Recommended Posts

Nothing really new since this is just the basic principle of relativity. The faster you go, the more time accelerates.

I believe it's something on the lines of if you travel at the speed of light for one year, 7 years here on Earth would elapse.

So technically that would be time traveling forward with respect to Earth. The key part is the time dilation.

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

  • Like 3

Nothing really new since this is just the basic principle of relativity. The faster you go, the more time accelerates.

I believe it's something on the lines of if you travel at the speed of light for one year, 7 years here on Earth would elapse.

So technically that would be time traveling forward with respect to Earth. The key part is the time dilation.

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

Nothing really new since this is just the basic principle of relativity. The faster you go, the more time accelerates.

I believe it's something on the lines of if you travel at the speed of light for one year, 7 years here on Earth would elapse.

So technically that would be time traveling forward with respect to Earth. The key part is the time dilation.

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

I agree with the first part, there's nothing particularly new in this article as we've known about the theory of relativity for a long time, and with it we've known and tested the time dilation effect.

However, the article points out that there is a possibility of traveling back in time by using wormholes. The only problem is that we can only speculate about the idea, which is as good as saying, "it's not yet possible." Even if wormholes were a portal for time traveling to the past, we've got no way to manipulate it so that it would send us back to a specific time. We'd just have to accept where the wormhole's end point in time is.

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

No. The theory of relativity states that the closer you get to the speed of light, the slower time passes for you. As the article points out, if you were on a train that got to 99% of the speed of light, you would perceive time as passing at a normal rate, but what is happening is that the time is passing slower on the train than it is for the people at the train station.

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

Just because something seems impossible doesn't make it so.

I'm not saying I can prove you wrong, but in 1896 the Wright brothers would of thought it was "impossible" to put man in Space, let alone cross the Atlantic ocean.

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

No, basically the passage of time will be different for the person travelling close to the speed of light relative to someone standing still on earth, this is time dilation. So if you traveled around the earth at such speeds, for you only a week will have passed, but for everyone moving at relatively much lower speeds around you more time will have passed. The theory is that the closer you get to the speed of light the greater the effect.

edit: spent so long typing, someone beat me to it!

If you want to know more about spacetime, Brian Cox has a nice book that explains it in an easy to understand language.

The fun thing is, not only time changes if you go faster, but also space itself. For example, a lot of people think that travelling to a star that is 5 million lightyear away would take you more than 5 million years if you travel at 99% of the speed light, while in fact it would only take you a few hundred years. Very interesting stuff physics ;)

send a message wirelessly around the world in under a 100th of a second is physically impossible...... oh wait we do that now... who knows what the future brings, to say something is impossible means you already gave up trying for new inventions...

I know very little on this, so bear with me...

What you say is the faster you travel, the faster time passes?

So the slower you travel the slower is passes? But that's not true, surely?

It's kind of an abstract idea, and it gets confusing pretty easily, but the time differential is only measurable when comparing two objects. For instance, if you are in a spaceship traveling at the speed of light away from Earth and then come back, the clock in your spaceship would he ahead of the time on a clock here on Earth. So depending on how you look at it, either time sped up in the spaceship, or time slowed down on Earth. It all comes down to reference.

Another example is that an astronaut in space will age slightly less while in space than people back on Earth. That's due to being further from the center of the Earth and essentially moving at a faster velocity than people on Earth. Gravity may have an effect too. That's pretty much "time dilation" in a nutshell.

160px-Nonsymmetric_velocity_time_dilation.gif

Traveling backwards in time, on the other hand, is physically impossible.

Why do you say that ?

Time, as it is usually thought of, is an illusion.

Many of the 'Alien' craft encountered, are in fact, from Earth's 'future'. ;)

I don't think backwards time travel is possible. Forward, theoretically yes (Just basic relativity). if in an infinite amount of time from now that backwards time travel is possible, there should be evidence in the past of people from the future coming back. However, there is no evidence of it.

Time travel in the sense that some objects travel slower in time than us happens all the time. GPS satellites regularly need their times corrected because they experience relativistic effects, and we want high accuracy from their clocks. Their clocks simply run slower than ours, but not because they are faulty!

