Recommended Posts

12fps on my work desktop which is a HP Compaq DX2000 PC (E4500 2.2GHz with 1GB RAM and an Intel 946GZ integrated GPU)

I expect my home PC will max out the 60fps cap...

On my co-worker's Win 7 machine, the same test runs on IE9 at 60+ fps. I think they really botched something this this release. Let's just hope that more frequent updates means this will be fixed soon, otherwise it's pretty horrible to watch even non-hardware accelerated browsers like Safari and Chrome kick it's butt.

60+fps here too on i5 430m 2.27-2.53GHz,Mobility Radeon 5650 1GB.Maybe your HA is not turned on?Type about:support on the last table you need to have direct2D:true,directwrite:true and the last one must be 1/1 Direct3D 9/10.On my old HP i have ticked the use HA when available, but it doesn't use it because drivers are old(it sais it need 10.6 ATI drivers or newer).

Co-worker's GPU is a AMD Mobility Radeon HD5470 with 1GB of memory. Direct2D is disabled, so is DirectWrite and GPU acceleration is 0/1. I just told him to upgrade his graphics drivers.

On my Mac I get this...

Direct2D Enabled: false

DirectWrite Enabled: false

WebGL Renderer: NVIDIA Corporation -- NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M OpenGL Engine -- 2.1 NVIDIA-1.6.26

GPU Accelerated Windows: 1/1 OpenGL

I'll report back on if upgrading the Windows 7 machine's drivers make a difference. As for my Mac, I haven't upgraded to 10.6.7 yet but I don't think it has any GPU driver upgrades for me anyway. I think it's just a sloppy implementation for Macs then.

Still doesn't explain why IE9 was able to run it at full speed on his computer though.

Still doesn't explain why IE9 was able to run it at full speed on his computer though.

Firefox likely has a different range of blacklisted drivers.

It may take a while before people start thinking about how they need to update their gfx drivers for browsers - it's pretty much always been the domain of gamers. Now everyone should be paying attention.

Is double clicking for new tab taken away?

I tried disabling putting the tab on top and it still maxi/minimize the screen. I even installed tab mix plus and it didn't help. Is it built this way or is there a way to make double clicking open new tab. Note: I do know that middle click can open new tab.

Is double clicking for new tab taken away?

I tried disabling putting the tab on top and it still maxi/minimize the screen. I even installed tab mix plus and it didn't help. Is it built this way or is there a way to make double clicking open new tab. Note: I do know that middle click can open new tab.

It behaves this way because the tab bar is now in the aero window border, this is the proper behavior for double clicking part of the aero border.

OK, I think -moz-appearance affects this but I don't know what that element on the left-side is called. Can anyone tell me? Trial-and-erroring my way through the list is too much hassle with having to keep relaunching the browser to see what happens. I have the add-on bar behaving exactly how I want now. Just need it to look right.

This is pretty close to what I'm looking for. But how can I make it look like the new-style status bar. For consistency I'd like them both to match.

image2tv.png

I know this has probably been discussed before, but the only thing I'm not super happy with in Firefox is the add-on bar. It takes a lot of space, and I can't disable it because I need some of the add-ons functionality like the Alexa ratings. Is there an add-on to make it just a button in the bottom right corner that would expand on mouse hover, or something similar?

Thanks.

Try this:

/*Animated Add-on Bar and Find Bar fixes*/
#navigator-toolbox:not([customizing]) ~ #browser-bottombox {
	position: fixed;
	bottom: 0;
	left: 0;
}
#navigator-toolbox:not([customizing]) ~ #browser-bottombox #addon-bar {
	-moz-appearance: none !important;
	padding: 4px 10px 2px 10px !important;
	margin-bottom: -1px !important;
	border: none !important;
	border-radius: 1.5px 1.5px 0 0 !important;
	margin-right: 25px !important;
	background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.8), rgba(200,200,200,.8)) !important;
	box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(0,0,0,.25) inset, 0 0 0 2px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset !important;
	position: fixed;
	bottom: -7px;
	right: 25px;
	opacity: 0;
	-moz-transition: bottom 0.25s 0.5s ease-in, opacity 0.1s 0.65s ease-in;
}
#addon-bar .toolbarbutton-1 {
	vertical-align: bottom !important;
}
#navigator-toolbox:not([customizing]) ~ #browser-bottombox #addon-bar:hover {
	bottom: 0;
	opacity: 1;
	-moz-transition: bottom .25s .25s ease-out, opacity 0.1s 0.25s ease-out;
}
#FindToolbar {
	border: none !important;
}
#FindToolbar .findbar-container {
	margin-bottom: -2px !important;
	margin-left: -2px !important;
	border-radius: 0 1.5px 0 0 !important;
	background: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.8), rgba(200,200,200,.8)) !important;
	box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(0,0,0,.25) inset, 0 0 0 2px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset !important;
}
#FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="notfound"] + .findbar-find-status, #FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="wrapped"] + .findbar-find-status {
  	padding-right: 5px !important;
}
#FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="notfound"], #FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="wrapped"] {
 	 margin-left: -1px !important;
}
#FindToolbar .find-status-icon:not([status="notfound"]):not([status="wrapped"]) + .findbar-find-status {
 	 display: none !important;
}

Is double clicking for new tab taken away?

