Windows 7 experience


Windows 7 experience  

1826 members have voted

  1. 1. How was installation?

    • 7 - Awsome, very fast, no problems!
      1163
    • 6
      394
    • 5
      171
    • 4
      54
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Couldn't be worse. Got nasty errors, couldn't install.
      17
  2. 2. How is compatability

    • 7 - Everything compatible (programs and hardware)
      750
    • 6
      611
    • 5
      319
    • 4
      99
    • 3
      27
    • 2
      7
    • 1 - Nothing at all, not even crucial things(processor, etc)
      13
  3. 3. The features

    • 7 - It has everything
      713
    • 6
      626
    • 5
      354
    • 4
      85
    • 3
      20
    • 2
      11
    • 1 - It has nothing, windows 1 was better.
      17


Recommended Posts

I don't know what the issue is. Don't really want to reinstall until RTM. Autocad 2009 won't install because it says i'm not on a supported operating system, and compatibility wizard won't convince it otherwise.
32bit on 64bit, i've heard issues about that, but i'd think since x64 supports 32bit software it would work.

Google is your friend :) I did a quick search and found this:

http://discussion.autodesk.com/forums/mess...ssageID=5933536

To summarize: the installers for 32-bit versions of Autocad will not

allow installation onto a 64-bit version of Windows (not just Win 7,

but also Vista and XP64). This appears to be a limitation imposed by

the creators of Autocad, not a Windows limitation.

Ive got RTM installed on my laptop: a (nearly 2) year old Toshiba Sat Pro. I was quite happily typing away on it last night when I noticed that the battery life is much better managed. While I used to have stupid life with xp (say maybe 30-40min) on battery; under Windows 7 it shot up to 1hr 46min!

Very stable, very clean, very nice. Everything is where i want it to be; minimal issues with driver installation that were solved quickly (ie: detecting wireless card) I'm extremely happy with this and am debating installing a clean copy on my desktop which is still sporting Vista Ultimate.

I'm curious to compare it to Snow Leopard on my MacBook Pro - but we'll see...dont think you can really compare the two!

I'm running 7 64bit from MSDN, and I have to say.. its great so far.

I was worried about it not working well with my Xbox 360 as I like to stream videos alot, but it works fine and I've even started using Media Centre, its that good!

A small problem for me was my printer, I had an old HP 3200 series, at least I think it was a 3200. No drivers available for it for some reason, after a day of searching the net I decided to just buy a new HP printer (D1560) and it worked fine and was setup in less than a minute. Perfect for my black and white docs.

Overall I'm very impressed, all I'm looking for now is addons for the media centre, online radio etc....

I am a gamer and haven't had any issues with drivers or my games, result!

Hello, been a long time since I was around, I have to say I installed Win7 build 7100 and I have to say driver support is exceptional at least for me, I only had to D/L the creative X/fi driver. Runs fast, no complaints, Xeon 3210 o/c to 3.6 ghz from 2.13 ghz with minor voltage change.

I like it better than Vista which I normally use, cleaner, smoother, no problems...yet.

My System Specs

CPU: X3210 @3.6ghz

CPU Cooling: Arctic Freezer Pro

Mainboard: ASUS P5K PREMIUM Black Pearl/WIFI-AP

Mem: 4 X 1gb GSkill F2-6400CL5-1GBNQ

HDD: 2 X36GB Raptor Raid0

2nd HDD: Wd 80Gb Sat /win7 64 bit

CD/DVD: Samsung SH-223F DVD Burner

Video: EVGA8800 GTX 768mb/384bit (G80)

Sound: Creative Fatality X-Fi Extreme

Misc: Logitech Z-5500 speaker statem

Case/PSU: LianLiPC7B Modded/PC Performance 850w SSI turbo

Monitor(s): 2 X Dell 1908fp 19" 4:3 monitors

Drivers: Windows WDDM 1.1

OS: Vista Ultimate64/Windows7-64

I don't know why but before I was having massive problems with BSODs. Right now I'm running x64 alongside XP x86 and having no problems.

CPU: AMD Athlon 64 x2 5000+ @ 3.28 GHz on Water

Water: Thermaltake Bigwater 735

Motherboard: Biostar TA780G M2+

Memory: 2x2GB Corsair @ 950 MHz

HD: 200 GB Seagate

Video Card: Onboard (4870 tomorrow)

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows XP Pro x86

In a posting bump attempt to lose the "One Post Wonder" moniker I must say the few days I have now had with Win7 has been a pleasure. Most of the "where the heck did they put that" stuff was absorbed by Vista experience. Win7 is just plain very nice, smooth, responsive. I'm lovin' it.

It is so good that when on my laptop where more limited space would require a fresh install instead of dual boot, I'm actually considering it. Must wait awhile longer to make sure some Win7 demon isn't lurking in the background to change my opinion.

Im on a retail ultimate copy I got from my technet account, and I can say Ive not had any problems with it at all, and this 5 year old laptop its on is acting like its brand new. Vista didnt even want to install. I am very pleased with this version of windows, and cant really wait for the next version if its as good as this turned out

On my Gateway P-7811FX notebook I've had a couple driver issues. Sound (Conxant) has no mic and the sound drivers don't install as completely as Vista. I'm sure this will work out eventually or I will find some work around. Just sayin'. The other mystery is I have an uninstalled "Mass Storage Device" in Device Manager. But all my storage devices work, USB, SD, etc. ???

