Sony calls out Xbox and Wii as flea market peddlers


Recommended Posts

No, their situation is nothing like MS's
And you don't think that if MS includes better hardware and all bells and whistles in their Xbox 720 or whatever that it will cost more to produce than the 360 did at launch?

I find your lack of proper rebuttal quite weak, sir :p

And you don't think that if MS includes better hardware and all bells and whistles in their Xbox 720 or whatever that it will cost more to produce than the 360 did at launch?

I find your lack of proper rebuttal quite weak, sir :p

The difference is that while Sony relied on the PS2 to fund the PS3's expensive hardware, they still sold it for a very steep price. I think DM's idea was that MS can include a few extras next round while maintaining a reasonable price at launch.

The difference is that while Sony relied on the PS2 to fund the PS3's expensive hardware, they still sold it for a very steep price. I think DM's idea was that MS can include a few extras next round while maintaining a reasonable price at launch.

...and use technology that has been proven, not a format to push their own agenda and a chip that was the Achilles' heel for programmers.

The difference is that while Sony relied on the PS2 to fund the PS3's expensive hardware, they still sold it for a very steep price. I think DM's idea was that MS can include a few extras next round while maintaining a reasonable price at launch.
So what, if they're just re-launching the 360 with all peripherals attached, would people buy? No, of course not. A new console would mean better hardware. Better hardware would mean increased cost. And if they sold it at a too reasonable price, they would bleed all the 360's (still minute) profits in a heartbeat (provided people would actually buy the 720 so soon after the 360).
...and use technology that has been proven, not a format to push their own agenda and a chip that was the Achilles' heel for programmers.
See newer hardware point above.

If they didn't include a Blu-Ray player in their next release, they would be shooting themselves in the foot. Or perhaps they would be so stubborn that we'd eventually see 10 disc games? That'd be just lol.

So what, if they're just re-launching the 360 with all peripherals attached, would people buy? No, of course not. A new console would mean better hardware. Better hardware would mean increased cost. And if they sold it at a too reasonable price, they would bleed all the 360's (still minute) profits in a heartbeat (provided people would actually buy the 720 so soon after the 360).

Now that's just you making stuff up.

Better hardware doesn't mean increased cost, because "better" is relative to the old hardware, launched years ago. The point you missed is that the 360 could have launched with wifi and a few other extras built-in, but for around $500. With profits made from the 360, they can put those extras in at no cost to the end user, resulting in an attractively priced console. And just so I don't get misunderstood, I'm just saying they can, I'm in no way saying they'll do this, or are even considering it.

If they didn't include a Blu-Ray player in their next release, they would be shooting themselves in the foot. Or perhaps they would be so stubborn that we'd eventually see 10 disc games? That'd be just lol.

I'm more inclined to believe the next XBox will include an HD-DVD drive, it's a proved format and would provide for less piracy. Blu-ray could come as an external accessory or not at all, since they're pushing digital distribution.

I'm more inclined to believe the next XBox will include an HD-DVD drive, it's a proved format and would provide for less piracy. Blu-ray could come as an external accessory or not at all, since they're pushing digital distribution.

That would be absolute fail.

HD-DVD isn't made any more, and it would mean you couldn't watch any of your physical HD movies on the next 360. It's not a proved format, it's a dead format.

There would be no pluses what so ever to MS including an HD-DVD drive in the next xbox. If anything costs would be higher as HD-DVD discs (and readers) would need to be made just for the xbox 360, nothing else uses them. By then Blu Ray drives/discs will be incredibly cheap compared to when they launched.

It's ether going to be proprietary, or Blu Ray.

That would be absolute fail.

HD-DVD isn't made any more, and it would mean you couldn't watch any of your physical HD movies on the next 360. It's not a proved format, it's a dead format.

There would be no pluses what so ever to MS including an HD-DVD drive in the next xbox. If anything costs would be higher as HD-DVD discs (and readers) would need to be made just for the xbox 360, nothing else uses them. By then Blu Ray drives/discs will be incredibly cheap compared to when they launched.

