Recommended Posts

This is a big bummer that you guys could not get the new version working. Couldn't you guys create a mirror server and test out the upgrade on that while the forum is still 2.0 here? In that way you can get it working even if it takes weeks. No problem is permanent. Everything has a solution.

I think that they will be doing the switch eventually- though nice that it is back up.... once they can pinpoint just what the holdup was- I am guessing that the forums have so much data to go through that it would just take to long to convert it.

Great job though getting it back up even with the older theme.

Thank you to yourself and the other admin's that have worked hard over this period. I really enjoy using these forums and greatly appreciate all of the effort and hard work that you guys put it.

You guys deserve a big pat on the back!

QFT!

As I said in the other thread...I am glad that Neowin is back online. :yes: Hopefully IPS can help you guys work and fix the things that were causing the issues so we can get back IPB 3.0.

It's no hurry though. I like the Finity theme a bit better on IPB 2.x, rather than atlas on IPB 3. It seemed as there was just too much going on in IPB3.

As someone that was able to beta the new setup it was truly amazing and it does sadden me to see it will not be able to be setup sooner on the mainsite however I have faith in the Neowin dev team and I hope to see it up and running in the coming months. I am truly sorry that currently the work that was done was in waste.

I'm sure we'll see IPB 3 rolled out eventually.

Having used IPB 3 on my own site, I can say it's quite a substantial upgrade from 2.x, both on the outside and inside, and thus it doesn't surprise me at all there were some major server issues with it.

I know what it feels like to have a big project close to completion, with problems appearing along the final stretch. Coding can be a nightmare, but I have a feeling IPB3 is just having a seizure from dealing with millions of posts. Since you have already contacted IPB, I am sure they will help fix the problem now or in a later release.

To the Neowin Developers: Do not give up! Everything will be fine. :HUGS:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you don't care to read what I said, then you prove my point. Maybe written media is beyond your attention span. Titles are not summaries my friend.
    • Nobody asked... in fact, I said "I don't care about political leanings"  
    • TLDR. Here is a far better title (just a basic example): Windows 11 26H2 to allow disabling Web search results
    • Restore will get my vote, only if to see if things are any different, doubt it though but Labour and Conservatives too out of touch and same thing over and over and over…, Lib Dem who?
    • There is nothing wrong with this title. You have completely missed the plot when it comes to "clickbait." The issue was never that a title tries to entice you to click, that is how titles have worked for over 100 years. The issue is when the title subverts expectations, getting you to click expecting something that isn't there. The classic clickbait example is "Boyfriend caught cheating, what happens next will shock you," then what happened next is the girlfriend was upset...which is probably the least shocking outcome imaginable. If sounds like what you want is for the titles to be a collection of 10-word summaries that you can skim, get the just of the story, and only click if you want more details. That is not, never has been, and never will be what titles are. You can go all the way back to print newspapers during the great depression and see the same thing. The newspaper was locked in a vending machine, all you can see is the headline, you choose to put in 5¢ to buy the paper and read the rest if you want. Those headlines were written in a way to sell the paper, not just to provide a summery. Here are two actual headlines from that time, "Wall Street Lays an Egg," or "Stocks Hit Bottom?" Maybe you'd say something like "it was wrong then and it's still wrong now." Okay, fine opinion to have, but it isn't like Neowin is doing something unjurnalistic, they are just following the age-old standards for written media.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!