All said Win7 is impressively working "out of the box" so to speak on the two machines I've tried so far.

My old 5 year old Compaq computer running Vista for some reason can't upgrade to Windows 7 because of it's SATA drives. However, on my main PC it's running brilliantly. The first day was a little rocky because super fetch as kicking in and everything however now on the second day it's running very fast and smooth.

Really very happy with Windows 7 so far. Using Ultimate x64 through MSDN - I could use Enterprise from work but for once decided Windows was worth paying the pre-order price of ?50 and will be getting / installing Home Premium when it comes out in October.

It's quick, pretty, everything works.. well, except HomeGroup which me and my friend were trying to make play nice a few weeks back. Basic LAN with three hosts on - we were both using the RTM of Windows 7 Ultimate and I'll be damned if we could make it work. It gave me a password to share with the other computer which I dutifully did then tried to share volumes and files and it just would not work for toffee.. very strange.

Will revisit it again when I need to share files.

I've just installed the RTM build and find it incredibly solid. The first few days were a bit slow but SuperFetch has sorted all that out and now its so smooth and quick. Installed all my usual programs - iTunes x64, CCleaner, Office 2010 Tech Preview, Live Messenger, Norton Internet Security 2010 Beta and not ONE problem.

Well done Microsoft - Windows 7 is a real winner!

With Windows 7 is WMP12 . It has no advance tag editor, big disappointed :(

I don't know why WMP and IE really get bad day by day. But W7 is a big winner :)

Look like M$ makes nice step

On my Gateway P-7811FX notebook I've had a couple driver issues. Sound (Conxant) has no mic and the sound drivers don't install as completely as Vista. I'm sure this will work out eventually or I will find some work around. Just sayin'. The other mystery is I have an uninstalled "Mass Storage Device" in Device Manager. But all my storage devices work, USB, SD, etc. ???

All said Win7 is impressively working "out of the box" so to speak on the two machines I've tried so far.

I'm using Gateway Computer Md7818u . You can go to its website to download drivers. But It works good with me :) Everything is fine .

Everything is great, but I'm having problems with the sound. I have the latest drivers from my onboard soundcard Realtek ALC1200 (MB ASUS M3A78-EM), but the sound is skipping while playing audio and video, with any application (WMP, Winamp, KMPlayer). Realtek says the drivers are fully compatible with Windows 7... It's more frequent when browsing or performing any other tasks.

I tried using default Windows drivers, and it seems that there are no major problems, but it doesn't support my quadraphonic speakers (back speareks are muted).

pleasant. from install to daily use....just as smooth as can be, much better than my Vista x64 experience (though that was good too; I'd never understand what the negative buzz was all about, at least not even after SP1).

looking to get some new tv tuner and better video card soon.

i'm a little upset with the VT processor requirement - which means some extra bucks for intel - but i'm looking forward to my move to, and first real experience with, AMD :)

Yesterday I was able to download the Windows 7 Enterprise Trial edition from Microsoft. Currently I'm hesitating to install it on my old Gateway laptop. I'm not sure how it'll perform on the machine. The specs on it are Core Solo [email protected], 1GB of RAM, Intel G950 graphics, and a Seagate 7200.3 320GB hard drive. Do you guys think it'll run well? For a three year old laptop, this thing is still in many ways faster than a netbook and from what I read, Windows 7 regardless of the edition can run fine on a laptop, albeit for basic tasks like web surfing, IM, and watching simple videos on Youtube. What do you guys think? Will Windows 7 run fine for the tasks that I have in mind to justify the time to install the OS?

What about drivers? Should I start searching the web for Windows 7 compliant drivers or the OS will automatically detect an internet connection and install the applicable drivers?

when i had my old ati card it was all so nice. everything worked and all was well in the world.

but since i "upgraded" to a better nvidia card, it's all gone to pot. i get terrible stuttering in game now. i've re-installed more times than i care to remember (so no trace of my old card) with all sorts of different driver versions and nothing works. even a bare naked install of windows, updates, chipset drivers and latest directx with no other software at all installed still gives me the same ****. using the same driver packages in vista works perfectly. so who to blame? nvidia or microsoft? it doesn't matter either way. the simple fact is, i can't run windows 7. :(

when i had my old ati card it was all so nice. everything worked and all was well in the world.

but since i "upgraded" to a better nvidia card, it's all gone to pot. i get terrible stuttering in game now. i've re-installed more times than i care to remember (so no trace of my old card) with all sorts of different driver versions and nothing works. even a bare naked install of windows, updates, chipset drivers and latest directx with no other software at all installed still gives me the same ****. using the same driver packages in vista works perfectly. so who to blame? nvidia or microsoft? it doesn't matter either way. the simple fact is, i can't run windows 7. :(

Which nvidia card r u running?

I have a GeFore 9600GTS running without any problems on Win7 Pro x64

I have a GeFore 9600GTS running without any problems on Win7 Pro x64

oh i know most people don't have any problems. it's just me. :laugh:

i have an 8800gts 512mb FWIW. since my post, i've tried windows 7 x86 and that's running ok. i'm still a bit peeved i'm wasting some of my ram and not getting the 64bit goodness though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!