Windows Technical Preview  

1031 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-5, 1 being worst, 5 being best. What do you think of Windows 10 from the leaks so far?

    • 5.Great, best OS ever
      156
    • 4. Pretty Good, needs a lot of minor tweaks
      409
    • 3. OK, Needs a few major improvements, some minor ones
      168
    • 2. Fine, Needs a lot of major improvements
      79
    • 1.Poor, Needs too many improvements, all hope is lost, never going to use it
      41
  2. 2. Based on the recent leaks by Neowin and Winfuture.de, my next OS upgrade will be?

    • Windows 10
      720
    • Windows 8
      20
    • Windows 7
      48
    • Sticking with XP
      3
    • OSX Yosemite
      35
    • Linux
      24
    • Sticking with OSX Mavericks
      3
  3. 3. Should Microsoft give away Windows 10 for free?

    • Yes for Windows 8.1 Users
      305
    • Yes for Windows 7 and above users
      227
    • Yes for Vista and above users
      31
    • Yes for XP and above users
      27
    • Yes for all Windows users
      192
    • No
      71


Recommended Posts

It's a service now. I'll be damned if they don't start charging for it at some point...

 

Only MS could turn an OS into a monthly subscription. Seriously hope that doesn't happen.

Only MS could turn an OS into a monthly subscription. Seriously hope that doesn't happen.

So what would you propose instead (in an era of low-cost or free operating systems AND given that Microsoft has only their software as a cash cow)?

 

Microsoft needs INCOME to keep up that steady stream of software - should Microsoft basically give the OS away (which is, in fact, their second-largest cash cow)?

So what would you propose instead (in an era of low-cost or free operating systems AND given that Microsoft has only their software as a cash cow)?

 

Microsoft needs INCOME to keep up that steady stream of software - should Microsoft basically give the OS away (which is, in fact, their second-largest cash cow)?

 

 

Vl & Retail licence is very important TBH.

  • Like 7

So what would you propose instead (in an era of low-cost or free operating systems AND given that Microsoft has only their software as a cash cow)?

 

Microsoft needs INCOME to keep up that steady stream of software - should Microsoft basically give the OS away (which is, in fact, their second-largest cash cow)?

 

Right, because Microsoft never made money from full license sales that weren't subscription based.

One interesting new feature available in the Technical Preview is the Start menu's integration with Bing and Windows Store applications. A search for "current weather in New York" from the Start menu returns results for the current weather in that state.

post-483058-0-37076200-1421820345.png

Hopefully Microsoft expands this capability so that other applications can be searched as well. It would be interesting to perform a cursory search and be provided with instant results from MSN News, for example.

  • Like 1

I think you guys have misunderstood what they mean when they say "it's a service". Because it works on everything from desktops to phones all of that syncs up so you can move between devices without issue and pick up where you left off. The OS syncing is a "service", if you use a Microsoft account that is. That's all it is, there's NO subscription coming.

I think you guys have misunderstood what they mean when they say "it's a service". Because it works on everything from desktops to phones all of that syncs up so you can move between devices without issue and pick up where you left off. The OS syncing is a "service", if you use a Microsoft account that is. That's all it is, there's NO subscription coming.

Yes, there is a subscription coming. What do you think they meant by for the first year?

Yes, there is a subscription coming. What do you think they meant by for the first year?

 

I hope not...though they (Microsoft) didn't really answer the question..."yes" or "no".

 

Audience question: What happens after the free upgrade to Windows 10 period? (Implication: Will they have to pay?)

Answer: Unclear. Nadella: "We hope it helps people move over to Windows 10"

 

So what will people have to pay? Will there be a subscription fee?

Nadella: We want to be able to service our customers. There is no fundamental shift to our business model. Hardware vendors buy Windows, and their customers are covered for the life of the machine.

 

Question from audience: What's going to happen to Windows XP users?

Nadella: "Windows 10 is a fantastic upgrade for the platforms we announced." (That means Win 7 and 8... XP users are out of luck. Although to be fair, I wouldn't want to run an OS Like 10 on XP hardware)

 

Just so we're all on the same page. There was no mention of a monthly service fee for the consumer version of Windows 10. Satya even said there will be no fundamental shift in the way Microsoft sells Windows.

 

From the Yahoo folks there..  http://yahoo-tech.tu...event/windows10

 

 

The bold part give me some hope that there will not be any subscription based model.

Windows 10 needs to get everybody on board MS have pretty much said that in 100 different ways,  just as windows 7 brang everyone back from the perceived failure and consumer backlash of vista.  You don't do something as major as moving your OS to a subscription model if one of your key goals is to get everybody on board.  Windows as a paid service is definitely in the future but not for windows 10 I very much think this is another case of MS using poor language which wouldn't be the first time these sorts of miscommunications between presenter and everyone has occurred.

the webcast was really laggy. some aspects of the cast was intolerable. but what I took from the webcast is;

 

1. more of the same. they just repackaged touch surface stuff and tried to sell it as a new concept or vision.

