Windows 8 From a Mac User's perspective


Recommended Posts

I agree vitorio, that view does suck. I think it would have be much easier to transition if they wouldn't have dorked with the (non-customizable) sorting. In Windows Explorer, icons are arranged left to right, then top to bottom. In Metro, they flipped it to top to bottom then left to right - which makes sense for more vertically oriented screens (like WP) but is contradictory on 16:9 widescreen aspects of the Desktop and even the Surface.

In fact, I haven't seen such terrible view options since the Finder...

FWIW I had read an article about how horizontal scrolling is more natural and easier on eyes than vertical scrolling. No, it wasn't from Microsoft or affiliates(read it 2-3 years ago). I will see if I can find a link to it.

I like Windows 8 a lot but I don't recall this happening in Win 7. I was playing Elemental: Fallen Enchantress last night and when I moved my cursor on the right side to scroll across the map, the cursor came out and onto my second monitor. I have noticed this on other RTS games as well. Why does this work fine in Win 7 but not 8? Does this have to do with the charms on the right?

You know what else takes advantage of widescreens' extra space? Windows (as in a window, the UI element).

Considering many apps are built to copy website functions, and not OS functions, I fail to see your what you're getting at.

FWIW I had read an article about how horizontal scrolling is more natural and easier on eyes than vertical scrolling. No, it wasn't from Microsoft or affiliates(read it 2-3 years ago). I will see if I can find a link to it.

Not sure what that study was based on, but having experienced both I vastly prefer vertical scrolling.

Left to right apps finally take advantage of widescreens' extra space. Can't say that about websites, ever.

Here it is: http://www.thinkingforaliving.org/archives/5469

Considering many apps are built to copy website functions, and not OS functions, I fail to see your what you're getting at.

My point was that the horizontal space available could be taken to good use already by keeping multiple websites open at the same time, or one website combined with whatever other windows you choose to keep visible and available. So whether you consider apps that lay their content out from left to right and make you scroll horizontally to be a feature at all, in the context of widescreen displays it's only really relevant if you put the app into full-screen mode. Which you aren't forced to do, unless you're in TileWorld.

Indeed, and i just got word yesterday that one of the makers of a popular start menu replacement is trying very hard to enter into an agreement with our stores and one OEM to have their start menu pre-installed and set as default for windows 8 because pc sales have taken such a horrible turn for the worse since windows 8 was released, this is only for certain models but covers over 50% of projected sales.

If it happens I'm sure sales would be given a much needed boost.

Want to know why?

Because peoples are really affraid to try out something new. Just because peoples are affraid to try out something new doesn't means that the new things is bad.

I was actually against Windows 8 quite alot in the beginning. But i decided to give Windows 8 a good go in VirtualBox while it was Beta to try it out before i decided to buy it and use it on my laptop.

And it turned out that i could actually be more effective with Windows 8 in the way i use Windows over Windows 7. Instead of pressing the Start Button (in Windows 7) and then press the run button, then i can just press the Windows Key + R to instantly go to the run command. It's much easier. This kind of things made me to buy Windows 8 Pro for the whole 22 dollar lol.

Once you learn those shortcuts, then Windows 8 will be much easier and much faster to use.

Anyone who have used at least 3-4 hours with Windows 8 will like it when they find out how much better it is to use Windows 8 when you have learned all of the shortcuts.

My point was that the horizontal space available could be taken to good use already by keeping multiple websites open at the same time, or one website combined with whatever other windows you choose to keep visible and available. So whether you consider apps that lay their content out from left to right and make you scroll horizontally to be a feature at all, in the context of widescreen displays it's only really relevant if you put the app into full-screen mode. Which you aren't forced to do, unless you're in TileWorld.

I do keep multiple websites open... in tabs. Otherwise, my browser is fullscreen, showing one at a time. I run everything fullscreen. It doesn't take much effort to alt-tab.

Want to know why?

Because peoples are really affraid to try out something new. Just because peoples are affraid to try out something new doesn't means that the new ting is bad.

I was actually against Windows 8 quite alot in the beginning. But idecided to give Windows 8 a good go in VirtualBox while it was Beta to try it out before i decided to buy it and use it on my laptop.

And it turned out that i could actually be more effective with Windows 8 in the way i use Windows over Windows 7. Instead of pressing the Start Button (in Windows 7) and then press the run button, then i can just press the Windows Key + R to instantly go to the run command. It's much easier. This made me to buy Windows 8 Pro for the whole 22 dollar lol.

Once you learn those shortcuts, then Windows 8 will be much easier and much faster to use.

