Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Raphaël G. said:

Hey folks, I have a question.

 

I got multiple requests for folder play, but as I don't need such feature myself, I'm wondering how it can be useful. Why should a music player replicate ones folder structure? Isn't that just the same as opening Windows Explorer, browsing to the desired file, and double clicking it? Or right clicking a folder, and choosing "Play with ..."?

Honest question. I'd like to understand why some people find a player without folder play "worthless".

I'm totally with you on this. Folder browsing is a very old fashioned method and for those that don't organise their music with tags.

  • Like 1
3 hours ago, Raphaël G. said:

Hey folks, I have a question.

 

I got multiple requests for folder play, but as I don't need such feature myself, I'm wondering how it can be useful. Why should a music player replicate ones folder structure? Isn't that just the same as opening Windows Explorer, browsing to the desired file, and double clicking it? Or right clicking a folder, and choosing "Play with ..."?

Honest question. I'd like to understand why some people find a player without folder play "worthless".

The only reason I can think of is some people don't have their music properly tagged. When that's the case, library view scrambles all your files. 

 

I have no use for that feature but what I really miss from my previous player is double clicking a file in explorer and Dopamine loading all the content of the folder. 

I have a lot of personal files (Band practice, audio memos, etc) not on my library and opening the whole folder instead of just the file was really useful for me. No idea if other Dopamine users would use this feature, though.

 

 

16 minutes ago, dakn said:

Sorry I forgot to reply to this. It only shuffles the collection by whole albums, not songs, which doesn't seem correct to me?

I'm not following: would't that be the same? (please tell me what I'm missing :)). When pressing "Shuffle all", Dopamine takes all songs (whether or not they are part of an album, doesn't matter) and randomizes the order, then it plays the first song in the resulting randomized list. 

14 minutes ago, dakn said:

I'm totally with you on this. Folder browsing is a very old fashioned method and for those that don't organise their music with tags.

Thanks. That's also what I was thinking. I got quite some requests for it though. I can't understand why someone who doesn't use tags, would need something like Dopamine.

7 minutes ago, Zequi said:

The only reason I can think of is some people don't have their music properly tagged.When that's the case, library view scrambles all your files. 

 

I have no use for that feature but what I really miss from my previous player is double clicking a file in explorer and Dopamine loading all the content of the folder. 

I have a lot of personal files (Band practice, audio memos, etc) not on my library and opening the whole folder instead of just the file was really useful for me. No idea if other Dopamine users would use this feature, though.

 

 

I'd like to know more about that "loading of the whole folder" feature. Which player did that? What exactly gets loaded and how is it displayed? Does that player open up some kind of Explorer-like view of that folder?

2 minutes ago, Raphaël G. said:

I'm not following: would't that be the same? (please tell me what I'm missing :)). When pressing "Shuffle all", Dopamine takes all songs (whether or not they are part of an album, doesn't matter) and randomizes the order, then it plays the first song in the resulting randomized list. 

Thanks. That's also what I was thinking. I got quite some requests for it though. I can't understand why someone who doesn't use tags, would need something like Dopamine.

When you press shuffle it will play tracks 1 to 10 of the first album (for example), in order, and then tracks 1 to 10 of the next album. The only thing that gets shuffled is the album order.

 

Try it. :)

10 minutes ago, dakn said:

When you press shuffle it will play tracks 1 to 10 of the first album (for example), in order, and then tracks 1 to 10 of the next album. The only thing that gets shuffled is the album order.

 

Try it. :)

It doesn't do that here. But looking at the code, I'm wondering what I was thinking, because how it is written right now, makes it very unreliable. So it's definitely possible it acts that way on your collection.

I'll fix that :)

Just had a check at what it's doing and it adds the whole collection to a playlist but only starts playing at a random position in the playlist but doesn't actually shuffle from there.

 

You would expect the playlist to be in a random order and start from the top?

 

I get the same result whether in Artist, Genre or Album view

2 minutes ago, dakn said:

Just had a check at what it's doing and it adds the whole collection to a playlist but only starts playing at a random position in the playlist but doesn't actually shuffle from there.

Indeed. I triggered "shuffle" before "enqueue". Silly, it should be the opposite :rofl:

7 minutes ago, dakn said:

Just had a check at what it's doing and it adds the whole collection to a playlist but only starts playing at a random position in the playlist but doesn't actually shuffle from there.

 

You would expect the playlist to be in a random order and start from the top?

 

I get the same result whether in Artist, Genre or Album view

Well the fact that it doesn't shuffle is indeed a bug. The order in the playlist is not randomized, because people wanted drag and drop reordering in playlists. If I showed songs in the randomized order, the combination with drag and drop would give "interesting" results. So it is normal that shuffle all will never start at the first song of the displayed list. It'll start at a random one, and randomize from there.

I just released Dopamine 1.2.4 (build 862). This is the change log:

 

– [Fixed] Artists are not sorted alphabetically
– [Fixed] “Shuffle all” doesn’t shuffle

 

Download here

  • Like 2
12 hours ago, Raphaël G. said:

Hey folks, I have a question.

