Is Time Travel Possible? Paul Davies Says "Yes".

By Scorbing
in Science News & Discussion

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Astra.Xtreme

Posted
Posted

Nothing really new since this is just the basic principle of relativity. The faster you go, the more time accelerates.

I believe it's something on the lines of if you travel at the speed of light for one year, 7 years here on Earth would elapse.

So technically that would be time traveling forward with respect to Earth. The key part is the time dilation.

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

  • Pygmy_Hippo, Malisk and oliver182
  • Like 3
Grand Master

+Nik Louch Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

Nothing really new since this is just the basic principle of relativity. The faster you go, the more time accelerates.

I believe it's something on the lines of if you travel at the speed of light for one year, 7 years here on Earth would elapse.

So technically that would be time traveling forward with respect to Earth. The key part is the time dilation.

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

Grand Master

Nick H. Supervisor

Posted
  • Supervisor
Posted
Nothing really new since this is just the basic principle of relativity. The faster you go, the more time accelerates.

I believe it's something on the lines of if you travel at the speed of light for one year, 7 years here on Earth would elapse.

So technically that would be time traveling forward with respect to Earth. The key part is the time dilation.

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

I agree with the first part, there's nothing particularly new in this article as we've known about the theory of relativity for a long time, and with it we've known and tested the time dilation effect.

However, the article points out that there is a possibility of traveling back in time by using wormholes. The only problem is that we can only speculate about the idea, which is as good as saying, "it's not yet possible." Even if wormholes were a portal for time traveling to the past, we've got no way to manipulate it so that it would send us back to a specific time. We'd just have to accept where the wormhole's end point in time is.

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

No. The theory of relativity states that the closer you get to the speed of light, the slower time passes for you. As the article points out, if you were on a train that got to 99% of the speed of light, you would perceive time as passing at a normal rate, but what is happening is that the time is passing slower on the train than it is for the people at the train station.

Grand Master

Crisp

Posted
Posted

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

Just because something seems impossible doesn't make it so.

I'm not saying I can prove you wrong, but in 1896 the Wright brothers would of thought it was "impossible" to put man in Space, let alone cross the Atlantic ocean.

Community Regular

watkinsx2

Posted
Posted

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

No, basically the passage of time will be different for the person travelling close to the speed of light relative to someone standing still on earth, this is time dilation. So if you traveled around the earth at such speeds, for you only a week will have passed, but for everyone moving at relatively much lower speeds around you more time will have passed. The theory is that the closer you get to the speed of light the greater the effect.

edit: spent so long typing, someone beat me to it!

Grand Master

XerXis

Posted
Posted

If you want to know more about spacetime, Brian Cox has a nice book that explains it in an easy to understand language.

The fun thing is, not only time changes if you go faster, but also space itself. For example, a lot of people think that travelling to a star that is 5 million lightyear away would take you more than 5 million years if you travel at 99% of the speed light, while in fact it would only take you a few hundred years. Very interesting stuff physics ;)

Grand Master

neufuse Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

send a message wirelessly around the world in under a 100th of a second is physically impossible...... oh wait we do that now... who knows what the future brings, to say something is impossible means you already gave up trying for new inventions...

Grand Master

Astra.Xtreme

Posted
Posted

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

It's kind of an abstract idea, and it gets confusing pretty easily, but the time differential is only measurable when comparing two objects. For instance, if you are in a spaceship traveling at the speed of light away from Earth and then come back, the clock in your spaceship would he ahead of the time on a clock here on Earth. So depending on how you look at it, either time sped up in the spaceship, or time slowed down on Earth. It all comes down to reference.

Another example is that an astronaut in space will age slightly less while in space than people back on Earth. That's due to being further from the center of the Earth and essentially moving at a faster velocity than people on Earth. Gravity may have an effect too. That's pretty much "time dilation" in a nutshell.

160px-Nonsymmetric_velocity_time_dilation.gif

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

Why do you say that ?

Time, as it is usually thought of, is an illusion.

Many of the 'Alien' craft encountered, are in fact, from Earth's 'future'. ;)

Grand Master

chconline Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

I don't think backwards time travel is possible. Forward, theoretically yes (Just basic relativity). if in an infinite amount of time from now that backwards time travel is possible, there should be evidence in the past of people from the future coming back. However, there is no evidence of it.

Grand Master

Malisk

Posted
Posted

Time travel in the sense that some objects travel slower in time than us happens all the time. GPS satellites regularly need their times corrected because they experience relativistic effects, and we want high accuracy from their clocks. Their clocks simply run slower than ours, but not because they are faulty!

