Recommended Posts

What bothers me is that it hasn't even been two months since the CP was released, and there was immediate hate, which tells me many didn't even bother with downloading and trying out the OS to see what Metro offers. Desktops can be more than point and click. Trying to use beta software like you did previous versions negate the point of running the beta.

It's a beta OS which means you have to remove it eventually, so why not leave your old habits behind, and run the OS on the side and give it an honest try. But you can't cling onto old computing habits for long. Clinging onto those is going to leave you high and dry before long, no matter what OS you use.

That's not how I see your behaviour, when you say stuff like that it tells me you can't fathom how someone could not like Metro, so you conclude they obviously never even tried it

And trying to pin it on not wanting change or clining on to old habits is silly, most will agree change is good, but in the case of Metro I don't see it as a good change for a desktop UI

Microsoft says they're trying to unify their UI, but without a unified input, that's not going to work well, just like using a mouse UI on a touch input didn't work well

Trying it out for a day or so doesn't count either. Still use it?

Used it for two weeks, 1st as native installation in spare hdd, then vmware player, again, windows 8, no thanks.

Taking too long to look, but I coulda swore you said you would disable Metro for users who brought their computers to you IF there was the option to do so.

Well then. Go look and get back to me. Just don't quote as 'Fact" until you've research. Thanx!

What bothers me is that it hasn't even been two months since the CP was released, and there was immediate hate, which tells me many didn't even bother with downloading and trying out the OS to see what Metro offers.

Oh I downloaded it alright, oh yes!

Oh I downloaded it alright, oh yes!

Are you still using it? Have you tried using some of the new apps that have appeared in the store? Have you delved into the new features in Metro and Explorer in an attempt to learn all its secrets? Have you thrown all your programs and apps at it checking out the OS's compatibility? Have you tried using the OS as it's intended to be used (Metro and all) for more than a day? A week? A month? How about day in and day out since the CP was released, like the beta was intended for?

Or did you stare at it for an hour, yell in terror, and uninstall it?

Please, tell us, inquiring minds want to know.

Are you still using it? Have you tried using some of the new apps that have appeared in the store? Have you delved into the new features in Metro and Explorer? Have you thrown all your programs and apps at it checking out the OS's compatibility? Have you tried using the OS as it's intended to be used (Metro and all) for more than a day? A week? A month? How about day in and day out since the CP was released, like the beta was intended for?

Or did you stare at it for an hour, yell in terror, and uninstall it?

Please, tell us, inquiring minds want to know.

I've been using it since the CP came out on one device or another. I've used the Metro apps (though not the new ones)... I'm just not a fan.

Trying it out for a day or so doesn't count either. Still use it?

dude you need to stop trolling on here. we get you like w8 & metro, good for you. i think it sucks and looks like crap, others agree...move on!

  • Like 2
Are you still using it? Have you tried using some of the new apps that have appeared in the store? Have you delved into the new features in Metro and Explorer in an attempt to learn all its secrets? Have you thrown all your programs and apps at it checking out the OS's compatibility? Have you tried using the OS as it's intended to be used (Metro and all) for more than a day? A week? A month? How about day in and day out since the CP was released, like the beta was intended for? Or did you stare at it for an hour, yell in terror, and uninstall it? Please, tell us, inquiring minds want to know.

just fyi, the motioninjoy program that enables a bluetooth dongle to use the ps3 dualshock 3 works with errors, in case you tell me I didn't test my "obscure" programs, but at this point I think you are just paid by MS.

What the hell does Instagram have to do with Photoshop!? Instagram is a mobile social photo app with a few filters, while Photoshop is a professional software for photo manipulation and design.

Exactly that. I mean come on, how can anyone claim otherwise and still expect to remain credible.

**** this. I give up trying to explain.

Explain...??? That's not really what you're trying to do. Blindly promoting without listening to the opinions of others is a far more apt description.

But here's a news flash. Your opinions are not, I'm sorry to say, the holy grail. Others opinions are just as valid, if not more so.

  • Like 3

Short memory eh, I've gone over this with you before. The development resources required would not be higher than the income from the additional sales, even if it was it wouldn't

have any noticable impact from the overall sales, we aren't talking about some small development company here, we're talking about Microsoft, who dominates the desktop OS market

and the time required for this would not cause any considerable delays in patch releases.

And I've already told you before that's plain putre BS by someone who's never seen code much less coded professionally in a enviroment where quality is paramount.

And yes we're talking about MS, that doesn't mean you can solve problems better or faster by throwing more chefs/resources at it. seriously do you have ANY clue about coding, AT ALL ? and even if they wanted to waste resources by coddling the less than 1% that cares, we're still talking about a significant delay in release of important security patches, NOT ACCEPTABLE.