It's ether going to be proprietary, or Blu Ray.

Unless MS start producing the drives themselves and puts the games on HD-DVD discs.

Why would they do that?

Again, it would ramp up manufacturing costs.

Some of you guys are going bananas about manufacturing costs through adding wireless, yet somehow reviving a dead format, then having to manufacture the readers and discs yourself is a good option?

Why would they do that?

Again, it would ramp up manufacturing costs.

Some of you guys are going bananas about manufacturing costs through adding wireless, yet somehow reviving a dead format, then having to manufacture the readers and discs yourself is a good option?

I wasn't suggesting they would, I just stated that it's an option if they decided to.

I wasn't suggesting they would, I just stated that it's an option if they decided to.

Fair enough, my bad, but they still ain't going to do it :p

It would be one of the biggest mistakes ever.

Unless there is a landfill of say 60-80 million HD-DVD players dumped somewhere ;)

Could work as a gaming format, just like Blu-ray. You say proprietary? Why not use an already existing format then. Just because it's a failed MOVIE format, doesn't mean it's a failed gaming format.

At least they won't try to shove a format down our throat to aid their own agenda ...

I do agree it probably won't happen but there are other sides to the coin than "zOMG HD MOVIEZZZ", some of us use our consoles as a gaming console, not a media center.

I'm more inclined to believe the next XBox will include an HD-DVD drive, it's a proved format and would provide for less piracy. Blu-ray could come as an external accessory or not at all, since they're pushing digital distribution.

The next Xbox won't use HD-DVD, it just won't happen. It would totally take away from the media centre aspect of the console if can't even play the current standard for HD movies. By that point plenty of people will probably own a Blu-Ray player and a couple of movies too. Sure a console is for gaming, but plenty of people watch movies on them too, otherwise they wouldn't be wasting their time with Netflix right?

The other choice I see is they could build a hybrid drive to read both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray discs, but why incur those manufacturing costs when there is already a defined standard? I expect the next Xbox will use Blu-Ray, and Microsoft will probably be singing it's praises too tbh.

Could work as a gaming format, just like Blu-ray. You say proprietary? Why not use an already existing format then. Just because it's a failed MOVIE format, doesn't mean it's a failed gaming format.

At least they won't try to shove a format down our throat to aid their own agenda ...

I do agree it probably won't happen but there are other sides to the coin than "zOMG HD MOVIEZZZ", some of us use our consoles as a gaming console, not a media center.

Using the existing format over a new proprietary format would be a marketing and image nightmare - You'd have the media everywhere saying "MS adopts failed format". You can't even comprehend how much bad PR MS would get for reviving HD-DVD just for the next xbox.

There's nothing you can really say about a new format with no history (if they went proprietary).

And some people like using consoles to play movies, it's been that way for ages. The Wii even gets stick for not playing back DVDs, yet people probably have 100 DVD players in their houses. Consoles are primarily under the TV, the place where you're going to watch DVDs/Blu Rays, ect.

When the next consoles come, the HD market will be much larger, it makes perfectly fine sense for MS to use Blu Ray for gaming and movies. Consumers get the ability to play their movie collections, and play games.

The only people who'll be spazzing up against that are those that somehow get butthurt because Blu Ray is heavily imaged with Sony. And quite frankly that's sad, Blu Ray is the format of HD movies, just accept that and not go crazy if MS adopt it. It's perfectly sensible for them to do so.

It would just be two companies sharing tech, like DVD was in the PS2/Xbox - Fanboy logic does not stand in this equation, it would merely be business decisions and deciding what's best for your consumer base which includes people playing games/people using media features/ect.

Edited by Audioboxer
Now that's just you making stuff up.

Better hardware doesn't mean increased cost, because "better" is relative to the old hardware, launched years ago. The point you missed is that the 360 could have launched with wifi and a few other extras built-in, but for around $500. With profits made from the 360, they can put those extras in at no cost to the end user, resulting in an attractively priced console. And just so I don't get misunderstood, I'm just saying they can, I'm in no way saying they'll do this, or are even considering it.