If we didn't regularly correct for the GPS satellites travelling slower in time, the end result would be that navigational errors would accumulate with 10 km per day!

Read more here: http://www.physicsce...riters/will.cfm

You can also read more on time dilation in general here: http://en.wikipedia....i/Time_dilation

So, in an extreme case, yes, it's both possible and proven that a person can in theory travel very fast around the Earth for a long time and age just 1 year while the entire Earth becomes 100 years older. His friends and relatives would be dead at the time he exits his spacecraft. In practice, though, the energy requirements for this would be absolutely immense and not really workable in any way we can understand today.

Traveling back in time isn't impossible, just incredibly hard as you have to move all matter in the universe to its previous point in existence. However that would also effect you, so even if you went back in time within your own life time, you'll be the same age as you had been and completely forgotten you went back in time.

Laws of conservation are a bugger.

Just because something seems impossible doesn't make it so.

I'm not saying I can prove you wrong, but in 1896 the Wright brothers would of thought it was "impossible" to put man in Space, let alone cross the Atlantic ocean.

You're comparing three dimensional travel to not-even-a-dimensional travel. While it's presumptuous to say what the Wright brothers would have thought possible in their day, even the most fantastical forms of travel are at least plausible when they're within dimensions that have already welcomed travel (XYZ). There has, however, never--ever--been any observable evidence, in all of mankind's recorded history and science, that time is a freely traversible dimension.

Traveling back in time isn't impossible, just incredibly hard as you have to move all matter in the universe to its previous point in existence.

That would just be duplicating the past in the future. If I slapped you yesterday and slapped you again today, I didn't send your face back in time.

I don't think backwards time travel is possible. Forward, theoretically yes (Just basic relativity). if in an infinite amount of time from now that backwards time travel is possible, there should be evidence in the past of people from the future coming back. However, there is no evidence of it.

I once worked out why it must be impossible to time travel either way, a similar theory to yours, if it was possible to move back in time, we would already know, and the fact that we don't means it has never been done in the future, which also means, either there is no such thing as the future (yet, only now), or we never work out how to move in time, .... something along those lines

(Disclaimer: The above is a vague memory of a very intelligent thought, back in time)

That would just be duplicating the past in the future. If I slapped you yesterday and slapped you again today, I didn't send your face back in time.

The first part is my point, second part misses it completely .Time is just a measurement of the movement of matter (and also energy), however everything in the universe is moving. Using your example, we would have to move everything back to the point you slapped me. But the process would of also changed our brains to that point as well thus forgetting that you slapped me again the next day followed by going back in time. Think the film Galaxy Quest with the Omega 13 if you ever saw it.

I only have one thing to say: Prove it

You could prove it to yourself.

Develop your OOBE ability and travel to various times.

http://www.amazon.com/Out-Of-Body-Adventures-Rick-Stack/dp/0809245604

http://www.amazon.com/Journeys-Out-Body-Robert-Monroe/dp/0385008619/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1357342576&sr=1-1&keywords=robert+monroe+journeys+out+of+the+body

It is only the accepted Beliefs and mental barriers that keeps you locked into this present Time.

Be daring -- accept the challenge. ;)

So with the gravity time thing... here is a thought.

If you move away from the earth time moves faster.... not by much but its been shown by two clocks one on the earth and one in space.

So If you fly towards the centre of our galaxy which is just a massive black hole then time should slow down for you and earth time speed up. Or have I had too much jack :)

You could prove it to yourself.

Develop your OOBE ability and travel to various times.

http://www.amazon.co...k/dp/0809245604

http://www.amazon.co...out+of+the+body

It is only the accepted Beliefs and mental barriers that keeps you locked into this present Time.

Be daring -- accept the challenge. ;)

I once believed, I believed so much that all other beliefs were pushed out of my brain, I was left with only 1 truly amazing 100% brain capacity belief, so I climbed up on the kitchen bench, I stuck my arms out in-front of me and I jumped..

To be fair, I did fly for a short while, but the landing was less comfortable that I believed it would be...

I left the kitchen with the understanding that believing is not really everything

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!