Apple responds to Microsoft ads: "a PC is no bargain"


Recommended Posts

The response from Apple doesn't surprise me. The company has always been acting like a spoiled little child, screaming insults and jokes calling it funny but when reality hits, they go on whining rampage trying to deny something that's obvious without a second thought.

Funny.

Christ. Everybody needs to get off their high horse and just calm down for a second.

Look, I love my Mac. I also love my PC. Both machines are fantastic at what they do. That said, based on my experience working as a computer technician at my university, far fewer customers come in with Mac problems versus customers with PC problems. Now, this could be for any number of reasons: maybe there are fewer Mac users on campus, maybe they're taking their Macs elsewhere to get fixed, or maybe, just maybe, the Mac users are having fewer problems than their PC-using counterparts. I don't know, and I don't profess to know.

Assuming that a Mac has fewer problems than a PC, how much is that advantage worth? I don't think anybody can argue that a Mac at a certain spec is going to be the same price as a PC at the same (or similar) spec, but are customers willing to pay a few extra hundred dollars to deal with fewer problems over the life of the machine? I don't know, but I can say I've had far more customers with broken PCs saying that they're going to switch to Mac than customers with broken Macs saying they're going to switch to PC.

If you know what you're doing and don't have a particular attachment to OS X, you can definitely save some money by going with a PC. That said, if you love the Apple design aesthetic and the OS, or if you just aren't that comfortable with dealing with the problems that tend to arise more often on a PC versus a Mac, you should probably go ahead and get that Mac and just eat out a couple times less per month.

Personally, I buy Mac for my laptops and build my own PC desktops. Apple's laptops seem to have better battery life, weigh less, and are thinner than similarly spec'ed PC laptops. However, for a desktop, I enjoy playing games and can get the experience I want by building my own machine.

Finally, for people laughing at Apple for responding to Microsoft's ad, get a freakin' life. Companies attack one another and the targets issue retaliatory statements right back. It's just a part of business. If Microsoft didn't retaliate when Apple started their "I'm a Mac" ads, that's their own damn fault.

I think that what Windows users need to realize is that Mac users have a different view on computing.

For instance, I like an OS built on Unix. I don't want an OS with 400,000 lines of code so that some old legacy software runs fine (thus impacting on the OS's stability and performance). I also don't want to be under a constant tirade of threats, malware etc.

Nearly forgot, I also actually don't want a generic operating system designed to run as many devices in the world, as possible. I want an OS that is tuned to a specific range of computers that are tightly supported.

I don't care if I can run 1,000,000,023 'apps' with Windows. I only really want and need about 40 that do the job damn well.

Plus the golden quote for any fanboy is this: 'Your hardware is only as good as your OS allows it to be.'

Windows never ran my hardware well. I always felt that Windows was doing it's own thing - at times, just when I rather it did what I wanted it to do.

So this silly quibbling over PC / Mac specifications, hardware etc.. See my quote in bold.

For those Windows fanboys who argue that PC is more secure and more advanced than any other OS on the market: Security Now 192: Listener Feedback 64 - have a listen to the opinions of a real security expert - not what flows from the bowels of Microsoft.

Thats another laughable argument to say the least, and as with Macalicious your assessment would require that everyone has the same experiences with Windows that you do, and that everyone else thinks that Unix is superior in the same way that you do, which they obviously don't because there are a lot of people perfectly happy with how Vista functions with their hardware. I have a Q6600, 4GB of memory, and a 512mb ATI 4850, and I don't see any of the issues you claim (my rig is even overclocked). My games run fluidly and smoothly, with hardly any framerate spikes, I rarely if ever get any BSOD's or crashes, and I don't find any problems with the legacy compatibility built into Windows either.

For the record also, Malware is only an issue if you don't secure your computer properly, or are careless when using the Internet.

I think that what Windows users need to realize is that Mac users have a different view on computing.

For instance, I like an OS built on Unix. I don't want an OS with 400,000 lines of code so that some old legacy software runs fine (thus impacting on the OS's stability and performance). I also don't want to be under a constant tirade of threats, malware etc.

Nearly forgot, I also actually don't want a generic operating system designed to run as many devices in the world, as possible. I want an OS that is tuned to a specific range of computers that are tightly supported.

I don't care if I can run 1,000,000,023 'apps' with Windows. I only really want and need about 40 that do the job damn well.

Plus the golden quote for any fanboy is this: 'Your hardware is only as good as your OS allows it to be.'

Windows never ran my hardware well. I always felt that Windows was doing it's own thing - at times, just when I rather it did what I wanted it to do.

So this silly quibbling over PC / Mac specifications, hardware etc.. See my quote in bold.

For those Windows fanboys who argue that PC is more secure and more advanced than any other OS on the market: Security Now 192: Listener Feedback 64 - have a listen to the opinions of a real security expert - not what flows from the bowels of Microsoft.

Steve Gibson? Pfft. Don't you remember his scare mongering when XP launched? He is good but exaggerates a lot!

