Recommended Posts

I'm also really getting into it. My progress is slow in terms of getting promoted but really liking everything about it.. the sound on it is just incredible! Playing the Firestorm map with the jets and helicopters overhead and stuff - it's sensational.

I really do wish they would show you what map is next on the end of round screen. I don't see any reason why they can't do that, especially when they have that leaver stat and leaving affects your w/l ratio. I also hate getting put into conquest games when the server I joined is called 24/7 rush blah blah blah, too.

I guess maybe it's hard to do because map rotations aren't static and are unique for each server? That or dice is just lazy..

Agreed. It would be great if they implemented something like that soon. It doesn't bother me too much though as I like to play all the maps equally.

I'm also really getting into it. My progress is slow in terms of getting promoted but really liking everything about it.. the sound on it is just incredible! Playing the Firestorm map with the jets and helicopters overhead and stuff - it's sensational.

It's definitely awesome. :D

Anyway, I play on the Xbox 360 and there are two things that bother me: people that can't work together as a team and ace pilots. The former is to be expected on consoles but the latter came as a huge surprise to me. I don't use jets a lot but when I do, I get shot down by other jets quite easily. The same goes for helicopters. One thing I was really good at in Battlefield 2 was piloting jets and helicopters. I would take down a lot of people and sometimes, that resulted in me being kicked (and sometimes banned) by the server admin. All of this was with a keyboard and mouse, by the way. I bought a joystick back in 2006 for BF2 and I was even better at piloting the jets and helicopters. Unfortunately, those skills didn't fully carry over to the Xbox 360 controller. I'm great at piloting the helicopters in BF3 but not-so-great with the jets. I can pilot them fine in terms of staying in the air but I absolutely suck when it comes to dogfights. Maybe it's my controller sensitivity but I can't turn as sharply as other jet pilots. It's annoying because it's hard for me to level up the jets. I think I just recently unlocked flares after flying around for a combined time of ~40 minutes.

Unfortunately, those skills didn't fully carry over to the Xbox 360 controller. I'm great at piloting the helicopters in BF3 but not-so-great with the jets. I can pilot them fine in terms of staying in the air but I absolutely suck when it comes to dogfights. Maybe it's my controller sensitivity but I can't turn as sharply as other jet pilots. It's annoying because it's hard for me to level up the jets. I think I just recently unlocked flares after flying around for a combined time of ~40 minutes.

The 360 is harder to pilot, switch heli stick to legacy and their the same as BC2 I think, as for jets, I was the same took like 40mins to unlock flares, but once you have them things get a lot easier as you can avoid missiles, give it another 10-20 mins you'll have missiles and then it gets a lot easier, especially if you have a squad member in jets as well 1 can fire cause enemy to use flares 2nd takes the shot, enemy has no protection. Just persist and try attacking heli's as the don't move as fast they're easier to hit....Just be careful not to keep shooting them for too long on one run before pulling out, I did that a few times and just smashed right into them.

All I want is to be able to pick my spawn point from the actual map on the ride side of the screen while dead rather than having to scroll/click through the squad and captured points list on the left while surveying map to see who/where it will take me.

Just like BFBC2.

  • Like 1

Not sure if it was posted, but look at that :

How to get easy points. This will probably be patched asap.

http://kotaku.com/58...nts-****s-broke

I just find that makes the game pointless, I like the challenge of not having the best weapons and working to get them and higher ranks.

I guess they only way they could fix that is make it so your own team can't damage the teams gadgets?

No, in BC2 you stopped getting points after a certain amount of repairs/revives/resupplies. They'll just add that into the game, although it seems kind of stupid they didn't have a cap already.

I guess they only way they could fix that is make it so your own team can't damage the teams gadgets?

This is why hardcore is hardcore, FF is on and so is team damage. I would think it would be hard for them to patch this in such a quick way because of the actual people who DO repair their own teams equipment alot, I do this alot as an engineer but dont play on hardcore so I'm doing it on our vehicles and it alone is alot of points as well. Just look for peoples accounts who have alot of engineering points but not alot of time played, then you can see whos doing this exploit.

and they no longer have that sniper rifle accurate machine gun?

Yeah, medic is combined with the assault kit to encourage people to push forward more and lmg's were given to an actual support class. The class balance is pretty damn good and actually makes a little bit of sense compared to BC2.

Yes, medic trains as they were in bc2 are impossible. No more revive immunity (also the defibs hit reg is kind of terrible lol)

nice. pretty much the reason i stopped playing conquest in BC2... 6-7 medics coming at you in a staggered line you might as well rage quit before they even get to you cause you have no chance.

Yeah, medic is combined with the assault kit to encourage people to push forward more and lmg's were given to an actual support class. The class balance is pretty damn good cause one douche doesn't have full balance control and actually makes a little bit of sense compared to BC2.

fixed ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Python programmers in a nutshell. Now, guess what lang most AI programmers use... :-)
    • There was nothing whatsoever wrong with Vista as an OS after the SP1 update. People who claim it wasn't were using ancient machines for some silly reason. Not kidding, no hyperbole/exaggeration. Vista was good.
    • Windows ME was worse.
    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      443
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!