Christian students walk out as Dan Savage attacks the Bible


Recommended Posts

Those individuals had the right to walk out if their beleifs are being desecrated just in as much as Savage had the right to spew his "opinion".

So I guess you follow ALL of the bible to the letter then? Including the slavery, beating your wife, and all the other juicy parts, or are you just another one of those pick and choose Christians he was talking about ?

The bible was written over 2000 years ago, based on things people had learnt over hundreds and thousands of year of experience. Stuff that told them that pig meat could cause illness, so they made it illegal in the religion, later people learnt to properly cook and prepare the meat, and the ban was removed in newer religions based on the older ones.

Maybe it's time for another generation of religions to take over and drop the stuff that wasn't dropped last time, it's been 2000 years we've learnt a lot of stuff since then, we've changed and adapted and don't need those rules anymore.

Then again, I don't breve in fantasy stories and don't give a **** as long as religious nuts don't interfere with other people, which unfortunately they are completely unable to do, or rather not do. Follow your own stupid rules, but don't impose them on others, that includes your family.

  • Like 2

So I guess you follow ALL of the bible to the letter then? Including the slavery, beating your wife, and all the other juicy parts, or are you just another one of those pick and choose Christians he was talking about ?

The bible was written over 2000 years ago, based on things people had learnt over hundreds and thousands of year of experience. Stuff that told them that pig meat could cause illness, so they made it illegal in the religion, later people learnt to properly cook and prepare the meat, and the ban was removed in newer religions based on the older ones.

Maybe it's time for another generation of religions to take over and drop the stuff that wasn't dropped last time, it's been 2000 years we've learnt a lot of stuff since then, we've changed and adapted and don't need those rules anymore.

Then again, I don't breve in fantasy stories and don't give a **** as long as religious nuts don't interfere with other people, which unfortunately they are completely unable to do, or rather not do. Follow your own stupid rules, but don't impose them on others, that includes your family.

Well you can twist it to your agenda, but I have beleifs just as I suppose that you do. What do you follow or beleive in?

So what? If they started offending/attacking him there would be something wrong, but they just walked away. Today everything about christians make the news :/

It shows how closed-minded and ignorant they are, and that is saddening. Savage was nothing but respectful in how he went about attacking the content of the Bible. He could have articulated his point better, but he was respectful. Reasonable people are open-minded enough to listen to opposing viewpoints; these people decided they didn't want to open their minds.

It shows how closed-minded and ignorant they are, and that is saddening. Savage was nothing but respectful in how he went about attacking the content of the Bible. He could have articulated his point better, but he was respectful. Reasonable people are open-minded enough to listen to opposing viewpoints; these people decided they didn't want to open their minds.

Amen. ;)

I know this is like stepping into a minefield, but frankly, people should be allowed to hold whatever opinion they want, and say what ever they want, provided that they aren't hurting anyone (and I do not mean feelings) by doing so. I don't think anyone deserves to be bullied, regardless of who they are, but people of any faith can genuinely believe that something is wrong without bullying the people who are 'guilty' of it, at least in the minds of the people who believe that something is wrong.

But if there is one thing I've learnt over the years, that's that attacking people's beliefs with verbal attacks and profanity doesn't accomplish much, other than ****ing them off. I'm sure that Mr. Savage would've been upset if one of the people who walked out had jumped up and called his beliefs BS, and I doubt that he would've sat through an anti-gay rally where people were throwing slurs left and right. I'm not siding with anyone here, just trying to be objective - mutual respect goes a long way, and genuine debate and friendship is way better than anger and emotional attacks.

Well you can twist it to your agenda, but I have beleifs just as I suppose that you do. What do you follow or beleive in?

Do you even understand what we are talking about?

here is a very simple way for you to understand I guess....

You have a book of rules that you and everyone else follows. It has 40 rules of life. You agree with 38 rules, but not the 2 last ones, so you ignore those. Well, your friend agrees with only 25 rules, so he ignores the other 15.... so on and so on. Now, all of you who follow this book, go around and tell everyone what they should and should not do, based off of this book, that you have chosen to cherry pick certain details to follow and certain ones to ignore. You have no basis upon how to choose, except " i don't agree with this " and yet, you tell people that if they do not do it all, they are bad. You , and everyone else that is a part of the big game of religion, do this. You will choose to ignore what it says about slavery, while others won't. But the key peice is, you have no base to cherry pick from. It is either you choose all or nothing in a book. You can't read Lord of the Rings and say, " Well, the hobbits were real, but I don't think wizards are...." without having solid reasoning. It makes you look like just that much more of a hypocrite....

  • Like 2

I know this is like stepping into a minefield, but frankly, people should be allowed to hold whatever opinion they want, and say what ever they want, provided that they aren't hurting anyone (and I do not mean feelings) by doing so. I don't think anyone deserves to be bullied, regardless of who they are, but people of any faith can genuinely believe that something is wrong without bullying the people who are 'guilty' of it, at least in the minds of the people who believe that something is wrong.

