Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

Windows 8 was/is a tablet based mess of an OS, eagerly waiting to see if Windows 10 allows desktop owners to feel at home again (Y)

As a desktop owner, I felt very at home with 8.1 Even 8.0 didn't bother me that much, but 8.1 added some nice things, which Win10 will be building on.

As a desktop owner, I felt very at home with 8.1 Even 8.0 didn't bother me that much, but 8.1 added some nice things, which Win10 will be building on.

 

I do as well, but only after installing startisback :/

Windows 8 was/is a tablet based mess of an OS, eagerly waiting to see if Windows 10 allows desktop owners to feel at home again (Y)

 

I feel more at home with 8.x than with any Windows OS since Windows 3.1.

  • Like 1

Since 7 brought taskbar pinning I've used the menu less and less, the start screen change had little effect on me at that point.

  • Like 2

Since 7 brought taskbar pinning I've used the menu less and less, the start screen change had little effect on me at that point.

Same here, George.  In fact, Taskbar pinning - which stayed put - largely obviated the Start menu altogether in my case. (Just yesterday, a family friend brought over their new Lenovo AIO to have their Office (365) subscription installed; instead of creating desktop shortcuts, I pinned their preferred Office applications to the Taskbar.  Because it supports touch, keyboard, AND mouse, you can select anything on either desktop OR Taskbar any which way - it's NOT one or the other.  Yes - I used a 7-style pinning in 8.1 - while the Start menu is gone, the Taskbar isn't.  In fact, if you application installer has a Create a QuickLaunch shortcut (and most application installers from the Windows 7 era do), it will pin to the Taskbar automatically.  Basically, there was NO change whatever for THIS Windows 7 user who upgraded, as I miss the Start menu not at all.

 

Dismissing ModernUI as touch-only is so incorrect it stopped being funny with the RTM of Windows 8 - why are folks continuing to think so?

I do as well, but only after installing startisback :/

I have to ask -- how many different applications do you use in a given day?  If you use more applications than are pinned to the desktop and/or Taskbar, I can see why you would need SOME sort of menuing system; however, if you don't, how many unused shortcuts do you have (on your StartIsBack, your desktop, or both)?  One major problem I have run into (starting in technical support) are users with a major case of "shortcut-itis"  shortcuts to every application, utility, etc., on their desktop, in their Start menu, etc. Unused shortcuts DO chew up resources - if there are programs that load when Windows starts that you don't use, they REALLY chew up resources (this is something Microsoft has warned against going back to Windows 3.x).  Every so often, review your shortcuts - all of them.  If you have unused (or seldom-used) shortcuts, they are ripe for pruning.  (Despite my using both Word AND Outlook several times a day, I have not a single shortcut for either on my desktop - or my Taskbar.  Instead, I launch via the Runbox - the olde-schoole Windows method; it works in every version of Windows since 3.x; the reason WHY it works is because Office is in the PATH by default.  It also applies to any of the Windows utilities and applets (WordPad, Notepad, etc.).  It's very KISS (Keep It Simple, Son) - and it applies to every OS in existence; yet how many users don't do it?)

There are also the old Fax & Scanning app, and a bunch of other smaller things. I would like to see everything freshened up.

 

The replacement is simply called Scan as I don't think anyone uses the Fax functionality any more.

No surprise for the 532, I'm pretty sure MS said a month or so ago that every WP8 Lumia will get upgraded to 10. If you're on WP 8.1.1 then there should be no issue going to 10.

Microsoft needs a flagship Lumia this year if they expect Windows Phone to survive. It's BS that most of my "Upgrade" options from my 920 are actually downgrades to lesser hardware.  

Microsoft needs a flagship Lumia this year if they expect Windows Phone to survive. It's BS that most of my "Upgrade" options from my 920 are actually downgrades to lesser hardware.  

Dot - go to the thread on the proposed Microsoft phablet (and my own comment) - I posit this phablet as just such a Lumia flagship (and a bridge to the Surface lineup AND an alternative to SurfaceRT).