I tried disabling putting the tab on top and it still maxi/minimize the screen. I even installed tab mix plus and it didn't help. Is it built this way or is there a way to make double clicking open new tab. Note: I do know that middle click can open new tab.

Put this code inside your userChrome.css - only works when tabs on titlebar is off (maximized or normal mode) - by foxxyn8:

#navigator-toolbox > #TabsToolbar {
	-moz-binding: url("chrome://global/content/bindings/toolbar.xml#toolbar") !important;
}

Anyone else getting this problem? You need at least 2 tabs open, and hover over any link on a page that will show the URL bar at the bottom. It shifts the colour in the left/right borders downwards when the URL bar opens. It's quite distracting when that happens.

no_hover.pnghover.png

Confirmed this still happens on a new profile with no addons added or settings changed.

EDIT: added an animated gif at this -> link <- to better elaborate the problem.

Try this:

/*Animated Add-on Bar and Find Bar fixes*/
#navigator-toolbox:not([customizing]) ~ #browser-bottombox {
	position: fixed;
	bottom: 0;
	left: 0;
}
#navigator-toolbox:not([customizing]) ~ #browser-bottombox #addon-bar {
	-moz-appearance: none !important;
	padding: 4px 10px 2px 10px !important;
	margin-bottom: -1px !important;
	border: none !important;
	border-radius: 1.5px 1.5px 0 0 !important;
	margin-right: 25px !important;
	background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.8), rgba(200,200,200,.8)) !important;
	box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(0,0,0,.25) inset, 0 0 0 2px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset !important;
	position: fixed;
	bottom: -7px;
	right: 25px;
	opacity: 0;
	-moz-transition: bottom 0.25s 0.5s ease-in, opacity 0.1s 0.65s ease-in;
}
#addon-bar .toolbarbutton-1 {
	vertical-align: bottom !important;
}
#navigator-toolbox:not([customizing]) ~ #browser-bottombox #addon-bar:hover {
	bottom: 0;
	opacity: 1;
	-moz-transition: bottom .25s .25s ease-out, opacity 0.1s 0.25s ease-out;
}
#FindToolbar {
	border: none !important;
}
#FindToolbar .findbar-container {
	margin-bottom: -2px !important;
	margin-left: -2px !important;
	border-radius: 0 1.5px 0 0 !important;
	background: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.8), rgba(200,200,200,.8)) !important;
	box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(0,0,0,.25) inset, 0 0 0 2px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset !important;
}
#FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="notfound"] + .findbar-find-status, #FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="wrapped"] + .findbar-find-status {
  	padding-right: 5px !important;
}
#FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="notfound"], #FindToolbar .find-status-icon[status="wrapped"] {
 	 margin-left: -1px !important;
}
#FindToolbar .find-status-icon:not([status="notfound"]):not([status="wrapped"]) + .findbar-find-status {
 	 display: none !important;
}

I tried this, addon bar just disappears for good :/

Nope. No theme at all. It could be Aero kicking in.

I guess I just need to know what the default colours are for that status bar-type popup.

All I have in my userchrome.css is this:

#appmenu-button 
{
background: -moz-linear-gradient(top, rgba(25,143,224,.7), rgba(22,80,129,.7)) !important;
}

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -12px;
  right: 1px;
  border: 0 !important;
  opacity: 0;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-border-radius: 4px 0 0 0 !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .2s 1s ease-in, opacity .2s 1s ease-in;
  padding-top: 1px !important;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
  bottom: 1px;
  opacity: 1;
  -moz-transition: bottom .2s ease-out, opacity .2s ease-in;
}

That makes mine appear transparent as well. Apart from that it works good (Y)

Can you tell me if you find out what's making yours transparent? Thanks

How do I move the Firerfox findbar to just under the tabs when I open it instead of opening at the bottom of the browser window?

you can try one of these

http://userstyles.org/styles/44781/

http://userstyles.org/styles/45007

Does anyone have issues with the font looking "fuzzy" ... I'm running FF 4 and I think everything is at default values.. but my fonts looks fuzzy and seem to be faint.. anyone notice? I have cleartype on in Win7 and have adjusted the setting...

Does anyone have issues with the font looking "fuzzy" ... I'm running FF 4 and I think everything is at default values.. but my fonts looks fuzzy and seem to be faint.. anyone notice? I have cleartype on in Win7 and have adjusted the setting...

Looks normal to me. Not fuzzy at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!