Recommended Posts

Seriously, Forza 3's cars are right up there with GT5 premiums as well, and yet Turn 10 gimps the photo export. What on earth were they thinking? I would have had a huge collection of photos had their export worked properly. I already have 100x more saved replays and 100x more saved photos in GT5 than I did with FM3.

Exactly, what he has put up was a promo shot from the Turn10 guys themselves, not an indication of what is possible from the game unfortunately.

Forza certainly does look good, although I still feel that PD have the edge when it comes to lighting.

Forza certainly does look good, although I still feel that PD have the edge when it comes to lighting.

I'd agree. The car model itself looks excellent but the lighting on it looks more subdued compared to GT5. One thing that I think is definitely better than GT5 in that shot though is the background scenery.

Forza certainly does look good, although I still feel that PD have the edge when it comes to lighting.

I agree. It will improve over time, they are only on version 3 ;)

So I am reading on GTPlanet.net that no youtube upload ability until further notice. I guess it wasn't ready for primetime and might come via patch. So this video portion of the thread will be stale for awhile :(

I'd agree. The car model itself looks excellent but the lighting on it looks more subdued compared to GT5. One thing that I think is definitely better than GT5 in that shot though is the background scenery.

speaking of scenery, from looking at the pictures i guess that placing custom objects in the scenery isnt possible... like posing your car on a track, and then putting a bunch of things right next to it, maybe have your pit crew be present as well since they already have polygonal models in game...

speaking of scenery, from looking at the pictures i guess that placing custom objects in the scenery isnt possible... like posing your car on a track, and then putting a bunch of things right next to it, maybe have your pit crew be present as well since they already have polygonal models in game...

I've not seen it in one of the travel locations, so right now I guess it's not possible. I would think though that if you were to pit and watch that in the replay you could then take a photo of it.

Not got that far in the game though to need to use the pits though.

I also understand that you can't save replays from online races, which means no photos from online? I loved the idea of being able to line up all of our cars together from some shots. sad.gif

Stll not played online but maybe you can take shots straight after, just not save the replay to take shots? As I say that's just a hopeful guess really.

Forza_3_93_Mustang_Cobra_R_1_by_NoLiMiT06.jpg

Forza_3_DBR9_by_NoLiMiT06.jpg

I still think Forza looks better in many ways, the cockpits are much more realistic in GT5 thats for sure. I will try to get some shots from GT5 and compare later today. The two pics above are mine.

Forza_3_93_Mustang_Cobra_R_1_by_NoLiMiT06.jpg

Forza_3_DBR9_by_NoLiMiT06.jpg

I still think Forza looks better in many ways, the cockpits are much more realistic in GT5 thats for sure. I will try to get some shots from GT5 and compare later today. The two pics above are mine.

Is that the highest output available?

Might be worth creating a different thread though before you get accused of bashing/comparing in the Official GT5 thread for pics though.

Is that the highest output available?

Might be worth creating a different thread though before you get accused of bashing/comparing in the Official GT5 thread for pics though.

The output is 1280x720 I think. The best way for me to do comparison is with the stock cars at Laguna Seca, if anyone is interested in seeing some just let me know.

<<snipped>>

<<snipped>

I still think Forza looks better in many ways, the cockpits are much more realistic in GT5 thats for sure. I will try to get some shots from GT5 and compare later today. The two pics above are mine.

810174306.png

you guys straight up failed reading comprehension eh?

I understand the want of comparison, personally I don't care What looks better than what as I've never played a Forza to compare (though I wish I had bought one before GT5 had come out)

But seeing as this topic is dedicated to GT5, could you guys start a different one or even find an older one to continue, we don't want to fill this topic that is supposed to be dedicated to GT5 pictures with the rants that usually follow comparisons.

I am having trouble figuring out how to share my pictures. Anyone have some tips?

go into photo mode, save whatever you want to save.

then go to the photo mode in the GT life screen and you will see them all there. From there you can save them to the XMB and using photo gallery upload them to picasa like i do or copy paste them onto a USB drive

go into photo mode, save whatever you want to save.

then go to the photo mode in the GT life screen and you will see them all there. From there you can save them to the XMB and using photo gallery upload them to picasa like i do or copy paste them onto a USB drive

Thanks, will post a couple of my pics in a bit :)

How do you capture the speed so well (especially in the flying one)? I've fiddled with the settings for shutter speed but I either have the shot crystal clear as if there is no motion or blurry beyond recognition. Can't manage to find the middle balance.

Also, any idea what the panning mode (in the triangle menu) and "AE lock" do? Have tried them once or twice but struggle to notice a difference.

How do you capture the speed so well (especially in the flying one)? I've fiddled with the settings for shutter speed but I either have the shot crystal clear as if there is no motion or blurry beyond recognition. Can't manage to find the middle balance.

Also, any idea what the panning mode (in the triangle menu) and "AE lock" do? Have tried them once or twice but struggle to notice a difference.

auto focus?

I honestly didn't really mess with the settings that much. For the "Flying Civic" I just watched the replay, went to photo mode, set the camera to the distance I wanted and the rotation, then did auto focus on the front end of the car. Did the same for the Dale Jr car as well. I have some more NASCAR pics from Daytona to post here in a bit as well :)

Here they are:

Superspeedway%20-%20Daytona.jpg

Superspeedway%20-%20Daytona.jpg

The last picture looks stunning in my opinion :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!