Recommended Posts

But naturally it will happen one day..

 

Space has finite number of particles and they will some day run out of number of state in which they can be unique and they are bond to rearrange them self to a state which they previously were.. Distance between these two state is huge but they will some day do it..

that a flawed assumptions.

particles that dragged and united into a black hole won't ever revert to state where they were before became one with the black hole.

 

I believe in time travel but to do this you need to travel at the speed of Light which we don't have the technology. But if can reach the speed of light we will be able not just to travel in time but reach planets that are far far away.

Well, you are only correct in 1 particular sense.  Light speed travel is not the only way (theoretically) - In fact, there might be 1000 different ways, all easier than light speed travel - mainly because once you get close to the speed of light, you also approach infinite resistance.  (among a myriad of other issues making this not the ideal way)   .... so we think.....

All discussion aside, the audio in the OP is pretty detailed. It really sounds like the guy believes he went to the future. Of course, it was recorded in 2000 and he refers to events happening in 2002 and 2003 that we know didn't happen. The fact that hospitals haven't changed in 137 years and the fact that he needed 6 weeks of treatment leaves it feeling very suspicious. My only issue is that he had an answer for every question and seemed to genuinely believe that this all happened. He didn't come across as a liar though.

All discussion aside, the audio in the OP is pretty detailed. It really sounds like the guy believes he went to the future. Of course, it was recorded in 2000 and he refers to events happening in 2002 and 2003 that we know didn't happen. The fact that hospitals haven't changed in 137 years and the fact that he needed 6 weeks of treatment leaves it feeling very suspicious. My only issue is that he had an answer for every question and seemed to genuinely believe that this all happened. He didn't come across as a liar though.

Events after 2000 have been altered by him returning from the future, so it makes sense things won't be the same as in his story. The chance he did time travel is slim but still events not happening is not proof he didn't.

Events after 2000 have been altered by him returning from the future, so it makes sense things won't be the same as in his story. The chance he did time travel is slim but still events not happening is not proof he didn't.

That's pretty convenient.

No.  Some people theorize that if you could move faster than the speed of light, you would travel back in time, but I can't go for that.  Think about this.  There are objects in space that are millions of light years away.  When we look at those objects, what we see is what things looked like millions of years ago.  The reality is very different, the light just hasn't had time to get here yet for us to see it.  If we were somehow able to instantly teleport to those objects, we would be able to see "reality".  If we were to move faster than the speed of light in one direction, I don't think anything would happen except that we would be catching up with old rays of light, so time would "appear" to be moving backwards if we looked behind us because the light rays entering our eyes would be increasingly older light rays.  Basically, we would be viewing light in the reverse of how it is normally seen, so things would appear to be going backward in time.  However, that would just be a visual illusion, and I don't think, physically, it is possible to "actually" travel back in time and walk around and interact with a past version of the universe, as it is portrayed in the movies.

  • Like 2

No.  Some people theorize that if you could move faster than the speed of light, you would travel back in time, but I can't go for that.  Think about this.  There are objects in space that are millions of light years away.  When we look at those objects, what we see is what things looked like millions of years ago.  The reality is very different, the light just hasn't had time to get here yet for us to see it.  If we were somehow able to instantly teleport to those objects, we would be able to see "reality".  If we were to move faster than the speed of light in one direction, I don't think anything would happen except that we would be catching up with old rays of light, so time would "appear" to be moving backwards if we looked behind us because the light rays entering our eyes would be increasingly older light rays.  Basically, we would be viewing light in the reverse of how it is normally seen, so things would appear to be going backward in time.  However, that would just be a visual illusion, and I don't think, physically, it is possible to "actually" travel back in time and walk around and interact with a past version of the universe, as it is portrayed in the movies.

I was going to bring up the objects in space in an upcoming post, but you saved me the trouble. Thank you.

Considering time flows differently in space, and at close to the speed of light. It's not fixed like we're use to / experience on earth.

Another question would be is we make the tech is it true time travel or hopping to an alternate reality that makes it feel like we time traveled if alteration accrued. 