And while they don't have usage stats specifically for Metro (well actually right now they do have, from well over a million active users), Metro is Based on what the usage stats from Windows vista and Windows 7 has shown them, or rather 7 was based on what Vista showed, and then the 7 stats showed that people did not use the start menu at all, what little it was used was simply the pinned items and recently used. which is what the start screen is, it's pinned items, your favorite apps, the ones you use frequently, only more of them and more organized.

dude you need to stop trolling on here. we get you like w8 & metro, good for you. i think it sucks and looks like crap, others agree...move on!

So it's ok for you Metro haters to spew every thread with your BS "Metro sucks"

But you have an issue when people who actually tried and like it, to come here and tell so.

Just stop reading threads that involve Win8 if you can't handle positive comments

Exactly that. I mean come on, how can anyone claim otherwise and still expect to remain credible.

Normal people use Photoshop to color, crop, and filter images. Same thing Instagram does and with a few more lines of code, could be used one day by the masses to crop and otherwise alter photos. Why should users contine to gunk up theior machines with Adobe junk, when they could one day just download Instagram to their PCs and be done with it? Not to mention save $600+ in the process.

So for those of you that say "Metro is here to stay so live with it". Do you honestly believe that Microsoft will keep it in the desktop OS if 90% of the people hate it? Windows 8 might be a success, but it might be a flop on the DESKTOP side. If that is the case, wouldn't they fix things to make a product that sells better? You know, give people more choice. Isn't that what they did with the UAC due to complaints in Vista?

"Normal people use Photoshop to color, crop, and filter images. Same thing Instagram does and with a few more lines of code"

I am sorry, that is not a valid argument. Most people can build flow charts and business diagrams in Word just fine. I guess that makes Visio, OmniGraffle and others completely useless right?

Normal people use Photoshop to color, crop, and filter images. Same thing Instagram does and with a few more lines of code, could be used one day by the masses to crop and otherwise alter photos. Why should users contine to gunk up theior machines with Adobe junk, when they could one day just download Instagram to their PCs and be done with it? Not to mention save $600+ in the process.

Well, tbh normal people use windows live gallery and Picasa. Which has different purposes than instagram, and I don't think people want to ruin their family pictures with instagram anyway, instagram is for people who wants to make fancy Facebook pictures they think look arty and cool.

Normal people use Photoshop to color, crop, and filter images. Same thing Instagram does and with a few more lines of code, could be used one day by the masses to crop and otherwise alter photos. Why should users contine to gunk up theior machines with Adobe junk, when they could one day just download Instagram to their PCs and be done with it? Not to mention save $600+ in the process.

Not that I have any stake in this whatsoever, but I'd like to meet the normal People that buy Photoshop to color, crop, and filter images. It can do those things, but "normal" people don't buy PhotoShop to do that. They use chintsy free apps to do that and make fisheyes and bubbles, and a few frames, etc.

Please just leave PhotoShop out of it. You have no clue what professionals can, and do do, from high end Photo manipulation to UI design, to high volume print production automation.

Please stop. Stick to Metro's real strengths if you're going to simply refuse to accept any flaws or weaknesses for any users. It does have strenghts in many areas for the right people. But this PhotoShop thing makes it hard to take ANYTHING you say seriously. Move on ...

PS: At the very least, try to recover by saying, "Ooops, I meant PhotoShop Elements"

You guys are being too literal. It doesn't have to be Instagram per se, but a similar Metro app. It wouldn't be too hard, for example, to translate the functionality of Paint.Net into a Metro app.

Normal people use Photoshop to color, crop, and filter images. Same thing Instagram does and with a few more lines of code, could be used one day by the masses to crop and otherwise alter photos. Why should users contine to gunk up theior machines with Adobe junk, when they could one day just download Instagram to their PCs and be done with it? Not to mention save $600+ in the process.

Dude... Seriously? (*I wonder if you could get me some of that stuff you've been smoking.*) Picasa, Paint.net, ACDSee, etc., fine, yes, even PS Elements (but even those are too complicated for an average user). But Photoshop? No. Just... NO.

Dude... Seriously? (*I wonder if you could get me some of that stuff you've been smoking.*) Picasa, Paint.net, ACDSee, etc., fine, yes, even PS Elements (but even those are too complicated for an average user). But Photoshop? No. Just... NO.
Obviously not the people that buy it (few people have that much money to burn), though that's probably true for most of the people that pirate it.

Dude... Seriously? (*I wonder if you could get me some of that stuff you've been smoking.*) Picasa, Paint.net, ACDSee, etc., fine, yes, even PS Elements (but even those are too complicated for an average user). But Photoshop? No. Just... NO.

If they can have Photoshop online, they can have Photoshop in WinRT.

EDIT: Oh, look, they even have an iPad app.... go figure. :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      66
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!