Recommended Posts

Tip to anyone trying to level up jets, Play lots of caspian border rush and use the warthog/frogfoot. they are much easier to get kills with than the other jets. One pass with your main gun can easily kill a tank.

Actually, as a total jet noob, I've found the A10 Thunderbolt the most enjoyable to fly. Granted I've spent around 30 minutes in jets and have yet to get a single kill which isn't kamikaze. My problem is in cockpit mode on an attempted machine gun run, I fly a hair too low and end up hitting things like cranes or stupid objects. I've had some matches where I was 0-10 in KD due to the jets. Sure it murders my stats, but it's sadly the only way to practice.

Probably is. Battlelog works perfectly here. I use it on IE 9, and use firefox 8 for my normal browsing.

Yeah, I've tried Firefox, Chrome, Opera, and IE. With admuncher disabled, firewall disabled, antivirus disabled, anything else I can think of and I still get stuck on "Loading Stats". It was working as it should until a few days ago but I have no idea what's changed.

Eventually when I get fed up with it enough I'll boot into safe mode and see if it still happens then. The only thing I can think of is that I recently updated java. :wacko:

True and false lol ^_^ but for the most part i would just stick with origin :-P

On an unrelated note, whos ready to see something epic?

That's awesome.

I have hear rumors of a "crack" that lets people run BF3 bypassing origin and going straight to battlelog, but i shall not say anything about where I heard such rumors. I dont see the point in bypassing it since origin hasnt hurt me in anyway but some people might think its useful to them.

it's not a rumour...

Actually, as a total jet noob, I've found the A10 Thunderbolt the most enjoyable to fly. Granted I've spent around 30 minutes in jets and have yet to get a single kill which isn't kamikaze. My problem is in cockpit mode on an attempted machine gun run, I fly a hair too low and end up hitting things like cranes or stupid objects. I've had some matches where I was 0-10 in KD due to the jets. Sure it murders my stats, but it's sadly the only way to practice.

Same. I have tanked my stats a lot trying to learn jets, my flight is perfect. I can stay up an entire round in the same jet dodging locks and other jets, and flipping around.... But I have to get a single damn kill on anything. I try to take down other jets with the machine gun, but to no avail, I barely hit them. When I strafe the ground, I never get anything, even firing on tanks, flying slow and low. I love flying them more than anything in this game, but I just can't kill anything!

True and false lol ^_^ but for the most part i would just stick with origin :-P

On an unrelated note, whos ready to see something epic?

That is the greatest thing I have seen yet!

What level is this? I haven't come across this base-jump platform on the XB360 version.

EDIT: Never mind, looked it up. Guess you have to play Damavand Peak on Rush. I only play Conquest, so I'll have to switch over to check this out!

Battlefield 3 Coming to Steam Rumors Surface Once More

bf3-steam.jpg

While unfortunately too late for those already toiling in Origin, further rumors have surfaced regarding Steam obtaining Battlefield 3. Though we?ve been fooled before, this time the word comes from two separate sources, a stashed-away portion of code and a possible slip from a graphics card company.

Those digging into the PunkBuster anti-cheat system for Steam reportedly discovered the following lines of code.

  • C:\Program Files (x86)\Electronic Arts\Battlefield 3\
  • C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\SteamApps\common\battlefield 3\
  • C:\Program Files\Steam\SteamApps\common\battlefield 3\
  • C:\Program Files\Electronic Arts\Battlefield 3\

But, we?ve been tricked by hidden code hinting at content before. It doesn?t end there, though. Graphics card company Sapphire listed a prize for an upcoming contest as, ?One (1) PC Game code for Battlefield 3, redeemable for the game on Steam (www.steampowered.com) with a Suggested Retail Price of $USD 59.99?

The beginning of the month cruelly teased us with the word that EA and Valve were ?hard at work? regarding Battlefield 3 and Steam. This, of course, turned out to be either false or for naught. But, if there was truly some serious effort made at this meeting of giants, and these current rumors are accurate, then it may still possible to play Battlefield 3 on Steam.

