Mac OS X Lion Discussion


Recommended Posts

Let me guess why Windows Shadow Copy isn’t used by everybody...

It’s hidden somewhere? It requires advanced Windows knowledge? Its GUI is awful? etc.?

Microsoft always implements awesome features for the enterprise. I’m not against them, more like on the contrary, but they’re mostly badly implemented.

Let me guess why Windows Shadow Copy isn’t used by everybody...

It’s hidden somewhere? It requires advanced Windows knowledge? Its GUI is awful? etc.?

It's pretty hidden. You have to go to the Properties panel of the document (from Explorer) and go to the Previous Versions tab in that panel. There's no indication in the app window that Shadow Copy exists.

Interesting tidbit: there's now a separate process in Safari that handles web content (maybe the start of WebKit 2 implementation). Quitting it makes all your tabs reload right now.

post-17580-0-03450400-1298591358.png

Let me guess why Windows Shadow Copy isn’t used by everybody...

It’s hidden somewhere? It requires advanced Windows knowledge? Its GUI is awful? etc.?

Microsoft always implements awesome features for the enterprise. I’m not against them, more like on the contrary, but they’re mostly badly implemented.

You right click on a file and select, "Restore Previous Version." A little window appears with a list of all the versions, their dates, and you're given the option of opening them up, copying them, or restoring. That's it really. It doesn't do a nice swoopy timeline effect or anything so I guess it's not "intuitive", but it's no less straight forward. I think the reason why it isn't well known and used is because it's not given a nice big icon on the taskbar and advertised anywhere. But straight forward as it is, I think restricting it to a tiny little properties panel is a horrible mistake.

It's pretty hidden. You have to go to the Properties panel of the document (from Explorer) and go to the Previous Versions tab in that panel. There's no indication in the app window that Shadow Copy exists.

That's what I meant before. Windows has some really powerful features but most of the time they're just horribly executed with a less than user-friendly interface, which is a real shame. Apple has always been ahead in the interface design game making everything much more accessible.

You right click on a file and select, "Restore Previous Version." A little window appears with a list of all the versions, their dates, and you're given the option of opening them up, copying them, or restoring. That's it really. It doesn't do a nice swoopy timeline effect or anything so I guess it's not "intuitive", but it's no less straight forward. I think the reason why it isn't well known and used is because it's not given a nice big icon on the taskbar and advertised anywhere.

The implementation of Versions is pretty understated as well (inconspicuous triangle in the upper right of the document's window), but the whole timeline effect is really nice if you're trying to find a specific version of the file.

After using it for a little while, I can say the lack of open indicators in the dock is definitely not a good change. I understand why... but I miss my little blue glow :(

same here... D;

anyone have a clue to to change the scroll direction, 2 fingers down scrolls up and vice-versa?

The implementation of Versions is pretty understated as well (inconspicuous triangle in the upper right of the document's window), but the whole timeline effect is really nice if you're trying to find a specific version of the file.

I think that being able to see a nice big image of the window/folder/file helps a lot more than the timeline animation thing. Far superior to the GUI for shadow copies in Windows, where a visual comparison requires the user to click "open" on each one, then closing it if it's the wrong one, and repeating over and over and over... :wacko: .

same here... D;

anyone have a clue to to change the scroll direction, 2 fingers down scrolls up and vice-versa?

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/947186-mac-os-x-lion-discussion/page__view__findpost__p__593731420 ;)

I can't believe what I just did.

I just joined the Apple Developer Connection ($99/year) just to run a developer preview of Lion. But hey, also means I can get the final build of Lion the second it's released, so at least I won't have to make another purchase, right?

Anyway, I plan to install it (as soon as I get a confirmation e-mail, apparently it can take up to a day) to an external hard drive. Is this fairly stable for day-to-day use? I ran some of the Leopard builds and most of them never crashed, but obviously had lots of missing features.

I can't believe what I just did.

I just joined the Apple Developer Connection ($99/year) just to run a developer preview of Lion. But hey, also means I can get the final build of Lion the second it's released, so at least I won't have to make another purchase, right?

Anyway, I plan to install it (as soon as I get a confirmation e-mail, apparently it can take up to a day) to an external hard drive. Is this fairly stable for day-to-day use? I ran some of the Leopard builds and most of them never crashed, but obviously had lots of missing features.

lol

The problem that I had with previous versions (shadow copy) was that it only made backups of a file after a restore point. If I made several changes to a file within a period where there's no restore point, those changes were lost. Credit is due to Microsoft for having the first implementation of this feature, but it was just too severely limited for me to get efficient use out of it.

Lion's Versions is actually saving the changes to a document every time you open it and also every hour you're working on it (like Time Machine). We've talked about the timeline UI, but I think one of the more valuable aspects of it is that you can quickly copy and paste information from previous versions to your current version right in the UI.

The most exciting thing is going to be app autosave & resume, just like multitasking is on the iphone & ipad right now. That way apps that have work on them you can close them quickly and they wont waste battery in the background, when it's time to open them everything is as it was.

I can't believe what I just did.

I just joined the Apple Developer Connection ($99/year) just to run a developer preview of Lion. But hey, also means I can get the final build of Lion the second it's released, so at least I won't have to make another purchase, right?

Anyway, I plan to install it (as soon as I get a confirmation e-mail, apparently it can take up to a day) to an external hard drive. Is this fairly stable for day-to-day use? I ran some of the Leopard builds and most of them never crashed, but obviously had lots of missing features.

Reminds me of why I like to be subscribed to technet.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!