Formula 1 World Championship 2015 Season Discussion


  

57 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you think will win the 2015 Driver's Championship?

    • Lewis Hamilton
      44
    • Nico Rosberg
      6
    • Daniel Ricciardo
      0
    • Daniil Kvyat
      0
    • Felipe Massa
      1
    • Valtteri Bottas
      0
    • Sebastian Vettel
      3
    • Kimi Raikkonen
      0
    • Fernando Alonso
      1
    • Jenson Button
      0
    • Sergio Perez
      0
    • Nico Hulkenberg
      0
    • Max Verstappen
      0
    • Carlos Sainz Jr
      1
    • Romain Grosjean
      0
    • Pastor Maldonado
      0
    • Will Stevens
      1
    • Roberto Merhi
      0
    • Marcus Ericsson
      0
    • Felipe Nasr
      0
  2. 2. Who do you think will win the 2015 Constructor's Championship?

    • Mercedes AMG Petronas F1 Team
      48
    • Infiniti Red Bull Racing
      1
    • Williams Martini Racing
      2
    • Scuderia Ferrari
      3
    • McLaren Honda
      1
    • Sahara Force India F1 Team
      0
    • Scuderia Toro Rosso
      0
    • Lotus F1 Team
      0
    • Manor Marussia F1 Team
      1
    • Sauber F1 Team
      1


Recommended Posts

Thing is they seem to be upset that they feel that somehow Mercedes has some kind of advantage in their engines that the other teams are simply unable to get near to. But isn't it a fairly widely held belief that the Red Bull wasn't purely just a great design but actually had some kind of hidden aerodynamic or special diffuser arrangement that made is so strong for so many years (and was therefore a 'creative' interpretation of the FIA rules, which is presumably all Mercedes have done to make their car so strong this year). 

Exactly. RBR was utterly dominant and never during that time did they whine about the rules being bad for the sport. Even last year CH stated that it was other teams job to catch up with Mercedes. Now they're threatening to quit the sport again (they made the same threat last year) and calling for Mercedes to be disadvantaged by the FIA. Williams, on the other hand, has praised Mercedes and said they'll be working hard to close the gap.

 

If RBR is only interested in the sport if they can win and intend to quit then good riddance. What RBR is doing, all the moaning about the regulations and Mercedes, is bad for the sport. Ferrari hasn't won the WCC since 2008 but rather than quit the sport they've worked hard and look to have a decent car this year.

 

Then thing I don't get is why they are aiming their frustrations at Mercedes when clearly, their biggest issue this year and last has been Renault, Lotus could see that and dropped them.

 

I've seen articles in which CH has stated that the Renault engine is 100BHP short on the Merc PU's but given that they actually have some ability to deliver their enginers this year I would be jumping up and down at Renault and telling them if they don't pull their fingers out they will drop them. I don't want to see that happen, we need diversity among the engines but Renault just aren't doing a good enough job IMO.

 

Look at Mclaren too, they have gone for something different too because of a lack of success, and they have had the Merc engine.

 

 

Thing is they seem to be upset that they feel that somehow Mercedes has some kind of advantage in their engines that the other teams are simply unable to get near to. But isn't it a fairly widely held belief that the Red Bull wasn't purely just a great design but actually had some kind of hidden aerodynamic or special diffuser arrangement that made is so strong for so many years (and was therefore a 'creative' interpretation of the FIA rules, which is presumably all Mercedes have done to make their car so strong this year). 

 

There were investigations into flexible noses and the double diffusers countless times. He just shrugged it off and made statements like it just shows we are doing a good job if the other guys want to slow us down.

 

I do however to an extent agree with him on one aspect. I would like to see other teams fighting for the top step and it not just being a duel between the two Merc drivers as long as despite all that, Hamilton still comes out on top :p

 

I do think we will see a resurgence at Ferrari and with Vettel at the wheel this year, they have as good a chance as any to take it to them.

 

  • Like 2

Yeah I think there are several arguments here - the hypocrisy from Horner towards Mercedes is quite entertaining, but I think his frustrations reflect those of many fans of F1. It's no pleasure having one team utterly dominating - it's no longer a sport when one team basically are guaranteed to win it, unless outside influences such as a crash or mechanical failure get in the way. 

 

I'm fairly happy to see Lewis succeeding but I'm sure even he must wish there was a bit more of a fight and it wasn't quite the walk in the park for Mercedes that it is right now. 

