Recommended Posts

For those missing images, if you check the source code, you can use that URL. Using them directly seems to work :)

Looks too much like Chrome.

Yes, it has curved tabs. A different type of curved tab, mind you. Can we move on now?

  • Like 2

For those missing images, if you check the source code, you can use that URL. Using them directly seems to work :)

Yes, it has curved tabs. A different type of curved tab, mind you. Can we move on now?

If you cannot hanndle that the entire world is copying Google then by all means move on, I do not use it and never will.

Some worth mentioning stuff:

Issue with Proxy while SPDY ON: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763352

UI Snappiness (not tagged): https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764117 but got Backout due to Mac OS X reftest failure.

New Memory reporter for Azure API: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738189

D2D issue fix for UI: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761397

Adobe Flash has been updated: https://www.neowin.net/news/adobe-flash-player-113300262 but I can't find anything online if it resolves issues with Firefox. I'm on 11.2 atm.

Old Release notes are old btw (already checked) ;)

Adobe Flash has been updated: http://www.neowin.ne...layer-113300262 but I can't find anything online if it resolves issues with Firefox. I'm on 11.2 atm.

Old Release notes are old btw (already checked) ;)

Using newer Flash, it resolved one of my issue with embedded Youtube video not streaming. Lets hope it fixes other too.

Using newer Flash, it resolved one of my issue with embedded Youtube video not streaming. Lets hope it fixes other too.

I get "an error occurred" with Youtube videos, I'll just disable protected mode and see if that helps.

Thanks for the Flash update note :)

Whenever you see "Posted Image" , just drag it to a new tab

Ooh, yeah that works :)

If you cannot hanndle that the entire world is copying Google then by all means move on, I do not use it and never will.

I think you misunderstood me. I do not care that it has similarities to Chrome. I care that it looks good, and works; it manages these. My request was that could we kindly stop bringing the topic up. Nothing new is being said apart from unconstructive complaining that 'it looks like Chrome'.

100% agree with Kirkburn.Im sick and tired of posts like "looks like xxxx", "they copied it from xxxxx", "xxx had it first".I don't give a " "(insert bad word here) who invented it or who copied who.All i care is does it work ok HERE and is it usefull to me.

My thoughts exactly!

If something just works and has some basic clean design then for me that's the key

My thoughts exactly!

If something just works and has some basic clean design then for me that's the key

Still doesn't justify the fact that it looks like Chrome. I've said many many time, fire the UX team, let the developers at DeviantArt do the work...for free!

So according to you new games should just go back to 2D since someone already did a 3D game and others are now forbidden to do any other 3D games?You copied your house design(having windows and walls and roof) from my house so should you demolish your house and invent a completely different house design???Ofc not.You just see what useful and good features the competition has and if they are good and useful why not use them in your product too???I just don't get these guys.Implementing features that look like the ones on other browsers doesn't justify not taking the advantage of having those features just because they "look" the same as Chrome for example.I'm not going to try and explain anymore how stupid those "looks like xxx" etc. statements are.Ppl will just keep posting them,and they can just move to another browser if they don't like it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!