Anyone who have used at least 3-4 hours with Windows 8 will like it when they find out how much better it is to use Windows 8 when you have learned all of the shortcuts.

The keyboard shortcuts are great and if it works for you then all the better, problem is the average consumer isn't at all interested in learning keyboard shortcuts in this world of click-n-go, part of my job as sales manager is to show potential customers how to use the metro interface and as soon as I mention keyboard shortcuts their attention goes right out the window.

I think the greatest shortcut is not even a keyboard shortcut at, simply right click bottom left, many customers who were on the fence decided to make a purchase because of that mouse shortcut alone, so much in fact that it is the first thing that I show them and it certainly keeps their attention.

It's not at all about being "afraid" of change, change should be for the better but in the case of metro it's for the worse, while most neowin posters including myself can easily adapt to the metro interface and use it daily without any trouble the average consumer wants nothing to do with it at all, this is noted in the massive drop in sales over the last 45 days at all the stores in our chain, people are avoiding metro at all costs, this time last year we were selling a minimum of 20 machines a day just during my shift alone, now we will be lucky to have sold 5, while some of that can rightfully be blamed on the economy most of it is due to consumers wanting nothing to do with metro, not because they are afraid of it, they realize right away that it's a huge step backwards in productivity overall.

Instead of pressing the Start Button (in Windows 7) and then press the run button, then i can just press the Windows Key + R to instantly go to the run command. It's much easier. This kind of things made me to buy Windows 8 Pro

Win-R is not a new shortcut, you know?! :huh:

Win-R is not a new shortcut, you know?! :huh:

I know.

problem is the average consumer isn't at all interested in learning keyboard shortcuts in this world of click-n-go

Learning new things is a part of our life. If they have a fobia against learning new things, then i'm afraid they will get into many troubles in their lives.

Then how can this be something that made you buy Windows 8? Or are you just appreciative of the fact that Windows 8's mystery meat navigation nudges you to use shortcuts?

Because with Windows 7, you would normally use the start button and then use the run button there even if you can just use WIN button + R there to.

The only thing i use the start menu in WIndows 7 to, is to use the Run functionality and use the Reboot / Shut Down button.

And since i can do those things much faster and easier in Windows 8, then why shouldn't i go for Windows 8 when i don't need the start button there (because infact, it's just in the way) and when Windows 8 are faster and boots up faster than Windows 7?

And Windows 8 is also more secure than Windows 7. Not by alot, but it's still more secure.

Because with Windows 7, you would normally use the start button and then use the run button there even if you can just use WIN button + R there to.

The only thing i use the start menu in WIndows 7 to, is to use the Run functionality and use the Reboot / Shut Down button.

And since i can do those things much faster and easier in Windows 8

You can't do it faster and easier on Windows 8. You only seem to think so because Windows 8 takes away your ability to use the allegedly more cumbersome (yet discoverable and obvious) alternative that used to exist on Windows 7, and so you've been forced to adapt your approach to performing those actions.

If anything, shutting down the computer is both more difficult and slower . What is your faster and easier way to do that on Windows 8 compared to Windows 7?

then why shouldn't i go for Windows 8 when Windows 8 are faster than Windows 7 and boots up faster than Windows 7 to?

And Windows 8 is also more secure than Windows 7. No0t by alot, but it's still more secure.

Those are of course all valid reasons to choose a new OS.

You can't do it faster and easier on Windows 8. You only seem to think so because Windows 8 takes away your ability to use the allegedly more cumbersome (yet discoverable and obvious) alternative that used to exist on Windows 7, and so you've been forced to adapt your approach to performing those actions.

If anything, shutting down the computer is both more difficult and slower . What is your faster and easier way to do that on Windows 8 compared to Windows 7?

Those are of course all valid reasons to choose a new OS.

Ewww ok?

Takes me almost instantly to press the key combination WIN + R, while i have to move my mouse to the start button and press the start button and then move my mouse over to the run botton and press the run button. Pressing WIN + R and get the run command up instantly is more easier and faster than going the Start Button way.

Again, no one would EVER use the WIN + R key combination when we have the start button in Windows 7. That's the point. And if they actually ARE using the shortcut combinations in Windows 7, then what are the problems with Windows 8 then?

If you learn those shortcuts in Windows 8, it is actually quite alot faster to use. Those who sayno to this haven't tried Windows 8 out good.

Takes me almost instantly to press the key combination WIN + R, while i have to move my mouse to the start button and then move my mouse over to the run botton. Pressing WIN + R and get the run command up instantly is more easier and faster than going the Start Button way.

