Recommended Posts

Speak for yourself, I love Forza and Fable and have bought xboxes in the past just to play those games, I was interested in getting Xbox One for exclusives but I am not interested in the slightest after that abomination of a reveal.

Who said they were forcing you, you used the old "don't like it don't buy it" moronic retort.

The fact is they are forcing their "vision" on people who want the console to play the freaking exclusive games they've come to know and love. Kinect was hardly a success outside of casual games and a few arbitrary motion/voice commands in some "better with kinect games", why force it on the next generation?

Don't bother replying, I don't expect an objective reply from a Microsoft apologist.

Console gaming has evolved beyond "just gaming". The XBox has been a home entertainment hub for sometime now, and that's not going to change. I still fail to see where I'm being "forced" here, is the next XBox supposed to provide some other "vision" besides the one Microsoft intended? Maybe dual boot some Sony games, or something? Of course it provides Microsoft's vision, it's a Microsoft product.

So this is as far as we can get from Microsoft right now,

Q: Will Xbox One allow players to trade in, purchase and play pre-owned games?

A: We are designing Xbox One to enable customers to trade in and resell games. We?ll have more details to share later.

Strange, was it not a woman that presented us the Halo TV series? How about the CBS woman who also presented?

I'm pretty sure the image is fake. It's a jab at this article: http://kotaku.com/5986025/the-lack-of-women-presenters-at-the-ps4-event-is-bigger-than-sony

There were, in fact, two female presenters at the Xbox One event. And both of them were on the stage at the same time. It looks like Microsoft has done their homework and made sure not to make the same mistake as Sony.

Console gaming has evolved beyond "just gaming". The XBox has been a home entertainment hub for sometime now, and that's not going to change. I still fail to see where I'm being "forced" here, is the next XBox supposed to provide some other "vision" besides the one Microsoft intended? Maybe dual boot some Sony games, or something? Of course it provides Microsoft's vision, it's a Microsoft product.

People already have smartphones, tablets, Apple TV, Google TV, Smart TVs, media streamers, DVRs. They don't need another $400 box to do something they already have. They buy a games console to play, um I dunno, games?

Why compromise what is happening on the screen by making it smaller and pinning an even smaller window on the screen to use an app beside playing a game?

Kinect was hardly a success, casual games and games that have shoehorned arbitrary kinect controls/voice commands "better with kinect".

Why build a console around it?

So this is as far as we can get from Microsoft right now,

Q: Will Xbox One allow players to trade in, purchase and play pre-owned games?

A: We are designing Xbox One to enable customers to trade in and resell games. We?ll have more details to share later.

That doesn't disprove anything, they could be designing the Xbox One around game passes that you can purchase for a reduced amount if you buy a used game.

  • Like 1

So this is as far as we can get from Microsoft right now,

Q: Will Xbox One allow players to trade in, purchase and play pre-owned games?

A: We are designing Xbox One to enable customers to trade in and resell games. We?ll have more details to share later.

When they can't answer the question directly, they know the it may be unpopular, or yet to be determined.

People already have smartphones, tablets, Apple TV, Google TV, Smart TVs, media streamers, DVRs. They don't need another $400 box to do something they already have. They buy a games console to play, um I dunno, games?

Why compromise what is happening on the screen by making it smaller and pinning an even smaller window on the screen to use an app beside playing a game?

Kinect was hardly a success, casual games and games that have shoehorned arbitrary kinect controls/voice commands "better with kinect".

Why build a console around it?

24 million Kinect sales is a failure?

People already have smartphones, tablets, Apple TV, Google TV, Smart TVs, media streamers, DVRs. They don't need another $400 box to do something they already have. They buy a games console to play, um I dunno, games?

Why compromise what is happening on the screen by making it smaller and pinning an even smaller window on the screen to use an app beside playing a game?

Kinect was hardly a success, casual games and games that have shoehorned arbitrary kinect controls/voice commands "better with kinect".

Why build a console around it?

I think it's the other way around. I'd rather not have Kinect and I hope they release a version that doesn't come bundled with it. If that isn't an option, then I'll make the most of what I get. And that means using the voice commands and hand gestures to use my console. The convenience of turning my Xbox on and off without a controller in hand is nice.

As for the Xbox being the one device to use, what they mean is the one living room device. Most people have smartphones but even less have tablets and Apple/Google TV. I like the fact that they've expanded the capabilities of the Xbox but I really hope their main focus is still gaming. I don't plan on using my Xbox as an all-in-one entertainment device but I can admit that I'm probably in the minority.

