Recommended Posts

I haven't got motion assist ribbons yet because i haven't hit 5+ spotted, always less than 4 heh.

You got more than 5?

No, I just wasn't aware of how short the range on it is. It's like 10 feet, if that. Whatever the case it's still completely useless because the range is so small you'll be able to see anyone who it would spot anyways.

All in all the recon kit compared to bc2 is not nearly as interesting or dynamic. All the gadgets they've given the kit are based on the theory that you're not going to to be moving around. It's lame.

Thanks all. (Y)

So looks like I need to unlock those missiles... or just stick to driving the tank which is a much more likely scenario. :laugh:

Thats my plan! I was driving around a tank minding my own business yesterday and saw a foot solder trying to RPG my tank. It did not end well for him!

Side question - is it possible for tanks to shoot down air vehicles?

No, I just wasn't aware of how short the range on it is. It's like 10 feet, if that. Whatever the case it's still completely useless because the range is so small you'll be able to see anyone who it would spot anyways.

All in all the recon kit compared to bc2 is not nearly as interesting or dynamic. All the gadgets they've given the kit are based on the theory that you're not going to to be moving around. It's lame.

You're using the motion detector wrong. You suppose to place them by the walls to detect enemies in buildings behind those walls. Not in open area, where it's really has no use (other than warn on upcoming squads and vehicles).

And recon isn't designed to stay in one spot. The only gadget that recon has that forces him to stay in one spot, is the MAV (and even that covers more ground that recon itself on foot). Everything else is designed to keep him moving and reconnaissance.

Thats my plan! I was driving around a tank minding my own business yesterday and saw a foot solder trying to RPG my tank. It did not end well for him!

Side question - is it possible for tanks to shoot down air vehicles?

Let me build on yxz's response with a HELL YES!

That is perhaps the most exciting kill a tank can get, at least IMO, when you shoot a copter (or more rare, a jet) out of the sky. I had a round in Bad Company 2 where I shot down 6 copters in one round. Was incredibly fun and exhilarating. (Y)

The best advice I can give for taking out copters is definitely "lead" the shot. It is all about trying to anticipate where they will be, at least from longer distances. It is definitely challenging when they are far away, but definitely incredibly rewarding when done properly.

Are service stars given out when there are no more upgrades? I am asking because I am still pretty new to BF but I am only lvl 16 and got my first service star for engineering and my 2nd star is shown as the next item, 145000 points from now haha. I am asking so I understand and so I can begin working on maxing other classes if only service stars are to come (from engineering).

Are service stars given out when there are no more upgrades? I am asking because I am still pretty new to BF but I am only lvl 16 and got my first service star for engineering and my 2nd star is shown as the next item, 145000 points from now haha. I am asking so I understand and so I can begin working on maxing other classes if only service stars are to come (from engineering).

They are awarded on every 100 kills with the weapon

  • Like 1

You're using the motion detector wrong. You suppose to place them by the walls to detect enemies in buildings behind those walls. Not in open area, where it's really has no use (other than warn on upcoming squads and vehicles).

And recon isn't designed to stay in one spot. The only gadget that recon has that forces him to stay in one spot, is the MAV (and even that covers more ground that recon itself on foot). Everything else is designed to keep him moving and reconnaissance.

I usually drop them in places that have high traffic like payways to/from mcoms. I know how to use them and I think the range is entirely to small and the noise they make is not loud enough.

I disagree about the recon too. In BC2 with sensor balls and c4 you could tell they wanted recons moving around, it feels exactly the opposite now.

Let me build on yxz's response with a HELL YES!

That is perhaps the most exciting kill a tank can get, at least IMO, when you shoot a copter (or more rare, a jet) out of the sky. I had a round in Bad Company 2 where I shot down 6 copters in one round. Was incredibly fun and exhilarating. (Y)

The best advice I can give for taking out copters is definitely "lead" the shot. It is all about trying to anticipate where they will be, at least from longer distances. It is definitely challenging when they are far away, but definitely incredibly rewarding when done properly.

Sweeeeeet. I haven't been able to play for more than an hour at a time due to work, school and other things. Hopefully this week will be quiet and I can really get a better feel for the game :) I'm only level 3 :(

I never used a console to play video games , I always used the PC. I hear that it is far superior on a PC. Shooting and hitting your target is better,

I was a console gamer first and it has its benefits. You can sit back comfortably and play the game with a controller in your hand. I was still a beast on Halo 3 with a controller :)

No.