Part of the reason for a LACK of a flagship Lumia today is that if Lumia screens get any bigger, they wind up in phablet turf, and why should Microsoft bring out a "me-too" phablet?  Instead, what about an Intel-driven phablet?  A phabllet that can run business-productivity software?  (I referred specifically to Office 2013 because enterprises likely have unused licenses for it - such a phablet could use existing seat licensing, therefore, the extra software cost to the business would be nil.)  Such a phablet (I gave it the cryptonym of Lumia 2015) would be anything BUT a "me-too" phablet.  It would also be the missing bridge between Lumia and Surface and an alternative to SurfaceRT (which would solve the biggest complaint - no x86 compatibility in the RT price range; because it would be a phablet, it would be a Lumia - NOT a Surface).

Microsoft is at work undoing the bad choices Nokia made at the end. Lets face it, the 530 should never have happened, and the 630/635 is not that good for the price in general.

 

The 435, 532 and 535 are a nice new line showing that MS isn't going to skimp out on the hardware. They need to do a new 638 or 636 with 1GB and dump all the 512mb models asap.

 

If Windows 10 mobile is going to take longer than we think they could do a 835 and a 935 respin with WP 8.1.2 with a guaranteed update to 10.

technically both as the OS's are being fused

My point exactly, Brando.

 

While both Lumia and Surface are Microsoft "brands", there is a disconnect between the two.

 

Surface is the "Ultrabook/tablet" brand, while Lumia is the "smartphone" brand (there are no Lumia phablets).

 

Intel (with BayTrail Atom) has now entered the phablet SoC space - if Microsoft will launch a BTA phablet, it should properly be a Lumia (not Surface) and (like other Lumias) be sold primarily by wireless carriers (not to exempt the Microsoft Store or even traditional retailers, which are still selling current Lumias).  What would separate this proposed Lumia from other phablets are features (specifically, being able to run productivity software, such as Office 2013 - which no Lumia can do today).  As to why Office 201x in particular, it's software that businesses - especially enterprises - doubtless have unused seats for (and existing seat-management platforms for).  It saves enterprises money, configuration issues, and user headaches (it's software they are already using) - name ONE phablet that covers this turf today.  In other words, what Surface Pro did for Ultrabooks, this Lumia can do for phablets.

I have to ask -- how many different applications do you use in a given day?  If you use more applications than are pinned to the desktop and/or Taskbar, I can see why you would need SOME sort of menuing system; however, if you don't, how many unused shortcuts do you have (on your StartIsBack, your desktop, or both)?  One major problem I have run into (starting in technical support) are users with a major case of "shortcut-itis"  shortcuts to every application, utility, etc., on their desktop, in their Start menu, etc. Unused shortcuts DO chew up resources - if there are programs that load when Windows starts that you don't use, they REALLY chew up resources (this is something Microsoft has warned against going back to Windows 3.x).  Every so often, review your shortcuts - all of them.  If you have unused (or seldom-used) shortcuts, they are ripe for pruning.  (Despite my using both Word AND Outlook several times a day, I have not a single shortcut for either on my desktop - or my Taskbar.  Instead, I launch via the Runbox - the olde-schoole Windows method; it works in every version of Windows since 3.x; the reason WHY it works is because Office is in the PATH by default.  It also applies to any of the Windows utilities and applets (WordPad, Notepad, etc.).  It's very KISS (Keep It Simple, Son) - and it applies to every OS in existence; yet how many users don't do it?)

 

I just don't like the start screen and big tiles on my PC monitor that has a higher resolution than 1080p. Feels clunky and designed for a touch screen interface. It's not so much about how many applications I use, it's about feeling like I'm maximizing desktop space and productivity. I never do anything in fullscreen apart from word processing and playing games (or videos). My web browser and any apps I'm using are usually various window sizes.

 

Options are fine, but MS nuked the start button completely with Windows 8. It was a forced procedure that was completely unnecessary given an individual dev managed to reinstate the start menu very easily (startisback). If he/she can do it, MS can give desktop owners a choice. My desktop isn't a mobile device.