This mystical transfer would mean players could dodge the awkward menu system of Origin and Battlelog. It would also mean your friends could efficiently harass you for playing BF3 and not Team Fortress 2.

http://geek.pikimal.com/2011/10/31/battlefield-3-coming-to-steam-rumors-surface-once-more/

On an unrelated note, whos ready to see something epic?

This is the best thing I have seen in a FPS since playing Halo 2 and watching my teammate jump off the underneath platform, on Lockout, to save the flag and throw it back onto the ledge as we carried it to victory in sudden death.

Peak is a really fun map, but riddled with ****ty snipers, luckly my mortars cure that lol. If you can get past the craptastic people that like to sit back and snipe and not do objectives the map is great, and the jump is always fun, i still find myself yelling "weeeeeeee" as i jump lol.

There is one thing I would like to see, the ability to look at a platoon you are in and compare your stats to everyone else in there. like a platoon leader board.

Peak is a really fun map, but riddled with ****ty snipers, luckly my mortars cure that lol. If you can get past the craptastic people that like to sit back and snipe and not do objectives the map is great, and the jump is always fun, i still find myself yelling "weeeeeeee" as i jump lol.

There is one thing I would like to see, the ability to look at a platoon you are in and compare your stats to everyone else in there. like a platoon leader board.

I second that. That's been my experience with it too. And then the tunnel at the end. It's pretty much suicide to run down them. It's not much better in conquest, too.

Just recorded a round of A10-Thunderbolt gameplay :) Much prefer flying these to the jets, wish they weren't only found in rush mode.

Of course the round before I went 14-1 with it and wasn't recording :( I think on the round I recorded the other team just gave up on the jet :rofl:

post-159052-0-74048500-1320170756_thumb.

This mystical transfer would mean players could dodge the awkward menu system of Origin and Battlelog. It would also mean your friends could efficiently harass you for playing BF3 and not Team Fortress 2.

Even if it comes to steam, I doubt it will get rid of Battlelog. You need battlelog for a lot of things. Including the stats.

And personally, I think battlelog is the best thing ever. But definatelly not Origin.

Just recorded a round of A10-Thunderbolt gameplay :) Much prefer flying these to the jets, wish they weren't only found in rush mode.

Of course the round before I went 14-1 with it and wasn't recording :( I think on the round I recorded the other team just gave up on the jet :rofl:

post-159052-0-74048500-1320170756_thumb.

Impressive flying. What do you use to control the jet?

I use the WASD and arrow keys but I don't find it that accurate. I can't use the mouse because it's backwards for me and I haven't noticed a way to reverse up and down while in jets.

Even if it comes to steam, I doubt it will get rid of Battlelog. You need battlelog for a lot of things. Including the stats.

And personally, I think battlelog is the best thing ever. But definatelly not Origin.

I like the battlelog and honestly have no issues with Origin, you launch it and then never see it again. The cool thing is that games that I have purchased in the past just showed up one day, even my BFBC2 which I lost in a move.

Just recorded a round of A10-Thunderbolt gameplay :) Much prefer flying these to the jets, wish they weren't only found in rush mode.

Of course the round before I went 14-1 with it and wasn't recording :( I think on the round I recorded the other team just gave up on the jet :rofl:

Thanks for the video, I have a much better understanding now of how to get kills.

I keep getting a ton of stutter during gameplay. I'm using a Nvidia 460 graphics card, but despite putting my graphics down to low i will get constantly framerate dips and 5 second freezes while playing. This is generally fatal for me, and i find it's nearly impossible to play with this issue. Besides that, i've found 20 player matches to be very enjoyable, it's not overwhelming and i am actually getting a few kills.

I keep getting a ton of stutter during gameplay. I'm using a Nvidia 460 graphics card, but despite putting my graphics down to low i will get constantly framerate dips and 5 second freezes while playing. This is generally fatal for me, and i find it's nearly impossible to play with this issue. Besides that, i've found 20 player matches to be very enjoyable, it's not overwhelming and i am actually getting a few kills.

I have a 460 and it plays the Game OK and I do not get what you are getting. It heats up pretty fast. Are you using the recommended Nvidia Drivers?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!