Yeah I think there are several arguments here - the hypocrisy from Horner towards Mercedes is quite entertaining, but I think his frustrations reflect those of many fans of F1. It's no pleasure having one team utterly dominating - it's no longer a sport when one team basically are guaranteed to win it, unless outside influences such as a crash or mechanical failure get in the way. 

 

I'm fairly happy to see Lewis succeeding but I'm sure even he must wish there was a bit more of a fight and it wasn't quite the walk in the park for Mercedes that it is right now. 

 

I think Hamilton has said in the past that he has never wanted a walk in the park when it comes to the championship, Rosberg has made similar comments this weekend but got some stick from Vettel for it;

 

 

Sebastian Vettel poked fun at Nico Rosberg's suggestion he wants to see the field close up after Mercedes' dominant one-two at the Australian Grand Prix.

 

Australia confirmed Mercedes has carried over a huge advantage from 2014, with Vettel 34 seconds adrift of Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg in third. In the post-race press conference Rosberg was asked for his opinion on the huge gap enjoyed by Mercedes.

 

"I hope we can have a good fight," he replied. "That would be awesome. I think the next couple of races we're going to be leading the way for sure, and we're going to try and keep it that way, but we know it would be good if they can come a bit closer, as long as they don't come too close

We are probably gonna see pandemonium at the Belgian Grand Prix this year...

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

Formula 1 is an engineering competition and always has been, purposely holding back one team so the others can catch up goes against everything the sport stands for. Renault pushed just as hard as Mercedes for these new regulations, so suck it up and improve your product. Red Bull's arrogance is nothing but a bad joke. As for Mercedes giving customer teams de-tuned engines, that is complete BS. Mercedes would want to give everyone the same spec of engine to enable themselves to gather performance data, plus producing 2 specs of engine would be a lot more expensive. Mercedes simply have a packaging advantage because they designed the engine and chassis to work together.

 

And I really don't buy the argument that they're just in front because of engine power, they have a great chassis. In short the other teams need to stop whining and produce a better product.

  • Like 2

Yeah I think there are several arguments here - the hypocrisy from Horner towards Mercedes is quite entertaining, but I think his frustrations reflect those of many fans of F1. It's no pleasure having one team utterly dominating - it's no longer a sport when one team basically are guaranteed to win it, unless outside influences such as a crash or mechanical failure get in the way.

F1 has always been this way. Go back to 1988 and you had four years of McLaren winning, then three years of Williams, one year Benetton then another two years of Williams, one of McLaren then six years of Ferrari, two years of Renault, two more years of Ferrari, one for Brawn, then four years of Red Bull and now we've had one year of Mercedes, with the potential for a second this year.

 

The point is that the sport is cyclical. RBR was happy when it was at the top, yet moans and threatens to quit the sport when it's someone else's turn. As much as I like Hamilton I don't want to see Mercedes be utterly dominant but the sport is still just as entertaining as ever. In fact it means that the competition has to work that much harder to win. Few would have thought Mercedes would be so utterly dominant when Hamilton moved there.

 

If Mercedes becomes too dominant

  • Like 2

1. Manor turned up only to get money and to give their sponsors visibility. They never had an intention to race, no matter what they say. I am glad that Bernie is now making them pay for freight.

 

2. Does anyone else hate the frequency with which the word "driveability" is being used. It's mentioned in almost every other sentence. It's tiring to hear it over and over.

Few would have thought Mercedes would be so utterly dominant when Hamilton moved there.

 

I remember an interview with Lewis just after he'd signed with Mercedes and he compared it to the start of the Schumacher/Ferrari days, with the potential to work with a team and help turn it into one which could dominate the championships. I didn't think much of it at the time (words are easy) but it seems like they're about as well set-up as they could be to actually manage something like that. I know it's only a year in, just in terms of the here-and-now, they're pretty much where they need to be to have a chance at making that happen.

Formula 1 is an engineering competition and always has been, purposely holding back one team so the others can catch up goes against everything the sport stands for. Renault pushed just as hard as Mercedes for these new regulations, so suck it up and improve your product. Red Bull's arrogance is nothing but a bad joke. As for Mercedes giving customer teams de-tuned engines, that is complete BS. Mercedes would want to give everyone the same spec of engine to enable themselves to gather performance data, plus producing 2 specs of engine would be a lot more expensive. Mercedes simply have a packaging advantage because they designed the engine and chassis to work together.