But if there is one thing I've learnt over the years, that's that attacking people's beliefs with verbal attacks and profanity doesn't accomplish much, other than ****ing them off. I'm sure that Mr. Savage would've been upset if one of the people who walked out had jumped up and called his beliefs BS, and I doubt that he would've sat through an anti-gay rally where people were throwing slurs left and right. I'm not siding with anyone here, just trying to be objective - mutual respect goes a long way, and genuine debate and friendship is way better than anger and emotional attacks.

Long is passed the time to play respect the make believe. The world does not need lies to run. Sure, believe what you want, but don't impede human evolution of the mind with it. We are passed the times of false gods and superstitions. We are passed the times of ideas that only help divide and segregate each other. We can do better... We must.

Well you can twist it to your agenda, but I have beleifs just as I suppose that you do. What do you follow or beleive in?

That I will live untill I die, and the I die and thats the end of it.

And again, do you follow every word of the bible or do you pick whatever you want and ignore what you don't like or what has become socially unacceptable... After all if you are a true Christian then you need to follow the whole book, all of it.

Long is passed the time to play respect the make believe. The world does not need lies to run. Sure, believe what you want, but don't impede human evolution of the mind with it. We are passed the times of false gods and superstitions. We are passed the times of ideas that only help divide and segregate each other. We can do better... We must.

And I absolutely respect your right to believe that! Again, I know this is a minefield, and I don't want to become involved in an argument - I'm just saying that respect is the best path. I don't see any difference in someone walking up to a Christian (or a Jew, or a Muslim, a Buddhist - you name it) and calling their heartfelt beliefs BS than some nutcase picketing a soldier's funeral. Real, intellectual debates with a respectful attitude go somewhere, but being abusive just shows that you're just as bad and ignorant as whoever you're opposing, regardless of which side you're on. A society that is intolerant to religion is just as bad as one that's intolerant to gays, racist, or any other evil.

And I absolutely respect your right to believe that! Again, I know this is a minefield, and I don't want to become involved in an argument - I'm just saying that respect is the best path. I don't see any difference in someone walking up to a Christian (or a Jew, or a Muslim, a Buddhist - you name it) and calling their heartfelt beliefs BS than some nutcase picketing a soldier's funeral. Real, intellectual debates with a respectful attitude go somewhere, but being abusive just shows that you're just as bad and ignorant as whoever you're opposing, regardless of which side you're on. A society that is intolerant to religion is just as bad as one that's intolerant to gays, racist, or any other evil.

Not really... we can be intolerant towards religion because it actually does some bad. There are preist molesting kids and other activities being performed that are just as harmful. Until the religious groups start doing more good than they are doing bad, they fall under scrupulous eyes. When someone holds as much power as religion does in politics and the daily lives of people, it should be held to a standard. If it isn't sticking to that standard, then the people of this world have every right to complain about it.

Religion isn't anything like your sex, skin color, age, or sexual preference.... Religion is something one chooses. Religion is something one practices. Religion is something one can walk away from when it is doing wrong. Religion is something that can be held accountable.

I think "respect" is used wrong. Respect is earned. Tolerance is what most should practice towards religions, if religions show they will do the same. If not, there is no reason to show tolerance to it, let alone an ounce of respect.

Wow. If I would have been able to witness the backlash from what I had originally posted, I wouldn't have said anything. To each his or her own. I've not been a member for too long but what I can gather the "higher posters" relish in making the new posters feel like crap if they don't agree somewhat to their beliefs.

Not really... we can be intolerant towards religion because it actually does some bad. There are preist molesting kids and other activities being performed that are just as harmful. Until the religious groups start doing more good than they are doing bad, they fall under scrupulous eyes. When someone holds as much power as religion does in politics and the daily lives of people, it should be held to a standard. If it isn't sticking to that standard, then the people of this world have every right to complain about it

I understand what you're saying, but I think you're making a bit of a blanket statement. I'm quite confident that the majority of religious people don't support the priests who molest children, and it is most certainly not supported by the beliefs they are supposed to hold. The same goes for many other problems. I'm sure that there have been atheists who have molested children as well, but I don't fault all atheists for that, and I'm sure you don't condone their activities. "One [insert religion here] does something bad, therefore all [insert religion here] are bad and do not deserve respect." Just seems a bit hypocritical to me, that's all I'm saying.

[. . .] I've not been a member for too long but what I can gather the "higher posters" relish in making the new posters feel like crap if they don't agree somewhat to their beliefs.