I've always followed the Red Queen's advice:

"I can't believe that!" said Alice.
"Can't you?" the Queen said in a pitying tone. "Try again: draw a long breath, and shut your eyes."
Alice laughed. "There's no use trying," she said: "one can't believe impossible things."
"I daresay you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for half-an-hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

 

The "laws" of physics aren't laws at all. They are merely hypotheses. Even where specific relationships have been shown to obtain mathematically, they could merely be local effects. And when you start to investigate the Nature of Reality, a whole new universe opens up, involving consciousness and energy.

As an individual with a PhD in Physic the only answer on my mind is, "Hell No."

Interesting. Care to elaborate? Personally I think that black holes are the closest that we'll get to time travel, but I cannot vouch for the idea that it will let us go backwards or forwards on ourselves in a true time traveling sense.

It was said that if you were to travel at the speed of light (which Hawking and many other say isn't possible due to radiation that would kill you and blow up your ship the instant you hit the speed). That the entire universe would seem to happen in a split second of your "time", there one moment, gone in the blink of an eye.

 

You also apparently wouldn't be able to see light particles that you're traveling past if you were going faster than the speed of light, that's apparently a problem with sci-fi movies and TV shows not being "realistic".

 

The opposite is said to happen when you're in a black hole, being able to see anything that has or will enter the horizon of it.

If time travel was possible in the future, don't you think people would return to the past to hurry up the discovery of it?

 

There are many reasons that may not work, one of them being the paradox solution, you going back in time and causing the changing of when time travel occurs will cause you to not be the one to do it at the time you originally came back and so it cancels out.

 

The other reasons being that what if Time really is tied to other dimensions other than just the 3 dimensions of space and "time travel" involves jumping into other universes or other bizarre circumstances, maybe it's not possible to come back to a point in time in your own universe? What if the universe diverges from your own with different choices being made, the alternate universe theories etc?

If time travel was possible in the future, don't you think people would return to the past to hurry up the discovery of it?

He didn't seem to care about it:

TimeTravelingHipster.jpg

:p

Seriously though, I think Alera is right in that it would have the potential to create a paradox. Unless you remove time travel and instead go with alternate universes. But then you're not messing with your direct timeline, you're messing with a timeline that could have been (for us.)

He didn't seem to care about it:

TimeTravelingHipster.jpg

:p

Seriously though, I think Alera is right in that it would have the potential to create a paradox. Unless you remove time travel and instead go with alternate universes. But then you're not messing with your direct timeline, you're messing with a timeline that could have been (for us.)

 

Fake picture huh? xD It'd be awesome if that was real!

There are many reasons that may not work, one of them being the paradox solution, you going back in time and causing the changing of when time travel occurs will cause you to not be the one to do it at the time you originally came back and so it cancels out.

 

The other reasons being that what if Time really is tied to other dimensions other than just the 3 dimensions of space and "time travel" involves jumping into other universes or other bizarre circumstances, maybe it's not possible to come back to a point in time in your own universe? What if the universe diverges from your own with different choices being made, the alternate universe theories etc?

Cancels out that YOU are not the one that returned to the past, but not that SOME one will. And it doesn't matter who's that person, as long as one returns to the past.

 

In that case, that's not time traveling.

Cancels out that YOU are not the one that returned to the past, but not that SOME one will. And it doesn't matter who's that person, as long as one returns to the past.

 

In that case, that's not time traveling.

 

But if you or someone from the future is not the one to do it, then how did you or they give those in the past the details to make the time machine? :p How do you stop the paradox? You'd have to ensure there was an endless loop if that was the case...

Who said anything about "me" returning to the past to give that information? Doesn't matter who will do it, as long as the information that speeds up the process of discovery will be transferred.

 

The point I'm trying to make is, if somebody at point A in time; the point that someone in the future has the information to make time travel work, then sends that information back either on it's own or with someone, then tries to make a time travel device in the past, that will change the past because time travel has already been invented, meaning that the future time travelers would have no reason to send anything into the past as it's already been done, which means nobody or nothing travels back.

 

Basically, the chain of events that made point A what it was will never happen, so the person or information that traveled from point A to point B will also never occur, cancelling the whole thing out.

 

EDIT: I may have to draw a diagram to make it easier to understand. xD

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!