Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit 2010


Recommended Posts

Some things I picked up about the PC version from reading the EA boards:

No AA or advanced video options. Total "check this box to compile for 360 and PC" release.

Poor framerate.

Poor racing wheel support.

All the above assumes it doesn't CTD when you try to run it.

I guess Big Surf Island not coming out for PC should have been a sign that Criterion's foray into PC-land with Burnout Paradise didn't go the way they had hoped. Still, I was hoping this one would have turned out good.

I'm playing on the 360. I am getting frustrated as I just cannot get separation from me and the other racers (solo career offline). Even if I pass them and drive without mistakes they catch up to me and pass me as if I am standing still. Well, I am exaggerating on the standing still part but they do pass me way too easy. Last night I had to retry an event at least 10 times as I kept coming in second. AGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!

Is this pretty much the same as Burnout but with more dedicated vs stuff?

No (except graphically). It's closer to the original NFS: HP but with things that were long wished for in both that title and HP2.

The one thing that it did lift from the Burnout series is Freedrive (both online and offline) - however, there's actually a reason for that that makes sense; it lets you *scout out upcoming courses*, which is useful for both racer and police careers.

Also, unlike previous NFS titles (any of them), it's not exactly low-end GPU friendly (my HD5450 has decided lag/chop at 1280x720 with Medium detail); the only other NFS that had this issue was Shift (prepatched).

Apparently, Criterion had been reading the various NFS fanboards, as they addressed most of the grips and peeves with the original HP and HP2.

The key is to know shortcuts and in those shortcut which one to take and which one not too (yeah not all shortcuts are helpfull).

That's actually explicitly stated in the game itself - which is why Freedrive is useful.

"Know your enemy - and know your battlefield!" - DJ Atomika, Burnout Paradise, The Ultimate Box

I agree, and that's the reason I bought it for 360. Not that my CPU couldn't handle it but just wanted a problem free experience. I remember I had to do an upgrade for the original NFS to run better :p.

That's actually explicitly stated in the game itself - which is why Freedrive is useful.

"Know your enemy - and know your battlefield!" - DJ Atomika, Burnout Paradise, The Ultimate Box

Yean didn't read it or heard it in the game, maybe was too exited. Also havn't tried the free roam yet since just got the game last night.

Some things I picked up about the PC version from reading the EA boards:

No AA or advanced video options. Total "check this box to compile for 360 and PC" release.

Poor framerate.

Poor racing wheel support.

All the above assumes it doesn't CTD when you try to run it.

I guess Big Surf Island not coming out for PC should have been a sign that Criterion's foray into PC-land with Burnout Paradise didn't go the way they had hoped. Still, I was hoping this one would have turned out good.

What hardware do you have (CPU/GPU)?

I noticed the lag/chop on my end; however, I have a Celeron DC and HD5450 (not exactly friendly to smooth frame rates on AAA titles).

As far as the lack of AA, I'm not surprised - name one multiplatform title that supports AA on the PC. (Multiplatform generally means no AA, and usually no AF, either.)

Poor racing wheel support - not an issue I'm concerned with, as I don't use a racing wheel (I use the keyboard). The keyboard support is on par with NFS: Shift (which has the best keyboard support of any NFS to date), which would also make this version of HP ideal for gaming notebooks (again, only Shift among previous NFS titles has gone there).

BSI not coming out for PC did suck - however, I think that a big reason for *that* had to be a lot of FUD concerning piracy on the PC in relation to DLC (in addition to the fact that BSI was paid DLC, which usually flies like a lead baloon on the PC). There is actually a chance to fix it (Burnout Paradise Complete for PC can still be done, which would include not just BSI, but Cops and Robbers as well, as *that* never made it to the PC, either), possibly for a Yule release.

Weird.

I was still getting 12fps but I completed the course successfully. I then retried it and got 60fps :/

Bizarrely, the game runs terrible until I've completed one event and then it works fine afterwards I have no idea why it does that.

However, the cars handle terribly - it feels like a very cheap and clunky Burnout Paradise. Very poor and I'm annoyed I wasted money on it.

more importantly do the cars feel weightless & defy physics like in burnout paradise?

there is no "weight transfer" stuff in burnout par..., eg. when you pull hand brake when turning the car, nothing "usual" happens, the rear end doesnt come out.

i stopped playing burnout for that small detail + all unlicensed cars :p

You didn't need to do that to drift in BP (however, that maneuver is useful for bootlegger turns); instead, back off the gas going into a turn, start your turn, then step on the gas again. If you don't start the turn too soon or accelerate too late, it will throw the tail out darn near perfectly. There's a switchback in Roadsters Reborn (your first race) where this trick can be very effective - I actually managed a chaindrift at 100 mph using the keyboard. (Take "that", racing wheel fanatics!) The trick works in NFS: Shift, too.

In other words, weight-transfer is actually more like NFS: Shift than previous NFS games.

Well, I bought the game today and I've been racing a bit.

I have an i7 920 (stock speed), 6 gb ram, Windows 7 x64 and a Sapphire ATI HD 4890. It runs beautifully on maximum (1680x1050).