I can assure you that isn't true :) The Real World Issues section of Neowin is full of passionate people on opposite sides. This is how people post in this area, and such posts are directed at anyone, no matter the amount of time they've spent here. They're passionate posts, but as long as they don't contain personal attacks or break any other rules, they're allowed. We've long said that people should have a thick skin, if they read or post in Real World Issues. Try not to let it get to you, if you do enjoy debating. We encourage polite debate and discussion, and I believe that a passionate discussion can also be a polite one. Welcome to Neowin, by the way :)

I can assure you that isn't true :) The Real World Issues section of Neowin is full of passionate people on opposite sides. This is how people post in this area, and such posts are directed at anyone, no matter the amount of time they've spent here. They're passionate posts, but as long as they don't contain personal attacks or break any other rules, they're allowed. We've long said that people should have a thick skin, if they read or post in Real World Issues. Try not to let it get to you, if you do enjoy debating. We encourage polite debate and discussion, and I believe that a passionate discussion can also be a polite one. Welcome to Neowin, by the way :)

TY for the welcome! I do have a thick skin. Just seems that others are quick to judge or try to force their opinion on others.

If they are too blinded by faith to understand that Savage's point on not respecting Leviticus to the letter is perfectly valid, they're stupid, period.

I'd bet most of the students who stayed, like most Americans, were Christian - just not the completely stupid kind.

Taken at face value, I mostly agree with you. But if you watch the video of him, he looks like he is picking a fight with the Bible as a whole.

But whatever, I agree with your sentiment. He could have been more PC and there still would have been some folks walking out.

[rant]

American Christians make themselves out to be persecuted and overall I would say they are the easiest people to offend in America because they take offense by a large number of things. It is such a large number of things because what offends them may or may not have anything to do with them or directly influence their personal lives at all. Yet they do not understand how extremely offensive they come across when they want to regulate and control the aspects of other people and they do it in a way the does have a direct influence on other's personal lives (or they do understand and don't care or are in extreme denial that they even do this and classify it all under everyone persecuting them).

[/rant]

Sorry if I offended you with my rant :p. I know there are individual christians that do not have the same boxed in mindset (I know a lot of them, and they are great people and some are good friends), but the vast majority of christians that are active in politics do seem to have this mindset.

It's a shame that some students these days aren't respectful enough to sit through his speech and actually engage in a debate with him later, instead choosing to walk out like they have some moral high ground.

Instead of being taught to learn and question, they choose to keep a closed mind and that won't get them very far in life if they can't handle people they don't agree with.

TY for the welcome! I do have a thick skin. Just seems that others are quick to judge or try to force their opinion on others.

Not at all, just trying to show the difference between what opinion and fact is. Debate all you want about anything, and be as passionate as you can... just be truthful and don't try to twist things around to make your argument try and have more validity than it should. I for one, and a stickler for being clear with the meanings of words. :p

@ Tholman, I know generalizing is bad, and I try not to. I'm not condoning those of the religion themselves, but more so, I condone the religious doctrines and how easily they can corrupt and sway those of a lesser thought.

TY for the welcome! I do have a thick skin. Just seems that others are quick to judge or try to force their opinion on others.

? and that's exactly the point. Religious people are too quick to judge homosexuals and try to force their opinion on them ...

The point is that Christians point to Leviticus as to why homosexuality is wrong, but then ignore the rest of Leviticus. If you yourself are in violation of Leviticus, how can you judge others breaking the rules? If you don't know what I'm talking about, you've probably never read the whole thing yourself.

So practice what you preach. Don't try to force your opinion on others.

Deuteronomy 22:9: Do not plant two kinds of seed in your vineyard; if you do, not only the crops you plant but also the fruit of the vineyard will be defiled.

Deuteronomy 22:11: Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together.

Leviticus 11:3: You may eat any animal that has a split hoof completely divided and that chews the cud.

[Edit: No cows, no pigs, no rabbits, no camels... can't remember what else you can't eat]

Leviticus 11:10: But all creatures in the seas or streams that do not have fins and scales--whether among all the swarming things or among all the other living creatures in the water--you are to detest.

[Nobody here in Louisiana follows this one... Louisianans love their crawfish]

Leviticus 18:22: Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.

My question to you is... which of these rules do you follow, and which of these do you think are bullsh*t?

Just popping in on a somewhat random note. The major problem I see for people disliking Christians is the sense of hypocrisy which sadly a lot do have. The rules in the bible are merely a standard to live by, and many have changed. The bible had reasons for those back then, but aren't as necessary now. I most definitely hate it when people go all" you are wrong, you should do that etc.." The bible clearly says to lead by Example, people should be able to see by the way act and live what they are, not what you tell them. The way I see it, a good way to live (no matter what religion) is said in Galatians 5:16-23

On a more on topic note. The kids have a right to maybe possible feel offended, but if they cant stand someone else's opinions, they cant be to sure about their faith, and would most like be easily persuaded. The same goes to the non Christians believing him about the bible being Wrong. most of the stuff he pointed out was the old testament. Most of the rules of the Old Testament was abandoned. And the bit about slaves in the new testament, its easy to say its wrong, but if you were to read it in the original greek or hebrew, it would have simply meant a servant. Im not saying I know much about the bible, but he was very much "cherry picking" as some of you mentioned in previous posts, with very little knowledge of the scripture. To use something like the bible on people, you must first study the ORIGINAL translations, since the meaning and words used either dont exist anymore, or have been changed. The Bible said homosexuality is wrong, it didn't say go bully them.

