Solution to get rid Windows 8 haters


Recommended Posts

LimeMaster

Provide an option using the installation or in the control panel to choose between the start menu or start screen. Keeping everybody happy. Windows 95 did this and eventually people switched to the new Ul and the older Ul was no longer needed so it was removed from Windows XP SP2. :)

zmic7a.jpg

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
COKid

I find it quite hilarious how sensitive Windows 8 fans are.

Question: Why do they care? Aren't they aware most of us are just pushing their buttons?

Lighten up, Windows 8 lovers. ;)

Decent suggestion, OP.

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
Matthew S.

I don't even remember ever seeing that...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
LimeMaster

I don't even remember ever seeing that...

If you select Custom you should see it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K

I don't even remember ever seeing that...

You have to select custom setup (vs. typical, portable, etc) to get to the User Interface to select either program manager or explorer.

You could do it after Win9x install by changing system.ini line "shell=Progman.exe"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Noir Angel

I never knew that option was in Windows 95. Neat :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
LimeMaster

I find it quite hilarious how sensitive Windows 8 fans are.

Question: Why do they care? Aren't they aware most of us are just pushing their buttons?

Lighten up, Windows 8 lovers. ;)

Decent suggestion, OP.

Don't know, guess some members are pushing the buttons way to hard.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
trek

Don't know, guess some members are pushing the buttons way to hard.

No, more like some members rush to defend windows 8 against any little bit of criticism thrown at it. It's worse than Mactards.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
link6155

I find it quite hilarious how sensitive Windows 8 fans are.

Question: Why do they care? Aren't they aware most of us are just pushing their buttons?

Lighten up, Windows 8 lovers. ;)

Decent suggestion, OP.

You could say the same about Windows 8 Haters. Why hate something you're not using or even plan to use. And most windows 8 haters just flame over windows 8 because they can.
  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
McKay

I'd like both sides to stop, Im fine with people expressing their opinions about it, it's a little annoying having 500 separate threads with people saying "I don't like the start screen, I wish the start menu was back". But thats their opinion and they're entitled to it. It's funny when people try and put their opinion across as fact.

It's gotten as bad as the people who are still clinging onto XP when the date for support end draws closer, who get up in arms when programs began to stop supporting it. At least those have died down though, I expect them to resurface nearer to the final end date though.

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites
LimeMaster

No, more like some members rush to defend windows 8 against any little bit of criticism thrown at it. It's worse than Mactards.

I get what you mean but unfortunately most the criticisms are not constructed very well. :/

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
LUTZIFER

You know, it's kinda funny how the Windows 8 fanatics call the ones who don't like it "Windows 8 Haters", but doesn't that also make themselves "Windows 7 Haters"?

How is one better than the other?

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Atomic Wanderer Chicken

What is there not to like about windows 8? I was very critical of it then i realized the start screen is exactly like the start menu, and start button is still really there but hidden, and it can run programs all the way back to the 1990s. I think the start screen is much more sophisticated and organized, and windows 8's new flat gui is much nicer too. What MS should do is add the ability to boot to dos :woot:

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
LimeMaster

You know, it's kinda funny how the Windows 8 fanatics call the ones who don't like it "Windows 8 Haters", but doesn't that also make themselves "Windows 7 Haters"?

How is one better than the other?

I like all versions Windows, so no.

Also I am just providing a suggestion that would keep everyone happy.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim K

That would work as well. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Arachno 1D

Don't know, guess some members are pushing the buttons way to hard.

You cannot push a button hard it a simple on or off switch

On a serious note I thought Microsoft was adapting the software for consumer ease of use, not forcing consumers to modify their actions to accommodate the software.

Link to post
Share on other sites
LimeMaster

You cannot push a button hard it a simple on or off switch

On a serious note I thought Microsoft was adapting the software for consumer ease of use, not forcing consumers to modify their actions to accommodate the software.

Which is what Microsoft is trying to do with Blue.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Atomic Wanderer Chicken

DS5LsyR.jpg

Is this a real screenshot??

Link to post
Share on other sites
sagum

Is this a real screenshot??

No. It's a mock up of how simple it would be for Microsoft make everyone happy.

Enable exclusive mode for either;

- Windows 8 UI only

No access to desktop, a bit like kiosk mode but with full access to everything Metro.

- Desktop only.

Ignoring the need for charms, quick switch and the other slide menus. It allows space for start menu and start button.

Or leave exclusive mode off and use it how it is now.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Chris123NT

I remember seeing that. I always went for the 95 UI because it was more intuitive. The 8 UI on the other hand....not so much lol.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
seta-san

Provide an option using the installation or in the control panel to choose between the start menu or start screen. Keeping everybody happy. Windows 95 did this and eventually people switched to the new Ul and the older Ul was no longer needed so it was removed from Windows XP SP2. :)

i'd really settle for an obscure registry key

Link to post
Share on other sites
dvb2000

Question: Why do they care? Aren't they aware most of us are just pushing their buttons?

haha - good one, and if we had a proper start button/menu we wouldn't need to push THEIR buttons :)

i'd really settle for an obscure registry key

Can't do that, the windows development team wouldn't see it on their "telemetry" that's telling them no one uses the start button any more.

