Recommended Posts

I haven't got motion assist ribbons yet because i haven't hit 5+ spotted, always less than 4 heh.

You got more than 5?

No, I just wasn't aware of how short the range on it is. It's like 10 feet, if that. Whatever the case it's still completely useless because the range is so small you'll be able to see anyone who it would spot anyways.

All in all the recon kit compared to bc2 is not nearly as interesting or dynamic. All the gadgets they've given the kit are based on the theory that you're not going to to be moving around. It's lame.

Thanks all. (Y)

So looks like I need to unlock those missiles... or just stick to driving the tank which is a much more likely scenario. :laugh:

Thats my plan! I was driving around a tank minding my own business yesterday and saw a foot solder trying to RPG my tank. It did not end well for him!

Side question - is it possible for tanks to shoot down air vehicles?

No, I just wasn't aware of how short the range on it is. It's like 10 feet, if that. Whatever the case it's still completely useless because the range is so small you'll be able to see anyone who it would spot anyways.

All in all the recon kit compared to bc2 is not nearly as interesting or dynamic. All the gadgets they've given the kit are based on the theory that you're not going to to be moving around. It's lame.

You're using the motion detector wrong. You suppose to place them by the walls to detect enemies in buildings behind those walls. Not in open area, where it's really has no use (other than warn on upcoming squads and vehicles).

And recon isn't designed to stay in one spot. The only gadget that recon has that forces him to stay in one spot, is the MAV (and even that covers more ground that recon itself on foot). Everything else is designed to keep him moving and reconnaissance.

Thats my plan! I was driving around a tank minding my own business yesterday and saw a foot solder trying to RPG my tank. It did not end well for him!

Side question - is it possible for tanks to shoot down air vehicles?

Let me build on yxz's response with a HELL YES!

That is perhaps the most exciting kill a tank can get, at least IMO, when you shoot a copter (or more rare, a jet) out of the sky. I had a round in Bad Company 2 where I shot down 6 copters in one round. Was incredibly fun and exhilarating. (Y)

The best advice I can give for taking out copters is definitely "lead" the shot. It is all about trying to anticipate where they will be, at least from longer distances. It is definitely challenging when they are far away, but definitely incredibly rewarding when done properly.

Are service stars given out when there are no more upgrades? I am asking because I am still pretty new to BF but I am only lvl 16 and got my first service star for engineering and my 2nd star is shown as the next item, 145000 points from now haha. I am asking so I understand and so I can begin working on maxing other classes if only service stars are to come (from engineering).

Are service stars given out when there are no more upgrades? I am asking because I am still pretty new to BF but I am only lvl 16 and got my first service star for engineering and my 2nd star is shown as the next item, 145000 points from now haha. I am asking so I understand and so I can begin working on maxing other classes if only service stars are to come (from engineering).

They are awarded on every 100 kills with the weapon

  • Like 1

You're using the motion detector wrong. You suppose to place them by the walls to detect enemies in buildings behind those walls. Not in open area, where it's really has no use (other than warn on upcoming squads and vehicles).

And recon isn't designed to stay in one spot. The only gadget that recon has that forces him to stay in one spot, is the MAV (and even that covers more ground that recon itself on foot). Everything else is designed to keep him moving and reconnaissance.

I usually drop them in places that have high traffic like payways to/from mcoms. I know how to use them and I think the range is entirely to small and the noise they make is not loud enough.

I disagree about the recon too. In BC2 with sensor balls and c4 you could tell they wanted recons moving around, it feels exactly the opposite now.

Let me build on yxz's response with a HELL YES!

That is perhaps the most exciting kill a tank can get, at least IMO, when you shoot a copter (or more rare, a jet) out of the sky. I had a round in Bad Company 2 where I shot down 6 copters in one round. Was incredibly fun and exhilarating. (Y)

The best advice I can give for taking out copters is definitely "lead" the shot. It is all about trying to anticipate where they will be, at least from longer distances. It is definitely challenging when they are far away, but definitely incredibly rewarding when done properly.

Sweeeeeet. I haven't been able to play for more than an hour at a time due to work, school and other things. Hopefully this week will be quiet and I can really get a better feel for the game :) I'm only level 3 :(

I never used a console to play video games , I always used the PC. I hear that it is far superior on a PC. Shooting and hitting your target is better,

I was a console gamer first and it has its benefits. You can sit back comfortably and play the game with a controller in your hand. I was still a beast on Halo 3 with a controller :)

No.