 

And I really don't buy the argument that they're just in front because of engine power, they have a great chassis. In short the other teams need to stop whining and produce a better product.

 

Toto has said it himself its not down to pure power;

 

 

"The most difference we see is mid- to high-speed corners - that seems to be the strength of the car," Mercedes boss Toto Wolff said. "That was the strength of the Red Bulls and it now seems to be where we are looking most competitive.

"We see a deficit from our car on the straights in comparison to Williams and Ferrari, they have much more straight line speed - as much as 10-12km/h in terms of straight-line speed, so less drag."

Read more at http://en.espnf1.com/mercedes/motorsport/story/194835.html#IfuZSoFRH8lfFdgQ.99

 

Formula one has and always will be more about aero and downforce than anything else. If you can take the fast corners flat then you will leave the others behind at most tracks.

Javascript is not enabled or refresh the page to view.

Click here to view the Tweet

 

Erm, perhaps if you hadn't tried to screw a driver out of money and contract, there wouldn't be a fight to have  :rofl:

 

Unless we don't have the full story on this, I cannot believe how nonchalant Sauber appear to be over this all. If I was that teams PR I'd be trying to apologies to the fans, not make out that VDG is the bad guy here. I honestly expect kaltenborn to step down this year over this.

  • Like 1

 

Erm, perhaps if you hadn't tried to screw a driver out of money and contract, there wouldn't be a fight to have  :rofl:

 

Unless we don't have the full story on this, I cannot believe how nonchalant Sauber appear to be over this all. If I was that teams PR I'd be trying to apologies to the fans, not make out that VDG is the bad guy here. I honestly expect kaltenborn to step down this year over this.

 

Ridiculous stance they've taken. To be fair though that's standard practice for F1 teams and does provide a lot of comedy.

I know F1 is a business and not a sport. Christian Horner et al, need to put their whining and bitching energy into catching up with Mercedes. Shoes on the other foot now and like the petulant children who currently work in F1 he doesn't like it. Why don't RedBull with all their money build their own engine, like Mercedes and Ferrari.

 

Also, I would like to see an F1 championship in which only the FIA make the rules. Not the teams, certainly not FOM.

 

How can you have a "sport" in which the top teams make the rules. Nobody ever agrees. Just have the FIA make all the rules. Then if you don't like the rules, don't play the game.

 

I also find it strange that tracks have to pay Bernie to put on a race, usually at a loss, and then the TV people have to pay Bernie to show it.

I know F1 is a business and not a sport. Christian Horner et al, need to put their whining and bitching energy into catching up with Mercedes. Shoes on the other foot now and like the petulant children who currently work in F1 he doesn't like it. Why don't RedBull with all their money build their own engine, like Mercedes and Ferrari.

 

Also, I would like to see an F1 championship in which only the FIA make the rules. Not the teams, certainly not FOM.

 

How can you have a "sport" in which the top teams make the rules. Nobody ever agrees. Just have the FIA make all the rules. Then if you don't like the rules, don't play the game.

 

I also find it strange that tracks have to pay Bernie to put on a race, usually at a loss, and then the TV people have to pay Bernie to show it.

 

CVC paid a lot of money for the rights to F1, got to make it back somehow :(

Alonso cleared to fly to Malaysia

(Reuters) - McLaren's Fernando Alonso has been cleared to travel to Malaysia for the second race of the Formula One season after passing medical tests in England, Spanish media reported on Sunday.

Marca and AS sports newspapers, quoting sources close to the driver, said the double world champion had short and long-term memory and reflex checks in Cambridge.

There was no immediate comment from McLaren.

The driver, who suffered concussion after crashing in testing in Barcelona last month, missed the March 15 Australian season-opener and must still pass FIA tests at the Sepang circuit on Thursday before being able to race.

His manager has said those should be a formality.

Source: Reuters

CVC paid a lot of money for the rights to F1, got to make it back somehow :(

 

Quite frankly I think the way F1 is ran is a complete joke. The venues that host the events often operate at a loss, and the teams only receive a small chunk of the commercial pot, all so Bernie and the rights holder can line their pockets. It creates a system where the people the contribute the least to the sport get the most out of it, I can fully see why it peeves so many of the teams and venues.

 

I don't blame the Germans for refusing to operate at a loss, nor would I blame any other circuit owners for pulling their events for the same reason. I really hope Bernie pops his clogs or retires soon, he's a greedy individual.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!