  • Like 1

Microsoft needs a flagship Lumia this year if they expect Windows Phone to survive. It's BS that most of my "Upgrade" options from my 920 are actually downgrades to lesser hardware.  

I honestly have no idea what Microsoft is doing with Windows Phone. We may find out more tomorrow but the lack of regular flagships is a major issue. The trouble is that everyone coming out of contract now will be looking to Android or iOS, meaning that Microsoft is missing out on those users for at least the next two years - users who may never switch back to Windows Phone. If I was looking for a new phone there just isn't anything available for Windows Phone that appeals to me.

 

Windows 10 might be an opportunity for Microsoft to reinvent itself but it's not like Windows Phone was a successful reinvention from Windows Mobile. Microsoft needs to be offering features that aren't available elsewhere and at prices that are competitive. Nokia did a good job distinguishing Lumia devices from others thanks to their colourful design but Microsoft hasn't done anything to expand on that.

 

Microsoft is at work undoing the bad choices Nokia made at the end. Lets face it, the 530 should never have happened, and the 630/635 is not that good for the price in general.

 

The 435, 532 and 535 are a nice new line showing that MS isn't going to skimp out on the hardware. They need to do a new 638 or 636 with 1GB and dump all the 512mb models asap.

You highlight one of the major problems, which is that the naming scheme is utterly ridiculous. HTC nearly drove itself into the ground with a similar practice. Apple, Samsung and Google have easier to follow product lines. I'm a tech enthusiast and try to follow mobiles as much as I can yet the Lumia range is utterly unnavigable.

I just don't like the start screen and big tiles on my PC monitor that has a higher resolution than 1080p. Feels clunky and designed for a touch screen interface. It's not so much about how many applications I use, it's about feeling like I'm maximizing desktop space and productivity. I never do anything in fullscreen apart from word processing and playing games (or videos). My web browser and any apps I'm using are usually various window sizes.

 

Options are fine, but MS nuked the start button completely with Windows 8. It was a forced procedure that was completely unnecessary given an individual dev managed to reinstate the start menu very easily (startisback). If he/she can do it, MS can give desktop owners a choice. My desktop isn't a mobile device.

In other words, you didn't have issues with the then-existing UI feeling kludged and clunky (from XP to 7) with all the patches and add-ons?

 

Part of my issue with the original Start menu was that clunky and kludged feeling with all the various patches and add-ons - worse, they did NOT work together uniformly.  Like you, I'm a keyboard+mouse user (no touch support whatever), so that definitely was NOT it.  The difference between us is that you needed that obvious bias toward mice (which I have nothing against - I even pointed out that some users DID need that); the only real difference is that despite my being a keyboard+mouse user, I'm not overly biased that way.

 

Another issue is that I don't have a desktop resolution taller than 1080p - mine is "exactly" 1080p.  (Due to my astigmatism, taller than 1080p is not practical - and it won't ever be practical as long as said astigmatism is not correctable by surgical means.)

 

Lastly, the very fact that a third party DID manage to bring it back should have enabled Microsoft to leave things as they were with 8.x - why the insistence that Microsoft throw THIS third-party developer (and all the others) under the bus?  Despite that I specifically didn't need THIS third-party utility, third-party utilities - in any OS - are there to fulfill needs of those that use them - therefore, being against them makes absolutely no sense.  It would be the same if Google banned third-party Web browsers from Android (or Apple were to do the same with iOS or OS X).

 

Have I explained myself sufficiently?

The replacement is simply called Scan as I don't think anyone uses the Fax functionality any more.

 

My point was that they don't need to have two of those things. The old one should be removed once the new one provides the same level of functionality. After all, it is already buried into Programs and Features.

My point was that they don't need to have two of those things. The old one should be removed once the new one provides the same level of functionality. After all, it is already buried into Programs and Features.

 

It will be, the point is that no one sends faxes any more so the replacement, called Scan, is all we'll get.

Samsung ... have easier to follow product lines

I still remember my confusion between Galaxy S and Galaxy Ace on a phone call - not to mention Galaxy Y, Duo, Grand, Note, Tab etc. :laugh:

And yes, Lumina line desperately needs a new naming scheme.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!