Neowin Digital Gallery

[Dejon]

OMFG DEJON'S BACK!!! I was just wondering where you went like 2 weeks ago.

Welcome back :)

Thanks, been busy : )

[Elliot B.]

Ruby's ball.

The sky is smiling down on us.

Mood lighting.

[Bubbabyte]

OMFG DEJON'S BACK!!! I was just wondering where you went like 2 weeks ago.

Welcome back :)

Same here, i was actually looking at his site a few weeks ago wondering where he went.

Great pics Dejon, can you link me to your flickr, i googled it and found a flickr account of yours but hadn't been updated, so i'm assuming you have a different one?

Also, your website, TOP NOTCH, you'd be hard pressed to find a better photography site, nicely done.

[Inklin]

Here's another from Chester Zoo in the UK. Seems too perfect for 3.2MP

[Argote]

I've been digging up some of my older, unposted, pictures to make up for my lack of recent shots, enjoy:

[crazzy88ss]

Also, your website, TOP NOTCH, you'd be hard pressed to find a better photography site, nicely done.

I have to disagree. I HATE the navigation. It's so slow and difficult. I enjoy the photos, obviously, and I enjoy how big they are in the browser, which is different than a lot of flash-based sights.

[Argote]

I have to disagree.??I HATE the navigation.??It's so slow and difficult.??I enjoy the photos, obviously, and I enjoy how big they are in the browser, which is different than a lot of flash-based sights.

I'd like to weigh in on that, can anyone provide links?

[crazzy88ss]

http://www.dejon.ca/

[MasterC]

Here's another from Chester Zoo in the UK. Seems too perfect for 3.2MP

I hate to disagree with you, but it's blurry and it looks like there's some artifacting going on. :/

I have to disagree. I HATE the navigation. It's so slow and difficult. I enjoy the photos, obviously, and I enjoy how big they are in the browser, which is different than a lot of flash-based sights.

Agreed. Navigation like that is frustrating.

[Argote]

Here's another from Chester Zoo in the UK. Seems too perfect for 3.2MP

I have to say I also think it look blurry and grainy, but well, it's a cameraphone. One thing about digital photos is that the ammount of megapixels is somewhat important, but the quality of those megapixels is much much more important. For example, I took these with a 2.0 MP Point and Shoot camera:

http://www.flickr.co...ote/3627709803/

http://www.flickr.co...ote/3628521364/

http://www.flickr.co...ote/3628521458/

Notice how the fact that an actual Lens and AF system were used have positive impacts on the image quality even though the image is just 2MP.

(I posted links rather than photos in order to avoid confusion with the rest of the pictures on the gallery).