Chkdsk bug in Windows 7 RTM Build 7600.16385/16399


Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if this is a bug. But CHKDSK does use a lot of ram. It has stablized to about ?10MB of ram from shown image.

I have 4GB of ram on a HP EliteBook 6930p on 16385

5bpulz.jpg

No antivirus running..

UPDATE: The chkdsk has finished. It closed properly and released all the ram immediately.

The verdict is still out whether this is a memory leak, or a by-design..

I've never really used chkdsk in vista..so I'm not sure..

I believe it's probably a bug, but definitely not a real show stopper.

Edited by JOHW
First, both of you post exact hardware specs. Lets see if we can find something in common.

Second, I dont believe this bug at all. I think it has to do with certain HW/SW configs. Note that the first guy (with screenshots) gets a BSOD and the second does not.

http://www.infobyte.org/newsimg/

(My opinion)

Also happens on my Laptop (screenshot attatched is laptop, previous was desktop, I don't think this is config related, I think it is just a bug. Spec anyway:

Desktop

  • Q6600 @ 2.9 GHZ (Water cooling, Overclocked)
  • 8GB Corsair XMS2 PC6400 DDRII - 800 MHZ
  • 512MB HiS ATI 4850HD, Catalyst 9.7
  • Realtek ALC890 onboard Audio (5.1 surround mode, R2.29)
  • nVidia nForce 650i SLi Chipset, nForce 16.25
  • Windows 7 X64 Edition obviously (Ultimate)
  • Boot drive: 250GB Western Digital WD2500JB IDE Hard Drive
  • Drive test was performed on: 750GB Samsung Spinpoint HD753LJ (SATAII, running on default SATA drivers, not nVidia drivers)
  • 570W PSU, never had problems with lack of PSU power before

Laptop

  • AMD QL-62 Dual Core CPU, 2GHZ, 1MB L2 Cache
  • 3GB DDRII 667 Memory
  • 250GB Sata Hard Disk, test was performed on a partition
  • ATI Chipset (can't remember revision)
  • ATI 3200 Mobile Graphics (256MB shared memory)

Both machines running MSE for AntiVirus

post-286512-1249355560_thumb.png

It's really strange for me to see people deny such bugs or flaws because they use or like certain apps or operative systems. No OS is perfect, why the need to defend something you didn't create?

Not sure how this is show stopping? Does everyone do chkdsk every hour of every day? Is there some sort of leet crazy hack I am not aware of?

Its show stopping because it can eat up your available memory and cause a BSOD very quickly, when something as simple as chkdsk causes such a severe memory leak.

Its just lucky for Microsoft that this has been discovered before general release, they could really do without the negative publicity

RTM code is RTM code. It's finished. Done. They will patch that through Windows Update. And that's that. Showstopper? Just because it's RTM, doesn't mean it doesn't have undiscovered bugs. Otherwise we wouldn't have service packs and hotfixes.

Edit. Sorry for jumping the gun too quickly. HOLY @#*(&(*#& @**(@&*(#@

Yeah. It's serious. :woot:

post-102022-1249357390_thumb.jpg

Edited by Pharos
Its show stopping because it can eat up your available memory and cause a BSOD very quickly, when something as simple as chkdsk causes such a severe memory leak.

Its just lucky for Microsoft that this has been discovered before general release, they could really do without the negative publicity

Hmm, fair enough I would have thought "Critical Show Stopper" as being something that any person would do day to day such as Rename a file, or copy a file, or something that would make the system unusable for a standard every day thing.

Confirmed. And yes this should be considered a showstopper. chkdsk killing a machine is not cool as there are real world uses for that tool.

Precisely. Whilst this is not so likely to be a problem for home users, enterprise users could have some serious problems from this

Confirmed. And yes this should be considered a showstopper. chkdsk killing a machine is not cool as there are real world uses for that tool.

I definantly 2nd that Chris123NT. Also, if "chkdsk" can crash a computer by BSODing it during a fix that "chkdsk" might be performing it can perminantly delete or render data unusable on the drive it is running on. This is 100% a Critical Show Stopper bug that IMO needs to have the RTM recalled and recompiled before the TechNet/MSDN copies go live and at least a Hotfix for the OEMs to impliment in System Recovery.

Confirmed. And yes this should be considered a showstopper. chkdsk killing a machine is not cool as there are real world uses for that tool.

Okay, Okay, well, everyone should stop complaining here, and send it to Microsoft - they won't listen unless alot of people submit it...

Yep, good catch. MS will now have to recall all the disks they sent out and remotely wipe RTM downloads from everyone's machines. They will then have to re-open full Windows 7 development to fix the issue and go through another round of voting before signing off on yet another RTM build, pushing to release back to sometime in 2011.

Or they could just issue a patch :p

I definantly 2nd that Chris123NT. Also, if "chkdsk" can crash a computer by BSODing it during a fix that "chkdsk" might be performing it can perminantly delete or render data unusable on the drive it is running on. This is 100% a Critical Show Stopper bug that IMO needs to have the RTM recalled and recompiled before the TechNet/MSDN copies go live and at least a Hotfix for the OEMs to impliment in System Recovery.

They will just release a hotfix, they are won't recall code once it has been RTMed

I see ATI and WD as common factors.

Again please post your entire system specs including brands and models.

Try again before jumping to conclusions. The drive that I performed the scan on was a Samsung Spinpoint, not a WD. The WD is my boot drive, and I don't have any WD drives in my Laptop.

Yep, good catch. MS will now have to recall all the disks they sent out and remotely wipe RTM downloads from everyone's machines. They will then have to re-open full Windows 7 development to fix the issue and go through another round of voting before signing off on yet another RTM build, pushing to release back to sometime in 2011.

Or they could just issue a patch :p

I know ur joking about this but no need to be a wise a$$. :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
    • Artist's renderings are so much nicer to view than the real thing, don't you think?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!