Recommended Posts

The article lists plausible reasons though. And Microsoft hasn't officially announced they are going to do the RTM release today. All we know is they planned to release it to technet/MSDN today. But that announcement is several weeks old?

Are you just slow??? Seriously, it's like you haven't been keeping up? Win 7 has already RTM a couple weeks ago. OEMs are already testing it on their systems.

Guess this means Server 08 R2 should go up today as well. Look forward to testing how RDP goes between it and W7 machine. The changes in theory sound good.

Server 2008 R2 is apparently going RTW a "couple of weeks" after Win 7 RTW. So afraid you probably won't be seeing that today

This isn't a public release download like Beta 1 - crash; RC1 - semi-crash "I found this download link 6 hours early so neowin users that were up-to-date and didn't wait got their downloads easy and fast"

This is technet/msdn users only.

but I agree we'll see.

Are you just slow??? Seriously, it's like you haven't been keeping up? Win 7 has already RTM a couple weeks ago. OEMs are already testing it on their systems.

That's different than releasing it to Technet/MSDN customers though. If you know there is a serious flaw in the code, why unleash it on professionals who are going to do more than test installs against hardware?

I hope it happens today for those excited by the release. But I am not sure I would want to risk using it on any of my systems until they have patched the flaw.

I hope it happens today for those excited by the release. But I am not sure I would want to risk using it on any of my systems until they have patched the flaw.

Yes because God help you if your system eats up a lot of memory while you're doing a check disk on non-system drive before a patch can be released. You're right, it's not worth the risk.

That's different than releasing it to Technet/MSDN customers though. If you know there is a serious flaw in the code, why unleash it on professionals who are going to do more than test installs against hardware?

I hope it happens today for those excited by the release. But I am not sure I would want to risk using it on any of my systems until they have patched the flaw.

First - do you even know what chkdsk does? Second - if yes, do you use it? Third - if yes, are you using it during peak hours or during downtime?

FYI: MS is aware of this and they deemed it as by design and if anything they are leaving it up to a 0-day Windows Update. If you are really following that blog, then read the original and what Sinofsky wrote. The point is, it's not a serious flaw and it's release is not going to be stalled.

Risk? Really, like if you answered no to any of the questions above you are going to now go chkdsk/r by mistake or just for the heck of it? You can keep waiting then, cause the patch won't come until Oct 22nd.

Big risk, because I may accidently run chkdsk /r on a non system volume.

As big a risk as accidentally running format c: on my disk.

That's different than releasing it to Technet/MSDN customers though. If you know there is a serious flaw in the code, why unleash it on professionals who are going to do more than test installs against hardware?

I hope it happens today for those excited by the release. But I am not sure I would want to risk using it on any of my systems until they have patched the flaw.

Let's not blow this ridiculous bug out of proportion here! Good lord. You're making it sound like anyone who installs this is going to have imminent data loss and hard drive corruption. It's a bug that 99.9% of people will NEVER SEE. This is why it escaped detection in the beta cycles to begin with. Since we are aware of the bug, we can all simply "not do that" and be fine. Really, the overreaction to this is mind boggling.

Let's not blow this ridiculous bug out of proportion here! Good lord. You're making it sound like anyone who installs this is going to have imminent data loss and hard drive corruption. It's a bug that 99.9% of people will NEVER SEE. This is why it escaped detection in the beta cycles to begin with. Since we are aware of the bug, we can all simply "not do that" and be fine. Really, the overreaction to this is mind boggling.

+1

Like I implied before, it's not something that just happens or that you could easily do on accident.

You know a good way to check your disk of errors is to format it. You can't have any errors if their's no data. Format! you know you want to. Just do it, you don't need to chkdsk, everything is great. Your drive doesn't have any issues it's just tired of running XP and WANTS YOU TO FORMAT IT!!!

Like a memory leak to BSOD is anything new. If you are scared of a little memory leak and BSOD then you shouldn't be using Windows and should be on technet or msdn.

Bit early for christmas don't you think?

Christmas? What's that? This is Windowsmas. Everyone knows that this isn't actually the day Windows was born but as long as we keep the true spirit in our hearts I think Balmer will approve.

Yes because God help you if your system eats up a lot of memory while you're doing a check disk on non-system drive before a patch can be released. You're right, it's not worth the risk.

lolz...

I'm wondering, is this just a kind of "MS haters" thing? People desperately wanting this product to fail?

This bug does not appear consistently. It does not damage a system. A user has to go out of his way to create the conditions where this bug MIGHT appear, and the bug occurs in a diagnostic tool (as opposed, say, to a frequently-used end user app), under a certain specific condition.

How is this a "showstopper", exactly?

Christmas? What's that? This is Windowsmas. Everyone knows that this isn't actually the day Windows was born but as long as we keep the true spirit in our hearts I think Balmer will approve.

What is this - a Seinfeld episode? Windowsmas for the rest of us? Hahaa

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google are hyprocrites for signing this. They have been pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft, only they do it on Android and ChromeOS.
    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!