Recommended Posts

I would still like an alternative selection method to be considered. There must be a better alternative than covering up the selected album artwork with a tick over it?

 

I know your thoughts on my suggestions were you had one previously and a bit Groove like, but they are just simple and still bold enough to make selection visible enough.

 

select1.PNGselect2.jpgselect3.jpg

12 hours ago, dakn said:

I would still like an alternative selection method to be considered. There must be a better alternative than covering up the selected album artwork with a tick over it?

 

I know your thoughts on my suggestions were you had one previously and a bit Groove like, but they are just simple and still bold enough to make selection visible enough.

 

select1.PNGselect2.jpgselect3.jpg

I guess I have no other choice than change it :) I'll try to restore it to how it was in the beginning.

3 minutes ago, TAZMINATOR said:

For selection? Such as select the item to move or delete?

It's just a selection box. The top right corner item doesn't add any more value, than just being shown. I'm wondering which one looks better.

 

Edit: I'd say without. As it hides part of the cover, without adding any functionality.

2 minutes ago, Raphaël G. said:

It's just a selection box. The top right corner item doesn't add any more value, than just being shown. I'm wondering which one looks better.

 

Edit: I'd say without. As it hides part of the cover, without adding any functionality.

Ah I see.  Without is good.   Hover can show it if you want. Unless click to show it.

18 minutes ago, Raphaël G. said:

With or without top right corner thingy?

 

Untitled.png

How about this. use the right style for single selection and use the left style for selecting multiple songs (i've seen a few apps do similar for selections)

  • Like 2
10 minutes ago, Brandon H said:

How about this. use the right style for single selection and use the left style for selecting multiple songs (i've seen a few apps do similar for selections)

I second this. Good idea! :)

I love Dopamine. I just noticed that some of my badly tagged files seems to be completely missing from my collection. See image. In that album, only the ones with tags showed up. I tried searching by filename, assuming they could not be in the correct album, but even by filename, I cannot find them.

 

Are files without proper tags ignored ? or is there a way to see them in Dopamine ?

snip_20161129172534.png

15 hours ago, Ikshaar said:

I love Dopamine. I just noticed that some of my badly tagged files seems to be completely missing from my collection. See image. In that album, only the ones with tags showed up. I tried searching by filename, assuming they could not be in the correct album, but even by filename, I cannot find them.

 

Are files without proper tags ignored ? or is there a way to see them in Dopamine ?

snip_20161129172534.png

Dopamine does include files with incorrect tags (unless reading the tags crashes due to file corruption, I think).

You should see them in under "Unkown artist" or "Unknown album". Also, when selecting no artist or album, you should see all songs in the rightmost list. The search bar should allow you to search by filename. The same can be achieved in the "Songs" screen. Do they appear there?

2 hours ago, Raphaël G. said:

Dopamine does include files with incorrect tags (unless reading the tags crashes due to file corruption, I think).

You should see them in under "Unkown artist" or "Unknown album". Also, when selecting no artist or album, you should see all songs in the rightmost list. The search bar should allow you to search by filename. The same can be achieved in the "Songs" screen. Do they appear there?

So I could not find them, tried MediaMonkey, same error. Tried MP3tag, was finally able to see the files and that the codec infos are missing, and trying to view the extended tags crashed even mp3tag. 

See below the properties tab from mp3tag showing a correct file and a not correct one (see timestamp, file size and the entire missing MPEG infos). 

 

Obviously this is a very weird case of missing/wrong infos, so no worry about it, thanks for the help. FYI, i can still play those files in WMP for example, so the mp3 is not "lost".

 

CaptureBugTag.png

CaptureBugTag2.PNG

6 minutes ago, Ikshaar said:

So I could not find them, tried MediaMonkey, same error. Tried MP3tag, was finally able to see the files and that the codec infos are missing, and trying to view the extended tags crashed even mp3tag. 

See below the properties tab from mp3tag showing a correct file and a not correct one. 

 

Obviously this is a very weird case of missing infos, so no worry about it, thanks for the help. FYI, i can still play those files in WMP for example, so the mp3 is not "lost".

 

CaptureBugTag.png

CaptureBugTag2.PNG

Cool. Thank for the info! I'd like to improve Dopamine to include such files in the collection instead of ignoring them (if they're not too corrupted). Would you mind sharing one of those file so I can maybe fine tune indexing? 

