Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, Boo Berry said:

Tampermonkey (which is a WebExtension) is available on Firefox now, so there's that. I read the Greasemonkey devs don't really know where to proceed.

a lot of Chromes Extensions can be installed on firefox Now , from Firefox 48 i believe you could/can do that This is the Addon you need to install other Chrome Extensions in Firefox

2 hours ago, Demz said:

dunno vhow many use DownThemAll . but that could possibly go Bye Bye to, an im not 100% sure about GreaseMonkey either

If the DownThemAll dev seemed even remotely interested in updating or fixing the extension, it'd most likely continue to work fine in the future.

 

I think the issues with Greasemonkey are mostly down to a few of their APIs being synchronous and having defined ordering, something that isn't really allowed with WebExtensions (For good reason)

1 hour ago, The_Decryptor said:

If the DownThemAll dev seemed even remotely interested in updating or fixing the extension, it'd most likely continue to work fine in the future.

 

I think the issues with Greasemonkey are mostly down to a few of their APIs being synchronous and having defined ordering, something that isn't really allowed with WebExtensions (For good reason)

the Dev(s) that do DownThemAll there is a Nightly Version ( 3.1 ) but looking at his Rant on his page here the Dev has a Rant but why continue making a Nightly version ?  DownThemAll Trunk akka Nightlies

7 hours ago, Demz said:

look on the bright side. its time for you firefox lovers to look for another browser or put upo with the changers. firefox is an will be DEAD by 57 an onwards , you might as well use Google Chrome

By Firefox 57 there will be 4 or more processes and more addons will be multithreaded, firefox will be nice and smooth by then. I think this will result in more people using firefox, more than those lost by a reduction of addons.

You can already enable multiple content processes now in Firefox Stable, for testing purposes I have mine set to 99.

9 hours ago, Lyraull said:

Now this just plain sucks. I use a userChrome.css file to remove additional useless crap (e.g. recently bookmarked) from the bookmarks menu.

as i said awhile ago , the removal of userchrome.css has been mentioned in the Mozillazine.org in Firefox General sub-forum Firefox General - MozillaZine

sommetime ago it has been mentioned . so its not New

will firefox Die? sure, a slow Death

8 hours ago, Boo Berry said:

You can already enable multiple content processes now in Firefox Stable, for testing purposes I have mine set to 99.

Now this just plain sucks. I use a userChrome.css file to remove additional useless crap (e.g. recently bookmarked) from the bookmarks menu.

Ehh, with the change from XUL to HTML none of the tweaks would still apply anyway, though I'm not sure it's worth forcing those customisations into webextensions just to protect against cases where they break (And the user doesn't know or remember they made those tweaks)

On 12/03/2017 at 2:50 AM, Boo Berry said:

You can already enable multiple content processes now in Firefox Stable, for testing purposes I have mine set to 99.

Now this just plain sucks. I use a userChrome.css file to remove additional useless crap (e.g. recently bookmarked) from the bookmarks menu.

this is how old this userchrome.css removal is UserChrome.css Removal

On 3/11/2017 at 4:50 PM, Boo Berry said:

You can already enable multiple content processes now in Firefox Stable, for testing purposes I have mine set to 99.

Now this just plain sucks. I use a userChrome.css file to remove additional useless crap (e.g. recently bookmarked) from the bookmarks menu.

SNAG-0004.png

 

Hmm? :p

  • Like 3
1 minute ago, Demz said:

he is old News, never gets anything up to date

Looking at some of the news stories, looks pretty up-to-date to me.

 

It's great for those users who don't want to search bugs on Bugzilla or search MozillaZine for any information.

2 hours ago, Boo Berry said:

IMO, there's nothing wrong with gHacks for news.

gHacks is a pretty decent site with some helpful tutorials on it, Boo Berry speaks the truth!

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...
15 minutes ago, Zlip792 said:

startin to look more an more like Chrome, soon enough you wont be able to tell the difference

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I like the show more options. The only problem with it is that it's not always in a consistent spot in the menu. If the copy/paste/cut, happens to show on top, then more option is the last in the menu. But if copy/paste/cut happens to show on the bottom, then more options is before the copy/paste/cut. But I do like the more options because it hides the stuff that I rarely use. But I would like to choose what it is or isn't hiding. That would make it better.
    • I wonder if "put it back the way it was for decades" ever crossed their minds? 🤣
    • Rescind the stupid "Show more options" in context menus and just give us the full menu instead of adding more steps to get to what we want. The "simpler by default" makes me think they'll go in the opposite direction. Every context menu should have a configure button so you can pick and choose what options should be shown, I know you can do that with some registry fu but that shouldn't be required.
    • This is why competition must exist. Finally, pressure is mounting on Microsoft to move in the right direction.
    • Microsoft is making Windows 11's context menus faster, simpler, and configurable by Taras Buria Five years ago, Windows 11 introduced redesigned context menus, offering users a simpler, more modern design. However, customers quickly discovered that the new menus leave a lot to be desired. Many are unhappy with performance (they are really slow), while others dislike the double-layed design, where many options are hidden behind the "Show more options" button. In addition, over the years, menus became cluttered and overloaded. While Microsoft has already fixed plenty of pain points across Windows 11, context menus remain mostly unchanged. Fortunately, Microsoft is finally listening. Marcus Ash, Design and Research Lead for Windows at Microsoft, responded to a tweet on X, confirming that the company is working on fixing Windows 11's context menus. Reworked context menus are supposed to be faster, simpler by default, and "configurable to what you use most." What the latter means is unknown, just like whether Microsoft plans to keep the classic menu alongside the modern one, but according to Marcus, the wait should finally be over soon, as he promised to "share our approach soon." Improved context menus will most likely appear first in Windows 11 preview builds in the Experimental Channel. While we wait for Microsoft to release them, you can try fixing context menus on your PC with a simple tool called Windows 11 Context Menu Manager. It lets you disable entries you do not need, not only cleaning up context menus, but also making them significantly faster. Microsoft has already improved Windows 11's Start menu and taskbar, so hopefully it will address user criticism of the context menu as well. Stay tuned for new Windows 11 preview builds, which usually arrive every Friday.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!