" at all. We have been over this.
The only requirement for online gaming some form of connection

Contradiction much?

It is not viable for people to run 100m ethernet cables all over their houses in many instances Emn1ty, I don't understand how you can't realize that.

I was on wireless in my room for years like I said above before I had an opportunity to go wired.

The majority of houses will have wireless routers, all the big broadband providers in the UK tend to give you a free wireless router when you sign on (BT/AOL/Mobile Phone Providers/Sky), and have done for years.

The Nintendo Wii ONLY has a wireless connection, and it's in 40 odd million households and you don't see many topics from people saying "I need an ethernet port over wireless".

Contradiction much?

It is not viable for people to run 100m ethernet cables all over their houses in many instances Emn1ty, I don't understand how you can't realize that.

I was on wireless in my room for years like I said above before I had an opportunity to go wired.

The majority of houses will have wireless routers, all the big broadband providers in the UK tend to give you a free wireless router when you sign on (BT/AOL/Mobile Phone Providers/Sky), and have done for years.

The Nintendo Wii ONLY has a wireless connection, and it's in 40 odd million households and you don't see many topics from people saying "I need an ethernet port over wireless".

Not for "some" people, wich probably is many yes, runing wires isn't... well I'll go so far as saying practical, thought I wouldn't go to impossible.

However, why should hose of us who don't need or want wireless have to pay for it. isn't it better that those who DO need it have to pay for it ?

and of course the Wii users don't complain, Firstly they never play on it, secondly the few who do play on it, hardly ever play online. And the one thing they neer do is stream HD content.

It is not viable for people to run 100m ethernet cables all over their houses in many instances Emn1ty, I don't understand how you can't realize that.

The Nintendo Wii ONLY has a wireless connection, and it's in 40 odd million households and you don't see many topics from people saying "I need an ethernet port over wireless".

First, who the hell needs 100m ethernet :laugh: Where do guys live, a palace? You don't have phone connections in bedrooms, but enough house for 100m cables?!

and second, the Wii has ethernet too :) (via accessory albeit, but wireless isn't the only solution)

Hawkman hit the nail on the head:

However, why should hose of us who don't need or want wireless have to pay for it. isn't it better that those who DO need it have to pay for it ?

:yes:

Which is the exact same route Nintendo took, but the other way around..but then, the 360 is cheaper ;)

A slim 360 with the powerbrick packed inside (death to power bricks!) would be awesome, and sure to boost 360 sales as opposed to moving to a new generation next year which will probably somewhat choke sales.

I'd definitely buy a new slim 360.

If they included a slot loading drive also, it would be amazing.

http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/24/xbox-36...-vision-mind-c/ - FTW!

*raises hand* I'd buy that :|

A slim 360 with a slot loader would be nazz-t!

First, who the hell needs 100m ethernet :laugh: Where do guys live, a palace? You don't have phone connections in bedrooms, but enough house for 100m cables?!

Okay "100m" :p I'm sure someone else said 100m and I just tagged along with it ;)

I use 20m I think it is right now. Or maybe it's 30m? Sure it's 20m. That's drilling into the walls of the house though, and luckily the room with the router is kinda directly below my bedroom.

Still the thing is, it's a pain in the ass to find a way to staple the cable all along the wall, through doors and into other rooms if you don't have a phone jack in the room your TV/console is in. You can't just drag a cable across your floor, out your door and around your house :p

Didn't know the Wii has an ethernet addon! It probably costs a bomb also.

I'm sure people at least have one phone line in their upstairs. You don't need to go to the livingroom or the furthest away phone point. Really, people are blowing this way over the top. Wireless isn't all its cracked up to be. Even if I had the choice with the 360 with built in wi-fi and I was in your position AB, I'd still use wires.

Wireless is bad enough for gaming (or any internet related tasks), but a weak signal is even worse.

ftr, a 100 meter tp cable wouldn't be category 5:p (well technically it woudl falljust within as the spec says 90 meters max, but with 5 meters of patch cabe at each end)

and yes, that's completely off topic :p

I'm sure people at least have one phone line in their upstairs. You don't need to go to the livingroom or the furthest away phone point. Really, people are blowing this way over the top. Wireless isn't all its cracked up to be. Even if I had the choice with the 360 with built in wi-fi and I was in your position AB, I'd still use wires.

Wireless is bad enough for gaming (or any internet related tasks), but a weak signal is even worse.

I played games online for years on wireless and it was no issue at all. Download speeds fine also.

Seriously, complaints about wireless gaming are completely blown out of proportion at times.

My signal would be from 65-80% across devices and PC.

I never intended this to be blown up, it's just as I was someone in a position previously who needed wireless, it's a bit daft seeing people say it's a luxury. Many people do need it to get connected, that's all.

Not every house is setup, or has an easy layout for running ethernet cable from under your TV.

but it's still not a necessity, a necessity would be if everyone needed it to play gams with the console or needed it to play online at the very least.

You still didn't reply saying wether you thought it wasn't a better idea that those that actually need it pay or it rather than everyone having to pay for something a minority will need and use.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!