 

I got multiple requests for folder play, but as I don't need such feature myself, I'm wondering how it can be useful. Why should a music player replicate ones folder structure? Isn't that just the same as opening Windows Explorer, browsing to the desired file, and double clicking it? Or right clicking a folder, and choosing "Play with ..."?

Honest question. I'd like to understand why some people find a player without folder play "worthless".

In my case, it's useful because it is the way I have my music organized. Everything is tagged as well. Example:

 

- Main music folder
     - "Artist" subfolder

          - "Year - Album" subfolder

               - "CD #" subfolder if there's more than one disc

 

When it's a movie soundtrack or compilation:

 

- Main music folder
     - "Year - Movie OST" subfolder

          - "CD #" subfolder if there's more than one disc

 

It would allow me better discoverability and replicate the exact sorting/navigation method I have my files organized in, but through Dopamine. For example, when I don't know what I want to listen to, and therefore have no album/artist/song to search (and don't want to use shuffle all), that's how I use WMP to find music. I just scroll through the folders until I find something I would like to play. It's easier on the eye because it's exactly like I have my library organized.

 

It absolutely is the same as using Windows Explorer, you're right. But doing that inside Dopamine, it would make the software richer and more feature complete.

 

We can edit tags outside Dopamine using Windows Explorer as well. We browse to the desired files, go to "Properties"->"Details" and edit the tags there. So, why is this feature useful in Dopamine when I can use native OS tools to achieve the same? Because it made Dopamine more convenient and richer to use.

 

For me, it's a comparable situation.

 

But hey, this is not a must-have feature for me, it's very secondary. Given the chance between "folder view" and "fading transitions between songs", I would totally support the implementing fading between songs. t's just something that I would like to see implemented, not something that says "until you do this, I refuse to use Dopamine". I use Dopamine nonetheless. :)

19 hours ago, Raphaël G. said:

Hey folks, I have a question.

 

I got multiple requests for folder play, but as I don't need such feature myself, I'm wondering how it can be useful. Why should a music player replicate ones folder structure? Isn't that just the same as opening Windows Explorer, browsing to the desired file, and double clicking it? Or right clicking a folder, and choosing "Play with ..."?

Honest question. I'd like to understand why some people find a player without folder play "worthless".

The main use case I can think of is if for whatever reason the user doesn't like browsing music based on how it's tagged. It's not something I've ever found much use for though

Hi everyone!

 

Development on the next version of Dopamine has started. The first preview is ready for consumption: 1.3 Build 871 (Preview)

 

This is the change log:

 

– [Changed] Updated the Spanish translation
– [Changed] Song title on playback info panes now scales to the available width
– [Fixed] Tray controls don’t respect the position of the Windows Taskbar.
– [Fixed] Added optional ‘Remove from disk’ option to the song context menu
– [Fixed] Date in the Song Information window is not localized
– [Fixed] WASAPI Exclusive mode plays high pitched sound

 

Enjoy!

 

Download here

  • Like 3
1 hour ago, dakn said:

I have just reinstalled Dopamine 1.2.862.4 and the Date Added view is now back to being based on when added to the database instead of date created. Is this intentional?

Yes it is intentional. I had complaints that, when users added new files to their collection, they didn't appear at the top of the list when sorting by date added. Because the date created in the files was older. This happens when you add a folder which existed for a longer time, but which wasn't in the collection before.

 

I'm not sure what I should do here. Whatever I chose, there's always someone who doesn't like it.

 

Maybe I could use a combination of both? E.g.:

 

- When doing full indexing: use the date from the file

- When adding new files: use the current date

48 minutes ago, Raphaël G. said:

Maybe I could use a combination of both? E.g.:

 

- When doing full indexing: use the date from the file

- When adding new files: use the current date

This is exactly how it was working for me. Even if I added files that had a creation date from years ago they would always be the latest, unless I deleted the database and re-scanned.

 

It might not have meant to be adding the new files with older dates as latest, but it was, and I was fine with that as it seems correct.

32 minutes ago, dakn said:

This is exactly how it was working for me. Even if I added files that had a creation date from years ago they would always be the latest, unless I deleted the database and re-scanned.

 

It might not have meant to be adding the new files with older dates as latest, but it was, and I was fine with that as it seems correct.

That's strange. When using the file creation date, they should never have appeared at the top. I have no idea how that could have been correct on your system.

 

Edit:

 

What is exactly the problem right now? Is the problem, that files cannot be sorted by the date they were added to the file system?

Because this should still work now: files which are added later to the collection, appear at the top.

 

Just tried rolling back to an earlier version but it wasn't early enough, but basically my collection ends a as Z to A for Date Added as it naturally goes through my collection alphabetically adding it.

 

Just checked Zune again and it definitely adds stuff based on the date created as I added some new stuff today that's dated a few years old and it placed them in that area of my collection.

Edited by dakn
25 minutes ago, dakn said:

Just tried rolling back to an earlier version but it wasn't early enough, but basically my collection ends a as Z to A for Date Added as it naturally goes through my collection alphabetically adding it.

 

Just checked Zune again and it definitely adds stuff based on the date created as I added some new stuff today that's dated a few years old and it placed them in that area of my collection.

I've reopened the GitHub issue: https://github.com/digimezzo/Dopamine/issues/248

 

  • Like 2
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!