Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2010


Recommended Posts

Everyone says the same thing every time a new Need for Speed game comes out, Oh there going back to roots and it looks so good and so on, but the game sucks every time, i am tiered of EA making a cool trailer for a new game and everyone goes its so cool then you hear them bitching the game sucks when they get it and then when a new game comes out its like the forgot about the last one they played and starts all over again. Never again EA, never Again. I am tiered of you taking my money for your over priced, buggy games.

Everyone says the same thing every time a new Need for Speed game comes out, Oh there going back to roots and it looks so good and so on, but the game sucks every time, i am tiered of EA making a cool trailer for a new game and everyone goes its so cool then you hear them bitching the game sucks when they get it and then when a new game comes out its like the forgot about the last one they played and starts all over again. Never again EA, never Again. I am tiered of you taking my money for your over priced, buggy games.

The most wanted games and NFS: Shift were good. And this game basically looks like a remake of the classic hot pursuit games so it looks like its gonna be fun to me. Loved those games.

Everyone says the same thing every time a new Need for Speed game comes out, Oh there going back to roots and it looks so good and so on, but the game sucks every time, i am tiered of EA making a cool trailer for a new game and everyone goes its so cool then you hear them bitching the game sucks when they get it and then when a new game comes out its like the forgot about the last one they played and starts all over again. Never again EA, never Again. I am tiered of you taking my money for your over priced, buggy games.

Not sure where you get the idea that they say that every time as they haven't had a proper "Hot Pursuit" game since Hot Pursuit 2 back in 2002. All the others haven't been anything like the originals, where as this looks to be going back to what the originals were all about (cops chasing speeders).

I'm really excited about this game. My only concern is that, while Criterion makes fun games they are really, really repetitive. Burnout: Paradise was as repetitive as they come, no variation whatsoever, gameplay never really evolved throughout the game. Hopefully they manage to do something about that, mix things up and open up new stuff as the player progress. ( Not just piling on cars in the same races and environments )

I've never had much trouble getting NFS3 to work on XP, and if I remember correctly you could substitute the Direct3D dll from NFS4 and get it working much better. Oddly NFS4 was always a much bigger pain to get working on XP for some reason and Porsche Unleashed always had that annoying swap file problem. I think deleting gimme.dll was one of the workarounds for that.

Porsche was the last game in the series I played before they turned it into a Fast and the Furious ghetto ricer clone.

OK, that demo video has erased most of my interest in the game. It looks like a dumbed-down version of Burnout (i.e. it stops the action every few seconds to warn you of an impending hazard which you can see or hear clear as day anyway), only with cops and real cars.

The current list of cars:

Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione

Audi TT RS Coupe

Bugatti Veyron 16.4 (cop only)

Chevrolet Camaro SS

Dodge Challenger SRT8

Dodge Viper SRT10

Ford Shelby GT500

Koenigsegg CCX

Lamborghini Gallardo LP 570-4 Superleggera

Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670-4 SV

Lamborghini Reventon (cop)

McLaren MP4-12C

Mercedes-Benz SLS AMG

Nissan GT-R SpecV (R35)

Pagani Zonda Cinque

Porsche Cayman S

Porsche Panamera Turbo :pinch: they could've included a M5 :shifty:

http://hotpursuit.needforspeed.com/game-info/cars

http://nfsunlimited.net/news/view/18566 links with photos

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!