If they were making a console in 2010, they wouldn't use 2007 hardware just because it's probably cheap to make, would they? They would use 2010 hardware to really punch a hole in the PS3's graphics.

We can speculate about what they could do all day long that would still produce marginally better graphics for a reduced manufac cost, but I'm trying to be realistic in what a company would do if they're launching a console.

Also: Well yes, they could make an "Ultimate" version of the console later during this generation that will cost as much as a PS3 costs now.

Could work as a gaming format, just like Blu-ray. You say proprietary? Why not use an already existing format then. Just because it's a failed MOVIE format, doesn't mean it's a failed gaming format.

Do you seriously believe that a proprietary format like that would work for a console that partially markets itself as a media center?

At least they won't try to shove a format down our throat to aid their own agenda ...

Which won them the war. Seems like a smart move in my book. And besides, you speak as if having two formats gained you anything as a consumer.

I do agree it probably won't happen but there are other sides to the coin than "zOMG HD MOVIEZZZ", some of us use our consoles as a gaming console, not a media center.

And some of us use our consoles as both.

I find it amusing that the console that markets itself as a gaming console is the best media center, and the console that markets itself as both is also mediocre at both.

Using the existing format over a new proprietary format would be a marketing and image nightmare - You'd have the media everywhere saying "MS adopts failed format".

There's nothing you can really say about a new format with no history.

And some people like using consoles to play movies, it's been that way for ages. The Wii even gets stick for not playing back DVDs, yet people probably have 100 DVD players in their houses.

When the next consoles come, the HD market will be much larger, it makes perfectly fine sense for MS to use Blu Ray for gaming and movies.

The only people who'll be spazzing up against that are those that somehow get butthurt because Blu Ray is heavily imaged against Sony.

I doubt Microsoft will ever use Blu-ray anyway so they might as well do a step up from DVD, a format which offers the same capacity and features of Blu-ray and STILL plays DVDs. They are probably going to do HD-DVD gaming format and just rename it so it looks like a proprietary format. Would be quite an effective solution really.

And yes, argue that all that but I really doubt Microsoft will go Blu-ray on the "next round".

And some of us use our consoles as both.

I find it amusing that the console that markets itself as a gaming console is the best media center, and the console that markets itself as both is also mediocre at both.

Hope you are talking about the PS3?

I doubt Microsoft will ever use Blu-ray anyway so they might as well do a step up from DVD, a format which offers the same capacity and features of Blu-ray and STILL plays DVDs. They are probably going to do HD-DVD gaming format and just rename it so it looks like a proprietary format. Would be quite an effective solution really.

And yes, argue that all that but I really doubt Microsoft will go Blu-ray on the "next round".

Fair enough if that's your view.

However I can see MS wanting to grab as many consumers attention as possible, and adhere to industry standards of movie playback and games. Consoles aren't just the game playing devices they were in the 90s, they've evolved into all in one entertainment solutions which has broadened their appeal. MS aren't fanboys, they are a business - They'll adopt and make decisions around industry standards, not what segregates them most from competition just to say "we're different".

They ain't going DVD next round, so good luck if they go proprietary, something which nearly every company gets stick for.

Ah yes, the "NO U" argument.

Somebody living in a dream world :rofl:

Fair enough if that's your view.

However I can see MS wanting to grab as many consumers attention as possible, and adhere to industry standards of movie playback and games. MS aren't fanboys, they are a business - They'll adopt and make decisions around industry standards, not what segregates them most from competition just to say "we're different".

They ain't going DVD next round, so good luck if they go proprietary, something which nearly every company gets stick for.

They are a business, exactly. Like using a dead format could have PR repercussions, so could jumping on the "competitors" format so quickly. I just want them to pick a format which adhere to gaming standards, I don't want mandatory, slow installs and long load times because they are trying to push their own agenda. WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

They are a business, exactly. Like using a dead format could have PR repercussions, so could jumping on the "competitors" format so quickly. I just want them to pick a format which adhere to gaming standards, I don't want mandatory, slow installs and long load times because they are trying to push their own agenda. WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

It's not a competitors format any more.

