Neowin.net Minecraft Server (Old Server)


Message added by Brandon H,

Come join the new Minecraft server discussion thread :)

 

 

Recommended Posts

Downloading the vhd still it’s about 100gb. Once it’s done I’ll either upload it somewhere or see if booting into windows will let me mount it. Then go from there. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Firstly, thanks @Timan for hosting our MC server for so long. :D Also thanks @Steven P. for offering to help with a payment method going forward.

 

Moving forward I'm OK with chipping in a few $$ a month to get our own server. However I think there are a few logistics that need to be sorted out first. Would the server only be open to paid players? Or should we make it open to anyone like now and grant paid players some tangible in game bonus (maybe the ability to switch between creative/survival for instance). Or maybe (if there is a suitable plugin) paid players have access to flight.

So we need to find a server/host, see how much its going to cost, see how much we need!

 

Asas for people who pay and who dont, maybe give diffrent colour names and maybe option to use creative mode, but i always find it to tempting to use and whould get bored quicker, maybe high priority to join server if full (hhaha) like thats going to happen.

 

Soon as server is picked, sorted just let us know where to pay.

I'm downloading the VHD file from Timans azure server now so I'll hopefully be able to get our map off of it.

 

once I get my Pi up and running full time this weekend I'm going to experiment with a free host again to see if it's enough for our needs. If it does then all the better but if not then I'll calculate the logistics of setting up a paid host for us with Steve's help :)

 

If we go the paid route would you guys think monthly would be easier or annually? monthly I'd only need a few $ from everyone. Annually would be closer to $60-80 but we'd save around 15% overall and we wouldn't have to worry about it as often. Quarterly is an option on most hosts as well.

 

here is the pricing range I was looking at for a 2gb ram server:

 

image.thumb.png.3a3f3370b14dd1b48c9888b0ec391569.png

 

(too bad minecraft client/server doesn't work on ARM otherwise I'd be willing to host it right on my Pi since I'm getting the 8gb model lol)

1 hour ago, Brandon H said:

I'm downloading the VHD file from Timans azure server now so I'll hopefully be able to get our map off of it.

 

once I get my Pi up and running full time this weekend I'm going to experiment with a free host again to see if it's enough for our needs. If it does then all the better but if not then I'll calculate the logistics of setting up a paid host for us with Steve's help :)

 

If we go the paid route would you guys think monthly would be easier or annually? monthly I'd only need a few $ from everyone. Annually would be closer to $60-80 but we'd save around 15% overall and we wouldn't have to worry about it as often. Quarterly is an option on most hosts as well.

 

here is the pricing range I was looking at for a 2gb ram server:

 

image.thumb.png.3a3f3370b14dd1b48c9888b0ec391569.png

 

(too bad minecraft client/server doesn't work on ARM otherwise I'd be willing to host it right on my Pi since I'm getting the 8gb model lol)

You can run it on a PI; I’ve done it before. Though it ran like garbage. 
 

https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/setup-minecraft-server-raspberry-pi/

12 minutes ago, adrynalyne said:

You can run it on a PI; I’ve done it before. Though it ran like garbage. 
 

https://www.makeuseof.com/tag/setup-minecraft-server-raspberry-pi/

neat, guess its just the client that wont run on ARM

good news, the VHD file finally finished downloading and I'm currently extracting our world folder from it. our world is a little more than 6gb so that really shows the time we've put into it.

 

thanks again @Timan for your assistance recovering these files :) 

ok so while trying to upload our wold to the free host I was messing with it appears they have a 1gb upload limit and a 4gb overall world size limit so paid server it is :D

 

let me know what kind of billing cycle sounds best and I'll work with @Steven P. to set it up so the donations can go towards it :) 

Could probably get that down to 2-3gb if the world editors were easier to use, most of our worlds are made up of dead chunks created while exploring, if you have a link for it I wouldn't mind a copy of the latest server for testing purposes. :D 

I wouldn't mind a copy too if it was available.

 

OK, so how many are willing to stump up a few $$ per quarter (probably best option), so we can get an idea of how much we'll need to pay.

 

Also, I checked out MelonCube hosting as shown above, and there is the option of various server packs if we want to not go plain old vanilla. Any thoughts on that? Looks like there is a small up front fee (about $6) but the cost is the same otherwise.

yeah I can upload a zipped up copy of our current world to me.ga or another host that allows larger files when I get home tonight :)

 

I'll also start up a poll when I get home to help us determine how many will be willing to contribute and what each price point will look like based on the RAM options we choose.

 

Quarterly does sound like a good middle ground that we should be able to handle as a group I agree so that helps with part of the decision.

  • Like 2

I not too fussed about the map, but wouldn't mind the seed as I like to look up slime chunks and the like. 

 

In terms of hosting, I agree that quarterly or semi annually makes sense to lower the number of times we need to get donations. I haven't heard of meloncube before, but I have used cubedhost, and they were very good, but they're not the cheapest. I did look at https://www.reddit.com/r/admincraft/comments/hiqj6x/subreddit_info_and_july_hosting_discussion/ and there wasn't any specific mention of them. There are lots of other hosts listed there too.

 

 

Just now, illumination said:

I not too fussed about the map, but wouldn't mind the seed as I like to look up slime chunks and the like. 

 

In terms of hosting, I agree that quarterly or semi annually makes sense to lower the number of times we need to get donations. I haven't heard of meloncube before, but I have used cubedhost, and they were very good, but they're not the cheapest. I did look at https://www.reddit.com/r/admincraft/comments/hiqj6x/subreddit_info_and_july_hosting_discussion/ and there wasn't any specific mention of them. There are lots of other hosts listed there too.

 

 

meloncube looks to be one of the best middle ground hosts from the research I did; not the best but far from the worst and good pricing. the other host I was looking at was shockbyte; they're marked at one of the best but in addition to the normal monthly/quarterly fee they also charge per GB on world size which I don't personally like.

BisectHosting is another host I'm considering. would be about $26.95 quarterly for 2gb on them but they have quite a few benefits such as unlimited NVME storage and free backups for that price

 

edit: actually that's only $4 more than melonhost and better offerings and reviews so yeah I think I'll go with BisectHosting when we get everything setup :)

Okay, I have a PayPal account setup specifically for funding our server now.

 

I'll post this in advance here and will be putting together the Poll when I get home to decide the amount of RAM we want and such for the server and how much it will cost. Feel free to contribute in advance :)

 

https://paypal.me/NeowinMC

Maybe you should front page this, more people tend to see it on front page news then in forums but ill be donating £10 Pounds tomorrow, thats for myself and my daughter (jessicajm)

8 hours ago, Nuculi said:

Maybe you should front page this, more people tend to see it on front page news then in forums but ill be donating £10 Pounds tomorrow, thats for myself and my daughter (jessicajm)

This is more of a fan project, the funding for it and PayPal is not managed by Neowin and the previous server wasn't either.

 

It's very shaky ground when monetary donations come into the picture and Neowin is a LLC operated in the US. I support and trust the people behind the project but beyond that we can't do a lot more than give blessing. 

Thanks @Slugsie and @illumination. your contributions along with my own gives us enough to almost cover a 2nd quarter as well :)

 

anyone else who wishes to please feel free to donate as well as that will help cover future payments the more we get.

 

I'll start registering and setting up the new server when I get home tonight and have @DaveLegg switch the DNS to the new IP when I get it and we should be back up and running before we know it (Y)

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!