You'll get it every time you kill 100 enemies, with the same weapon

Like I said, engineer service stars and weapon services stars are 2 different things. Quit confusing him.

Each weapon has service stars every 100 kills

Each kit has service stars after you've unlocked everything in the kit

Like I said, engineer service stars and weapon services stars are 2 different things. Quit confusing him.

Each weapon has service stars every 100 kills

Each kit has service stars after you've unlocked everything in the kit

Got it, that is how I needed it explained haha thanks guys.

I usually drop them in places that have high traffic like payways to/from mcoms. I know how to use them and I think the range is entirely to small and the noise they make is not loud enough.

I disagree about the recon too. In BC2 with sensor balls and c4 you could tell they wanted recons moving around, it feels exactly the opposite now.

Why exactly does it feels the opposite now? Just because you now have the C4 on the support class?

And maybe we just play the recon class differently; On medium maps I pack the t-ugs with me, setup the sks with the pka-s gunsight and run around with my squad max three shotting everyone, placing the spawn point on key locations and the motion detectors where the team needs them. On large maps I switch the sight on the sks to x7 (never actually tried the 12x one yet, even though I got it unlocked), change the motion detectors to soflam and then on to placing it in a middle of the map in some high place for better coverage. Then I'm moving with my squad not forgetting to hide the spawn point by the capture point after we captured it, for easier access to it later when and if it's going to tried to be recaptured. And as the soflam automatically marks targets when it's unattended, I rarely have to check up on it. But I not forget to, using its pda (you can access soflam using the pda from any point on the map, no matter how far it is from the device).

The only time I actually stop moving significantly, is really rarely on choke points like in the entrance to the bazaar itself from the alley on Grand Bazaar.

I am terrible at this game. Somehow, my squad who i'm right next to manages to stay alive, but i'll randomly get sniped from an unknown location, or a guy really far away will kill me (how do they even see me?!). I am just playing 32 player matches atm, as the 64 player matches just seem like absolute cluster ****s. Anyone have some tips on how to do better in this? I feel like i'm out skilled in both reaction time, and being able to spot people from very far away.

I am terrible at this game. Somehow, my squad who i'm right next to manages to stay alive, but i'll randomly get sniped from an unknown location, or a guy really far away will kill me (how do they even see me?!). I am just playing 32 player matches atm, as the 64 player matches just seem like absolute cluster ****s. Anyone have some tips on how to do better in this? I feel like i'm out skilled in both reaction time, and being able to spot people from very far away.

Same here bro. I, too, at times don't know how I died or from where I am getting the suppression.

Try to stay behind the cover and come out steadily aiming at the other side, where you think that goddamn camper is.

Sweeeeeet. I haven't been able to play for more than an hour at a time due to work, school and other things. Hopefully this week will be quiet and I can really get a better feel for the game :) I'm only level 3 :(

I totally can relate, as I am only a Level 5 myself, and will be for quite some time since Uncharted 3 comes out today and not only that, as you pointed out, real life comes first.

With that said, the great thing about Battlefield, is the longevity of the series. This game is going to be here for a long time to come, so we basically have all of the time in the world, and the thing I personally think they do a great job of is not making higher ranked people overwhelmingly more powerful. I can definitely hold my own with any ranked person.

I am terrible at this game. Somehow, my squad who i'm right next to manages to stay alive, but i'll randomly get sniped from an unknown location, or a guy really far away will kill me (how do they even see me?!). I am just playing 32 player matches atm, as the 64 player matches just seem like absolute cluster ****s. Anyone have some tips on how to do better in this? I feel like i'm out skilled in both reaction time, and being able to spot people from very far away.

I would say your teammates are making better use of cover than you, and standing near them draw attention to your location while theyre shooting hints why a "random" kill is actually just a sniper setting up shop. Also "how did they see me" you have to realize some people have massive scopes, especially if you not coming from a sniper class you might not realise just how far they can zoom in. I would also suggest peaking through small areas, much safer, under trucks too - been getting quite a few people that way. Game type youre playing would also help us help you (unless I missed it).

the great thing about Battlefield, is the longevity of the series. This game is going to be here for a long time to come, so we basically have all of the time in the world, and the thing I personally think they do a great job of is not making higher ranked people overwhelmingly more powerful. I can definitely hold my own with any ranked person.

(Y)

Another thing, on XBL is there any way to guarantee you will actually be on the same team? My roommates and I squad up and get in an XBL party, so technically we are already in a squad. Yet somehow when we enter a game, we are not in the same squad and over half the time not even the same team.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!