2. I'm not into the "across all platforms" stuff, xbox game streaming.

3. the search bar in the taskbar hogs alot of real estate.

4. DX 12 was impressive, the DX 11 and 12 side by side was interesting

5. the icons and color schemes are ripped straight from 8/8.1. I had hoped for some more artistic icons and color schemes.

6. Office.. meh.

7. windows 10 first note speaker gave me the "hint" of a future subscription as a service for windows by his stating windows seen as a "service"

 

The only really interesting reason at this point for me to upgrade to Windows 10 is for the DX12 gaming. maybe its still early and I can hold out hope for some monumental changes but it still looks like MSFT is stuck in the touchscreen arena with eye candy. I don't think 10 will change peoples minds as they'll think. having the 2 UI's still is fine as systems are touchscreen will need it. the desktop is pretty uninspired at this point. asthetically, the icons are too playskool'ish. to say straight up flat but, loud. The animations don't impress me, powerpoint etc. outlook...

 

I'll probably ONLY upgrade for the gaming, DX12 aspects. I still feel Windows 10 is a rehash of 8/8.1.

  • Like 1

So what would you propose instead (in an era of low-cost or free operating systems AND given that Microsoft has only their software as a cash cow)?

 

Microsoft needs INCOME to keep up that steady stream of software - should Microsoft basically give the OS away (which is, in fact, their second-largest cash cow)?

 

this is why MSFT has... get this... investors! it is a publically traded company, you can buy stocks. but Windows 10 as a service subscription.. yuck! so they shouldn't charge a hefty price up front to ream you in the backside with a monthly fee. lol.

It's free for the first year, that's all it means, after that you will have to pay for the upgrade. They're still selling licenses, OEMs still buy them, you still buy them. The difference here is that they'll be upgrading the OS faster, those that missed out later have to pay up.

I'll probably ONLY upgrade for the gaming, DX12 aspects. I still feel Windows 10 is a rehash of 8/8.1.

 

You seem kind of negative about MS and the presentation but I agree with this point.  The simple truth is it doesn't matter though.  MS could have taken windows 8.2 and called it Windows 10 and it was going to be popular because just like Windows 7 was mostly built on vista - it didn't matter - vista had a bad wrap in consumers minds just like win 8 does even though one could argue a lot of the intiail issues with Win8 have been resolved in 8.1 and would have been resolved in 8.2 with the start menu. 

 

That being said in this instance MS have gone further than just repackaging (cross device integration, focus on the interface, universal apps, cortana, dx12) so consumers are getting a lot of value even if in reality they just have Win8 R2.

Chap, I think we're in violent agreement.  The actual negative productivity impact of Windows 8's rather clumsy overhaul of the 'standard' Windows UI seems to have been stretched to absurd conclusions.  Sure, it required some time to accustomise to (depending on aptitude), but you could always largely ignore Modern elements, and it has been a great enabler of novel PC-based computing options.

 

I haven't had the opportunity to try it, but touch-enabled portable users (e.g. SP3) must find using an external monitor awkward (having to relocate the mouse), if you get used to the touch UI?  I think I would/will.

Actually I have not had that problem at all.  I use a Surface Pro 2 not SP3, but the principle is the same.  Easy as pie for me. 

Doc it up and I have a mouse and I move to that.  The function is the same if I am using touch or a mouse.   

the webcast was really laggy. some aspects of the cast was intolerable. but what I took from the webcast is;

 

1. more of the same. they just repackaged touch surface stuff and tried to sell it as a new concept or vision.

2. I'm not into the "across all platforms" stuff, xbox game streaming.

3. the search bar in the taskbar hogs alot of real estate.

4. DX 12 was impressive, the DX 11 and 12 side by side was interesting

5. the icons and color schemes are ripped straight from 8/8.1. I had hoped for some more artistic icons and color schemes.

6. Office.. meh.

7. windows 10 first note speaker gave me the "hint" of a future subscription as a service for windows by his stating windows seen as a "service"

 

The only really interesting reason at this point for me to upgrade to Windows 10 is for the DX12 gaming. maybe its still early and I can hold out hope for some monumental changes but it still looks like MSFT is stuck in the touchscreen arena with eye candy. I don't think 10 will change peoples minds as they'll think. having the 2 UI's still is fine as systems are touchscreen will need it. the desktop is pretty uninspired at this point. asthetically, the icons are too playskool'ish. to say straight up flat but, loud. The animations don't impress me, powerpoint etc. outlook...

 

I'll probably ONLY upgrade for the gaming, DX12 aspects. I still feel Windows 10 is a rehash of 8/8.1.

 

It's like you watched a completely different stream, but I don't think anyone's surprised.

 

and of course it's building on and expanding on windows 8.x, they're not going to go backwards are they.

Actually I have not had that problem at all.  I use a Surface Pro 2 not SP3, but the principle is the same.  Easy as pie for me. 

Doc it up and I have a mouse and I move to that.  The function is the same if I am using touch or a mouse.   

