UEFA Champions League Season 2009/2010


UEFA CL 2009/2010  

119 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will win UEFA CL 2009/2010?

    • Barcelona
      20
    • Manchester United
      32
    • Chelsea
      8
    • Real Madrid
      15
    • Liverpool
      5
    • Arsenal
      9
    • Inter Milan
      11
    • Milan AC
      5
    • Bayer Munich
      10
    • Bordeaux
      2
    • Other
      2
  2. 2. Who will be top scorer?

    • Messi
      20
    • Rooney
      27
    • Drogba
      10
    • Ronaldo
      17
    • Torres
      11
    • Walcott
      3
    • Eto'o
      7
    • Huntelaar
      2
    • Ribery
      7
    • Gourcuff
      1
    • Other
      14


Recommended Posts

^ Not quite, if Rooney wasn't at the club, then someone else would be playing up front - Berba hasn't played a lot this season due to the usage of 4-5-1 with only Rooney as a striker so of course he'll score more :p

As for tonights game, we didn't play well at all and I have no clue why Fergie took Carrick / Park off, especially when bringing Berba on. Bayern were looking dangerous so losing Park (for no reason that I know of) wasn't the smartest move. Valencia will track back but only on the wing and we all know Berba doesn't so that basically gave Bayern the midfield.

Bayern did really well and deserved a win although i'm a big fan of MU.They weren't themself on defense.Flet and Nani played so bad on that match.Miracle at OT?Hope so :cry:

That ag could come in real handy.. but missing Shrek could turn out to be a real real problem.. I just hope he's back for the WC..

I wish we had RvP fit all season.. unsure.gif

The acid test for us tonight..

i know og is own goal.. but how can own goal get injured?

are you referring to michael owen? has he ever even scored an own goal???

weird..

It was a joke.

And to all United fans feeling a bit down in the dumps... Remember the last time we lost 2-1 in the opening leg of a Champions League quarter-final?

Late boost for us..

Cesc Fabregas and William Gallas have been named in the Arsenal team to face Barcelona.

The Arsenal captain was given a 40 per cent chance of playing after picking up a leg injury at Birmingham on Saturday. But he will start against his former club provided he feels no ill-effects during the warm-up.

Gallas has not played since the 1-0 win over Liverpool in February, missing eight games with a calf injury. He returns to partner Thomas Vermaelenat the heart of Arsenal's defence.

Abou Diaby, Samir Nasri and Andrey Arshavin have all shrugged off minor knocks to take their place in the side. Theo Walcott, Denilson, Sol Campbell and Tomas Rosicky all drop to the bench.

Meanwhile, Arsenal legend Thierry Henry has been named on the bench for Barcelona.

Arsenal team: Almunia, Sagna, Gallas, Vermaelen, Clichy, Song, Fabregas, Diaby, Nasri, Arshavin, Bendtner. Subs: Fabianski, Rosicky, Eduardo, Walcott, Denilson, Eboue, Campbell.

That's a pretty solid looking lineup.. just wish we had someone else in the goal.. also I'd start Eduardo in place of Bendtner but his height can cause problems for short (Puyol) and inexperienced Barca defence..

'Cmon you Gooners!!

so still want to diss almunia? he is keeping you in this...this tie should be over by now because Arsenal is absent and a joke so far

well that's arshavin finished for the night

Edited by Rappy
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Alphabet Raises $84.75 Billion To Feed Its AI Compute Hunger https://www.techtimes.com/articles/317953/20260607/alphabet-raises-8475-billion-feed-its-ai-compute-hunger-warren-buffetts-berkshire-buying.htm
    • Good point Anti-spoofing protection for cloud mailboxes Anti-spoofing technology in Microsoft 365 specifically examines forgery of the From header field (also known as the 5322.From address, From address, or P2 sender), because email clients show the From header value as the message sender. When Microsoft 365 has high confidence the From header is forged, the message is identified as spoofed. https://learn.microsoft.com/en...g-protection-spoofing-about
    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? The engine has all the tools a dev needs to optimize their game, Epic isn't gonna hold their hand to make sure they use them. Also, Epic isn't forcing anyone to use Lumen, Nanite or super high resolution meshes and textures. Just because Nanite can render meshes with millions of polygons doesn't mean you should use it like that, in fact, Epic recommends you avoid doing that. Most of the stuttering can easily be fixed by cutting down on unique materials by using master materials, using instanced meshes, generating a PSO cache, pre-compiling every shader before loading the game and also managing what must be loaded and unloaded at runtime. It's up to the developer to set all that up properly.
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!