If people would just stop judging, bashing and using religion against one another, life would be much better for anyone

just thought id give my opinion. im not good at getting my point across in words:p

  • Like 2

The Bible said homosexuality is wrong, it didn't say go bully them.

Well said. Not only does it not say to go bully them, it says the opposite.

Mathew 7:1: Do not judge, or you too will be judged.

Mathew 7:3-5: ?Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother?s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, ?Let me take the speck out of your eye,? when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother?s eye.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google pitches Spanner as one database for all AI agents with these new featues by Karthik Mudaliar Google Cloud is introducing new features within Spanner, its distributed database, as a place where enterprises should keep their data, using which AI agents could make smarter and better decisions. In a detailed blog post, Google highlighted quite a few features coming to Spanner, including relational data, graph relationships, vector search, key-value access, full-text search, and operational analytics together in one database architecture. Google says that today's systems aren't well-made for AI agents. There could be data that is present in one system, search indexes in another, embeddings in a vector database, and relationship data in a graph database. This fragmentation isn't great for AI agents to do their jobs because they don't have access to all of this data in one place. This is where Google is positioning Spanner as a solution. Spanner is already a globally distributed relational database with strong consistency, and Google wants its customers to see it as a broader data layer for AI applications. The company introduced something called Spanner Graph, along with integrated vector search, full-text search, a Cassandra-compatible key-value endpoint, and a columnar engine for analytical queries on operational data. Google also added that its ScaNN-powered vector search can support indexes with more than 10 billion vectors, while the columnar engine can make some analytical scans up to 200 times faster. All of this isn't just exclusive to the Google Cloud Platform, and there's support for multi-cloud as well. This comes via Spanner Omni, which Google says is a downloadable, containerized version of Spanner that can run on Kubernetes and in environments outside Google Cloud, including Microsoft Azure and AWS, and even on-premises infrastructure as well as edge deployments. Google says that customers who are interested in the full-featured edition should contact the company, and there's no word on commercial availability or separate pricing. Those interested can read the full blog by Google Cloud, which details these features individually.
    • Kalmuri 4.2.5 by Razvan Serea Kalmuri is your all-in-one, portable screen capture and recording solution designed for speed, simplicity, and flexibility. Whether you need a full-screen snapshot, a custom area, a scrolling webpage, or smooth video recording, Kalmuri delivers with ease. Capture text instantly from images with built-in OCR, keep floating images on top for quick reference, and use the precise color picker for perfect design matching. Customize hotkeys to work your way and share results instantly with built-in upload options. Kalmuri runs without installation, making it ideal for USB use, and offers an intuitive interface that’s easy to learn. Kalmuri key features: Video recording support (designation of whole screen and area) Whole screen, active program, window control, area application Extract text from images using optical character recognition (OCR). Support for PNG, JPG, WEBP, BMP, GIF file formats MP4 video recording powered by FFmpeg for high-quality results Full web page capture Share the captured image on the web Color extraction function Printer output Hotkey settings Adjustable via keyboard for area capture (Arrow key, Ctrl+Arrow key, Shift+Arrow key) File name format (sequential, datetime) Free to use it at work, at home, in government offices, at school, etc. Using Kalmuri portable for video recording Kalmuri’s portable version doesn’t include FFmpeg, which is required for video recording. Without it, you’ll get an “error FFmpeg.exe not found” message. To fix this, download FFmpeg from the provided link, extract it, and place FFmpeg.exe in Kalmuri’s folder. Kalmuri will then recognize it automatically, allowing you to start recording in high quality instantly. Kalmuri 4.2.5 changelog: Fixed an intermittent crash when using Area Capture Improved stability for Area Capture and screen recording Resolved a capture issue that could occur right after startup Download: Kalmuri 4.2.5 | 24.2 MB (Freeware) Download: Kalmuri Portable 4.2.5 | 2.1 MB View: Kalmuri Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • They have lots of info on me, I have a facebook account and have done so for years, it was the thing to have then. My phone number is not on it. I don't have the Facebook app on my phone these days, just the messenger part, and only for a couple of people to contact me, most will text me via SMS or phone. I agree, Meta, like others, even without an account will know something about me. Just have to try and keep some things private Also, never saw the need for Whatsapp, people used to ask for me to join it, but as I said to them, I have SMS and a phone, use that, or email
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      272
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      143
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!