I don't disagree with that. At least once you are aware of and have gotten used to performing that shortcut.

Again, no one would EVER use the WIN + R key combination when we have the start button.

That's ridiculous. There is an argument to be made for Microsoft to make shortcuts more discoverable in some instances, but if you are aware of the shortcut, and if using it is easier and faster, why wouldn't people take advantage of that? Shortcuts are a power user feature. You usually start out by gradually moving from pure mouse usage to integrating shortcuts into your workflow for regularly used commands where it makes sense. By forcing people to use shortcuts, you expect them to instantly behave like a power user of the system.

And if they actually ARE using the shortcut combinations in Windows 7, then what are the problems with Windows 8 then?

If they are, then they obviously won't miss that entry in Windows 8's non-existent Start menu. But neither is the fact that it's gone a selling point for Windows 8.

That's ridiculous. There is an argument to be made for Microsoft to make shortcuts more discoverable in some instances, but if you are aware of the shortcut, and if using it is easier and faster, why wouldn't people take advantage of that? Shortcuts are a power user feature. You usually start out by gradually moving from pure mouse usage to integrating shortcuts into your workflow for regularly used commands where it makes sense.

I wouldn't really call my mom for a power user. She wanted a new computer in a form of a laptop. So she bought pretty much the same laptop as i have, except that my mom's laptop was shipped with Windows 8 Pro (mine was shipped with Windows 7 Home Premium) and have an Intel Core i5 CPU while mine have Intel Core i7 and my mom's laptop have 4 GB with RAM while mine have 8 GB with RAM.

Took me one time to show her how to get to the 'Shutdown Windows' menu by pressing Alt + F4. She haven't asked me for help when it's about that since then. If you are willing to learn, then you will learn the shortcuts in Windows 8 extremely fast.

I wouldn't really call my mom for a power user. She wanted a new computer in a form of a laptop. So she bought pretty much the same laptop as i have, except that my mom's laptop was shipped with Windows 8 Pro (mine was shipped with Windows 7 Home Premium) and have an Intel Core i5 CPU while mine have Intel Core i7 and my mom's laptop have 4 GB with RAM while mine have 8 GB with RAM.

Took me one time to show her how to get to the 'Shutdown Windows' menu by pressing Alt + F4. She haven't asked me for help when it's about that since then. If you are willing to learn, then you will learn the shortcuts in Windows 8 extremely fast.

Trust me. Most regular people are not willing to learn shortcuts to get around an OS. Your mom seems to be exceptional in that regard.

If you learn those shortcuts in Windows 8, it is actually quite alot faster to use.

For some reason you are, again, assuming that you would only learn the shortcuts for Windows 8, but not Windows 7?! And isn't it better to have both the option to use a system in a possibly slightly more inefficient but instantly discoverable way as well as in a less discoverable but more efficient way? Is there anything, specifically, that you can do faster in Windows 8 than in Windows 7 if you know the shortcuts for both systems?

Trust me. Most regular people are not willing to learn shortcuts to get around an OS. Your mom seems to be exceptional in that regard.

For some reason you are, again, assuming that you would only learn the shortcuts for Windows 8, but not Windows 7?! And isn't it better to have both the option to use a system in a possibly slightly more inefficient but instantly discoverable way as well as in a less discoverable but more efficient way? Is there anything, specifically, that can you do faster in Windows 8 than in Windows 7 if you know the shortcuts for both systems?

I can tell you right away that my mom is pretty bad when it comes to computers. She asks me about everything she sees almost. But the world is going forward she say, so she have to learn new things as new things comes out. That's pretty much how our life is today.

Peoples that have troubles with that statement is not normal peoples.

she have to learn new things as new things comes out. That's pretty much how our life is today.

Peoples that have troubles with that statement is not normal peoples.

Absolutely. It's necessary and beneficial to learn new things. Maybe you should teach her Linux one of these days, introduce her to the command line maybe? You wouldn't believe how efficiently a CLI can be used in some instances. ;)

Absolutely. It's necessary and beneficial to learn new things. Maybe you should teach her Linux one of these days, introduce her to the command line maybe? You wouldn't believe how efficiently a CLI can be used in some instances. ;)

Those were the days... plugging away on an old VAX mainframe using a VT52 or a VT100...

Strangely enough, Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8 sales continue to disprove your drivel.

And strangely enough neither you or any of the other microsoft zealots have yet to produce anything of merit to show that consumers are buying machines with windows 8 on them.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!