Recommended Posts

This is a great idea. Why have three separate threads? Mozilla is confusing me enough. :whistle:

Lol why blame mozilla? Its by me and erm i am the one who should be blamed? :s

If you create a thread for each thing like that won't it start spreading the discussion a little thin?

if we go by

Firefox (Nightly & Aurora together) and Firefox (Stable) threads , then Nightly & Aurora will involve discussions about latest landings , etc , while Stable will deal with problems , how tos , addons etc etc in just FINAL builds.

What say??

Firefox (Nightly & Aurora) and Firefox (Stable) Threads

(about pre-release builds) and (about final builds)

No, I think it's a fine to have a separate thread for the release version. That way, users of the stable version will not be confused and can easily post their queries there. The pre-release versions though (5,6 or whatever) should only have one thread since with the rapid updates (those are pre-releases), "web browser discussion" might turn into just "firefox discussion". On the pre-releases thread, maybe try and advise users to post whichever channel/version their using :)

Edit: oops, you beat me to it

so what is the final conclusion?

To make Meet Firefox X.0 as X.0 releases , while have one thread which involves just Firefox Pre-Release Discussion ?

MODS please you are needed here :s

(btw right now its so irritating to check two threads at same time :|)

If we have a thread for the Nightly and Aurora build channels, and maybe a discussion thread created when the final release gets pushed out. That would probably be fine. It's how Opera's threads are managed.

What I mean is as soon as a final version is released, a thread is created.

If we have a thread for the Nightly and Aurora build channels, and maybe a discussion thread created when the final release gets pushed out. That would probably be fine. It's how Opera's threads are managed.

So :

Create Meet Firefox X.0 when X.0 releases

and have Firefox (Nightly and Aurora) as primary discussion thread for PRE RELEASES of firefox

is it fine?

with that said , we gotta leave this thread for just firefox 5.0 and rename firefox 6.0 thread as just firefox (nightly and aurora) having all firefox nightly and aurora discussions , is it alright ?

So :

Create Meet Firefox X.0 when X.0 releases

and have Firefox (Nightly and Aurora) as primary discussion thread for PRE RELEASES of firefox

is it fine?

with that said , we gotta leave this thread for just firefox 5.0 and rename firefox 6.0 thread as just firefox (nightly and aurora) having all firefox nightly and aurora discussions , is it alright ?

We could just get the 5.0 and 6.0 threads merged, the title of the merged thread renamed, and have any major release thread posted. So when say, Firefox 4.2 releases, post the thread 'Firefox 4.2 Out Now' or something like that.

We could just get the 5.0 and 6.0 threads merged, the title of the merged thread renamed, and have any major release thread posted. So when say, Firefox 4.2 releases, post the thread 'Firefox 4.2 Out Now' or something like that.

okay!

i think its very safe option , MODS please merge Meet Firefox 6.0 into this thread , rest can be handled by us

Screenshot of Aurora:

capture.png

I quite like the artwork.

Thats so awesome!! :D

Will that update normally (I mean it's not 'overwrite another version to update')?

Also, this is the only thing I need, right? --> "firefox-5.0a2.en-US.win32.installer.exe"

I do not have any experience on using ftp builds so enlighten me :)

it will update to aurora builds as soon as they are out , you can change your channel to beta or release to get latest beta (none ATM) or to latest release (ff4)

I wish they would've kept the build dates on the About dialog. I know you can find out elsewhere, but it was convenient.

Will that update normally (I mean it's not 'overwrite another version to update')?

Also, this is the only thing I need, right? --> "firefox-5.0a2.en-US.win32.installer.exe"

I do not have any experience on using ftp builds so enlighten me :)

It won't overwrite your FF4.0 or Nightly installation if that's what you mean. And yes, that installer is all you need.

okay!

i think its very safe option , MODS please merge Meet Firefox 6.0 into this thread , rest can be handled by us

erm , since firefox 5.0 is gonna be out soon , so lets forget this merging thing for time being , i am renaming Firefox 6.0 thread to Meet Firefox Next and it will be used for all pre release version discussion, use this thread for only firefox 5.0 discussion , when firefox 6.0 will be released , new thread for 6.0 will be created , and Meet Firefox Next will remain unaffected. Now please dont change this plan , m so tired of changing plans and doing nothing to be exact :s

Finally : This thread will be used for firefox 5.0 discussion only , use Meet Firefox Next for nightly etc discussion

But can I use it side by side with the stable version (similar with how minefiled used to be)?

you gotta make separate profiles and install in different directories

I'm not sure if it reflects anything, but the newest version of the Firefox Nightlies is 6.0a1. Mozilla must really be preparing for a very aggressive new release system; here's hoping they can do it. I know I'd love Firefox to maintain its current position in the world of web browsers.