 

I mean, don't you find the inability to 'touch' the UI on external monitor jarring?  In my experience with the admittedly little desktop stuff I do on my RT, I've rarely needed the trackpad.  I imagine using using a Pro with an external display kind of forces you back to the mouse, compramising the Surface experience somewhat?

It's like you watched a completely different stream, but I don't think anyone's surprised.

 

and of course it's building on and expanding on windows 8.x, they're not going to go backwards are they.

And if you are running 9879, the new build is available right now (I'm downloading it as I type this via Update and Recovery->Preview Builds) - and I'm in the eastern US (specifically, the suburbs of Washington, DC - I had to reinstall 9879 due to a driver-corruption issue and checked for a new build just for yuks).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
    • A roguelike and a 4X strategy game are free to claim on the Epic Games Store by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final leg of the Epic Games Store's mystery giveaways promotion just landed, and it brought along two more games to keep. Last week's Lonestar and Calico giveaways have now been replaced with copies of Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest to claim for PC gamers. As always, the game is yours to add permanently to your Epic Games Store library within the next seven days. Diving into the games, Songs of Conquest is developed by Lavapotion. This is a turn-based 4X strategy experience that has players making tough decisions and participating in tactical combat while also managing their kingdom. "Songs of Conquest is a turn-based strategy game inspired by 90s classics. Lead powerful magicians called Wielders and venture to lands unknown," explains the developer. "Wage battles against armies that dare oppose you, hunt for powerful artifacts and expand your territory. The world is ripe for the taking – seize it." Meanwhile, Rogue Waters comes from developer Ice Code Games. This rogue-lite experience has you taking the role of Captain Cutter as he commands his ship and crew through procedurally generated encounters. You'll be recruiting and training crew, use sea creatures, and battle with other ships and pirates. "Set sail as Captain Cutter, a pirate caught in a deadly struggle for power and vengeance," adds the developer. "Navigate dangerous waters, unleash mythical sea creatures, and outwit enemies as you chase legendary treasure and confront dark secrets." The newly available Rogue Waters and Songs of Conquest giveaways on the Epic Games Store are set to run until June 11, giving PC gamers seven days to claim the latest offer. Once this closes out, a new freebie will take its place on the same day, which is slated to be Warhammer 40K Speed Freeks. Don't forget that mobile gamers can check out the Epic Game Store's weekly giveaways on Android and iOS to grab a freebie there as well.
    • Still using Classic Outlook? Microsoft highlights 15 reasons to switch to New Outlook by Usama Jawad As many of you may know, Microsoft has been trying to get customers to ditch Classic Outlook in favor of New Outlook for quite some time now. To that end, it has added numerous capabilities to the latter, including PST features, and it is working on several more, such as a unified inbox. However, customer response has been a bit lukewarm so far, with many considering the New Outlook to be "hot garbage". Now, Microsoft has highlighted 15 features that users can leverage in New Outlook in yet another attempt to get customers to migrate. Although not all of the 15 capabilities are exclusive to New Outlook, in fact, most of them are available in Classic Outlook as well. But Microsoft hopes that this combination of familiar and fresh features will be able to attract existing users as well as new ones. For ease of readability, we have summarized the 15 features below: Pin an email: This makes it easier to track important emails Snooze an email: You can temporarily snooze an email thread for a specific time frame until it becomes relevant again. This can be very useful in scenarios where you don't feel like actively following a thread or simply want to follow up on a later date Add multiple categories at the same time: You can assign multiple categories to an email through a single, simplified interface Sweep: As the name implies, you can define automated move processes on your inbox to declutter it, rather than cleaning it up manually Schedule send: Does exactly what it says on the tin, and can be useful when accommodating recipients in different timezones Simplified folder sharing: The sharing process has been simplified so permissions are automatically applied on parent folders Follow a meeting: This is an RSVP option that lets people know that you won't be able to join the meeting but would still like to access a recap Save calendar views: You can save different views for the calendar based on different workflows Improved meeting tracking: Organizers have more controls in viewing meeting responses, such as the ability to sort and download them. Typically useful when there is a large audience Meeting recap: The Outlook Calendar surfaces a meeting recap with recordings, transcripts, and shared files Filtered views: Allows you to declutter your Calendar so that it's easier to scan and schedule Change a recurring event: Users can modify future events of a series of meetings while preserving the configuration of previous ones Rename your email account: This labeling makes it easier to identify multiple accounts in Outlook Modern themes: Exactly what the name says, plus Dark Mode Keyboard shortcuts: This facilitates flexible user behavior as customers can choose between Outlook for Windows shortcuts, Outlook for the web, or turn them off completely There you have it. It's a decent list, but it remains to be seen if it will move the needle in a meaningful way for users who are attached to Classic Outlook. Again, a lot of the aforementioned features are already available in Outlook Classic, but for some, native functionality is not present, and people typically resort to workarounds. Microsoft will be hoping that it's primarily those capabilities that get people to finally switch.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      478
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!