Girl Gets Flu Shot - Now She Can Only Walk Backwards


Recommended Posts

WTF?!?!? It almost seems fake, but since it's on the news and such, I guess it must be real. Really makes you think twice about getting vaccinated with all these crazy side effects.

Oh, andI'd hit it.

Edited by Minifig
The story said flu shot, not "swine flu" shot. Correcting title.
WTF?!?!? It almost seems fake, but since it's on the news and such, I guess it must be real. Really makes you think twice about getting vaccinated with all these crazy side effects.

http://www.greensmilies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/big_ugly.gif

Edited by rm20010

But it's good for you, take it. Crap like this will only happen to a few people in a million, so your odds of not getting f*d up are pretty good. Oh, and if you do happen to end up like this chick you can be glad of the fact that you and people like you will not be able to sue the manufacturer, so you won't need to worry about lawyers taking all that tax payers money they got for mutilating you and you'll get to pay for your own health care for the rest of your miserable life. But hey, you avoided a bad case of the flu, so, er, profit?

WTF?!?!? It almost seems fake, but since it's on the news and such, I guess it must be real. Really makes you think twice about getting vaccinated with all these crazy side effects.

No. Something does not have to be real because it's on the news. In fact, the news very often gets things completely wrong. That she's suffering with it (psychogenic or otherwise) is true, the link to the vaccine or the implication that the vaccine causes it is a stretch. At most (and there is no evidence for it, not even in this case), the vaccine could have acted as a trigger for something she already had.

The swine flu vaccine does not have any "crazy side effects" listed. In fact, you can find far worse side effects on common drugs that you've probably taken more than once, you just never bother to read them.

Damn, that's awful. I knew there were side effects to pretty much every vaccine and drug but wow. I had no idea it could be this bad. I'm guessing some part of her brain or spine swelled up. Poor woman though.

You're more likely to get hurt by swine flu than getting a side effect (else they wouldn't use it) and also there's a chance this is some other completely unrelated issue that just coincidently happened following the shot - when you mass do things coincidences are bound to happen.

But hey, you avoided a bad case of the flu, so, er, profit?

The issue is that seasonal flu kills pretty much only the high-risk groups, and especially the old, whereas the swine flu also hits younger people outside of the risk groups at a much higher rate. That's the concern. It's killing people who still have their entire lives ahead of them.

And to repeat what has been said, this woman did not get the swine flu vaccine. She did not get the swine flu vaccine. It was not the swine flu vaccine that she got.. Not just that, but no medical evidence is presented here that shows a link between the non-swine flu vaccine she got, and her ailment. None. You are all letting your emotions take over.

The swine flu vaccine does not have any "crazy side effects" listed. In fact, you can find far worse side effects on common drugs that you've probably taken more than once, you just never bother to read them.

What none? None at all? How about this list of side effects for Pandemrix, approved just this month for H1N1

The frequency of possible side effects listed below is defined using the following convention:

Very common (affects more than 1 user in 10)

Common (affects 1 to 10 users in 100)

Uncommon (affects 1 to 10 users in 1,000)

Rare (affects 1 to 10 users in 10,000)

Very rare (affects less than 1 user in 10,000)

The side effects listed below have occurred with Pandemrix in clinical studies in adults, including the

elderly and in children aged from 3-9 years::

Very common:

• Headache

• Tiredness

• Pain, redness, swelling or a hard lump at the injection site

• Fever

• Aching muscles, joint pain

Common:

• Warmth, itching or bruising at the injection site

• Increased sweating, shivering, flu-like symptoms

• Swollen glands in the neck, armpit or groin

Uncommon:

• Tingling or numbness of the hands or feet

• Sleepiness

• Dizziness

• Diarrhoea, vomiting, stomach pain, feeling sick

• Itching, rash

• Generally feeling unwell

• Sleeplessness

In children aged 3-9 years fever occurred more often when the adult dose (0.5 ml of vaccine) was

given compared to administration of half the adult dose (0.25 ml of vaccine). Also fever occurred

more often in children aged 6-9 years compared to the children aged 3-5 years.

These side effects usually disappear within 1-2 days without treatment. If they persist, CONSULT

YOUR DOCTOR.

The side effects listed below have occurred in the days or weeks after vaccination with vaccines given

routinely every year to prevent flu. These side effects may occur with Pandemrix.

Uncommon

• Generalised skin reactions including urticaria (hives)

Rare

• Allergic reactions leading to a dangerous decrease of blood pressure, which, if untreated, may

lead to shock. Doctors are aware of this possibility and have emergency treatment available for

use in such cases.

• Fits

• Severe stabbing or throbbing pain along one or more nerves

• Low blood platelet count which can result in bleeding or bruising

Very rare

• Vasculitis (inflammation of the blood vessels which can cause skin rashes, joint pain and kidney

problems)

• Neurological disorders such as encephalomyelitis (inflammation of the central nervous system),

neuritis (inflammation of nerves) and a type of paralysis known a Guillain-Barr? Syndrome

Product Information - EMEA

Yeah, not crazy in the slightest. Need anyone be reminded that the vaccination program in 1976 killed more people that the flu did? Take it by all means but if you end up a dribbling idiot you have noone to blame but yourself.

Yeah, not crazy in the slightest.

Those are extremely mild side effects, almost to the point of ridiculousness. Headache? Tiredness? Redness? Have you seen the side effects for Aspirin? Everything from nausea to internal bleeding and seizures.

Take it by all means but if you end up a dribbling idiot you have noone to blame but yourself.

I have already taken it. Pandemrix in fact. You cannot get Dystonia from the swine flu vaccine. Stop your hysterical knee-jerk reaction.

Those are extremely mild side effects, almost to the point of ridiculousness. Headache? Tiredness? Redness? Have you seen the side effects for Aspirin? Everything from nausea to internal bleeding and seizures.

I have already taken it. Pandemrix in fact. You cannot get Dystonia from the swine flu vaccine. Stop your hysterical knee-jerk reaction.

Great for you, here's a clap. Clap. Now I'd say a 1 in 10000 chance of ending up a retard is pretty serious, and that is from Glaxo's own info, their data. Now can you show me that it is safer, i.e. I have a better chance of dying from swine flu than I do ending up in a wheel chair blowing into a straw, by all means provide me with those figures. You've got 1:10000 to beat, go.

Great for you, here's a clap. Clap. Now I'd say a 1 in 10000 chance of ending up a retard is pretty serious, and that is from Glaxo's own info, their data.

That is nonsense. Care to present your documentation that 1 in 10,000 end up severely handicapped? Hundreds of thousands have gotten it over here now, with no adverse reactions registered so far, and this is in a country with public health care and state liability for injuries caused.

I already have, so you've just shown your inability to read. Try again its only a page back.

You are lying. You know that is not what your quote says. It says that based on other flu vaccines, it's estimated that 1 in 10,000 have a more severe reactions (such as allergic reactions), not that they end up "drooling retards."

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!