The handling takes a bit to get used to, but once you get used to it, you'll be drifting like crazy.

If anyone wants to race a bit or compare/defeat times, add me: setnom_mike .

Well, I bought the game today and I've been racing a bit.

I have an i7 920 (stock speed), 6 gb ram, Windows 7 x64 and a Sapphire ATI HD 4890. It runs beautifully on maximum (1680x1050).

The handling takes a bit to get used to, but once you get used to it, you'll be drifting like crazy.

If anyone wants to race a bit or compare/defeat times, add me: setnom_mike .

If you haven't played Shift or BP (but have played other NFS titles), the vehicle physics will take getting used to.

What are you using for controls? (I play with the keyboard; the drift technique is downright fun. Once I got the hang of it, it *still* has the "I can't believe I just did that!" feel, especially when you're noticing that your speeds in drifts are steadily going upward as you get used to the handling.)

Weird.

I was still getting 12fps but I completed the course successfully. I then retried it and got 60fps :/

Bizarrely, the game runs terrible until I've completed one event and then it works fine afterwards I have no idea why it does that.

However, the cars handle terribly - it feels like a very cheap and clunky Burnout Paradise. Very poor and I'm annoyed I wasted money on it.

What are you using for controls?

One thing HP2010 is getting whacked for is the poor racing-wheel support (likely for reasons of handling). If you play NFS: Shift, use the same settings you do for that title (I'm using the same keyboard settings that I did for Shift, which are actually the keyboard defaults).

What hardware do you have (CPU/GPU)?

My specs are irrelevant this time around as I don't have the game. I was just scouting the boards to see how it panned out. Gotten wise after all the sub-par console ports. If a game is multi-platform then the chances of the PC version being a compiled-over-lunch port are increasingly high.

As far as the lack of AA, I'm not surprised - name one multiplatform title that supports AA on the PC. (Multiplatform generally means no AA, and usually no AF, either.)

Without AA a lot of games look pretty poor. Jaggies shouldn't be an issue these days. I don't have a uber-high-end rig, but if I was putting out big bucks on a regular basis for the latest and greatest hardware I'd be pretty ****ed with the standard of a lot of the big-name multiplatform titles these days.

Poor racing wheel support - not an issue I'm concerned with, as I don't use a racing wheel (I use the keyboard). The keyboard support is on par with NFS: Shift (which has the best keyboard support of any NFS to date), which would also make this version of HP ideal for gaming notebooks (again, only Shift among previous NFS titles has gone there).

Ditto, I would have used a 360 pad. But driving afficionados (I'm just a sunday driver) all have wheels and it seems any self-respecting game should support at least the most common/top models.

BSI not coming out for PC did suck - however, I think that a big reason for *that* had to be a lot of FUD concerning piracy on the PC in relation to DLC (in addition to the fact that BSI was paid DLC, which usually flies like a lead baloon on the PC). There is actually a chance to fix it (Burnout Paradise Complete for PC can still be done, which would include not just BSI, but Cops and Robbers as well, as *that* never made it to the PC, either), possibly for a Yule release.

Yeah I think piracy is one reason Criterion just didn't make the effort this time around. Pity because Burnout Paradise was great. I'd have happily bought BSI.

If you haven't played Shift or BP (but have played other NFS titles), the vehicle physics will take getting used to.

What are you using for controls? (I play with the keyboard; the drift technique is downright fun. Once I got the hang of it, it *still* has the "I can't believe I just did that!" feel, especially when you're noticing that your speeds in drifts are steadily going upward as you get used to the handling.)

I'm using a Logitech Chillstream (it's like a 360 controller)

this is by far the toughest NFS....

i cant get gold in many races..

and that last race???.. its the toughest because the damage takes over after u crash like 3 4 times.

but overall i really like the gameplay.

its more like shift. but to be honest. It is alot better.

But i wouldve loved something like GRID.. you had to do alot more in Grid.. like BRAKE.. actually BRAKE before a turn..

but i guess the MW and Carbon fans are happy. they got what they wanted.

Way to many info screens/cut scenes which you can't skip, it feel like you have 1 minute of racing and 3 minutes of info screens and all you can do is sit there and shout at your monitor. :angry:

I gotta say I am not a big fain of the intro to the races. I wish we had to start ourselves with a counter or light system or whatever. The start of a race is a lot of times key for gaining/losing advantage.

but i guess the MW and Carbon fans are happy. they got what they wanted.

Well, in my particular case I wish the handling was a little less like shift. I am not saying it is like shift but it is certainly not exactly like MW, Carbon, etc. I also wish it wasn't so easy for the other cars to pass me. I am not saying I should win every race with 30 seconds margin but they just go by me so easily.

I do like the game in general though. Happy with my purchase.

I got my copy this morning, been playing for a few hours, and loving it!

Cannot wait to get home, and get it running on my home rig, which needless to say is way better than my work rig! :)

Been a while since i was happy with a NFS release..... hope they do another one similar to porsche unleashed, with ferrari's and other legendary cars.