You'll get it every time you kill 100 enemies, with the same weapon

Like I said, engineer service stars and weapon services stars are 2 different things. Quit confusing him.

Each weapon has service stars every 100 kills

Each kit has service stars after you've unlocked everything in the kit

Like I said, engineer service stars and weapon services stars are 2 different things. Quit confusing him.

Each weapon has service stars every 100 kills

Each kit has service stars after you've unlocked everything in the kit

Got it, that is how I needed it explained haha thanks guys.

I usually drop them in places that have high traffic like payways to/from mcoms. I know how to use them and I think the range is entirely to small and the noise they make is not loud enough.

I disagree about the recon too. In BC2 with sensor balls and c4 you could tell they wanted recons moving around, it feels exactly the opposite now.

Why exactly does it feels the opposite now? Just because you now have the C4 on the support class?

And maybe we just play the recon class differently; On medium maps I pack the t-ugs with me, setup the sks with the pka-s gunsight and run around with my squad max three shotting everyone, placing the spawn point on key locations and the motion detectors where the team needs them. On large maps I switch the sight on the sks to x7 (never actually tried the 12x one yet, even though I got it unlocked), change the motion detectors to soflam and then on to placing it in a middle of the map in some high place for better coverage. Then I'm moving with my squad not forgetting to hide the spawn point by the capture point after we captured it, for easier access to it later when and if it's going to tried to be recaptured. And as the soflam automatically marks targets when it's unattended, I rarely have to check up on it. But I not forget to, using its pda (you can access soflam using the pda from any point on the map, no matter how far it is from the device).

The only time I actually stop moving significantly, is really rarely on choke points like in the entrance to the bazaar itself from the alley on Grand Bazaar.

I am terrible at this game. Somehow, my squad who i'm right next to manages to stay alive, but i'll randomly get sniped from an unknown location, or a guy really far away will kill me (how do they even see me?!). I am just playing 32 player matches atm, as the 64 player matches just seem like absolute cluster ****s. Anyone have some tips on how to do better in this? I feel like i'm out skilled in both reaction time, and being able to spot people from very far away.

I am terrible at this game. Somehow, my squad who i'm right next to manages to stay alive, but i'll randomly get sniped from an unknown location, or a guy really far away will kill me (how do they even see me?!). I am just playing 32 player matches atm, as the 64 player matches just seem like absolute cluster ****s. Anyone have some tips on how to do better in this? I feel like i'm out skilled in both reaction time, and being able to spot people from very far away.

Same here bro. I, too, at times don't know how I died or from where I am getting the suppression.

Try to stay behind the cover and come out steadily aiming at the other side, where you think that goddamn camper is.

Sweeeeeet. I haven't been able to play for more than an hour at a time due to work, school and other things. Hopefully this week will be quiet and I can really get a better feel for the game :) I'm only level 3 :(

I totally can relate, as I am only a Level 5 myself, and will be for quite some time since Uncharted 3 comes out today and not only that, as you pointed out, real life comes first.

With that said, the great thing about Battlefield, is the longevity of the series. This game is going to be here for a long time to come, so we basically have all of the time in the world, and the thing I personally think they do a great job of is not making higher ranked people overwhelmingly more powerful. I can definitely hold my own with any ranked person.

I am terrible at this game. Somehow, my squad who i'm right next to manages to stay alive, but i'll randomly get sniped from an unknown location, or a guy really far away will kill me (how do they even see me?!). I am just playing 32 player matches atm, as the 64 player matches just seem like absolute cluster ****s. Anyone have some tips on how to do better in this? I feel like i'm out skilled in both reaction time, and being able to spot people from very far away.

I would say your teammates are making better use of cover than you, and standing near them draw attention to your location while theyre shooting hints why a "random" kill is actually just a sniper setting up shop. Also "how did they see me" you have to realize some people have massive scopes, especially if you not coming from a sniper class you might not realise just how far they can zoom in. I would also suggest peaking through small areas, much safer, under trucks too - been getting quite a few people that way. Game type youre playing would also help us help you (unless I missed it).

the great thing about Battlefield, is the longevity of the series. This game is going to be here for a long time to come, so we basically have all of the time in the world, and the thing I personally think they do a great job of is not making higher ranked people overwhelmingly more powerful. I can definitely hold my own with any ranked person.

(Y)

Another thing, on XBL is there any way to guarantee you will actually be on the same team? My roommates and I squad up and get in an XBL party, so technically we are already in a squad. Yet somehow when we enter a game, we are not in the same squad and over half the time not even the same team.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!