I previously used this code to shrink the height of tabs in Fx4:

.tabbrowser-tab, .tabs-newtab-button {
 -moz-border-image: url("chrome://browser/skin/tabbrowser/tab.png") 5 3 3 3 / 5px 3px 3px 3px repeat stretch !important;
}

Unfortunately it doesn't seem to work too great in Fx5. Would appreciate some help with it, thanks.

But can I use it side by side with the stable version (similar with how minefiled used to be)?

Im using portableapps versions labeled as nightly, but now i dont know which one it is lol... But anyway, i think its much better solution than downloading installers or zip packages from bottomless Mozilla servers. Such a pity that you cant run it simultaneously without editing environment variables.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The useful lapdogs  
    • Nobody is buying a PS5 only for playing Until Dawn 2. Their loss.
    • If you actually used it instead of responding like a petulant child you might be surprised. I switched from Google some time ago and have been very satisfied.
    • I am one of the first people to use the DXVK technology. In the channel below you can see some videos that I have made using this technology, including Assassin's Creed Odyssey. https://www.youtube.com/@nahum7995/videos Assassin's Creed Odyssey experienced several bugs and technical issues during its first months after release. It launched with its own fair share of funny but frustrating glitches. I ran it on DXVK 9 days after its release and I played it for many hours but didn't see a single significant bug on Linux. Assassin's Creed Odyssey is widely celebrated for pushing the franchise in bold new directions and specifically for nailing several elements better than any other title in the AC series: Player Choice & Branching Narrative, The Mercenary & Cultist System, Mythological Integration, Overpowered Combat Abilities, Open World Exploration But what I'm trying to point out is that this game wasn't quite playable on most windows systems, until a few months after its release when most of the bugs were fixed. However, on Linux it ran completely flawless from day one, although DXVK had seen little development and refinement at the time. What do you think the situation will be in 2026 now that most bugs and glitches of DXVK have been completely eliminated? This is information from Google about these situations that I am quoting. In many cases, using DXVK (a translation layer that converts DirectX 9, 10, or 11 into Vulkan) can result in more stable frame times and higher performance than native Windows rendering. This happens primarily by bypassing driver overhead and multithreading draw calls that were previously restricted to a single CPU core. Older APIs (like DirectX 9 and 11) are largely single-threaded on the CPU side. DXVK translates these calls to Vulkan, which is highly multi-threaded. This reduces CPU-bound stuttering on weaker processors. In certain cases, GPU manufacturers (especially AMD) have significantly better and more modern Vulkan drivers than they do for legacy DirectX. Vulkan gives developers—and in this case, the translation layer—closer control over how resources are held in VRAM. This can prevent micro-stutters and sudden frame drops during chaotic gameplay. Yes, certain games, particularly older DirectX 9 to 11 titles, can run with fewer crashes on DXVK than on native Windows. By intercepting DirectX draw calls and translating them into the modern, highly efficient Vulkan API, DXVK bypasses the limitations and poor driver support that cause instability in aging game engines. PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 can be easily and perfectly emulated on Linux. In fact, modern Linux emulators offer high-performance upscaling, widescreen patches, and automatic controller mapping out of the box.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 PlayStation 1/2/3 games look drastically better on Linux thanks to resolution upscaling. Furthermore, it is also a fact that you cannot play many fun games on Windows either, isn't it? - The Nintendo Switch has an extensive library of exclusive games. - PlayStation has an extensive library of exclusive games - Android has "mobile-exclusive" games, meaning they are exclusive to mobile devices (iOS and Android) and aren't available on PC or consoles. And finally, it is also the case that in the next five years there will be games that millions of people will say you absolutely must play and that they want to play this specific game that released a few days ago. However, the other side of this story is that currently, absolutely no one cares that they cannot play these upcoming games right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!