My performance though in the game is brilliant. decent frame rate, enjoy the responsiveness of the cars, and so far, i have had gold's all the way :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
    • Hello, Bonjour is Apple's implementation of a multicast-DNS service, which allows devices running Apple's software and/or hardware to find each other on your local network.  I believe the Windows version was last updated around 2010. If you do not need it, you can stop and disable the Bonjour service in the Services Control Manager (filename: SERVICES.MSC).  Once you have done that, the operating system will no longer attempt to load the service. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • This AMD RX 9070 16GB GPU that performs close to Nvidia 5070 is under $600 by Sayan Sen With the memory shortage that's prevalent nowadays, discounts are super-hard to get. As such we post good deals whenever they pop up. Recently, we covered a few great discounts on SSDs wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup NVMe PCIe Gen4 drive for just $400 thanks to a special coupon. If you want a faster product but don't need all that capacity, you can also opt for Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB that is on sale for its lowest price in over three months. Let's say though that you are on the hunt for a 1440p gaming card. In that case AMD's RX 9070 non-XT can help, and with its 16GB VRAM, you can also run AI models locally without worrying about bottlenecking (check out our recent 9070 GRE reviews for gaming and productivity to get an idea). The PowerColor Reaper variant of the RX 9070 is currently on sale for just $580 which is a very good price in the current state of affairs (purchase link under the specs table down below). The Reaper cooler on this 9070 uses a triple‑fan design with ring‑blade fans, paired with premium dual ball bearings to extend lifespan and reduce friction. "Intelligent" fan control allows the fans to remain idle at lower temperatures, only spinning up when the GPU is under load. A nickel‑plated copper base makes direct contact with both the GPU and memory modules, helping to spread heat evenly. PowerColor also applies Honeywell PTM7950 phase‑change thermal interface material (TIM), which fills microscopic gaps between the die and heatsink for more efficient thermal transfer. The fan shroud is shorter in height as the firm has made it such that it can be used in certain SFF (small form factor) cases. The technical specifications of the Reaper RX 9070 are given in the table below: Specification Value Stream Processors 3584 Units Video Memory 16GB GDDR6 Memory Speed 20.0 Gbps Memory Interface 256-bit Engine Clock Game Clock: up to 2070 MHz Boost Clock: up to 2520 MHz Bus Standard PCI Express 5.0 x16 Display Connectors 1 x HDMI 2.1b, 3 x DisplayPort 2.1a Maximum Resolution DisplayPort: 7680 × 4320 HDMI: 7680 × 4320 Board Dimensions 289mm × 111mm × 41mm 304mm × 127mm × 42mm (with bracket) Slot 2 Minimum System Power Requirement 600W Power Connectors Two 8-pin PCI Express Get the PowerColor Reaper RX 9070 at the links below (you get only a 90-day warranty on Woot): PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $579.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $700) PowerColor Reaper Radeon RX 9070 16GB Graphics Card (RX9070 16G-A): $559.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Are they marketed as an entry into astronomy or astrophotography? I do astrophotography. With big rigs, lots of computers, cables and headaches. I love it. And by learning this ridiculously complex hobby, I’ve learned about the objects I’m shooting. Astronomy followed from photography.
    • Microsoft confirms Recycle Bin bug across all versions of Windows by Usama Jawad A couple of days ago, we reported that the latest Patch Tuesday update has seemingly resulted in a lot of issues for many users, including OneDrive and Dropbox access problems, BitLocker recovery lockouts, and BSODs. Although Microsoft is yet to acknowledge these bugs, it has confirmed another, relatively smaller issue across all supported versions of Windows. In an update on its Windows Release Health Dashboard, Microsoft has confirmed that after installing June's Patch Tuesday update (KB5094126), you'll experience unexpected behavior when leveraging Recycle Bin. Basically, when you attempt to delete an item from the Recycle Bin, the confirm dialog will show you the internal file name of that content rather than the actual name. For example, the file may be named abc.png, but the confirm dialog will ask if you're sure that you want to permanently delete $Rxxxxx.png from the Recycle Bin. This is pretty much it for the scope of the bug itself; it just displays the wrong name in the confirm dialog. The correct name will be shown in the list view of the Recycle Bin and if you restore the file, it will return with the correct name as well. This issue affects pretty much all supported versions of Windows client and server, including: Client: Windows 11, version 26H1; Windows 11, version 25H2; Windows 11, version 24H2; Windows 11, version 23H2; Windows 10, version 22H2; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2021; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019; Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 2016 Server: Windows Server 2025; Windows Server 2022; Windows Server 2019; Windows Server 2016; Windows Server 2012 R2; Windows Server 2012 As things currently stand, Microsoft is working on a concrete solution that will be released in a "future" Windows update. It remains to be seen if the firm will wait till the next Patch Tuesday or roll out an out-of-band (OOB) fix. The good news is that commercial customers can deploy a workaround right now, but they will have to reach out to Microsoft Support for Business for additional details.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      578
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!