Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Konstantine said:

I, on the other hand, cannot wait for Servo to show up. :p I haven't understood the whole WebExtensions thing but if I can use uBlock Origin, Stylish and Youtube High Definition on Firefox 57+ then I don't really care. uBlock Origin has a WebExtension version if I recall correctly.

just install Chrome Extensions in Firefox now by Adding a https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/chrome-store-foxified/ in Firefox now an you'll get a Preview of what WebExtensions will be like , once you install that Extension, then install a Extension from the Chrome Store 

2 hours ago, Gary7 said:

Stylish will be gone.

If they're making Firefox compatible with Chrome extensions then stylish still exists but it is nowhere near as useful as Stylish on Firefox. On the old Firefox anyways...  It's pretty much limited to just websites.

There is different between Stylish for Fx and Ch, in the second one You can't control browser interface itself, that is why Ch Stylish is only substitute of this what we have on Fx... So sad.  After so many years withy FX I don't see alternative for my self.

9 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

Then I guess it will be Chrome or Cyberfox.

What's Cyberfox and why does it benefit with the (Intel/AMD) CPU variant over Firefox? (I use Chrome, Firefox and Edge (the latter only if I must!))

 

Would there be any benefit to me switching from Firefox x64 to Cyberfox Intel x64? (I am rocking an i5-4400 Haswell btw fellas) 

  • Like 1
5 minutes ago, Steven P. said:

What's Cyberfox and why does it benefit with the (Intel/AMD) CPU variant over Firefox? (I use Chrome, Firefox and Edge (the latter only if I must!)

 

Would their be any benefit to me switching from Firefox x64 to Cyberfox Intel x64? (I am rocking an i5-4400 Haswell btw fellas) 

It runs better that Firefox and they have a tool called Profile Buddy that will transfer everything from Firefox 64 to Cyberfox 64. I am not sure if what Mozilla is doing with Fx  will affect Cyberfox or not. It is not really a clone as there are some changes in the programming. You can find all the info you need at the link below Steve. You may have to join their forum to get that tool. Good Luck. The Intel or AMD version will both work I was told.

https://cyberfox.8pecxstudios.com/

 

Cyberfox is Firefox based fork, working quite OK if You ask me, but we don;t know if changes made in Firefox 57 will not land in Cyberfox as well. I've ported Nightly profile direct into Cyberfox profile without problem. simple Ctrl C and Ctrl V ;)

 

Alternative is Palemoon browser, also nice and old school Firefox fork, based on 27 or 28 ESR.

Just now, Gary7 said:

It runs better that Firefox and they have a tool called Profile Buddy that will transfer everything from Firefox 64 to Cyberfox 64. I am not sure if what Mozilla is doing with Fx  will affect Cyberfox or not. It is not really a clone as there are some changes in the programming. You can find all the info you need at the link below Steve. You may have to join their forum to get that tool. Good Luck.

https://cyberfox.8pecxstudios.com/

 

Thanks Gary, I will definitely check it out! (Y)

  • Like 1
3 minutes ago, Boo Berry said:

IMO, there's no real world benefits to using Cyberfox or Waterfox over Firefox 64-bit for Windows. I've tried both and performance has always been the same.

Firefox will be not using extensions. Cyberfox also comes in a 32 bit platform. The performance is not better but the security is. This is what I have been told. Waterfox is strictly a clone while Cyberfox is not.

4 minutes ago, Gary7 said:

Firefox will be not using extensions. Cyberfox also comes in a 32 bit platform. The performance is not better but the security is. This is what I have been told. Waterfox is strictly a clone while Cyberfox is not.

Uhh, how? Security should be exactly the same since it's more-or-less based on Firefox's open source code with additional branding/skinning changes, and compiled using a different compiler than Mozilla uses (I believe it's the Intel compiler, as far as I know).

Exactly. These third-party Windows 64-bit builds of Firefox (in the case of Waterfox, and early Cyberfox builds until they added 32-bit builds) were popular and good to use before Mozilla pushed out an official Firefox 64-bit stable build for Windows a year ago. As such, if I recall correctly these third-party builds gained a little in terms of performance thanks to optimizations in the compiler used (e.g. SSE2) but I recalled correctly again Mozilla is using at least SSE2 now when compiling Firefox for official builds. But today I cannot note any performance difference with Firefox 64-bit vs Cyberfox 64-bit vs Waterfox 64-bit in real world use. I just tried all three and performance seemed the same for me. Firefox 64-bit on Windows should also benefit from PAE too by default, since after all it's a 64-bit binary.

 

It *might* have performance improvements on slower, older hardware but on this high-end machine I don't notice any difference.

  • Like 1
1 minute ago, Semtex said:

in some stages regular FX is safer since in forks some changes are fixed bit later.

Well, this might be true with Pale Moon somewhat, as long as Cyberfox/Waterfox is built against the newest stable releases, it should inherit all security-related changes from upstream.

12 minutes ago, Boo Berry said:

Uhh, how? Security should be exactly the same since it's more-or-less based on Firefox's open source code with additional branding/skinning changes, and compiled using a different compiler than Mozilla uses (I believe it's the Intel compiler, as far as I know).

I am talking about The 64 Bit Browser, any 64 Bit Browser. Not just Cyberfox as I already posted they do have a 32 Bit browser as well. Firefox will no longer be using extensions, read through the thread.

1 minute ago, Gary7 said:

I am talking about The 64 Bit Browser, any 64 Bit Browser. Not just Cyberfox as I already posted they do have a 32 Bit browser as well. Firefox will no longer be using extensions, read through the thread.

I'm already well aware of Mozilla's push for WebExtension-only extensions by the end of 2017, targeting Firefox 57. This will have an effect on Waterfox and Cyberfox too - Pale Moon likely not due to it being a full fork of Firefox with all kinds of legacy stuff (which doesn't make sense - I don't believe they're even willing to support EME!).

1 minute ago, Boo Berry said:

Well, this might be true with Pale Moon somewhat, as long as Cyberfox/Waterfox is built against the newest stable releases, it should inherit all security-related changes from upstream.

Waterfox is strictly a clone, Cyberfox has used the Firefox platform but coded it differently.

Just now, Boo Berry said:

I'm already well aware of Mozilla's push for WebExtension-only extensions by the end of 2017, targeting Firefox 57.

If so then you have no problems. It is not known if Cyberfox will permit extensions past release 56 or not? They may have to come up with their own Extension source which has been discussed.

1 minute ago, Gary7 said:

Cyberfox has used the Firefox platform but coded it differently.

Uhh, how? From what I'm seeing from the Cyberfox website and using the portable version is that it's still re-branded Firefox compiled in a different compiler and a different skin. Even if it has some cosmetic and feature changes, it's still largely still based on upstream code.

Just now, Gary7 said:

If so then you have no problems. It is not known if Cyberfox will permit extensions past release 56 or not? They may have to come up with their own Extension source which has been discussed.

I have no problems right now in Firefox, I only use one extension (Download Cleaner Lite) and it's already been ported as a WebExtension. :p But yeah, they might have to go the Pale Moon route and fully fork off. Waterfox will likely still be a straight re-brand.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!