(I think they are reading the telemetry from smart phones though, not desktop/laptop users, anyway, just in a failed attempt to try and prove a point. I know I have all options to send info back to Microsoft turned off, so they aren't getting any telemetry from me.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
AJerman

The reason you hear so much from people that don't like Windows 8 is because a lot of us actually work in the tech business and therefore have to deal with it even if we don't use it at home. This isn't a case of "Well just don't use it!". So I should quit my job because I'm not allowed to give feedback over a massive downturn in usability? Whether you can play Angry Birds and browse Facebook just as easily in Windows 8, it's a pain in the ass for a lot of us who don't want our workflow interrupted by space wasting start screens and gaudy Metro apps.

And it wouldn't be so bad if they weren't forcing this UI on the server versions of Windows which is beyond stupidity, honestly. If they had a huge suite of incredibly useful live tiles that gave all the vital details of your server, you could make an argument, but they don't, they have just a handful of icons showing by default and a ton of wasted space. Hell, the perfect solution to me would be to run a server version that keeps the old style. Then I could just use the server version as a workstation when I didn't like Metro.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
Raa

One can only hope...

Link to post
Share on other sites
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Dutchie64
      HI,

      Hope there are still some Surface2 (RT)  Win8 users around, as I still use mine almost daily besides my S3.

      The tablet ran the latest 04-2018 security update yesterday, but it messed up all my installed apps. Almost all of them refused to start and got stuck on the start/icon screen.
      It doesn't really matters if it's MS native apps or 3rd party ones.
      After some fiddling I got some of them to start again, by starting/closing them frequently, but are dog slow atm.

      While this was all happening, CPU and harddrive usage was over 60-70%%, as if Windows was still doing stuff. Even after multiple reboots/shutdowns.

      Also, the apps that refuse to start (for now) are apps that are not in the Store anymore. Coincidence?
      Does this sound familiar to someone, or did I just got a bad update experience?

      cheers!

      rob

       
    • By ogannon
      Hi All,
       
      I am trying to mend my parents in law's computer. It's a Lenovo with Windows 8. The computer is extremely slow - loading up the computer you need at least two attempts - the first attempt you get a blue screen. Using the PC I've encountered that the computer is extremely slow - mouse stops when you are moving it etc...
       
      I've run a disk cleanup and then also a virus run. These did not make a big difference.
       
      Does anyone have any further ideas on how to remedy this problem? Would prefer not to reboot the entire machine as I have lost the Office 2010 code.
    • By Sergey "hb860"
      Win+X Menu Editor for Windows
      version 2.0.0.1
      Win+X Menu Editor is one of my applications and it serves to provide you a simple and useful way to edit Win+X menu without system files modification. It keeps your system integrity untouched.
      With Win+X Menu Editor you are able:
      to add new items. to remove any item of Win+X menu. to change display name of any item of Win+X menu. to reorder Win+X menu items. Screens:


      This release features the following changes:
      hashlnk is not required anymore, all its functions are ported into the Win+X Menu Editor source code Numerous bugs are fixed, such as sorting bug or crash on empty Win+X menu Improved "add a program" feature New clean and useful UI with hotkeys, new icons The ability to move shortcuts between groups New feature - "Presets", which allows you to add various commands in Win+X menu, such as shutdown options, calculator and so on. Fixed a bug with built-in items renaming Video with new version is available at the download page.
      Download link
    • By Ian W
      Do you use the Libraries feature introduced in Windows 7 and / or the Saved Search (otherwise known as Virtual Folder) feature introduced in Windows Vista? If so, do you have a preference for either feature?

      While I like both features I, as you probably expected, prefer the Saved Search feature. Both Libraries and Saved Searches consolidate content from multiple locations in a single view, and both allow users to customize their viewing experience based on the content displayed. Libraries, however, only allow users to display content based on folder locations (e.g., they cannot reference content based solely on dates, file attributes, et cetera), and users must manually add folders to a library before their content will appear.

      In contrast, Saved Searches can reference multiple locations simultaneously—or an individual folder(s) if that is what a user desires—based on a user's criteria such as specific names, dates, metadata, types, and words or phrases within files themselves. Also unlike Libraries, users can refine their Saved Search results with Boolean operators, natural language search (in Windows Vista and Windows 7), query composition, and / or the options offered by the column headers in File Explorer.
    • By RickC
      I don't know what to do. It is driving me crazy. None of the solutions suggested have work. I turned off the adaptive brightness feature in the advanced settings and I also disabled the sensor in the msconfig and it still lower the brightness to almost not visible. I have a Sony Vaio that came with windows 8 and upgraded to 10. It does it with both versions.