Blu Ray is an industry standard for HD movies, like DVD is for SD movies. PCs, Apple MACs, movie players, ect all are using it, it's not just the PS3 any more. The Playstation pretty much shot forward disc based gaming over cartridge, do you think that meant competitors wouldn't adopt it? Well Nintendo tried not to (stuck with cartridges) and failed for that.

It was only really a competitors format when it itself was essentially a proprietary format - Whilst the war was going on. Once the war ended it became a standard.

And you won't have mandatory installs and slow loading times - That is down to the read speed of the PS3 reader, do you really think 2x readers are going to be put in the next generation of consoles? The speeds of disc based readers always ramp up over time.

Even the PS3 has pretty much abolished mandatory installs nowadays anyway.

Edited by Audioboxer
They are a business, exactly. Like using a dead format could have PR repercussions, so could jumping on the "competitors" format so quickly. I just want them to pick a format which adhere to gaming standards, I don't want mandatory, slow installs and long load times because they are trying to push their own agenda. WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

Not all installs are mandatory. I only have 3 games thus far, but Dynasty Warriors 6 did not feature a mandatory install. It was quite optional.

WHEN Blu-ray is mature enough as a gaming format, then we can talk.

So basically when the disc drives get faster read speeds (and cheaper prices to match), which will have happen over time just like it always does with new optical disc formats.

It's not a competitors format any more.

Blu Ray is an industry standard for HD movies, like DVD is for SD movies. PCs, Apple MACs, movie players, ect all are using it, it's not just the PS3 any more.

It was only really a competitors format when it itself was essentially a proprietary format - Whilst the war was going on. Once the war ended it became a standard.

And you won't have mandatory installs and slow loading times - That is down to the read speed of the PS3 reader, do you really think 2x readers are going to be put in the next generation of consoles? The speeds of disc based readers always ramp up over time.

Even the PS3 has pretty much abolished mandatory installs nowadays anyway.

Still just left the womb of Sony and a product of the current generation console 'war', so it would still have some PR repercussions whether you like it or not.

I have no idea what next generation hardware has to offer, read speeds are still horrible plus the Blu-ray discs are bolstered to hell and back with dummy files - Doubt everything is just magically fixed in a year or two.

And the PS3 didn't do jack about mandatory installs, it's developers who had to adapt and cope with that huge boulder around their angles. I truly do hope the format will be so much more mature next generation.

Still just left the womb of Sony and a product of the current generation console 'war', so it would still have some PR repercussions whether you like it or not.

I have no idea what next generation hardware has to offer, read speeds are still horrible plus the Blu-ray discs are bolstered to hell and back with dummy files - Doubt everything is just magically fixed in a year or two.

And the PS3 didn't do jack about mandatory installs, it's developers who had to adapt and cope with that huge boulder around their angles. I truly do hope the format will be so much more mature next generation.

When the next consoles hit it will be about 4-5 years after the release of the PS3.

No one will care, only those as I said butthurt over formats - That goes for any media that in say 2011/2012 would even care to report the 360 using Blu Ray. By then Blu Ray will be as I said in many many places covering PCs, to Macs, to players under your TV.

No one seems to care about people using a Blu Ray drive with Microsofts Windows operating system... because even the thought of caring about that doesn't cross most peoples minds.

It is an industry standard. People are either ignoring that fact, or they are really that offended by seeing their next Xbox include Blu Ray. Which as I said, is completely sad. It's just a piece of technology/hardware there for anyone to use, it's not a Sony proprietary format any more.

The developers work on the PS3 with the development kits they're given, if the end results are no install, it's no install.

And as we've said, readers get faster, we're talking players that will be generations older than what we have now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you have entire racks of servers and that minor module cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a 10g switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports and should be a fully managed switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. if your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      533
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!