• Sign in to Neowin Faster!

    Create an account on Neowin to contribute and support the site.

Sign in to follow this  

Neowin Digital Gallery

Recommended Posts

Dejon    4

OMFG DEJON'S BACK!!! I was just wondering where you went like 2 weeks ago.

Welcome back :)

Thanks, been busy : )

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Elliot B.    1,592

4319593905_576c1478f6.jpg

Ruby's ball.

3216339287_b3b6374ec6.jpg

The sky is smiling down on us.

3217182110_04ded3dbe2.jpg

Mood lighting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bubbabyte    14

OMFG DEJON'S BACK!!! I was just wondering where you went like 2 weeks ago.

Welcome back :)

Same here, i was actually looking at his site a few weeks ago wondering where he went.

Great pics Dejon, can you link me to your flickr, i googled it and found a flickr account of yours but hadn't been updated, so i'm assuming you have a different one?

Also, your website, TOP NOTCH, you'd be hard pressed to find a better photography site, nicely done.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Inklin    28

Here's another from Chester Zoo in the UK. Seems too perfect for 3.2MP

DSC00223.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Argote    73

I've been digging up some of my older, unposted, pictures to make up for my lack of recent shots, enjoy:

4313708007_5fc57d43fe.jpg

4316669523_4813bf7f93.jpg

4319495035_08a03a7c21.jpg

4320509023_cfa0cc3856.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
crazzy88ss    65

Also, your website, TOP NOTCH, you'd be hard pressed to find a better photography site, nicely done.

I have to disagree. I HATE the navigation. It's so slow and difficult. I enjoy the photos, obviously, and I enjoy how big they are in the browser, which is different than a lot of flash-based sights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Argote    73

I have to disagree.??I HATE the navigation.??It's so slow and difficult.??I enjoy the photos, obviously, and I enjoy how big they are in the browser, which is different than a lot of flash-based sights.

I'd like to weigh in on that, can anyone provide links?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MasterC    10

Here's another from Chester Zoo in the UK. Seems too perfect for 3.2MP

DSC00223.jpg

I hate to disagree with you, but it's blurry and it looks like there's some artifacting going on. :/

I have to disagree. I HATE the navigation. It's so slow and difficult. I enjoy the photos, obviously, and I enjoy how big they are in the browser, which is different than a lot of flash-based sights.

Agreed. Navigation like that is frustrating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Argote    73

Here's another from Chester Zoo in the UK. Seems too perfect for 3.2MP

DSC00223.jpg

I have to say I also think it look blurry and grainy, but well, it's a cameraphone. One thing about digital photos is that the ammount of megapixels is somewhat important, but the quality of those megapixels is much much more important. For example, I took these with a 2.0 MP Point and Shoot camera:

http://www.flickr.co...ote/3627709803/

http://www.flickr.co...ote/3628521364/

http://www.flickr.co...ote/3628521458/

El Resplandor del Cielo

Notice how the fact that an actual Lens and AF system were used have positive impacts on the image quality even though the image is just 2MP.

(I posted links rather than photos in order to avoid confusion with the rest of the pictures on the gallery).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.