Recommended Posts

I've finally gotten used to flying the jets and it's SO FREAKING FUN. In one round, took out 6 tanks and 3 jets. It sucks flying with the keyboard and mouse though, because I can't maneuver as well with the mouse, but luckily there are other noob pilots :laugh:

Question for you... How the hell do you shoot missiles? :blush:

I never could fly jets in the older BF games, but one round I was playing in, for whatever reason no one was taking the jet, so I said okay, I can fly up and parachute out like I always do... Except I proceeded to fly around the map the rest of the round, but all I could fire was the dame machine guns. So is it as easy as just pressing 2 on the keyboard, as I swore I tried that? Or am I missing something else that is painfully obvious?

Question for you... How the hell do you shoot missiles? :blush:

I never could fly jets in the older BF games, but one round I was playing in, for whatever reason no one was taking the jet, so I said okay, I can fly up and parachute out like I always do... Except I proceeded to fly around the map the rest of the round, but all I could fire was the dame machine guns. So is it as easy as just pressing 2 on the keyboard, as I swore I tried that? Or am I missing something else that is painfully obvious?

Unlike BF2, you actually need to unlock the weapons for jets (e.g. air-to-air missiles, guided (air-to-ground) missiles, etc).

Question for you... How the hell do you shoot missiles? :blush:

I never could fly jets in the older BF games, but one round I was playing in, for whatever reason no one was taking the jet, so I said okay, I can fly up and parachute out like I always do... Except I proceeded to fly around the map the rest of the round, but all I could fire was the dame machine guns. So is it as easy as just pressing 2 on the keyboard, as I swore I tried that? Or am I missing something else that is painfully obvious?

Like yxz said, you have to unlock them, but it doesn't take too long to get the homing missiles (they're the second unlock). Once you get some of the other unlocks like Air Radar, it becomes a little easier to find others which is always a pain if your team doesn't spot them.

Anyone played 64p Conquest on Metro, that is some crazy stuff right there, it just becomes a fight over B, highly recommend everyone tries it lol so much fun :D

Conquest in Metro is THE BEST hands down (Y)

Has anyone noticed any difference in performance with the new AMD Catalyst 11.10 that was released today?

Yep.

For the first time I played for a whole hour with out the 'crash at the end of the round'

Anyone played 64p Conquest on Metro, that is some crazy stuff right there, it just becomes a fight over B, highly recommend everyone tries it lol so much fun :D

Oh god, 64p Op. Metro is so bad it's not even funny. Easily the same amount of bull**** design decisions as with 1st stage of Vantage Point rush on BC2: Vietnam (those who have played it will understand). Awful, awful map with 64 players. Slightly better with 32 but only a tiny bit. Seems like Metro is built purely for rush and TDM with CQ being an afterthought.

Had a bit of an epiphany last night.. after an initially sour experience playing Battlefield 3 on the PS3 (not used to the control pad - much prefer keyboard and mouse but didn't want to pay up for a graphics card upgrade on my PC just yet) I got into the co-op mode with a friend of mine.

I lost about 4 hours, totally immersed in it.. absolutely brilliant fun. Only got onto the third mission (of six) but man it was SO good... I was on the edge of my seat. Brilliant game :)

^ If you suffer so much, why not get one of

and play with mouse and keyboard?

I'm sure it's going to be as funny to see the console kiddies getting owned with a superior controls in BF3, as it was in MW3:

I am seriously tempted but just feel I'm giving myself an unfair advantage, akin to cheating by doing that.. doesn't seem very fair!

I am seriously tempted but just feel I'm giving myself an unfair advantage, akin to cheating by doing that.. doesn't seem very fair!

I agree with this guy from

on the matter of calling this "cheating":
...lol~ using a keyboard and mouse = cheating now. ****ing love you console players. You're weak. Years you defend controllers over kb/m~ saying it's even better at times. Now it's? cheating. You guys are pathetic.

Also if this is cheating, does using a steering wheel in racing games on consoles counts as cheating too?

I agree with this guy from

on the matter of calling this "cheating":

Also if this is cheating, does using a steering wheel in racing games on consoles counts as cheating too?

That's a very good point. Never thought about the steering wheel analogy - but you're right... it does give you a massive advantage!

Like yxz said, you have to unlock them, but it doesn't take too long to get the homing missiles (they're the second unlock). Once you get some of the other unlocks like Air Radar, it becomes a little easier to find others which is always a pain if your team doesn't spot them.

Unlike BF2, you actually need to unlock the weapons for jets (e.g. air-to-air missiles, guided (air-to-ground) missiles, etc).

Thanks all. (Y)

So looks like I need to unlock those missiles... or just stick to driving the tank which is a much more likely scenario. :laugh:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!