Recommended Posts

This is a great idea. Why have three separate threads? Mozilla is confusing me enough. :whistle:

Lol why blame mozilla? Its by me and erm i am the one who should be blamed? :s

If you create a thread for each thing like that won't it start spreading the discussion a little thin?

if we go by

Firefox (Nightly & Aurora together) and Firefox (Stable) threads , then Nightly & Aurora will involve discussions about latest landings , etc , while Stable will deal with problems , how tos , addons etc etc in just FINAL builds.

What say??

Firefox (Nightly & Aurora) and Firefox (Stable) Threads

(about pre-release builds) and (about final builds)

No, I think it's a fine to have a separate thread for the release version. That way, users of the stable version will not be confused and can easily post their queries there. The pre-release versions though (5,6 or whatever) should only have one thread since with the rapid updates (those are pre-releases), "web browser discussion" might turn into just "firefox discussion". On the pre-releases thread, maybe try and advise users to post whichever channel/version their using :)

Edit: oops, you beat me to it

so what is the final conclusion?

To make Meet Firefox X.0 as X.0 releases , while have one thread which involves just Firefox Pre-Release Discussion ?

MODS please you are needed here :s

(btw right now its so irritating to check two threads at same time :|)

If we have a thread for the Nightly and Aurora build channels, and maybe a discussion thread created when the final release gets pushed out. That would probably be fine. It's how Opera's threads are managed.

What I mean is as soon as a final version is released, a thread is created.

If we have a thread for the Nightly and Aurora build channels, and maybe a discussion thread created when the final release gets pushed out. That would probably be fine. It's how Opera's threads are managed.

So :

Create Meet Firefox X.0 when X.0 releases

and have Firefox (Nightly and Aurora) as primary discussion thread for PRE RELEASES of firefox

is it fine?

with that said , we gotta leave this thread for just firefox 5.0 and rename firefox 6.0 thread as just firefox (nightly and aurora) having all firefox nightly and aurora discussions , is it alright ?

So :

Create Meet Firefox X.0 when X.0 releases

and have Firefox (Nightly and Aurora) as primary discussion thread for PRE RELEASES of firefox

is it fine?

with that said , we gotta leave this thread for just firefox 5.0 and rename firefox 6.0 thread as just firefox (nightly and aurora) having all firefox nightly and aurora discussions , is it alright ?

We could just get the 5.0 and 6.0 threads merged, the title of the merged thread renamed, and have any major release thread posted. So when say, Firefox 4.2 releases, post the thread 'Firefox 4.2 Out Now' or something like that.

We could just get the 5.0 and 6.0 threads merged, the title of the merged thread renamed, and have any major release thread posted. So when say, Firefox 4.2 releases, post the thread 'Firefox 4.2 Out Now' or something like that.

okay!

i think its very safe option , MODS please merge Meet Firefox 6.0 into this thread , rest can be handled by us

Screenshot of Aurora:

capture.png

I quite like the artwork.

Thats so awesome!! :D

Will that update normally (I mean it's not 'overwrite another version to update')?

Also, this is the only thing I need, right? --> "firefox-5.0a2.en-US.win32.installer.exe"

I do not have any experience on using ftp builds so enlighten me :)

it will update to aurora builds as soon as they are out , you can change your channel to beta or release to get latest beta (none ATM) or to latest release (ff4)

I wish they would've kept the build dates on the About dialog. I know you can find out elsewhere, but it was convenient.

Will that update normally (I mean it's not 'overwrite another version to update')?

Also, this is the only thing I need, right? --> "firefox-5.0a2.en-US.win32.installer.exe"

I do not have any experience on using ftp builds so enlighten me :)

It won't overwrite your FF4.0 or Nightly installation if that's what you mean. And yes, that installer is all you need.

okay!

i think its very safe option , MODS please merge Meet Firefox 6.0 into this thread , rest can be handled by us

erm , since firefox 5.0 is gonna be out soon , so lets forget this merging thing for time being , i am renaming Firefox 6.0 thread to Meet Firefox Next and it will be used for all pre release version discussion, use this thread for only firefox 5.0 discussion , when firefox 6.0 will be released , new thread for 6.0 will be created , and Meet Firefox Next will remain unaffected. Now please dont change this plan , m so tired of changing plans and doing nothing to be exact :s

Finally : This thread will be used for firefox 5.0 discussion only , use Meet Firefox Next for nightly etc discussion

But can I use it side by side with the stable version (similar with how minefiled used to be)?

you gotta make separate profiles and install in different directories

I'm not sure if it reflects anything, but the newest version of the Firefox Nightlies is 6.0a1. Mozilla must really be preparing for a very aggressive new release system; here's hoping they can do it. I know I'd love Firefox to maintain its current position in the world of web browsers.

I previously used this code to shrink the height of tabs in Fx4:

.tabbrowser-tab, .tabs-newtab-button {
 -moz-border-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab.png") 5 3 3 3 / 5px 3px 3px 3px repeat stretch !important;
}

Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work too great in Fx5. Would appreciate some help with it, thanks.

But can I use it side by side with the stable version (similar with how minefiled used to be)?

Im using portableapps versions labeled as nightly, but now i dont know which one it is lol... But anyway, i think its much better solution than downloading installers or zip packages from bottomless Mozilla servers. Such a pity that you cant run it simultaneously without editing environment variables.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!