"I also actually don't want a generic operating system designed to run as many devices in the world" ????

News flash: OS X by your definition is a generic OS and only thing stopping it running on a generic computer is Apple's DRM and lack of drivers. Stop using it!

For those Windows fanboys who argue that PC is more secure and more advanced than any other OS on the market: Security Now 192: Listener Feedback 64 - have a listen to the opinions of a real security expert - not what flows from the bowels of Microsoft.

I have another security expert that says different and he is a Mac user to boot.

Why Safari? Why didn?t you go after IE or Safari?

It?s really simple. Safari on the Mac is easier to exploit. The things that Windows do to make it harder (for an exploit to work), Macs don?t do. Hacking into Macs is so much easier. You don?t have to jump through hoops and deal with all the anti-exploit mitigations you?d find in Windows.

It?s more about the operating system than the (target) program. Firefox on Mac is pretty easy too. The underlying OS doesn?t have anti-exploit stuff built into it.

With my Safari exploit, I put the code into a process and I know exactly where it?s going to be. There?s no randomization. I know when I jump there, the code is there and I can execute it there. On Windows, the code might show up but I don?t know where it is. Even if I get to the code, it?s not executable. Those are two hurdles that Macs don?t have.

It?s clear that all three browsers (Safari, IE and Firefox) have bugs. Code execution holes everywhere. But that?s only half the equation. The other half is exploiting it. There?s almost no hurdle to jump through on Mac OS X.

That is Charlie Miller, you know the guy that took the Mac down 2 years in a row first and in seconds.

Charlie Miller Interview on ZDNet

The fact is in the real world, OSX is far less secure than Windows when you look at the ease it takes to crack it open because it doesn't implement ASLR and other features properly.

Get ready for a whole new level of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks when Microsoft releases Windows XP this fall. That's the prediction of security expert Steve Gibson in reaction to Microsoft's improved TCP/IP implementation in Windows XP

Sorry, did somebody call Steve Gibson an expert on something?

Steve Gibson is nothing more than a scaremonger that uses people's security paranoia to sell his own services to people gullible enough to believe what he spouts.

The fact that anyone would quote him as an authoritative source on anything is just laughable

Even if Macs had a higher failure rate than Windows you'd still see more Windows machines due to huge difference in market share. Working in a PC repair shop and hardly seeing a Mac is not an indicator that Macs are superior. You can prove this with simple math.

Thats another laughable argument to say the least...

Anyway. Just because there is more Windows PC's than Unix / Linux / Mac Computers doesn't mean that Windows is in any way better. It's just a 'no brainer' for most customers who couldn't care less what they run on their computer - as long as it works.

Edited by warwagon
And as the report describes, the bargain basement HP hardware isn't very compelling, with a wimpy battery rated for 2.5 hours compared to the MacBook Pro's eight, an extra 1.2 pounds of weight in a thicker case, and a far lower quality display with much lower resolution, 1440x900 compared to the MacBook Pro's 1920x1440

Of course a bargain basement PC is going to have crap specs, thats what you get choosing the 'Bargain Basement' option and people who chose this option are the people who know **** all about computers, and couldn't tell a Celeron from a Core 2 Duo!

Geez, go back to school Apple!!

Edited by bbfc_uk
Oh, and I suppose a Mac is a bargin..?!

A MAC is certainly not a bargain. I don't have ~?1000 to shell out for a basic mac, but I did have ?400 for a Dell laptop with pretty much the same specs.

A MAC is certainly not a bargain. I don't have ~?1000 to shell out for a basic mac, but I did have ?400 for a Dell laptop with pretty much the same specs.

I wasn't responding to your post, the one above mine...I made that reply in response to the OP's post on the first page.

Anyway. Just because there is more Windows PC's than Unix / Linux / Mac Computers doesn't mean that Windows is in any way better. It's just a 'no brainer' for most customers who couldn't care less what they run on their computer - as long as it works.

More stereotyping , Why am i not surprised i guess all mac users are smug and arrogant douchebags it works both ways . Our decisions to use PC's are every bit as valid as yours . Stop trying to claim that everyone who uses a pc is somehow inferior its nonsense.

Edited by warwagon
Anyway. Just because there is more Windows PC's than Unix / Linux / Mac Computers doesn't mean that Windows is in any way better. It's just a 'no brainer' for most customers who couldn't care less what they run on their computer - as long as it works.

I didn't make that claim, but like I said, everyone who I know that uses Vista is very happy with it, and have encountered no issues. What is "better" is a relative term anyway, which depends on what a user wants from a Computer.

I also own a Mac Pro but I run Windows 7 on it! Apple is really a perfect choice for people that aren't very good with computers and do not want to know how it works. A Power user cannot really like a Mac...

I beg to differ (and I'm sure a lot of others here would too). Many "power users" absolutely love the Mac, with features like a true Unix shell, Applescript and Automator. The fact the a full development suite (Xcode) comes free with the Mac is a nice bonus as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!