41 minutes ago, Raphaël G. said:

Cool. Thank for the info! I'd like to improve Dopamine to include such files in the collection instead of ignoring them (if they're not too corrupted). Would you mind sharing one of those file so I can maybe fine tune indexing? 

Sent you a private link.

Dopamine 1.2 build 812 (preview) has just been released. This is the change log:

 

– [Changed] Changed the album selection box, as it wasn’t visible enough.
– [Fixed] Lyrics lines starting with text in square bracket are incorrectly interpreted as timestamped lyrics
– [Fixed] A lot of bugs in processing of metadata changes
– [Fixed] Non-square covers are not streched anymore
– [Fixed] Moved the “Shuffle all” button to a, hopefully, more logical place.
– [Fixed] A possible infinite loop while searching for lyrics online

 

Enjoy!

 

Download here

  • Like 2

***EDIT***  -- I just went back to your last build you had posted and that is working with out an issue.  Let me know if you need me to do any further testing for this new build****

 

 

Hello!  First off I really enjoy this program.  I've been using it for quite a while and never had any issues at all until I just tried to upgrade today.  I uninstalled an older version from like March of this year.  Installed this current one you just posted today.  But I am getting an odd error whenever I try to play anything. 

 

Quote

Your computer does not have sufficient audio capabilities to use Dopamine.
This issue can occur if you have a N version of Windows. The N versions of Windows include the same functionality as other versions of Windows except for media-related technologies (Example: Windows Media Player and Windows Media Foundation are not preinstalled on N versions). Windows Media Foundation is required to use Dopamine.
If you are using a N version of Windows, please install the Media Feature Pack for N versions of Windows to fix this issue.

Now I have never seen this error before until today.  I have Windows 10 Pro build 1607.  I have been playing .mp3 and .flac audio files with no issues at all.  I can play them in other programs just not Dopamine any longer.   I really don't want to install this media feature pack as I worry it could mess up something else.  Please note I did go back and install an earlier build and that is now giving me a SQL error.  Any ideas on this?

 

Thanks!

8 hours ago, Jiovani said:

***EDIT***  -- I just went back to your last build you had posted and that is working with out an issue.  Let me know if you need me to do any further testing for this new build****

 

 

Hello!  First off I really enjoy this program.  I've been using it for quite a while and never had any issues at all until I just tried to upgrade today.  I uninstalled an older version from like March of this year.  Installed this current one you just posted today.  But I am getting an odd error whenever I try to play anything. 

 

Now I have never seen this error before until today.  I have Windows 10 Pro build 1607.  I have been playing .mp3 and .flac audio files with no issues at all.  I can play them in other programs just not Dopamine any longer.   I really don't want to install this media feature pack as I worry it could mess up something else.  Please note I did go back and install an earlier build and that is now giving me a SQL error.  Any ideas on this?

 

Thanks!

Could you send me the log file? I added a check at startup, for people which have a N version of Windows. Because I get a lot of people complaining that Dopamine doesn't play their files, and put a lot of time figuring out their version of Windows, to then find out it is a N edition. However, it seems my attempt at detecting that throws false positives.

Crazy feature idea of the day ...

 

Spinning CDart :rofl:

 

CDart covers from fanart.tv. I've seen this in one of the skins in Kodi, and it's a lot smoother than the gif below.

 

Anyways ... just thinking outside of the case.

output_Z4GLrZ.gif

  • Like 2
56 minutes ago, jasondefaoite said:

Crazy feature idea of the day ...

 

Spinning CDart :rofl:

 

CDart covers from fanart.tv. I've seen this in one of the skins in Kodi, and it's a lot smoother than the gif below.

 

Anyways ... just thinking outside of the case.

output_Z4GLrZ.gif

O_O Spinning....oh my...

16 hours ago, jasondefaoite said:

Crazy feature idea of the day ...

 

Spinning CDart :rofl:

 

CDart covers from fanart.tv. I've seen this in one of the skins in Kodi, and it's a lot smoother than the gif below.

 

Anyways ... just thinking outside of the case.

output_Z4GLrZ.gif

That sure is fancy! :) I don't know what I'll do with the info yet, but I might try it out.

 

In other news: I added lyrics source information to the lyrics screen (tonight's build will have it). Left shows online lyrics, right shows embedded lyrics.

 

 

lyrics source.png

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!