If we didn't regularly correct for the GPS satellites travelling slower in time, the end result would be that navigational errors would accumulate with 10 km per day!

Read more here: http://www.physicsce...riters/will.cfm

You can also read more on time dilation in general here: http://en.wikipedia....i/Time_dilation

So, in an extreme case, yes, it's both possible and proven that a person can in theory travel very fast around the Earth for a long time and age just 1 year while the entire Earth becomes 100 years older. His friends and relatives would be dead at the time he exits his spacecraft. In practice, though, the energy requirements for this would be absolutely immense and not really workable in any way we can understand today.

Collaborator

Silver47

Posted
Posted

Traveling back in time isn't impossible, just incredibly hard as you have to move all matter in the universe to its previous point in existence. However that would also effect you, so even if you went back in time within your own life time, you'll be the same age as you had been and completely forgotten you went back in time.

Laws of conservation are a bugger.

Grand Master

Joshie

Posted
Posted

Just because something seems impossible doesn't make it so.

I'm not saying I can prove you wrong, but in 1896 the Wright brothers would of thought it was "impossible" to put man in Space, let alone cross the Atlantic ocean.

You're comparing three dimensional travel to not-even-a-dimensional travel. While it's presumptuous to say what the Wright brothers would have thought possible in their day, even the most fantastical forms of travel are at least plausible when they're within dimensions that have already welcomed travel (XYZ). There has, however, never--ever--been any observable evidence, in all of mankind's recorded history and science, that time is a freely traversible dimension.

Traveling back in time isn't impossible, just incredibly hard as you have to move all matter in the universe to its previous point in existence.

That would just be duplicating the past in the future. If I slapped you yesterday and slapped you again today, I didn't send your face back in time.

Grand Master

Detection

Posted
Posted

I don't think backwards time travel is possible. Forward, theoretically yes (Just basic relativity). if in an infinite amount of time from now that backwards time travel is possible, there should be evidence in the past of people from the future coming back. However, there is no evidence of it.

I once worked out why it must be impossible to time travel either way, a similar theory to yours, if it was possible to move back in time, we would already know, and the fact that we don't means it has never been done in the future, which also means, either there is no such thing as the future (yet, only now), or we never work out how to move in time, .... something along those lines

(Disclaimer: The above is a vague memory of a very intelligent thought, back in time)

Collaborator

Silver47

Posted
Posted

That would just be duplicating the past in the future. If I slapped you yesterday and slapped you again today, I didn't send your face back in time.

The first part is my point, second part misses it completely .Time is just a measurement of the movement of matter (and also energy), however everything in the universe is moving. Using your example, we would have to move everything back to the point you slapped me. But the process would of also changed our brains to that point as well thus forgetting that you slapped me again the next day followed by going back in time. Think the film Galaxy Quest with the Omega 13 if you ever saw it.

Grand Master

Hum

Posted
Posted

I only have one thing to say: Prove it

You could prove it to yourself.

Develop your OOBE ability and travel to various times.

http://www.amazon.com/Out-Of-Body-Adventures-Rick-Stack/dp/0809245604

http://www.amazon.com/Journeys-Out-Body-Robert-Monroe/dp/0385008619/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1357342576&sr=1-1&keywords=robert+monroe+journeys+out+of+the+body

It is only the accepted Beliefs and mental barriers that keeps you locked into this present Time.

Be daring -- accept the challenge. ;)

Experienced

Stup0t

Posted
Posted

So with the gravity time thing... here is a thought.

If you move away from the earth time moves faster.... not by much but its been shown by two clocks one on the earth and one in space.

So If you fly towards the centre of our galaxy which is just a massive black hole then time should slow down for you and earth time speed up. Or have I had too much jack :)

Grand Master

Detection

Posted
Posted

You could prove it to yourself.

Develop your OOBE ability and travel to various times.

http://www.amazon.co...k/dp/0809245604

http://www.amazon.co...out+of+the+body

It is only the accepted Beliefs and mental barriers that keeps you locked into this present Time.

Be daring -- accept the challenge. ;)

I once believed, I believed so much that all other beliefs were pushed out of my brain, I was left with only 1 truly amazing 100% brain capacity belief, so I climbed up on the kitchen bench, I stuck my arms out in-front of me and I jumped..

To be fair, I did fly for a short while, but the landing was less comfortable that I believed it would be...

I left the kitchen with the understanding that believing is not really everything

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG

      By Nas · Posted

      So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By excalpius · Posted

      For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • The Trump administration doesn't want you to use OpenAI's GPT-5.6 without its approval

      By ad47uk · Posted

      Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices

      By Fiza Ali · Posted

      4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried

      By Nas · Posted

      Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!