Wondering how big this thing really is.

The 3 red line are the same length.

What to you reckon, 14 to 15 inches square?

I guess that's a good guess. If the slot is a disc wide ...then about 13-14 total length, right?

When they can't answer the question directly, they know the it may be unpopular, or yet to be determined.

Yup, they could go either way. No one knows.

Dunno why people are shocked at how big it is, from the PS4 teaser it looks to be about same size.

Yeah, first-gens are always big and hungry. They'll release slimmer versions in a few years time.

I have a receiver that has plenty of inputs/outputs that compliment the TV. I don't need another thing that challenges my receiver, unless the Xbox also acts as a surround sound theater receiver.

shakey, while YOU do, all too many do not. And does your receiver support HDMI pass-through? (Most don't, due to HDCP.)

And HDMI passthrough is indeed a big problem for video.

And, if anything, the XB ONE, like XB360 (and even the PS3) is meant to replace standalone DVD or BD players - not necessarily your A/V receiver.

I pointed out (in another thread) that the current XB360+Kinect (or PS3+Move) is rather unwieldy as it stands - integration of the two makes all too much sense merely from a connectivity/integration standpoint with current HT setups.

Throw in the standing-out-like-a-sore-thumb aspect and it HAS turned folks off.

People already have smartphones, tablets, Apple TV, Google TV, Smart TVs, media streamers, DVRs. They don't need another $400 box to do something they already have. They buy a games console to play, um I dunno, games?

Whoa, wait when did this happen? My friends and I must be behind the times then.

I personally know of no one who has Apple TV, or even Google TV for that matter, they're complete failures on the market. Also, what the hell is a smart TV?

Why compromise what is happening on the screen by making it smaller and pinning an even smaller window on the screen to use an app beside playing a game?

IDK. Why multi-task? Who needs that?

Kinect was hardly a success, casual games and games that have shoehorned arbitrary kinect controls/voice commands "better with kinect".

Why build a console around it?

24 million isn't a "success"?

24 million isn't a "success"?

Yes, we get it, you're a kinect fan who can't grasp the fact that no matter how many people were suckered into buying the damn thing it's still a failure for real games.

  • Like 2

Wow. It actually runs two VMs in a HyperV setup. That's impressive if it doesn't affect game performance!

http://www.zdnet.com/microsofts-xbox-one-whats-windows-got-to-do-with-it-7000015684/

Didn't Wired say it's a bit bigger than the 360 is? I think the extra size is because it might have the power brick inside the case this time. There is also the dedicated Kinect 2 port and the hdmi in tv pass-through bits in there that add to things. Just look at all the ports on the back for example.

I don't really care about the size, i'm not going to be walking around with it, it's not a mobile device in the end.

Wow. It actually runs two VMs in a HyperV setup. That's impressive if it doesn't affect game performance!

http://www.zdnet.com/microsofts-xbox-one-whats-windows-got-to-do-with-it-7000015684/

That's exactly what I figured was going on when MS said that it's running 3 "OS". A base Hyper-V at the hardware level with Windows and Xbox OS on top which allows for the quick and smooth multitasking. The fact I can jump to other apps or the dashboard and NOT have to end my game first is a big step up.

Seeing how the PS Move sold nearly the same amount and is considered a failure.... Yes.

The reality is that move at best sold half that in full usable kits, realistically closer to be third. Since they counted every addon as a move sale, whereas every kinect was a full suite.

The numbers do not lie kids...

ku-xlarge.jpg

ku-xlarge.jpg

So seriously, you guys can think whatever you want about how glorious MS is and can never do any wrong. A decent amount of the world must disagree with you for that above to take place, even if it is only temporary which is sure to be the case, it does show the pulse of what those who do not care one way or the other are thinking.

  • Like 1

Whoa, wait when did this happen? My friends and I must be behind the times then.

I personally know of no one who has Apple TV, or even Google TV for that matter, they're complete failures on the market. Also, what the hell is a smart TV?

You've gotta be trolling right? I know a few people who have Apple TVs. It's great for them as they live in the Apple ecosystem.

24 million isn't a "success"?

It may be a success in sales figures, however it's a failure in implementation in the current generation because the features that are used in games are just "gimmicky". With the Xbox One supporting OS wide gestures and it being forced on the users, more people may get to grips with it and get used to it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!